跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.9) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/03/14 07:55
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳奕全
研究生(外文):Yi-Quan Chen
論文名稱:葡萄藤生物炭對水稻幼苗生長及土壤理化之影響
論文名稱(外文):Effects of grape vine biochar on rice seedlings growth and soil physical and chemical properties
指導教授:陳建德陳建德引用關係
口試委員:莊愷瑋鄭智馨吳耿東
口試日期:2019-07-24
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:農藝學系所
學門:農業科學學門
學類:一般農業學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:66
中文關鍵詞:葡萄藤生物炭有機肥孵育土壤水稻
外文關鍵詞:grape vine biocharorganic fertilizerincubationsoilrice
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:349
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:30
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
生物炭是以有機質作為原料,經熱裂解形成富含碳的產物。大部分外施生物炭能改善貧瘠土壤並促進作物生長,但卻也有生物炭的施用會降低作物產量。因此本研究利用在400℃下炭化的葡萄藤生物炭進行水稻盆栽試驗。結果顯示,施用1%與2.5%的葡萄藤生物炭處理會使水稻株高顯著下降。接著,進一步試驗葡萄藤生物炭與雞糞共施,分別為控制組、1%葡萄藤生物炭、雞糞和雞糞+1%葡萄藤生物炭處理,各處理再分別作未孵育與預先加水進行孵育兩周,再進行水稻栽培與水稻幼苗的生長分析。結果顯示,在未孵育處理,單施1%葡萄藤生物炭和雞糞+1%葡萄藤生物炭其株高與乾鮮重皆顯著低於控制組;而在孵育兩周處理,雞糞與雞糞+葡萄藤生物炭處理之水稻,其株高與乾鮮重皆顯著高於控制組。而無論有無孵育,添加葡萄藤生物炭會使土壤pH值、EC值、有機質含量與有效磷含量上升,但卻使銨態氮含量下降。將孵育過的土壤進行微生物分析,發現經預先孵育的雞糞+葡萄藤生物炭能最顯著提高土壤微生物活性,且水稻幼苗生長並無受抑。探究上述原因,可能是葡萄藤生物炭內含有有毒物質且會降低土壤有效氮進而導致水稻幼苗生長受抑,而添加雞糞並孵育可以有效解除葡萄藤生物炭的抑制效果。
Biochar is a carbon-rich product which is made from organic matter as a raw material by pyrolsis. Most of the applied biochar can improve poor soil and promote crop growth, but there are also applications of biochar to reduce crop yield. Therefore, this study used grape vine biochar for rice pot experiment. The results showed that application of 1% and 2.5% grape vine biochar treatment significantly reduced rice seeding plant height. Then, the grape vine biochar was further tested with chicken manure, which was treated with control (C), 1% grape vine biochar (B), chicken manure (G) and chicken manure +1% grape vine biochar (B1%+G), each treatment was non-incubated and incubated pre-watered for two weeks, respectively. The results showed that in the non-incubation, the plant height and dry weight of B1% and B1%+G were significantly lower than C, while in the two weeks of incubation, the plant height and dry weight of rice treated with G and B1%+G were significantly higher than the C. Addition of grape vine biochar increased the soil pH, EC value, organic matter content and available phosphorus content, but decreased the ammonium nitrogen content. The microbial analysis of the incubated soil showed that the pre-incubated B1%+G could significantly increase microbial activity, and there was no disadvantage in rice seedling growth. To explore the above reasons, it may be that the grape vine biochar contains toxic substances and will reduce the soil available nitrogen and lead to the growth of rice seedlings. Adding chicken manure and incubating can effectively remove the inhibition of grape vine biochar.
摘要 i
Abstract ii
目次 iii
表次索引 v
圖次索引 vi
壹、前言 1
貳、前人研究 8
一、生物炭的起源與發展 8
二、生物炭性質 9
三、添加生物炭對土壤理化性質的影響 11
四、添加生物炭對作物之影響 12
五、添加生物炭對土壤微生物之影響 14
參、材料與方法 16
一、生物炭原料 16
二、生物炭炭化 16
三、葡萄藤原料與生物炭基本性質分析 18
四、土壤來源與性質分析 19
五、水稻品種及種子預處理 23
六、有機質肥料供給 23
七、試驗規劃與處理 23
八、農藝性狀調查 25
九、群落層級生理圖 (Community-level physiological profiling, CLPP) 25
十、統計分析 28
肆、結果與討論 29
一、葡萄藤原料與葡萄藤生物炭的性質差異 29
二、不同葡萄藤生物炭濃度對水稻幼苗生長之影響 32
三、添加葡萄藤生物炭與雞糞未經孵育對水稻幼苗生長之影響 35
四、添加葡萄藤生物炭與雞糞經孵育後對水稻幼苗生長之影響 38
五、添加葡萄藤生物炭與雞糞未經孵育與孵育後對土壤理化之影響 42
六、葡萄藤生物炭與雞糞對土壤微生物之影響 47
伍、結論 59
陸、參考文獻 60
行政院環境保護署。2015。農業統計年報。
行政院環境保護署。2019。溫室氣體排放統計。
林大方。2013。生物炭材料與熱解溫度對其農藝性能的影響。碩士
論文。台北: 國立台灣大學森林學系。
周于盟。2014。長期有機與慣行耕作對蕉園土壤微生物多樣性之影
響。碩士論文。國立中中興大學土壤環境學系。
范振宗、柯武虎、陳建順。2005。台肥季刊。台灣肥料股份有限公
司。
陸柏憲。2017。生物炭對於水稻田土壤性質與水稻栽培之影響。碩
士論文。台中: 國立中興大學農藝系。
楊凱成。2019。焙燒生質物混合餘留體化床進行二氧化碳氣化之研
究。博士論文。台中: 國立中興大學森林系。
賴威宇。2012。生物炭施用對盆栽水稻及天菜土壤溫室氣體排放之
影響。碩士論文。台北: 國立台灣大學農業化學系

