臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

網路資訊的快速成長使得網路探究學習近年日益興盛，教師在進行網路探究學習的教學時，以主題探究的形式，讓學生融入情境中，搜尋相關的知識。學生在進行網路探究學習時，必須透過電腦以及網路瀏覽器的使用，然而應用開放式的上機學習，學生的自我約束常是學習成效關鍵，因此本研究建置一自律學習機制輔助系統，讓學習者在自律循環模式中進行網路探究學習，亦讓教師能夠即時監控學生的成就表現並適時給予協助。本研究以北縣某國小六年級學生為實驗對象，各別取三班為實驗組、三班為控制組，實驗處理以為期五週的網路探究學習進行環保肥皂課程的教學，探討本研究自律學習機制輔助網路探究學習與一般網路探究學習，學習者在自律程度與學習成效之間的關係，並透過系統操作歷程記錄、學習者學習記錄，觀察學習者之行為模式中自律的行為表現。
經過系統建置、資料分析及實驗處理後，本研究得到以下結果。
一、開發具自律學習輔助機制之網路探究學習系統。
二、使用本系統學習者在學習成效上明顯優於一般網路探究學習者；使用本系統之高自律程度學習者成績優於一般網路探究高自律程度學習者；而使用本系統之低自律程度學習者成績優於一般網路探究低自律學習者，且和一般網路探究高自律學習者無明顯差異，顯示本系統在提升學習成效及輔助低自律程度學習者上確具成效。
三、學習者的自律程度並未在實驗處理中產生變化，顯示其自律程度未因使用本系統而有所變化，故本系統雖未能在實驗處理中，提升學習者自律程度，然而對低自律程度學習者的學習成效，仍具一定效益。
四、以序列分析發掘高、低自律程度學習者之探究任務行為模式，發現高自律程度學習者在探究任務行為模式中之自律行為表現較佳，但藉由本系統輔助可增加低自律程度學習者之自律行為表現，進而提升其學習成效。

The rapid growth of information in the WWW has resulted WebQuest to become more useful than ever. While teachers are lecturing with WebQuest , they are able to present the topic in different ways which has allowed the students to integrate with the situation and research for related knowledge. Through this type of learning and interaction with WebQuest, learners are able to obtain new information from the internet resources. However, it is hard to assess the efficiency of hands on teaching strategy, and the key point to a successful lesson teaching is student's self control. In order to have a decent quality lesson using WebQuest, a well organized Self-regulated Learning system should be provided and teachers should be monitoring students' behaviors at all times and giving appropriate guidance. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to construct a WebQuest Learning system with self-regulated learning.
Samples were certain of six classes’ students at 6th grade of Elementary School in Taipei County, and were divided into experimental (three classes) and control (three classes) groups. The pretest-posttest nonequivalent-groups design study method was selected. The study used Children Self-regulated Degree Assessment as pretest and posttest, and Knowledge of Eco-Soap Comprehensive Test as achievement pretest and WebQuest as achievement posttest. The data is processed by statistics methods such as two way covariance (two-way ANCOVA), Correlation Coefficient, Independent-Samples T Test and Pair-Samples T Test etc. After analyzing, the conclusions are as follows:
1.The study used self-regulatory cycle to build the Self-regulated learning doctrine in WebQuest Learning system.
2.The achievement of experimental group of high self-regulated degree student is better than the achievement of experimental group of low self-regulated degree student and that of both control group. The achievement of experimental group of low self-regulated degree student is advanced up to achievement of control group of high self-regulated degree student.
3.After teaching experiment, the self-regulated degrees of experimental group and control group are not significant different.
4.By using sequential analysis to analyze self-regulated behavior, the acts of experimental group of high self-regulated degree are most accord with self-regulated behavior and are better than other group. The acts of experimental group of high self-regulated degree sometimes match with self-regulated behavior and which cause the achievement better than control group of low self-regulated degree students.

第一章 緒論 1
　第一節 研究動機 1
　第二節 研究目的 6
　第三節 待答問題 7
　第四節 研究範圍與限制 8
　第五節 研究流程 10
　第六節 名詞釋義 11
第二章 文獻探討 13
　第一節 網路探究學習理論 13
　第二節 自律學習理論 22
　第三節 本章結論 29
第三章 研究方法 31
　第一節 研究架構 31
　第二節 研究對象 33
　第三節 研究設計與實施 34
　第四節 研究工具 40
　第五節 資料分析 52
第四章 研究結果與討論 55
　第一節 系統自律循環機制的建立 56
　第二節 具自律輔助機制的網路探究學習之成效分析 65
　第三節 自律程度之提升與學習成效的關係 75
　第四節 高、低自律程度學習者的自律行為 80
　第五節 研究結果 91
第五章 研究結論與建議 95
　第一節 結論 96
　第二節 建議 98
參考文獻 101
　附錄一 肥皂課程學習成就測驗 106
　附錄二 學童自律量表 108
　附錄三 肥皂學習課程探究任務 112
　附錄四 實驗組高自律程度習者學習歷程序列分析 114
　附錄五 實驗組低自律程度學習者學習歷程序列分析 115
　附錄六 控制組高自律程度學習者學習歷程序列分析 116
　附錄七 控制組低自律程度學習者學習歷程序列分析 117

