跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.23) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/03/07 00:18
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:李宜家
研究生(外文):Yi-Chia Li
論文名稱:以蒙地卡羅模擬找尋擴散磁振頻譜影像之最佳造影參數
論文名稱(外文):Optimum Diffusion Spectrum Imaging: Minimum Angular Discrimination
指導教授:林慶波林慶波引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ching-Po Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立陽明大學
系所名稱:放射醫學科學研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:醫學技術及檢驗學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:英文
論文頁數:80
中文關鍵詞:擴散磁振頻譜影像位置密度函數蒙地卡羅模擬擴散時間擴散梯度持續時間
外文關鍵詞:Diffusion Spectrum MRI (DSI)Orientation Density Function (ODF)Monte-Carlo simulationdiffusion timediffusion duration
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:388
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:44
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
磁振擴散頻譜技術(Diffusion Spectrum MRI)能夠從磁振影像上每個像素內的水訊號去準確分析水分子的擴散分布情況,這有助於從磁振影像去觀察大腦神經之病變;然而,目前為止在任何文獻上卻都找不到跟擴散頻譜影像之取像參數相關的研究。
在本篇研究中,我們用蒙地卡羅的方法去模擬腦神經內外之訊號,之後再利用擴散頻譜技術去分析,看在怎麼樣的取像參數下可以得到最佳的分析結果。在模擬中神經的數目是被設定成兩根,神經的直徑為5μm,研究的目的是希望採取較簡化的模擬模型,進一步去探討在怎麼樣的擴散時間與擴散磁場持續時間之關係、多大的b值以及多少取像點數目下等方能得到較好的神經位置辨別率,與在分析結果上有較少的假神經出現。
模擬結果顯示,當取像是用比較低的b值時 (≦ 10000 s/mm²),擴散時間必須遠大於擴散磁場持續時間方能得到較好分析結果。而取像若用較大的b值(> 10000 s/mm²)時,擴散時間與擴散磁場持續時間之關係則不用被限定,因為在較大的b值下,磁振造影系統對交叉神經纖維之訊號的分辨能力較強,如此可彌補擴散時間並非遠大於磁場持續時間這件事。而這樣的彌補特性會隨著b值愈大而益發明顯。除此之外,從模擬中我們發現最佳b值與建議的取像點數目分別為 [16000, 18000] s/mm²和 515,兩者皆是因為能夠得到最好的神經位置辨別率,與在分析結果上有較少的假神經出現方被認定為最佳參數。
在臨床上磁振系統有許多限制,例如擴散磁場強度不可超過5 Gauss/cm等,目前都尚未被突破。在目前這樣的磁振技術限制下,我們唯一能做的就是在取像時用最佳造影參數,以期能夠得到較好的影像分析結果。而本篇研究則是提供一個指標,讓大家了解什麼是擴散頻譜影像的最佳造影參數,日後在取影像時也能夠將其有所應用。
Diffusion Spectrum MRI (DSI) can be used to define complex oriented coherence accurately by mapping 3D orientation density function (ODF) of water molecular diffusion within each MRI voxel. However, the optimal imaging parameters for DSI to discriminate crossing fibers have not been studied yet. In this study, a Monte-Carlo simulation model is used to optimize the DSI imaging parameters such as the relationship between diffusion time and diffusion duration, b value, and the number of encoding points, for intersecting fiber mapping. Furthermore, the indices used for the optimization are Minimum Angular Resolution (MAR) and Length of Pseudo-Fiber (LPF), which represent the smallest crossing angle that could be distinguished by DSI and the longest ODF length of errors within DSI post-processing results, respectively. From the study, in lower b values (≦ 10000 s/mm²), diffusion time >> diffusion duration is requested to obtain better angular discrimination of crossing nerves; in higher b values (> 10000 s/mm²), diffusion time >> diffusion duration is not necessary because of the compensation of higher crossing discrimination ability due to higher b values. Besides, the optimal b value and the suggested number of encoding points are [16000, 18000] s/mm² and 515 respectively. In clinical, there are still many limitations, such as small maximum strength of bipolar gradients and difficult achievements of diffusion time >> diffusion duration, have not been broken through yet. Under the limitation, optimal imaging parameters seem to be the only way for acquiring images with the best results of DSI algorithms. The research could be of help to get gold standards for this manner.
1. Backgrounds..........................................15
1-1 Brownian Motion...................................15
1-2 Background........................................18
1-3 Diffusion Measurements by NMR.....................23
1-3-1 Spin Echo-EPI..................................23
1-3-2 Diffusion Spectrum Magnetic Resonance Imaging..25
2. Introductions........................................32
3. Methods..............................................36
4. Results..............................................44
The Comparisons Between (Δ>>δ) and (Δ~δ)............44
Optimal b Value Fitting in with Clinical Situations..46
Optimal Number of Encoding Directions...............49
Optimal SNR while Acquiring Diffusion Images........50
5. Discussions..........................................51
Verification of Hindered Diffusion in the Simulation.51
Verification of Restricted Diffusion in the Simulation..............................................53
The Comparisons Between (Δ>>δ) and (Δ~δ)...........55
Optimal b Value Fitting in with Clinical Situations.............................................57
Optimal Number of Encoding Directions..............58
5. Conclusions.........................................60
6. Reference...........................................78
Adam WA., 2005. Measurement of Fiber Orientation Distributions Using High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging. Magn Reson Med, 54:1194-1206.

