臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

隨著科技的進步，電子設備普及，人人都可以使用這些設備上網，也將霸凌搬到了電子通訊網路上，稱為網路霸凌(Cyberbullying)。然而不少研究探討網路霸凌的危險因子與所帶來的影響。本研究以18~25歲大學生為例。探討大學生網路霸凌概況，並深入了解面對網路霸凌時人格特質、因應與憂鬱間關係。本研究使用大學生網路霸凌行為量表、大學生網路霸凌因應行為量表、華人基本性格量表（台灣地區簡式版本）、流行病學研究中心憂鬱量表來加以測量。結果顯示，大學生涉入網路霸凌的比例為85.6%。曾經有網路受害經驗的比例最多(74.6%)，其中以最多比例的學生報告出被他人盜用帳號及密碼(59.2%)。網路加害經驗中則有男性顯著多於女性。年級可預測是否有受害經驗。檢驗網路受害者人格特質、因應方法與憂鬱間的關係中，發現人格特質「樂觀自在：悲觀善感」可預測憂鬱程度；網路霸凌因應方法「壓抑退縮」可預測憂鬱程度。「壓抑退縮」部分中介人格特質「樂觀自在：悲觀善感」對憂鬱程度的影響。根據結果，應注重網路霸凌在大學生的相關議題。

Following the advancement of modern technology, a new form of aggression called “cyberbullying” has emerged. Many studies devoted to explore the risk factors and the impact of cyberbullying. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of cyberbullying among college students, and to explore the relationships among personality, coping, and depression in cybervictims. The instruments used in this study were the Cyberbullying Behavior Questionnaire, Cyberbullying Coping Scale, Chinese Basic Personality Inventory (Taiwan Region Simplified Version), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale. Results indicated that the prevalence rate involved in cyberbullying was 85.6%. The largest proportion of the sample was cybervictims (74.6%), in which the experience of having accounts and passwords been stolen were the most common (59.2%). More males than females were perpetrators. The number of years in college could predict cybervictim experience. Regarding the relationships among personality, coping, and depression in cybervictims, both optimism-pessimism personality and suppression-withdrawal coping style could predict depression. Suppression-withdrawal coping style was a partial mediator between optimism-pessimism personality and depression. According to the results of this study, it was suggested that we should pay more attention to cyberbullying in college students.

目錄
摘要.............................................................I
Abtract.........................................................II
目錄........................................................... III
表目錄...........................................................IV
圖目錄...........................................................VI
第一章 緒論..................................................... 1
第二章　文獻回顧.................................................. 3
第一節　霸凌與網路霸凌.............................................. 3
第二節　大學生網路霸凌之概況......................................... 11
第三節　網路霸凌經驗相關研究......................................... 14
第四節　人格、因應與憂鬱............................................ 22
第三章　研究方法...................................................31
第一節 研究架構與假設............................................ 31
第二節 研究對象..................................................32
第三節 研究工具..................................................35
第四節 研究程序..................................................41
第五節　 統計分析.................................................42
第四章　 研究結果................................................ 44
第一節 大學生網路霸凌之概況......................................... 44
第二節 不同背景變項在大學生網路霸凌的概況.............................. 47
第三節 大學生網路受害者人格、因應與憂鬱之關係........................... 49
第五章 討論與建議..................................................56
第一節 綜合討論....................................................57
第二節 研究貢獻、限制與建議..........................................64
參考文獻......................................................... 67
附錄A ..........................................................75
附錄B 華人基本性格自評量保授權同意書...................................81
附錄C 網路霸凌行為與因應策略量表授權同意................................82
附錄D霸凌因應量表授權同意............................................83