Anyika, C., Z. A. Majid, M. Rashid, A. B. Isa, N. Ismail, M. P. Zakaria, and A. Yahya. 2016. Toxic and nontoxic elemental enrichment in biochar at different production temperatures. J. Clean. Prod. 131:
810-821.

Atkinson, C., J. D. Fitzgerald, and N. A. Hipps. 2010 . Potential
mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar
application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil. 337: 1-18.

Ball, D. F. 1964. Loss-on-ignition as an estimate of soil organic matter
and organic carbon in non-calcareous soils. J. Soil Sci. 15: 84-92.

Bian, R., S. Josepha, L. Cui, G. Pana, L. Li , X. Liua, A. Zhanga, H. Rutlidgef, S. Wonge, C. Chiac, C. Marjof, B. Gongf ,P. Munroec, and S. Donne. 2014. A three-year experiment confirms continuous immobilization of cadmium and lead in contaminated paddy field with biochar amendment. J. Hazard. Mater. 272: 121-128.

Bonanomi, G., F. Ippolito, G. Cesarano. F. Vinale, N. Lombardi, A. Crasto. S. L.Woob, and F. Scala. 2018. Biochar chemistry defined by 13C-CPMAS NMR explains opposite effects on soilborne microbes and crop plants. Appl. Soil Ecol. 124: 351-361.

Cha, J. S., S. H. Park, S. C. Jung, C. Ryu, J. K. Jeon, M. C. Shin, and Y. K. Park. 2016. Production and utilization of biochar: a review. J.
Ind. Eng. Chem. 40: 1-15.

Clough, T. J., L. M. Condron, C. Kammann, and C. Müller. 2013. A
review of biochar and soil nitrogen dynamics. Agronomy. 3: 275-293.

Deenik, J. L., A. T. McClellan, and G. Uehara. 2010. Charcoal volatile matter content influences plant growth and soil nitrogen transformations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 74: 1259-1270.

Farrell, M., T. K. Kuhn, L. M. Macdonald, T. M. Maddern, D. V. Murphy, P. A. Hall, B. P. Singh, K. Baumann, E. S. Krull, and J. A. Baldock. 2013. Microbial utilisation of biochar-derived carbon. Sci.
Total Environ. 465: 288-297.

Glaser, B. 2007. Prehistorically modified soils of central Amazonia: a model for sustainable agriculture in the twenty-first century. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol Sci. 362: 187-196.

Glaser, B., and J. J. Birk. 2012. State of the scientific knowledge on properties and genesis of Anthropogenic Dark Earths in Central Amazonia (terra preta de Índio). Geochim. cosmochim. acta. 82: 39-51.

