臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

摘要

本研究旨在探討影響線上學習績效及滿意度之因素，探討不同背景及學習變項下，分析線上學習對樹德科技大學大學生、研究生的因素為何。為達研究目的，以相關文獻作為研究理論基礎，採用邱敏鑑〔2004〕問卷為研究工具，採用隨機抽樣方式，對樹德科技大學大學生、研究生進行問卷調查。問卷調查所得之資料利用平均數、標準差、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、相關分析及迴歸分析等統計方法進行分析。
根據研究結果，歸納出本研究結論如下：
1.「性別」對學習者「線上學習績效」及「線上學習滿意度」無顯著差異。
2. 研究生的「線上學習績效」及「線上學習滿意度」顯著優於代。
3.「年齡」對學習者「線上學習績效」及「線上學習滿意度」無顯著差異。
4.「主動學習、理解記憶、社群互動、案例演練、典範學習」對學習者「線上學習滿意度」及「線上學習績效」之間的關係顯著且呈正向。

關鍵字：線上學習、學習理論、學習績效、學習滿意度

ABSTRACT

The research aims to explore the factors of e-learning achivement and satisfactory degree and how different backgrounds and learning, as the variables in this study, analyzing how e-learning affect college students and graduate students in Shu-Te University. For the research objective, relevant literatures are taken as the theoretical basis, adapting Ming-Jen Chiou questionnaires〔2004〕to be the research tool. questionnaires were issued to college students and graduate students in Shu-Te University, a population selected with random sampling. The data obtained from the questionnaires were analyzed via such statistical methods as mean, standard deviation, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé method, correlation analysis, and regression analysis.
The conclusions based on the research result are as follows:
1. Variables such as "Gender" and "Age" caused no significant differences in the
learners’ " e-learning achivement " and "e-learning satisfaction".
2. The " e-learning achivement " and "e-learning satisfaction" of graduate students
surpassed college students.
3. Variables such as active learning, understanding, memory, community
interaction, case exercises and model learning caused significant and positive on the learners’ " e-learning achivement " and "e-learning satisfaction".

Keywords. e-learning, learning theory, learning achievement, learning satisfaction

信度與效度分析----------------------------------------47
3.6 資料蒐集與分析方法------------------------------------49
四、 資料分析與討論-----------------------------------------51
4.1 基本資料分析------------------------------------------51
4.2 獨立樣本t檢定-----------------------------------------53
4.3 單因子變異數ANOVA檢定---------------------------------55
4.4 相關分析---------------------------------------------56
4.5 因素分析---------------------------------------------57
4.6 迴歸分析---------------------------------------------59
4.7 假說檢定結果整理--------------------------------------65
4.8 研究結果與發現----------------------------------------66
五、 結論與建議--------------------------------------------69
5.1 結論-------------------------------------------------69
5.1.1經實證研究之後，獲得實證支持的假說-----------------------69
5.1.2經實證研究之後，未獲實證支持的假說-----------------------74
5.2 建議-------------------------------------------------74
5.2.1對線上學習的建議--------------------------------------75
5.2.2對後續研究之建議--------------------------------------76
參考文獻 -------------------------------------------------79
附錄一 正式問卷------------------------------------------87
附錄二 原始資料------------------------------------------91