表目錄
表1-1　國外學者對網路霸凌的概念性定義 ............................... 4
表1-2 國內研究對網路霸凌的定義..................................... 5
表1-3 大學生網路霸凌各分類盛行率概況................................ 12
表1-4 五大人格因素............................................... 23
表1-5 華人基本七大性格（以台灣大學生與社會人士為樣本）.................. 25
表3-1　預試樣本人數性別、年級與年齡之比例(N=239)....................... 33
表3-2　第一階段正式樣本人數性別、年級與年齡之比例(N=473)................ 34
表3-3　第二階段正式樣本人數性別、年級與年齡之比例(N=176).................35
表3-4 原研究者網路霸凌行為調查問卷表計分方式說明........................37
表3-5 華人七大性格各因素題項........................................38
表3-6　網路霸凌因應策略因素分析表.................................... 40
表4-1 大學生涉入網路霸凌之比例......................................44
表4-2 大學生網路霸凌各角色之比例.................................... 44
表4-3 大學生網路霸凌受害方式之比例.................................. 45
表4-4 大學生網路霸凌加害方法之比例.................................. 46
表4-5 大學生網路霸凌旁觀經驗管道之比例............................... 46
表4-6 不同性別在大學生網路霸凌上之差異概況.............................47
表4-7 不同年級大學生網路霸凌上之差異概況..............................48
表4-8 年級對大學生網路霸凌的單變量邏輯迴歸初步參數檢定.................. 49
表4-9 年級是否有加害經驗之整體模式適配度及個別參數顯著性摘要表.............49
表4-10 網路受害者之華人七大性格、網路霸凌因應方法述統計摘要表..............50
表4-11 七大人格特質、網路霸凌因應行為與憂鬱之相關摘要表...................51
表4-12 「樂觀自在：悲觀善感」預測憂鬱程度迴歸摘要表......................52
表4-13 「壓抑退縮」、「忽視」預測憂鬱程度迴歸摘要表......................52
表4-14 「樂觀自在：悲觀善感」預測「忽視」迴歸摘要表......................53
表4-15 「樂觀自在：悲觀善感」預測「壓抑退縮」迴歸摘要表.................. 53
表4-16 「樂觀自在：悲觀善感」、「壓抑退縮」預測憂鬱程度迴歸摘要表.......... 54
表4-17 「樂觀自在：悲觀善感」、「壓抑退縮」、「樂觀×壓抑」預測憂鬱程度迴歸摘要表..54
表4-18 「樂觀自在：悲觀善感」、「忽視」、「樂觀×忽視」預測憂鬱程度迴歸摘要表......55
表5-1 研究假設驗證摘要表................................................56

圖目錄
圖2-1　Transactional model解釋反應因應..............................18
圖2-2　Transactional model 解釋預防因應... .........................19
圖2-3 人格對壓力源的暴露與反應架構圖................................ 28
圖2-4 人格與壓力反應中的因應選擇與因應效用架構圖.......................29
圖3-1 研究架構圖之一............................................. 31
圖3-2 研究架構圖之二..............................................32
圖3-3 研究架構圖之三..............................................32
圖3-4 研究流程圖................................................. 42

參考文獻
一、中文部分
方曉喻（民90）。由性格因素探討婦女憂鬱焦慮之共病現象。未出版碩士論文，國立成功大學行為醫學所，台南。

王嘉琪（民98）。大學生憂鬱情緒、自尊、污名化、自我揭露與求助態度之關係。未出版碩士論文，臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所，台北市。

朱美瑰（民97）。網路犯罪新型態~看不見的拳頭：青少年網路霸凌現象初探。諮商與輔導，268，6-10。

江雅芳（民101）。看不見的拳頭：網路霸凌。諮商與輔導，323，62-63。

李靜如（民96）。大學生的成人依附、社交能力、社會支持、寂寞與憂鬱之關係。未出版博士論文，國立政治大學教育研究所，台北市。

李卓穎、楊士隆（民100）。高中職同儕間霸凌行為及其因應策略之研究－以花蓮地區為例。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊，3，81-132。

李仁豪、謝進昌、余民寧（民97）。以試題反應理論分析CES-D 量表不同調查方式的差異效果。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系教育心理學報，測驗與評量專刊，39，21 -42。

余民寧、劉育如、李仁豪（民97）。臺灣憂鬱症量表的實用決斷分數編製報告。教育研究與發展期刊，4，231-258。

吳錦松（民94）。壓力、人格特質、社會支援、因應方式與身心健康的關係。黃埔學報，48。45-49。

吳明隆、涂金堂（民94）。SPSS與統計應用分析(二版)。台北市：五南。

吳政航（民96）。大學生家庭功能與壓力因應型態對憂鬱症狀之影響。未出版之碩士論文，國立成功大學醫學院 行為醫學研究所，台南市。

吳明隆、簡妙如（民98）。 青少年網路霸凌行為探究。中等教育，60，90-109。

林苡彤（民98）。國中生關係攻擊角色與規範信念、同理心、人際衝突因應策略之相關研究。未出版碩士論文，臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所，台北市。

