跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.9) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/03/13 19:07
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:Omar D. Bah
研究生(外文):Omar D. Bah
論文名稱:績效管理對員工績效之影響:以甘比亞警察為例
論文名稱(外文):The Impacts of Performance Management on Employee Performance in The Gambia Police Force
指導教授:趙銘崇趙銘崇引用關係
指導教授(外文):M. Chao
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:長庚大學
系所名稱:商管專業學院
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:英文
論文頁數:86
中文關鍵詞:績效管理員工績效甘比亞警察
外文關鍵詞:performance managementplanningevaluationreviewimplementation
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:143
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
Performance management is a concept in the field of human resource management and is defined as a “continuous process of identifying, measuring and developing the performance of individuals and aligning performance with the strategic goals of the organization”. Performance management system was carried out by the Human Resources Unit of Gambia Police Force several years ago; starting first with Senior Managers and trickling down to all employees at all levels within the two portfolios of The Gambia Police Force, namely, strategic and operational staff. The performance management system developed for this purpose consisted of key performance areas, strategic sets, goals and targets including the developmental needs of employees in order to improve their skills and self-development. However, there were indications that there has not been a clear strategy on the use of the results of the performance management system by the Force for decision-making purposes, such as on promotion, reward or consequences for non-achievement of targets. Moreover, there were indications of a lack of participation among employees and a lack of feedback on the results of the final performance assessment, even though mid-term feedback was provided directly for those at the supervisory level. A significant amount of time is spent every year by the Human Resources Unit of the Force on this process, however, its impacts remain questionable.
For the purpose of this research, a study was conducted with the objective of evaluating the impacts of the performance management system on employee performance in The Gambia Police Force and the research questions were as follows: (1) How was the planning of performance management conducted in The Gambia Police Force? (2) What steps were followed for on- going feedback and employee input? (3) How effective was the evaluation and review of the performance management process? (4) How effective was the overall implementation of the performance management system?
In order to do justice to the above research questions, a structured questionnaire, together with a number of open-ended questions were used to collect data from the employees of the Force. A purposive sampling method was used to identify study participants from both the strategic and operational staff. The study participants were sent an email with a link to a questionnaire and feedbacks from them thus received. The qualitative data was analysed using data, a text flow analysis method.

The qualitative analysis of the responses shows that a significant number of participants agreed with most of the issues raised. However, the high number of respondents who indicated their disagreement (at different levels) or neutrality with regards to the issues points to the fact that there is much to be done in order to improve the impacts of performance management system in The Gambia Police Force. Regarding the implementation stage of performance management, the majority of respondents (68%) were either in disagreement or unsure about this.
The qualitative analysis uncovered interesting views on all aspects of performance management system, including lack of involvement in target setting and implementation of the system and different expectations on performance outcomes. Insufficient training and lack of support on the system was found to be one of the key areas which might have resulted in a lack of trust in the system and created a condition of imbalance in relation to the whole system.
The findings from this study are in line with the general notion that positive performance management systems should be highly anchored by practices and organizational contexts with certain traits. Indeed, as reported in this research, the Force needs to provide more performance management training, engage employees and lay critical emphasis on employee recognition. In this way, the performance management system will be enhanced, deliver more value and meet the desired outcomes of the organization.
Recommendation Letter from the Thesis Advisor
Thesis Oral Defense Committee Certification
Acknowledgement iii
Abstract iv
Table of Content vii
List of Figures x
List of Tables xi
Acronyms and Abbreviations xii
Chapter One: Introduction and problem statement 1
1 Introduction 1
1.2 Performance management system (The Gambia Police Force) 3
1.2.1 Performance Appraisal 3
1.3 Critical Success Factors in Performance Management 5
1.3.1 Simplification 5
1.3.2 Alignment with organizational goals 6
1.3.4 Integration with organizational culture 6
1.3.4 Use of technology 7
1.4 Research problem and research questions 7
1.4.1 Research Questions 9
1.5 Research Aim and Objectives 12
1.6 Structure of the dissertation 12
1.7 Conclusion 13
Chapter Two: Literature Review 14
2.1 Introduction 14
2.1 Purpose of Performance Management 15
2.1 Critical success factors for effective performance management 16
2.1.1 Simplification 17
2.1.2 Alignment with Organizational Goals 18
2.1.3 Integration with Organizational Culture 19
2.1.4 Critical success factors and critical practices 20
2.1.5 Performance Management Process 22
2.2.1 Performance Planning 24
2.2.2 On-Going Feedback and Coaching 25
2.2.3 Employee Input 27
2.2.4 Performance Evaluation 28
2.2.5 Performance Review 29
2.3 Performance management in higher education institutions 30
Chapter Three: Research design and methodology 33
3.1 Research Questions 36
3.1.1 Sampling frame and sampling process 36
3.1.2 Sample 37
3.1.3 Sample Size 37
3.1.4 Sampling Method 37
3.1.5 Data Collection Procedures 38
3.1.6 Data Analysis and Interpretation 38
3.1.7 Reporting the Data 39
3.1.8 Trustworthiness of the research 39
3.1.9 Ethical considerations 40
Chapter Four: Data analysis and interpretation 42
4.1 Performance planning 43
4.1.1 Respondent views on three aspects of performance planning 44
4.1.2 On-going feedback 44
4.1.3 Employee Input 45
4.1.4 Performance Evaluation 46
4.1.5 Performance review 46
4.2 Implementation of Performance Management Systems 47
4.2.1 Respondent views on four aspects of implementation performance management system 49
4.2.2 General Perceptions on the effectiveness of the performance management system 49
4.2.3 Employee Involvement and Target Setting 49
4.3 Implementation 52
4.3.1 Expectation and fairness of the performance management system 53
4.3.2 Trust and Fairness 53
4.3.3 Achievement of Targets and Expectations 54
4.3.4 Synthesis of the findings 55
4.3.5 Performance Planning and Employee Involvement 56
4.3.6 Performance Management and Reward 57
Chapter Five: Conclusion And Recommendations 60
5.1 Addressing the problem statement 61
5.1.2 How was the planning of performance management conducted? 61
5.1.3 What steps were followed for on-going feedback and employee input? 62
5.1.4 How effective was the evaluation and review of the performance management process? 63
5.1.5 How effective was the overall implementation of the performance management system? 63
5.1.6 Addressing the primary research objective 65
5.2 Recommendations 65
5.2.1 Performance Planning 66
5.2.2 On-going Feedback and Coaching 67
5.2.3 Performance Reviews and Rewards 68
5.2.4 Action plan 69
5.3 Limitations of the research 71
5.4 Future research 71
5.5 Summary and Conclusion 71
References 74
APENDIX 81