Alexander, DC., and Barker, GJ., 2005. Optimal imaging parameters for fiber-orientation estimation in diffusion MRI. Neuroimage, 27(2):357-67.

American College of Radiology, 2001. Magnetic Resonance Quality Control Manual.

A. Einstein, 1956. Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Motion. Dover, USA.

Armitage, PA, and Bastin, ME., 2001. Utilizing the Diffusion-to Noise ratio to optimize magnetic resonance diffusion tensor acquisition strategies for improving measurements of diffusion anisotropy. Magn Reson Med, 45(6):1056-65.

Assaf, Y., 2004. New modeling and experimental framework to characterize hindered and restricted water diffusion in brain white matter. Magn Res Med, 52: 965-978.

Assaf, Y., 2005. Composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (CHARMED) MR imaging of the human brain. NeuroImage, 27(1): 48-58.

Avam, L., 2004. The effect of rotational angle and experimental parameters on the diffraction patterns and micro-structural information obtained from q-space diffusion NMR: implication for diffusion in white matter fibers, 169: 30-38.

Avram, L., 2005. Finer discrimination of fiber orientation at high q diffusion MR: theoretical and experimental confirmation. In proceedings of ISMRM 13th Ann meeting.

Basser, P.J., 1993. Mattiello J., Turner R., and Le Bihan D., Diffusion Tensor Echo Planar Imaging of Human Brain. In Proceedings of the SMRM

Basser, B.J., 1993. Mattiello J., and Le Bihan D., Estimation of the Effective Self-Diffusion Tensor from NMR Spin Echo. J Magn Reson B, 103(3): 247-54.

Basser, P.J., 1994. Mattiello J., and Le Bihan D., MR Diffusion Tensor Spectroscopy and Imaging. Biophys J, 66(1):259-67.

Bence, PO., 1998. Monte Carlo Analysis of Obstructed Diffusion in Three Dimensions: Application to Molecular Diffusion in Organelles. Biophysical Journal, 74(5): 2722-30.

Bink, A., 2005. Importance of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of cystic brain tumors and intracerebral abscesses. Zentralbl Neurochir, 66(3):119-25.

Callaghan, PT., 1991. Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy. Clarendon Press.

Glicksman, ME., 2000. Diffusion in Solids: Field theory, Solid-state principles, and applications. John Wiley and Sons, Ch 12.

James, D., and Quirk, 2003. Equilibrium water exchange between the intra- and extra-cellular spaces of Mammalian brain. Magn Res Med, 50:493-499.

Jansons, KM., and Alexander, DC.,2003. Persistent Angular Structure: new insights from diffusion MRI data. Inf Process Med Imaging, 18:672-83.

Jones, DK., Horsefield, MA., and Simmons, A.,1999. Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med, 42(3):515–25.

Jones, DK., 2004. The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: A Monte Carlo study. Magn Reson Med, 51(4):807-15.