邱皓政（民95）。量化研究與統計分析：Spss中文視窗板資料分析範例解析。台北市：五南。

高雅勤（民101年10月28日）。1/3網友帳密曾被盜用　臉書詐騙快速增加。 卡優新聞網 。取自http://goo.gl/TWPrc

徐雅雯（民102）。研究生的人格特質、情緒調節策略和憂鬱之相關研究。未出版碩士論文，國立政治大學教育研究所，台北市。

許文宗（民99）。國中學生虛擬霸凌與傳統霸凌之相關研究。未出版碩士論文，國立彰化師範大學教育研究所，彰化市。

許功餘、王登峰、楊國樞（民90）。台灣與大陸華人基本性格向度比較。本土心理學研究，16，185-225。

溫福星（民101）。多變量分析方法與操作-SPSS之應用。台北市：鼎茂。


郭祐榕（民98）。網路霸凌被害者之被害特質：以嘉義市國中生為例。未出版碩士論文，國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所，嘉義。

黃天佑、黃士珍（民99）。國中生網路霸凌行為相關影響因素之研究。資訊科學應用期刊，6，1-16。

曾琬鈴（民99）。青少年網路霸凌行為形成原因之探討。未出版碩士論文，玄奘大學，應用心理研究所，新竹市。

葉光輝（譯）（民94）。性格心理學：理論與研究 (原著者：Pervin L. A., Cervone D, John O. P.) 雙葉：台北。310-327。（原著出版年：2001）。

張春興（民96）。張氏心理學辭典。台北市:東華。185。

張佑勳（民101）。大學生網路使用行為與網路霸凌感受之研究。未出版碩士論文，中華大學，新竹市。

楊國樞（民98）。社會與人格心理學在台灣的發展及研究：回顧與前瞻。取自homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~kuoshu/2nd/Yang.pdf

蔡慧珍（民101）。網路霸凌受害經驗對大學生精神幸福感影響之研究－以因應策略為調節變項。未出版碩士論文，南台科技大學人力資源管理研究所，台南市。

廖國良、黃正魁 、張仁俊 、劉籹君（民101）。臺灣網路霸凌之實證研究。資訊與管理科學期刊，5，31-55。

劉妍君（民98）。國中生之人格特質、人際關係與網路霸凌相關之研究。未出版碩士論文，台北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所，台北市。

顏伯琳（民99）。Facebook 對大學生人際關係相關性研究。未出版碩士論文，國立屏東教育大學，屏東。

顏理謙（民國102年4月9日）。日網路公司公布Facebook亞洲用戶數調查，台灣奪下人口比冠軍。數位時代網站。取自http://www.bnext.com.tw/focus/view/cid/103/id/27267

賴雅純（民95）。成人依附類型與人際衝突事件及其衝突知覺與解決策略對大學生憂鬱的影響。未出版碩士論文，國立成功大學行為醫學研究所，台南。

羅清俊（民96）。社會科學研究方法－如何做好量化研究。台北縣：威仕曼。86。

蕭文龍（民98）。多變量分析最佳入門實用書SPSS+LISREL(二版)。台北市：碁峰。

魏翊雄（民101）。青少年網路霸凌行為及影響因子調查研究。未出版碩士論文，國立東華大學，課程與潛能開發學系，花蓮。

蘇文碩（民91）。躁鬱症患者的人格特質與其自我照顧能力，生活適應關係之研究。未出版碩士論文，中原大學心理研究所，桃園。

特質論Allport、Eysenck、Cattell、Big Five大五因素理論（N.D）。取自140.122.69.164/download.php?filename=365_792a3e6e.ppt...

教育部防治校園霸凌專區（民100年）。取自 https://csrc.edu.tw/bully/bullying.asp

內政部警政署刑事警察局「拒絕網路霸凌」網站（民97）。什麼是網路霸凌? 取自http://bullying.cib.gov.tw/

二、英文部分
Aoyama, I. (2011). Cyberbullying: What are the psychological pofiles of bullies, victims, and bully- victims? Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 71, 3526.

Arıcak, O. T. (2009). Psychiatric symptomatology as a predictor of cyberbullying among university students. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 34, 167-184.

Aricak, T., Siyahhan, T., Uzunhasanoglu, A., Saribeyoglu, S., Ciplak, S., Yilmaz, N., & Memmedov, C. (2008). Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 253-261.

Barkoukis, V., Lazuras, L., & Tsorbatzoudis, H. (n.d.). A social cognitive perspective in cyberbullying prevention. Retrieved from http://www.bullyingandcyber.net/media/cms_page_media/59/Barkoukis%20et%20al..pdf

Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

Bartley, C. E., & Roesch, S. C. (2011). Coping with daily stress: The role of conscientiousness. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 79-83.


Berne, S., Frisén, A., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Naruskov, K., Luik, P., Katzer, C., Erentaite, R., & Zukauskiene, R. (2013). Cyberbullying assessment instruments: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 320-334.

Book, A. S.,Volk, A. A., & Hosker A.(2012). Adolescent bullying and personality: An adaptive approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 218-223.