List of Figures

Figure 2. 1 A model of HRM and performance relationship from a PM Perspective (Hartog et al., 2004) 4
Figure 2. 2 Organizational culture and performance management (Ahmed, 2012) 19
Figure 2. 3 Performance management process (Pulakos, 2004) 23

List of Tables

Table 2. 1 21

Table 5. 1 69
Aguinis, H 2009. Performance Management. 2nd Edition. India: Dorling Kindersley.
Ahmed, M.S. 2012. Impact of organizational culture on performance management practices in Pakistan. Business Intelligence Journal. 5(1), 50-55.
Ariyachandra, T.R. & Frolick, M.N. 2008. Critical Success Factors in Business Performance Management – Striving for Success, Information Systems Management, 25(2), 113-120, DOI: 10.1080/10580530801941504.
Armstrong, M. & Baron, A. 2005. Managing Performance: Performance management in action. London: CIPD.
Atkinson, C. & Shaw, S. 2006. Managing Performance. In: R. Lucas, B. Lupton, and
Babbie, E. 2010. The Practice of Social Research. USA: Wadsworth
Bandara, W., Indulska, M., Chong, S., & Sadiq, S. 2008. Major issues in business process management: An expert perspective. BP Trends, 10, 1-8.
Chambliss, D.F. & Schutt, R.K. 2012. Making Sense of the Social World: Methods of Investigation. Third Edition. USA: Sage Publications.
Chenail, R.J. 1995. Presenting Qualitative Data. The Qualitative Report 2. From: Retrieved 30 May 2015.
Christian, C.G. 2005. Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In: Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Third Edition. California: Sage Publications.
Chubb, C., Reilly, P. & Brown, D. 2011. Performance Management: Literature Review. IES Report, Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies.
Davis, P. & Rogers, R.W. 2002. White paper – Getting the most from your performance management system. Development Dimensions International.
Decramer, A., Smolders, C. & Vanderstraeten, A. 2008. Employee performance management culture and system features in higher education: relationship with employee performance management satisfaction, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(2), 352-371, DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2012.680602.
DeNisi, A.S. 2011. Managing Performance to Change Behaviour, Journal of Organizational Behaviour Management, 31(4), 262-276, DOI: 10.1080/01608061.2011.619414.
Elias, J. & Scarborough, H. 2004. ‘Evaluating human capital: an exploratory study of management practice’, Human Resource Management Journal, 14(4), 21-40.
Fletcher, C. & Williams, R. 1996. Performance Management, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment, British Journal of Management, 7, 169-179.
Fouché, C.B. 2005. Qualitative research designs. In: De Vos, Strydom, Fouché & Delport (Eds). Research at grass roots for the Social Sciences and human service profession. Third Edition. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Franco-Santos, M., Rivera, P. & Bourne, M. 2014. Performance Management in UK Higher Education Institutions: The need for a hybrid approach. London: LFHE.
Greenhalgh, T. & Taylor, R. 1997. How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research)? BMJ, 315, 740-743.
H. Mathieson (Eds.) Human Resource Management in an International Context. London: CIPD.
Haines III, V.Y. & St-Onge, S. 2012. Performance management effectiveness: practices or context? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(6), 1158-1175, DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2011.561230
Hancock, B. 2002. An introduction to qualitative research. Trent Focus Group.
Hartog, D.N., Boselie, P. & Paauwe, J. 2004. Performance Management: A Model and Research Agenda. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 2004, 53(4), 556- 569.