Gao, S., and T. H. Deluca. 2018. Wood biochar impacts soil phosphorus dynamics and microbial communities in organically-managed
croplands. Soil Biol. Biochem. 126: 144-150.

Gao, S., T. H. Deluca, and C. C. Cleveland. 2019. Biochar additions alter phosphorus and nitrogen availability in agricultural ecosystems: A
meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 654: 463-472.

Hafele, S. M., Y. Konboon, W. Wongboon, S. Amarante, A. A. Maarifat, E. M. Pfeiffer, and C. Konblauch. 2011. Effects and fate of biochar from rice residues in rice-based systems. Field Crops Res. 121: 430-
440.

Herath, H., M. Camps-Arbestain, and M. Hedley. 2013. Effect of biochar on soil physical properties in two contrasting soils: an alfisol and an
andisol. Geoderma, 209 pp. 188-197.

Karhu, K., T. Mattila, I. Bergstrom, and K. Regina. 2011. Biochar addition
to agricultural soil increase CH4 uptake and water holding capacity-
reslts from a short-term pilot field study. Agric. Ecos. Environ. 140:
309-313.

Khadem, A., and F. Raiesi. 2017. Responses of microbial performance and community to corn biochar in calcareous sandy and clayey soils.
Appl. Soil Ecol. 114: 16-27.

Kim, J. S., G. Sparovek, R. M. Longo, W. J. D. Melo, and D. Crowley. 2007. Bacterial diversity of terra preta and pristine forest soil from the Western Amazon. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39: 684-690.

Kim, J., G. Yoo, D. Kim, W. Ding, and H. Kang. 2017. Combined application of biochar and slow-release fertilizer reduces methane emission but enhances rice yield by different mechanisms. Appl. Soil Ecol. 117: 57-62.

Kołtowski, M. and P. Oleszczuk. 2015. Toxicity of biochars after polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons removal by thermal treatment. Ecol. Eng. 75: 79-85.

Kong, S., Y. X. Cheng, Z. J. Yong, Y. X. Dong, and Z. Hui. 2015. Review
of characteristics of biochar and research progress of its applications.
Ecol. Environ. Sci. 24: 716-723.

Laird, D. A., P. Fleming, D. D. Davis, R. Horton, B. Wang, and D. L. Karlen. 2010. Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma. 158: 443-449.

Lajtha, K., C. T. Driscoll, W. M. Jarell, and E.T. Elliott. 1999. Soil
phosphorus: characterization and total element analysis. p.115-142.
Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research,
Oxford University Press, New York.

Lehmann, J. J. P. da Silva Jr, C. Steiner, T. Nehls, W. Zech, and B. Glaser.
2003. Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological
anthrosol and a ferralsol of the central amazon basin: fertilizer,
manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil. 249: 343-357.

Lehmann, J. 2007 A handful of carbon. Nature. 447: 143-144.

Lehmann, J. 2009. Bological carbon sequestration must and can be a win-win approach. Clim. Change 97: 459-463.

Lehmann, J.and S. Joseph. 2009. Biochar for environmental management: science and technology Earthscan. 1st. London: Earthdcan.

Liao, X., Z. Wu, Y. Li, J. Luo, and C. Su. 2018. Enhanced degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by indigenous microbes combined with chemical oxidation. Chemosphere. 213: 551-558.

Liu, Y., H. Lu, S. Yang, and Y. Wang. 2016. Impacts of biochar addition on rice yield and soil properties in a cold waterlogged paddy for two
crop seasons. Field crops res. 191: 161-167.

Lladó, S., and P. Baldrian. 2017. Community-level physiological profiling analyses show potential to identify the copiotrophic bacteria present in soil environments. Plos one. 10: 1371.

Lyu, H., Y. He, J. Tang, M. Hecker, Q. Liu, P. D. Jones, G. Codling, and J.
P. Giesy. 2016. Effect of pyrolysis temperature on potential toxicity of biochar if applied to the environment. Environ. Pollut. 218: 1-7.

Mau, A.E., and S. R. Utami. 2014. Effects of biochar amendment and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on availability of soil phosphorus and growth of maize. J. Degrade. Min. Land Manage. 1:
69-74.

McLean, E.O. 1982. Soil pH and Lime Requirement. Methods of soil analysis, part 2, chemical and microbiological properties, agronomy monograph number 9, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Madison, 199-224.

