跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.97) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/03/16 23:44
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳諆聰
研究生(外文):Chi Tsung Chen
論文名稱:手術煙霧氣體成份與手術室醫護人員尿液代謝物濃度分佈
論文名稱(外文):Concentration distributions of volatile organic compounds in surgical smoke and urinary metabolites in medical personnel of operation rooms
指導教授:萬國華萬國華引用關係
指導教授(外文):G. H. Wan
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:長庚大學
系所名稱:臨床醫學研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:醫學學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:94
中文關鍵詞:手術室手術煙霧氣相層析質譜儀高效液相層析串聯式質譜儀馬尿酸甲基馬尿酸
外文關鍵詞:operating roomsurgical smokegas chromatography-mass spectrometryultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometryhippuric acidmethylhippuric acid
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:344
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:25
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
過去極少研究探討人體組織在不同的電燒條件下之揮發性有機化合物成份和濃度變化,以及手術室醫護人員尿液中甲苯和二甲苯代謝物濃度分佈,因此本研究利用瞬間採樣法收集乳房手術與耳鼻喉手術中使用不同種類電刀處理人體組織時產生的手術煙霧,再以氣相層析質譜儀分析87種揮發性有機化合物濃度;另外收集80位手術室醫護人員尿液檢體,以高效液相層析串聯式質譜儀分析尿液中馬尿酸、鄰/間/對-甲基馬尿酸與肌酐酸濃度。在乳房手術方面,結果顯示電燒刀處理乳腺組織時產生的總揮發性有機化合物濃度顯著高於其他組織如脂肪組織、腫瘤組織及皮膚組織,且可發現一級致癌物中的苯、1,3-丁二烯及氯乙烯,上述結果均高於電漿刀處理上述人體組織的結果。在耳鼻喉科手術方面,以二氧化碳雷射刀電燒口腔黏膜組織時產生總揮發性有機化合物濃度變化與使用電燒刀電燒顱顏脂肪組織的結果不同。不論使用何種電刀處理組織,在手術煙霧中均可發現高濃度的甲醇,且電燒皮膚組織時使用≥27.5瓦的電燒功率會產生高濃度的總揮發性有機化合物。此外,本研究發現行政護理師尿液中測得的馬尿酸、鄰-甲基馬尿酸、間-甲基馬尿酸和對-甲基馬尿酸濃度最高,麻醉護理師次之,而外科醫師最低,且發現醫護人員分組、性別、年齡、工作年資與搭公車習慣會影響尿液中鄰/間/對-甲基馬尿酸濃度變化。本研究的結論顯示電燒刀處理乳腺組織時會產生高濃度的總揮發性有機化合物與甲醇,而電刀種類與電燒功率會影響手術煙霧中的總揮發性有機化合物濃度;另外手術室內的外科醫師、麻醉師與行政護理師的尿液中馬尿酸和甲基馬尿酸之濃度分佈不同。
Limited studies have investigated the compositions and concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from human tissues at different electrocautery conditions, as well as the concentration distribution of urinary metabolites of toluene and xylene in health care personnel of the operating room. This study used the grab sampling to collect the surgical smoke generated from breast and otorhinolaryngology surgery with different types of electrosurgical units, and then the 87 VOCs concentrations were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The 80 urinary samples were collected from health care personnel of the operating room and then analyzed the concentrations of hippuric acid, o-/m-/p-methylhippuric acids, and creatinine using ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. In the breast surgery, the analytical results shows that the total VOCs concentrations in the surgical smoke from mammary glands using conventional electrosurgical knives were significantly higher than those from adipose, tumor, and subcutaneous tissues. The International Agency for Research on Cancer’s group 1 carcinogens including benzene, 1,3-butadiene, and vinyl chloride were also found in the surgical smoke generated from breast and otorhinolaryngology surgery. Above results using conventional electrosurgical knives were higher than those using pulsed electron avalanche knives. In otolaryngology surgery, the total VOCs concentrations in the surgical smoke from oral mucosa using a carbon dioxide laser scalpel differed from adipose tissue using an electrosurgical knife. High level of methanol was found in the surgical smoke from human tissues with types of electrosurgical units. The electrical power of ≥27.5 watts used for skin tissue produced high concentration of total VOCs. Additionally, the administrative nurses had the highest levels of urinary hippuric acid and o-/m-/p-methylhippuric acids, followed by the nurse anesthetists and surgeons. Also, some factors such as the group of health care personnel, gender, age, working years, and habit of taking bus would affect the concentrations of urinary o-/m-/p-methylhippuric acids. This study concluded that high concentrations of total VOCs and methanol were detected in the surgical smoke from mammary glands using conventional electrosurgical knives. The types of electrosurgical units and electrical power of electrosurgery machine would affect total VOCs concentrations in surgical smoke. The study also found the levels of urinary hippuric acid and o-/m-/p-methylhippuric acids were significantly different among administrative nurses, nurse anesthetists, and surgeons.