Kiernan, JA., 1998. The human nervous system- an anatomical view point. 7th Edition.

Kingsley, PB., and Monahan, WG.., 2004. Selection of the optimum b factor for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging assessment of ischemic stroke. Magn Reson Med, 51(5):996-1001.

Kumra, S., 1995. White matter abnormalities in early-onset schizophrenia: a voxel-based diffusion tensor imaging study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 44(9): 934-41.

Le Bihan, D., 1986. MR Imaging of Intravoxel Incoherent Motions: Application to Diffusion and Perfusion in Neurologic Disorders. Radiology, 161(2): 401-7.

Le Bihan, D., 1995. Molecular Diffusion, Tissue Microdynamics, and Microstructure. NMR Biomed, 8: 375-386.

Le Bihan, D.,1995. Diffusion and Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Applications to functional MRI. Raven Press Ltd, Ch 1.

Lin, CP., 2003. Validation of diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging with manganese-enhanced rat optic tracts and ex vivo phantoms. NeuroImage, 19(3):482-95.

Liu, C., 2005. Limitations of apparent coefficient-based models in characterizing non-Gaussian diffusion. Magn Reson Med, 54: 419-428.

Mark, A., 2002. Horsfield, and Derek K. Jones, Applications of Diffusion-weighted and Diffusion Tensor MRI to White Matter Diseases – a Review. NMR Biomed , 15: 570-577.

Martin, EG., 2002. Diffusion in Solids: Field Theory, Solid-State Principles, and Applications. John Wiley and Sons, 203-208.

Meca, CC.,2004. Diffusion MRI at large b values: what’s the limit? In proceedings of ISMRM 12th Ann meeting.

Meier, C., 2003. Diffusion in compartmental systems. I. A comparison of an analytical model with simulations. Magn Res Med, 50: 550-509.

Meier, C., 2003. Diffusion in compartmental systems. II. Diffusion-weighted measurements of rat brain tissue in vivo and postmortem at very large b values. Magn Res Med, 50: 510-514.

Moseley, M.E., 1990. Early Detection of Regional Cerebral Ischemia in Cats: Comparison of Diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI and Spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med, 14(2): 330-46.

Nicholson, C.,1998. Extracellular space structure revealed by diffusion analysis. Trends Neurosci, 21(5): 207-15.

Olveczky, BP., and Verkman, AS., 1998. Monte Carlo analysis of obstructed diffusion in three dimensions: application to molecular diffusion in organells. Biophysical Journal, 74(5): 2722-30.

Oscar, BM., Frank, P., and Laurance D., 2003. Optimization of diffusion measurements using Gramer-Rao lower bound theory and its application to articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med, 50(5):1069-76.

Ray, H.,2004. MRI: The Basics, 2nd Edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, CH4.

Rosner, B., 2005. Fundamentals of Biostatistics, 6th Edition, The Thomson Corporation.

Schaff, J., and Loew, LM.,1997. A general computation framework for modeling cellular structure and function. Biophys. J., 13:1135-46.

Torres, AM., 1998. Assignment of coherence features in NMR q-space plots to particular diffusion modes in Erythrocyte suspensions. J. Magn. Reson., 138:135-143.

Tuch, DS., and Wedeen, VJ.,2003. Diffusion MRI of complex neural architecture. Neuron, 40(5):885-95.

Tuch, DS.,2004. Q-ball imaging. Magn Reson Med, 52 (6):1358-72.

Tuch, DS.,2005. Q-ball imaging of macaque white matter architecture. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol Sci, 360(1457):869-79.

Wedeen, V.J.,2000. Mapping Fiber Orientation Spectra in Cerebral White Matter with Fourier-Transformed Diffusion MRI. In Proceedings of ISMRM 9th Ann Meeting, Denvor, USA.

Wedeen, VJ.,2005. Mapping complex tissue architecture with Diffusion Spectrum Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Magn Reson Med, 54(6):1377-86.

Yeh, JH.,2006. Optimal encoding points for Diffusion Spectrum Imaging: Using Bi-Gaussian Extrapolation. In proceedings of ISMRM 14th Ann meeting.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top