Hennings, E., Van Rensburg, W. & Smit, B. 2004. Finding your way in qualitative research. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Hoepfl, M.C. 1997. Choosing Qualitative Research: A Primer for Technology Education Researchers. Journal of Technology Education, 1(1).
Lawler, E.E. & Worley, C. 2011. Management Reset: Organizing for Sustainable Performance. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Leedy, P.D. & Ormrod, J.E. 2001. Practical Research Planning and Design. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Maykut, P. & Morehouse, R. 1994. Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophical and Practical Guide. London: Falmer Press.
McMillan, J.H. & Schumacher, S. 2001. Research in Education: A Conceptual Introduction. Fifth Edition. New York: Longman.
Missouri University of Science and Technology. n.d. Performance management: A tool for employee success: guidelines, process and useful hints for supervisors and staff. From: https://uminfopoint.umsystem.edu/media/fa/performancemgtguidelinesandprocessfin al.pdf. Retrieved 8 September 2015.
Mitchell, T.R., Thompson, K. and George-Falvy, J. 2000. Goal Setting Theory and Practice. In C. L. Cooper and E. A. Locke (eds.) Industrial and Organisational Psychology: Linking Theory with Practice. Oxford, U.K: Blackwell Business.
Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K. & Spiers, J. 2002. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), article 2.
Myers, M.D. 1997. Qualitative research in information systems. MISQ Discovery. From: http://www.qual.auckland.ac.nz. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
Pulakos, E.D 2004. Performance management: A roadmap for developing, implementing and evaluating performance management systems. SHRM Foundation: Alexandria, VA.
Reuters 2010. Finding meaningful performance measures for higher education. A report for executives. Thomson Reuters.
Rhee, M. & Mehra, S. 2006. Aligning operations, marketing, and competitive strategies to enhance performance: An empirical test in the retail banking industry. Omega, 34(5), 505-515.
Rothberg, A.F. & Morrison, C. 2012. Performance Measurement: Understanding Critical Success Factors, CFO Edge, LLC and Resource Planning Solutions Corporation.
Ryan, G.W. & Bernard, H.R. 2000. Data Management and Analysis Methods: In: N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds). Handbook of Qualitative Research. London. Sage Publications.
Sacht, J. n.d. Critical success factors to support the management of performance. Equity Skills News & Views. From: http://www.workinfo.com/free/downloads/178.htm. Retrieved 25 July 2015.
Sarrico, C.H.S. 2010. On Performance in Higher Education: Towards performance governance, Tertiary Education and Management, 16(2), 145-158. DOI: 10.1080/13583881003775401.
Skrinjar, R. & Trkman, P. 2013. Increasing process orientation with business process management: Critical practices. International Journal of Information Management, 33, 48-60.
Strebler M., Robinson D. & Bevan S. 2001. Performance Review: Balancing objectives and content, IES Report 370. Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies.
Trkman, P. 2010. The critical success factors of business process management. International Journal of Information Management, 30, 125-134.
UNH. n.d. Performance Management Toolkit – On-going Feedback and Performance Management. From: http://www.unh.edu/hr/sites/unh.edu.hr/files/pdfs/ongoing- feedback-and-performance-management.pdf. Retrieved 7 September 2015.
USOPM. 2011. A handbook for measuring employee performance. From: https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/performance-management/measuring/employee_performance_handbook.pdf. Retrieved 29 Aug 2015.
Williams, R. 2002. Managing Employee Performance: Design and implementation in organisations. London: Thomson Learning.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