Bolger, N., & Zuckerman, A. (1995). A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 890-902.

Brighi, A., Guarini, A., Melotti, G., Galli, S., & Genta, M. L. (2012). Predictors of victimisation across direct bullying, indirect bullying and cyberbullying. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 17, 375-388.

Campfield, D. C. (2009). Cyber bullying and victimization: Psychosocial characteristics of bullies, victims. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 69, 5769.

Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679-704.


Chien, L. L., Ko, H. C., & Wu, J.Y.W.(2007). The five-factor model of personality and depressive symptoms: One-year follow-up. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1013–1023.

Chioqueta, A. P., & Stiles, T. C. (2005). Personality traits and the development of depression, hopelessness, and suicide ideation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1283–1291.

Churchill, S. S., Villareale, N. L., Monaghan, T. A., Sharp, V. L., & Kieckhefer , G.M. (2010). Parents of children with special health care needs who have better coping skills have fewer depressive symptoms. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14, 47-57.

Connor-Smith,J. K.& Compas, B.E.(2002). Vulnerability to social stress: Coping as a mediator or moderator of sociotropy and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26, 39-55.

Corcoran, L., Connolly, I., & O'Moore, M. (2012). Cyberbullying in Irish schools: An investigation of personality and self-concept. The Irish Journal of Psychology , 33, 153-165.

Dilmaç, B. (2009). Psychological needs as a predictor of cyber bullying: A preliminary report on college students. Education Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9, 1307-1325.

Dooley, J. J., Pyzalski, J., & Cross, D. (2009). Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying: A theoretical and conceptual review. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 182–188.

Freis, S. D., & Gurung, R.A.R. (2013). A Facebook analysis of helping behavior in online bullying. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2, 11-19.

Fenaughty,J., & Harré, N.(2012). Factors associated with young people’s successful resolution of distressing electronic harassment. Computers & Education, 61, 242–250.

Grigg, D. W. (2010). Cyber-aggression: Definition and concept of cyberbullying. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20, 143-156.

Hamdan-Mansour, A. M., Puskar, K., & Bandak, A.G. (2009). Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy on depressive symptomatology, stress and coping strategies among Jordanian university students. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 30, 188–196.

Hanninen, V., & Aro, H. (1996). Sex differences in coping and depression among young adults. Social Science & Medicine, 43, 1452-1460.

Hemphill, S. A., Kotevski, A., Tollit, A., Smith, R., Herrenkohl, T. I., Toumbourou, J. W., & Catalano, R. F. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of cyber and traditional bullying perpetration in Australian secondary school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51, 59-65.

Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29, 129-156.

Horwitz, A. G., Hill, R. M., & King, C. A. (2011).Specific coping behaviors in relation to adolescent depression and suicidal ideation. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 1077–1085.

Huang, Y. Y., & Chou, C. (2010). An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1581-1590.

Ireland, J. L., Brown, S. L., & Ballarini S. (2006). Maladaptive personality traits, coping styles and psychological distress: A study of adult male prisoners. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 561–573.

Karreman, A., Assen, M. A. L. M., & Bekker, M. H.J. (2013). Intensity of positive and negative emotions: Explaining the association between personality and depressive symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 214–220.

Klein, D. N., Kotov, R., & Bufferd, S. J. (2011). Personality and depression: Explanatory models and review of the Evidence. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 269-295.

Kiriakidis, S. P., & Kavoura, A. (2010). Cyberbullying: A review of the literature on harassment through the Internet and other electronic means. Family & Community Health: The Journal of Health Promotion & Maintenance, 33, 82-93.

Kowalski, R. M. & Limber, S.P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S22–S30.

Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & Agatston, P. W. (2012). Cyber bullying: Bullying in the digital age (2th ed, pp. 83-88).Malden, MA; Oxford : Blackwell.

Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Reese, H. H. (2012). Cyber bullying among college students: Evidence from multiple domains of college life. Cutting-edge Technologies in Higher Education, 5, 293–321.

MacDonald, C. D., & Roberts-Pittman, B. (2010). Cyberbullying among college students: Prevalence and demographic differences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 2003-2009.
Machmutow, K., Perren S., Sticca F., & Alsaker F. D. (2012). Peer victimisation and depressive symptoms: Can specific coping strategies buffer the negative impact of cybervictimisation? Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties ,17, 403-420.

Mao,W. C.,Bardwell,W.A., Major,J.M., Dimsdale, J.E. & Major, J. M. (2003).Coping strategies, hostility, and depressive symptoms: a path model. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10, 331-342.