仁，1999，“從資訊處理談有效的學習策略”，教育學刊，9卷，頁47-66。
41.張靜嚳，1996：“何謂建構主義，建構與教學”，彰師大科教中心。
42.黃貝玲，2001，“從線上學習的發展看企業線上訓練”，電子化企業：經理人報告，頁12~23。
43.黃明信，2002，國小網路專題式教學模式之設計，私立淡江大學教育科技學系研究所，碩士論文。
44.黃淑敏，2001，電腦網路學習對學生學習成效之後設分析，國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所，碩士論文。
45.黃偉豪，2001，網路教學之獎懲機制與認知風格研究，國立中正大學資訊館理學系研究所，碩士論文。
46.溫嘉榮、吳明隆，1999，新時代資訊教育的理論與實務應用，松崗電腦圖書資料股份有限公司，台北。
47.楊奕農、柴蕙質, 2002，“非同步網路學習成效及影響因素之計量分析：經濟學課程個案研究”，科學教育學刊，第十卷第二期, 頁193-210。
48.楊家興，1992，“隔空教育下的傳播科技：新舊教學媒體的省思”，教學科技與媒體，21 期，頁5-12。
49.楊家興，1998，“資訊科技在教育訓練上的應用”，遠距教育，第1 期，頁44~47。
50.楊國德，1998，“網路學習的趨勢與策略”，成人教育，第45期，頁53~ 54。
51.趙美聲、陳姚真譯，1999，Kearsley著，遠距教育-系統觀，松崗，台北。
52.蔡宜君，2002，案例教學法在中等學校師資培訓之應用：教學案例之發展，私立淡江大學教育科技研究所，碩士論文，未出版。
53.廖桂菁，2000，情境式網路學習環境對科學學習之影響，台灣師範大學地球科學研究所，碩士論文。
54.廖培瑜，2002，企業訓練線上學習成效評量之研究，國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所，碩士論文。
55.劉仲矩，2002，“大學生對未來遠距教學相關事項看法之研究”，銘傳大學製商整合計劃研討會論文集。
56.鄭田，1995，交通部電信訓練所學員覺察之學習滿意度調查研究，交通大學管理科學研究所，碩士論文。
57.鄭晉昌，1993，“知識的發展與思考能力的培養” ，教育研究，34卷，頁29-39。
58.鄭廉勳，2002，適性化的使用者模組案例式學習知識庫，國立中央大學資訊工程研究所，碩士論文。
59.蕭安成，1998，隔空與非隔空學習者自我導向學習傾向和學習滿意度之研究，國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所，碩士論文。
60.魏世台等人，1993，“台北醫學院學生學習滿意度與相關因素之分析研究”，北醫學報，第22卷，第2期，頁153-178。
61.薛雅明與徐玉瓊，“影響案例式網路學習系統學習成效之研究”，國立台南大學教育研究學報，第40卷，第一期，頁173-194，2006。
62.簡綜男，1999，互動式多媒體輔助教材在電腦教學之學習成效影響研究，中央大學資訊管理研究所，碩士論文。
63.鍾邦友，1994，情境式電腦輔助數學學習軟體製作研究，國立台灣師範大學教育研究所，碩士論文。
64.鍾宜興，1992，“認知心理學上的個別差異”，研習資訊，9卷7期，頁33~35。
65.藍鴻文，2002，服務接觸中科技介入之影響-以網路教學為例，國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所，碩士論文。
66.數位學習國家型科技計畫，計畫緣起，取自：http://elnpweb.ncu.edu.tw/a/a.htm
67.Abraugh, J. B., 2000, “How classroom environment and student engagement affecting in internet-based MBA courses”, Business Communication Quarterly, pp. 9-26, 4, December.
68.Agogino, A. M., & Hsi, S.,1995 ,.“Learning style based innovations to improve retention of female engineering students in the Synthesis Coalition”, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education '95: Proceedings, Purdue University.
69.Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Bonk, C. J., 2003,“Communicatoin in a web-based conferencing system: the quality of computer-mediated interactions”, British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1).
70.Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M., 1968, Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes, In K.W. Spence & J.T. Spence (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, 2. New York: Academic Press.
71.Banrney Dalgarno,1997, Constructivist Computer Assisted Learning:Theory and echniques,WWW,21Oct.Available: http://services.canberra.edu.au/~barney/articles/ascilite96/paper.htm
72.Barbara Lynn Jones,1996, Self-Efficacy And Personal Goals In Classroom Performance: The Effect Of Task Experience, A Dissertation Submitted to the Kent State University Graduate School of Management in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, May.
73.Biner, P. M., Dean, R. S. & Mellinger, A. E. , 1994, “Factors underlying distance learnersatisfaction with televised college-level courses”, The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), pp. 53-70.
74.Bostrom, R.P. L. & M. K. Sein , 1990, ” The Importance of Learning Style in End-User Training ” , MIS Quarterly, pp.101~ 173.
75.Breeding, C. A., 2000, “An instruction to e-learning”, Performance in practice, 4.
76.Brown,J.S., Collins,A. & Duguid,P , 1989, ”Situated cognition and the culture oflearning” , Educational Research , vol.18, No.1 , pp.32~ 41.
77.Cross, K. P., & Steadman, M. H., 1996, Classroom research: Implementing the scholarship of teaching, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
78.Ertmer, P. A., & Quinn, J., 1999,The ID casebook: Case studies in instructional design, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
79.Field, H. S. & Giles, W. G., 1980, “Student satisfaction with graduate education: Dimensionality and assessment in a school of business”, Educational Research Quarterly, 5(2), pp.66-73.