目 錄
指導教授推薦書...................................................
口試委員會審定書.................................................
誌謝............................................................iii
中文摘要........................................................iv
英文摘要........................................................v
第一章 前言.....................................................1
第一節 研究背景...................................................1
第二節 研究目的...................................................2
第二章 文獻回顧..................................................3
第一節 手術煙霧的產生機制..........................................3
第二節 影響手術煙霧組成成份之因素...................................4
第三節 手術煙霧暴露的潛在健康風險...................................6
第四節 手術煙霧暴露與其代謝物之關係.................................9
第三章 材料與方法................................................15
第一部份研究:手術煙霧成份與濃度分析................................15
第一節 手術煙霧採樣...............................................15
第二節 手術煙霧中揮發性有機化合物成份與濃度分析......................16
第三節 統計分析...................................................19
第二部份研究:手術室醫護人員與行政護理人員尿液代謝物成份與濃度分析....20
第一節 手術室醫護人員與行政護理人員尿液檢體收集與濃度分析............20
第二節 研究問卷收集...............................................21
第三節 統計分析...................................................21
第四章 研究結果..................................................24
第一部份研究:手術煙霧成份與濃度分析................................24
第一節 整形外科手術煙霧成份與濃度分佈變化...........................24
第二節 耳鼻喉科手術煙霧成份與濃度分佈變化...........................29
第二部份研究:手術室醫護人員與行政護理人員尿液代謝物成份與濃度分析....58
第五章 討論.....................................................66
第一部份研究:手術煙霧成份與濃度分析................................66
第二部份研究:手術室醫護人員與行政護理人員尿液代謝物成份與濃度分析....71
第六章 結論與建議................................................73
參考文獻.........................................................74


表目錄
表一、手術煙霧中87種揮發性有機化合物種類...........................17
表二、電燒刀在不同電燒功率下產生的手術煙霧中87種總揮發性有機化合物濃度分佈..............................................................57
表三、手術室內醫療人員與行政人員之個人基本資料與生活特性.............62
表四、個人基本特性和生活型態對於手術室醫護人員尿液中的馬尿酸與鄰/間/對-甲基馬尿酸濃度之影響性.........................................65


圖目錄
圖一、綜合文獻流程圖..............................................13
圖二、研究架構圖..................................................14
圖三、材料方法流程圖..............................................23
圖四、應用氣相層析質譜儀分析87種揮發性有機化合物之質譜層析圖..........33
圖五、執行手術前消毒皮膚時背景空氣樣本之揮發性有機化合物濃度分佈......34
圖六、乳房手術使用不同電刀種類產生的手術煙霧中87種總揮發性有機化合濃度分佈變化...........................................................35
圖七、乳房手術使用不同電刀種類產生的手術煙霧中12種總揮發性有機化合物濃度分佈變化.........................................................36
圖八、乳房手術使用電燒刀電燒皮膚組織產生的手術煙霧中87種揮發性有機化合物種類分佈.........................................................37
圖九、乳房手術使用電燒刀電燒脂肪組織產生的手術煙霧中87種揮發性有機化合物種類分佈.........................................................38
圖十、乳房手術使用電燒刀處理乳腺組織產生的87種揮發性有機化合物種類分佈...............................................................39
圖十一、乳房手術使用電燒刀電燒腫瘤組織產生的手術煙霧中87種揮發性有機化合物種類分佈.......................................................40
圖十二、乳房手術使用電漿刀電燒脂肪組織產生的手術煙霧中87種揮發性有機化合物種類分佈.......................................................41
圖十三、乳房手術使用電漿刀電燒乳腺組織產生的手術煙霧中87種揮發性有機化合物種類...........................................................42
圖十四、乳房手術使用不同電刀種類產生的手術煙霧中一級致癌物質濃度分佈變化 ................................................................43
圖十五、乳房手術使用不同電刀種類產生的手術煙霧中2A級致癌物質濃度分佈變化 ................................................................44
圖十六、乳房手術使用不同電刀種類產生的手術煙霧2B級致癌物質濃度分佈變化 ................................................................45
圖十七、乳房手術使用不同電刀種類產生的手術煙霧中三級致癌物質濃度分佈變化 ................................................................46
圖十八、耳鼻喉科使用不同電刀種類產生的手術煙霧中87種總揮發性有機化合物濃度分佈變化.......................................................47