呂小翠（2005）。WebQuest學習活動之個案研究：以國小五年級社會學習領域為例。國立屏東教育大學碩士論文，未出版，屏東。
吳哲旭、蕭顯勝、張國恩、宋曜廷、趙美聲（2006）。自律式模擬教學系統之建置。第十屆全球華人計算機教育應用會議（頁631-641），北京。
汪秀花（2004）。WebQuest任務設計檢核表之研發與實施。南台科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文，未出版，台南縣。
林心茹譯（2002）。自律學習。台北：遠流。
林建平（2004)。學童自我調整學習之調查研究。臺北市立師範學院學報，35(1)，1-24。
高台茜(2002)。非同步網路教學中自律學習的鷹架輔助研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（NSC91-2520-S-259-001-）。花蓮：國立東華大學教育研究所。
陳家禾（2006）。以後設認知能力探討網路搜尋學習活動之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北。
陳嘉皇、郭順利、黃俊傑、蔡玉慧、吳雅玲、侯天麗（譯）（2003）。D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman著。自我調整學習-教學理論與實務。台北：心理。
Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training of self-regulated learning facilitate student’s learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523–535.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing Interaction: an Introduction to Sequential Analysis, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral. Change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Bilal, D. (2001). Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: II. Cognitive and physical behaviors on research tasks. Journal of the American society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 118–136.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. New York : Norton.
Butler, D. L., & Cartier, S. C. (2005). Multiple complementary methods for understanding self‐regulated learning as situated in context. Annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec.
Cartwright, S. (2005). Resource based learning. Retrieved October 14, 2007, from http://www.adelaidehs.sa.edu.au/rblweb/rblsue.html
Curtis, D. (2002). The power of project. Educational Leadership, 60(1) 50-53.
Dodge, B. (1995). Some thoughts about WebQuests. Retrieved October 14, 2007, from http://webquest.sdsu.edu/about_webquests.html.
Dodge, B. (2001). FOCUS: Five rules for writing a great WebQuest. Learning and Leadingwith Technology, 28(8), 6-9.
Dodge, B. (2002). WebQuest Taskonomy: A Taxonomy of Tasks. Retrieved October 14, 2007, from http://webquest.sdsu.edu/taskonomy.html
Dodge, B. (n.d.). The WebQuest Design Process. Retrieved October 14, 2007, from http://webquest.sdsu.edu/designsteps/index.html
Gates, Bill. (2005). 1994 Comdex Keynote. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/r_harvey/iayf2005.htm
Gottman, J. M., & Roy, A. K. (1990). Sequential Analysis: a Guide for Behavioral Researchers. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Hill, J., & Hannafin, M. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: Theresurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research andDevelopment, 49(3), 37-52.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1991). Learning together and alone:Cooperation, competition, and individualization. Englewood cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
King, K. P. (2003). Preparing elementary science teachers to use technology: TheWebQuest as a means of enhancing computer efficacy. Paper presented at the annualmeeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, St. Louis, MO.
Milson, A. J., & Downey, P. (2001). WebQuest: using internet resources for cooperativeinquiry. Social Education, 65(3), 144-146.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1989). A manual for the use of the motivated strategiesfor learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Mich: National Center for Research to Improve PostsecondaryTeaching and Learning (NCRIPTAL), School of Education. The University Michigan.
Risemberg, R., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1992). Self-regulated learning in gifted students. Roeper Review, 15(2), 98-101.
Schunk, D. H. (1989). Attribution and perceptions of efficacy during self-regulated learning by remedial readers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Self-regulation in education: Retrospect and prospect. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stone, N. J. (2000). Exploring the relationship between caliberation and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 12(4), 437-475.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Weinstein, C., Schulte, A., & Palmer, D. (1987). Learning and Study Strategies Inventory(LASSI). Clearwater, FL.: H & H Publications.
Wortzel, R. (1979). Multivariate analysis, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement:Theory, Research, and practice. NY: Springer Verlag.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learner: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51-59.