Mukherjee, A. and R. Lal. 2014. The biochar dilemma. Soil Res., 52 pp.
217-230.

Nguyen, B. T. and J. Lehmann. 2009. Black carbon decomposition under
varying water regimes. Org. Geochem. 40: 846-853.

Rutigliano, F. A., M. Romano, R. Marzaioli, I. Baglivo, S. Baronti, F. Miglietta, and S. Castaldi. 2014. Effect of biochar addition on soil microbial community in a wheat crop. Eur. J. Biol. 60: 9-15.

Sadaf, J., G. A. Shah, K. Shahzad, N. Ali, M. Shahid, S. Ali, R. A. Hussain, Z. I. Ahmed, B. Traore, I. M. I. Ismail, and M. I. Rashid. 2017. Improvements in wheat productivity and soil quality can accomplish by co-application of biochars and chemical fertilizers.
Sci. Total Environ. 607: 715-724.

Sarma, H., A. R. Nava, and M. N. V. Prasad. 2019. Mechanistic understanding and future prospect of microbe-enhanced phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil. Environ. Technol. Innov. 13: 318-330.

Shaaban, M., L. V. Zwieten, S. Bashir, A. Younas, A. N. Delgado, M. A. Chhajro, K. A. Kubar, U. Ali. M. S. Rana, M. A. Mehmood, and R. Hua. 2018. A concise review of biochar application to agricultural soils to improve soil conditions and fight pollution. J. environ.
manage. 228: 429-440.

Shand, C. A., B. L. Williams, and G. Coutts. 2008. Determination of N-
species in soil extracts using microplate techniques. Talanta 74:
648-654.

Sheng, Y., and L. Zhu. 2018. Biochar alters microbial community and carbon sequestration potential across different soil pH. Sci. Total Environ. 622: 1391-1399.

Sui, Y., J. Gao. C. Liu, W. Zhang, Y. Lan, S. Li, J. Meng, Z. Xu, and L. Tang. 2016. Interactive effects of straw-derived biochar and N fertilization on soil C storage and rice productivity in rice paddies of
northeast china. Sci. total environ. 544: 203-210.

Sun, D., J. Meng, H. Liang, E. Yang, Y. Huang, W. Chen, L. Jiang, Y. Lan, W. Zhang, and J. Gao. 2015. Effect of volatile organic compounds absorbed to fresh biochar on survival of Bacillus mucilaginosus and structure of soil microbial communities. J. Soil Sediments. 15: 271-281. 

Tian, J., J. Wang, M. Dippold, Y. Gao, E. Blagodatskaya, and Y. Kuzyakov. 2016. Biochar affects soil organic matter cycling and microbial functions but does not alter microbial community structure
in a paddy soil. Sci. Total Environ. 556: 89-97.

Utomo, W.H., Z. Kusuma, and W.H. Nugroho. 2011. Soil fertility status, nutrient uptake, and maize (Zea mays L.) yield following biochar and cattle manure application on sandy soils of Lombok, Indonesia.
J. Trop. Agric. 49.

Wang, X., D. Song, G. Liang, Q. Zhang, C. Ai, and W. Zhou. 2015. Maize biochar addition rate influences soil enzyme activity and microbial community composition in a fluvo-aquic soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 96: 265-272.

Wang, Y., Y. Liu, R. Liu, A. Zhang, S. Yang, H. Liu, Z. Yang, and Z. Yang. 2017. Biochar amendment reduces paddy soil nitrogen leaching but increases net global warming potential in Ningxia irrigation, China.
Sci. Rep. 7: 1592-1602.

Wang, C., Y. Wang, and H. M. S. K. Herath. 2017. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in biochar – Their formation, occurrence and analysis: A review. Org. geochem. 114: 1-11.

Xiang, J., D. Liu, W. Ding, J. Yuan, and Y. Lin. 2015. Effects of biochar on nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from paddy field during the wheat growth season. J. Clean Prod. 104: 52-58.

Yuan, J.H., R.K.Xu, and H. Zhang. 2011. The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures.
Bioresour. Technol.. 102: 3488-3491.

Zhang, H., C. Chen, E. M. Gray, S. E. Boyd, H. Yang, and D. Zhang. 2016. Roles of biochar in improving phosphorus availability in soils: A phosphate adsorbent and a source of available phosphorus.
Geoderma. 276: 1-6.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