圖十九、耳鼻喉科使用不同電刀種類產生的手術煙霧中12種總揮發性有機化合物濃度分佈變化.......................................................48
圖二十、耳鼻喉科手術使用電燒刀電燒表皮組織產生的手術煙霧中87種揮發性有機化合物種類分佈....................................................49
圖二十一、耳鼻喉科手術使用電燒刀電燒脂肪組織產生的手術煙霧中87種揮發性有機化合物種類分佈..................................................50
圖二十二、耳鼻喉科手術使用電燒刀電燒舌根組織產生的手術煙霧中87種揮發性有機化合物種類分佈..................................................51
圖二十三、耳鼻喉科手術使用二氧化碳雷射刀電燒口腔黏膜組織產生的手術煙霧中87種揮發性有機化合物種類分佈.......................................52
圖二十四、耳鼻喉科手術使用不同電刀種類產生的手術煙霧中一級致癌物質濃度分佈變化...........................................................53
圖二十五、耳鼻喉科手術使用不同電刀種類產生的手術煙霧中2A級致癌物質濃度分佈變化...........................................................54
圖二十六、耳鼻喉科手術使用不同電刀種類產生的手術煙霧中2B級致癌物質濃度分佈變化...........................................................55
圖二十七、耳鼻喉科手術使用不同電刀種類產生的手術煙霧中三級致癌物質濃度分佈變化...........................................................56
圖二十八、尿液中馬尿酸、鄰/間/對-甲基馬尿酸及肌酐酸濃度分析之質譜層析圖...............................................................61
圖二十九、手術室內醫護人員和行政護理人員尿液中馬尿酸及鄰/間/對-甲基馬尿酸濃度分佈.......................................................64
1.Massarweh NN, Cosgriff N, Slakey DP. Electrosurgery: history, principles, and current and future uses. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202(3):520-530.
2.Ulmer BC. The hazards of surgical smoke. AORN J. 2008;87:721–734.
3.Alp E, Bijl D, Bleichrodt RP, Hansson B, Voss A. Surgical smoke and infection control. J Hosp Infect. 2006 Jan;62(1):1-5.
4.Kwak HD, Kim SH, Seo YS, Song KJ. Detecting hepatitis B virus in surgical smoke emitted during laparoscopic surgery. Occup Environ Med. 2016;73(12):857-863.
5.Garden JM, O'Banion MK, Bakus AD, Olson C. Viral disease transmitted by laser-generated plume (aerosol). Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(10):1303-1307.
6.Capizzi PJ, Clay RP, Battey MJ. Microbiologic activity in laser resurfacing plume and debris. Lasers Surg Med. 1998;23(3):172-174.
7.Baan R, Grosse Y, Straif K, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, Bouvard V, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Guha N, Freeman C, Galichet L, Cogliano V; WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group. A review of human carcinogens--Part F: chemical agents and related occupations. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(12):1143-1144.
8.World Health Organization, WHO. Exposure to benzene: a major public health concern. Available at: https://www.who.int/ipcs/features/benzene.pdf Accessed February 28, 2019.
9.Himmelstein MW, Acquavella JF, Recio L, Medinsky MA, Bond JA. Toxicology and Epidemiology of 1,3-Butadiene. Critical reviews in toxicology. 1997;27:1-108.
10.Hill DS, O'Neill JK, Powell RJ, Oliver DW. Surgical smoke - a health hazard in the operating theatre: a study to quantify exposure and a survey of the use of smoke extractor systems in UK plastic surgery units. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(7):911-916.
11.Brüske-Hohlfeld I, Preissler G, Jauch KW, Pitz M, Nowak D, Peters A, Wichmann HE. Surgical smoke and ultrafine particles. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008;3:31.
12.Eshleman EJ, LeBlanc M, Rokoff LB, Xu Y, Hu R, Lee K, Chuang GS, Adamkiewicz G, Hart JE. Occupational exposures and determinants of ultrafine particle concentrations during laser hair removal procedures. Environ Health. 2017;16(1):30.
13.Ragde SF, Jørgensen RB, Føreland S. Characterisation of Exposure to Ultrafine Particles from Surgical Smoke by Use of a Fast Mobility Particle Sizer. Ann Occup Hyg. 2016;60(7):860-874.
14.Kalil J, Pessine FB, Fidelis CH, Menezes FH, Palma PC. Analysis of electrocautery generated smoke by chromatographic-mass spectrometry. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2016;43(2):124-128.