80.Fitzgerald, G., & Semrau, L., 1997, “An interactive multimedia program enhance teacher problem solving skills based on cognitive flexibility theory: Design and outcomes”, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6, 47-76.
81.Gagné, E. D., 1985, The cognitive psychology of school learning, Little, Brown: Boston.
82.Gagné R.M., Briggs, L.J., Wagger, W.W., 1992, Principle of Instructional Design, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Publishers, Orlando, FL.
83.Griffin,M. M., 1995,”You can’t get there from here: Situated learning, transfer, and map skills ” ,Contemporary Educational Psychology , vol. 20, No.1, pp.65~ 87.
84.Hiltz, Starr Roxanne, 1994, The Virtual Classroom: Learning Without Limits via Computer Networks , Ablex Publishing Corporation 355 Chestnut St.Norwood, NJ.
85.Khan,B.H, 2001, “Web-Base Training”,Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
86.Knowels, M. S. , 1970, The Modern Practice of Adult Education, New York Association Press.
87.Lave,J & Wenger,E, 1991, Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation,Cambridge University Press.
88.Lawson, A. E., 1991, “Constructivism and domains of scientific knowledge: A reply to Lythcott and Duschl ” , Science Education. 75(4), 481-488.
89.Lern(Lerning Resources Network) , 1998, ”Online education： Growing presence and growing pains” , Lifelong learning Today , vol.6, No.1, pp.6~ 7.
90.Linn, M.C., 1995, “Designing Computer Environments for Engineering and Computer Science: The Scaffolded Knowledge Integration Framework”, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 4, No. 2..
91.Lucy A. Suchman, 1987,Plans and situated actions：The problem of human- machine communication , Cambridge University Press , New York.
92.Marchionini, G., 1988, ”Hypermedia and learning: Freedom and chaos” , Educational Technology , vol. 28, No.11, pp.8~12.
93.Miller, G. A.. , 1956, The magical number seven, plus or minus two: “Some limits on our capacity for processing information” , Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
94.Motiwalla, L. & Tello, S., 2000, “Distance learning on the internet: An exploratory study”, The Internet and Higher Education, 2(4), pp. 253-264.
95.Nelson, W.A & Palumbo, D., 1992, ”Learning, instruction, and hypermedia” , Journal of educational Mutimedia and Hypermedia, vol.1, No.3, pp.287~294.
96.Rosenberg , M.J, 2001,E-Learning:Strages for deliverning knowledge in the Digital Age, McGraw -Hill, New York.
97.Simon, H.A., 1980, Problem solving and education, In D.T. Tuma and F. Reif (Eds.), Problem solving and education: Issues in teaching and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
98.Spence, R. B. and L. H. Evans., 1956, “Dropout in adult education”, Adult Education, vol.6, No.4, pp. 221-225.
99.Stokes, S. P., 2001, “Satisfactions of college Students with the digital Learning environment: Do learners temperaments make a difference?”, Internet Higher Education, 4, pp.31-44.
100.Tallman, F. D., 1994, “Satisfaction and completion in correspondence study: The Influence on Instructional and student-support services”, The America Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), pp. 43-55.
101.Thomas G. Lynch and Nancy N. Woelfl and David J. Steele et al., 1998, “Learning Style Influences Student Examination Performance”, The American Journal of Surgery, volume 176, pp. 62-66, July.
102.Tough, A., 1982, “Some major reasons for learning”,ERIC Document Reproduction, Service pp. 033-251.
103.Urdan and Weggen, 2000, “Corporate e-learning: Exploring a new frontier”,Computer News,53(11), pp.35-36.
104.Waterman, M. A, 1997, “Curriculum and teacher development in biology via case writing”, the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL., March. .
105.Wheatley, G.H. , 1991, “Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning”, Science Education, 75(1), pp.9-21.
106.Woolfolk, AE, 1993 , Educational Psychology, Boston: Allyn & Bacon, pp.459~ 463.