15.Hensman C, Baty D, Willis RG, Cuschieri A. Chemical composition of smoke produced by high-frequency electrosurgery in a closed gaseous environment. An in vitro study. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(8):1017-1019.
16.Al Sahaf OS, Vega-Carrascal I, Cunningham FO, McGrath JP, Bloomfield FJ. Chemical composition of smoke produced by high-frequency electrosurgery. Ir J Med Sci. 2007;176(3):229-232.
17.Fitzgerald JE, Malik M, Ahmed I. A single-blind controlled study of electrocautery and ultrasonic scalpel smoke plumes in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(2):337-342.
18.Lee T, Soo JC, LeBouf RF, Burns D, Schwegler-Berry D, Kashon M, Bowers J, Harper M. Surgical smoke control with local exhaust ventilation: Experimental study. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018;15(4):341-350.
19.Kocher GJ, Sesia SB, Lopez-Hilfiker F, Schmid RA. Surgical smoke: still an underestimated health hazard in the operating theatre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy356.
20.Takahashi H, Yamasaki M, Hirota M, Miyazaki Y, Moon JH, Souma Y, Mori M, Doki Y, Nakajima K. Automatic smoke evacuation in laparoscopic surgery: a simplified method for objective evaluation. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(8):2980-2987.
21.Sisler JD, Shaffer J, Soo JC, LeBouf RF, Harper M, Qian Y, Lee T. In vitro toxicological evaluation of surgical smoke from human tissue. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2018;13:12.
22.Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA. Laser/Electrosurgery Plume. 2008. Available at: https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/laserelectrosurgeryplume/index.html Accessed February 22, 2019.
23.Steege AL, Boiano JM, Sweeney MH. Secondhand smoke in the operating room? Precautionary practices lacking for surgical smoke. Am J Ind Med. 2016;59(11):1020-1031.
24.Le Moual N, Varraso R, Zock JP, Henneberger P, Speizer FE, Kauffmann F, Camargo CA Jr. Are operating room nurses at higher risk of severe persistent asthma? The Nurses' Health Study. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55(8):973-977.
25.Gates MA, Feskanich D, Speizer FE, Hankinson SE. Operating room nursing and lung cancer risk in a cohort of female registered nurses. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2007;33(2):140-147.
26.New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Technical Manual 1002: Guidance on Preparing an Air Quality Modeling Protocol. 2018. Available at: https://www.state.nj.us/dep/aqpp/downloads/techman/1002.PDF Accessed February 26, 2019.
27.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment, March 2005, Risk Assessment Forum. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2013-09/documents/ cancer_guidelines_final_3-25-05.pdf Accessed February 26, 2019.
28.Choi SH, Kwon TG, Chung SK, Kim TH. Surgical smoke may be a biohazard to surgeons performing laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(8):2374-2380.
29.Tseng HS, Liu SP, Uang SN, Yang LR, Lee SC, Liu YJ, Chen DR. Cancer risk of incremental exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in electrocautery smoke for mastectomy personnel. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:31.
30.LeBouf RF, Stefaniak AB, Virji MA. Validation of evacuated canisters for sampling volatile organic compounds in healthcare settings. J Environ Monit. 2012;14(3):977-983.
31.Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for Toluene. U.S. Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA. 2000.
32.Kandyala R, Raghavendra SP, Rajasekharan ST. Xylene: An overview of its health hazards and preventive measures. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2010;14(1):1-5.
33.Corlin L, Woodin M, Hart JE, Simon MC, Gute DM, Stowell J, Tucker KL, Durant JL, Brugge D. Longitudinal associations of long-term exposure to ultrafine particles with blood pressure and systemic inflammation in Puerto Rican adults. Environ Health. 2018;17(1):33.
34.Liu L, Urch B, Szyszkowicz M, Speck M, Leingartner K, Shutt R, Pelletier G, Gold DR, Scott JA, Brook JR, Thorne PS, Silverman FS. Influence of exposure to coarse, fine and ultrafine urban particulate matter and their biological constituents on neural biomarkers in a randomized controlled crossover study. Environ Int. 2017;101:89-95.
35.Dobrogowski M, Wesołowski W, Kucharska M, Sapota A, Pomorski LS. Chemical composition of surgical smoke formed in the abdominal cavity during laparoscopic cholecystectomy-assessment of the risk to the patient. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2014;27(2):314-325.
36.Cheng NY, Chuang HC, Shie RH, Liao WH, Hwang YH. Pilot Studies of VOC Exposure Profiles during Surgical Operations. Ann Work Expo Health. 2019;63(2):173-183.
37.American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Documentation of the TLVs and BEIs with Other World Wide Occupational Exposure Values. 7th Ed. CD-ROM Cincinnati, OH 45240-1634 2013., p. 3
38.Christiani DC, Chang SH, Chun BC, Lee WJ. Urinary excretion of hippuric acid after consumption of nonalcoholic beverages. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2000;6(3):238-242.
39.Ogawa M, Suzuki Y, Endo Y, Kawamoto T, Kayama F. Influence of coffee intake on urinary hippuric acid concentration. Ind Health. 2011;49(2):195-202.
40.Pacifici GM, Mogavero S, Giuliani L, Rane A. Conjugation of benzoic acid with glycine in the human fetal and adult liver and kidney. Dev Pharmacol Ther. 1991;17(1-2):52-62.
41.“TLVs® and BEI® based on the Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents & Biological Exposure indices”, 2007; Cincinnati, Ohio: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH).104.
42.Langman JM. Xylene: its toxicity, measurement of exposure levels, absorption, metabolism and clearance. Pathology. 1994;26(3):301-309.
43.Engström K, Husman K, Pfäffli P, Riihimäki V. Evaluation of occupational exposure to xylene by blood, exhaled air and urine analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1978;4(2):114-121.
44.Waikar SS, Sabbisetti VS, Bonventre JV. Normalization of urinary biomarkers to creatinine during changes in glomerular filtration rate. Kidney Int. 2010;78(5):486-494.
45.高雄長庚紀念醫院檢驗醫學科檢驗手冊-肌酸酐。Available at: https://www1.cgmh.org.tw/intr/intr4/c8920/manual/N_search_Tbl.asp?no=248 Accessed February 27, 2019.
46.中華民國行政院環境保護署環境檢驗所,空氣中揮發性有機化合物檢測方法-不銹鋼採樣筒/氣相層析質譜儀法(NIEA A715.15B),2014。Available at: https://www.niea.gov.tw/niea/pdf/AIR/A71515B.pdf Accessed February 27, 2019.
47.International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC),Available at: https://monographs.iarc.fr/agents-classified-by-the-iarc/ Accessed May 31,2019.
48.Failla M, Biondi G, Provvidenza Pistorio M, Gili E, Mastruzzo C, Vancheri C, et al. Intranasal steroid reduces exhaled bronchial cysteinyl leukotrienes in allergic patients. Clin Exp Allergy. 2006;36:325-330.
49.U.S. Coast Guard. 1999. Chemical Hazard Response Information System (CHRIS)-Hazardous Chemical Data. CommandantInstruction 16465.12C. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
50.Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). METHYL ALCOHOL (METHANOL). http://www.osha.gov/chemicaldata/chemResult.html?RecNo=474 (accessed 5 July 2019)
51.TEPA (Taiwan Environmental Protection Adminiatration), 2012. Indoor air quality standards. http://ndlib.web.nthu.edu.tw/ezfiles/971/1971/img/217/175842368.pdf (accessed 5 July 2019) [In Chinese].
52.Austin H, Delzell E, Cole P. Benzene and leukemia. A review of the literature and a risk assessment. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;127(3):419-439.
53.Wong O. An industry wide mortality study of chemical workers occupationally exposed to benzene. II. Dose response analyses. Br J Ind Med. 1987;44(6):382-395.
54.Melnick RL, Huff J, Chou BJ, Miller RA. Carcinogenicity of 1,3-butadiene in C57BL/6 x C3H F1 mice at low exposure concentrations. Cancer Res. 1990;50(20):6592-6599.
55.Radike MJ, Stemmer KL, Bingham E. Effect of ethanol on vinyl chloride carcinogenesis. Environ Health Perspect. 1981;41:59-62.
56.Spektor Z, Kay DJ, Mandell DL. Prospective comparative study of pulsed-electron avalanche knife (PEAK) and bipolar radiofrequency ablation (coblation) pediatric tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. Am J Otolaryngol. 2016;37(6):528-533.
57.Yoon HI, Hong YC, Cho SH, Kim H, Kim YH, Sohn JR, et al. Exposure to volatile organic compounds and loss of pulmonary function in the elderly. Eur Respir J. 2010;36(6):1270-1276.
58.Jacobson GA, McLean S. Biological monitoring of low level occupational xylene exposure and the role of recent exposure. Ann Occup Hyg. 2003;47(4):331-336.
59.X Chen, G Zhang, Q Zhang, H Chen. Mass concentrations of BTEX inside air environment of buses in Changsha, China. Build Environ. 2011;46(2):421-427.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top