Menesini, Nocentini E., Palladino A., Frisén B. E., Berne A., Ortega-Ruiz S., Calmaestra R., Scheithauer J., Schultze-Krumbholz H., Luik A., Naruskov P., Blaya K., Berthaud C., Smith J. & Peter K. (2012). Cyberbullying definition among adolescents: A comparison across six European countries. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 455-462.

Mishna, F., Khoury-Kassabri, M., Gadalla, T., & Daciuk, J. (2012). Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully–victictims. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 63-70.

Nocentini, A., Calmaestra, J., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Ortega, R., & Menesini, E. (2010). Cyberbullying: Labels, behaviours and definition in three European countries. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20, 129-142.

Langos, C. (2012). Cyberbullying: The challenge to define. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 285-289.

Låftman, S. B., Modin, B., & Östberg, V. (2013). Cyberbullying and subjective health: A large-scale study of students in Stockholm, Sweden. Children and Youth Services Review. 35, 112-119.

Law, D. M., Shapka, J. D., Hymel, S., Olson, B. F., & Waterhouse T. (2012). The changing face of bullying: An empirical comparison between tranditional and internet bullying and victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 226-232.

Leandro, P. G., & Castillo, M. D. (2010). Coping with stress and its relationship with personality dimensions, anxiety, and depression. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1562–1573.

Li, Q., Cross, D., & Smith, P. K. (2012). Cyberbullying in the global playground: Research from international perspectives (pp. 1-12). Chichester, U.K. : Wiley-Blackwell.

Parris, L., Varjas, K., Meyers, J., & Cutts, H. (2012). High school students’ perceptions of coping with cyberbullying. Youth & Society, 44, 284-306.
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2010). Cyberbullying and self-esteem. Journal of School Health, 80, 614-621.

Pervin, L. A., & Cervone, D. (2009). Personality: Theory and research (pp.8, pp.261). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Price, M., & Dalgleish, J. (2010). Cyberbullying experiences, impacts and coping strategies as described by Australian young people. Youth Studies Australia, 29, 51-59.

Radloff, L.S. (1977). A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.

Rey, R.D., Elipe, P., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2012). Bullying and cyberbullying: Overlapping and predictive value of the co-occurrence. Psicothema, 24, 608-613.

Riebel, J., Jäger, R.S., & Fischer, U.C. (2009). Cyberbullying in Germany : An exploration of prevalence, overlapping with real life bullying and coping strategies. Psychology Science, 51, 298-314.

Rosenbluth, M., Kennedy, S. H., & Bagby, R. M. (2005). Depression and Personality: Conceptual and Clinical Challenge (pp.43-50). Washington, DC : American Psychiatric .

Sahin, M. (2012). The relationship between the cyberbullying/cybervictmization and loneliness among adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 834-837.

Sarafino, E. (2008). Health psychology : Biopsychosocial interactions (6th ed, pp.118-121). Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.

Schenk, A. M., & Fremouw, W. J. (2012). Prevalence, psychological impact, and coping of cyberbully victims among college students. Journal of School Violence, 11, 21-37.

Slonje, R., & Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 147–154.

Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisén A. (2012).Processes of cyberbullying, and feelings of remorse by bullies: A pilot study. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 244-259.

Slonje, R., Smith, P.K., & Frisén A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 26-32.

Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376-385.

Sobel, M. E.(1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological methodology, 13, 290-312. American Sociological Association. Retrived from http://www.jstor.org/stable/270723

Sourander, A., Klomek, A. B., Ikonen, M., Lindroos, J., Luntamo, T., Koskelainen, M., Ristkari, T., & Helenius, H. (2010). Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: A population-based study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 720-728.

Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics(4th ed, pp.123). Boston : Pearson.

Tani, F., Greenman, P. S., Schneider, B. H., & Fregoso, M. (2003). Bullying and the big five: A study of childhood personality and participant roles in bullying incidents. School Psychology International, 24, 131-146.

Tokunaga, R. S.(2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 277-287.

Turan, N., Polat, O., Karapirli, M., Uysal, C., & Turan, S. G. (2011). The new violence type of the era: Cyber bullying among university students Violence among university students. Neurology, Psychiatry and Brain Research, 17, 21-26.

Ubertini, M. (2011). Cyberbullying may reduce adolescent's well-being: Can life satisfaction and social support protect them? Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 71, 7743.

Vandebosch, H., & Cleemput, K. V. (2008). Defining cyberbullying: A qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 499-503.

Völlink, T., Bolman, C. A. W., Dehue, F., & Jacobs, N.,C.,L. (2013). Coping with cyberbullying: Differences between victims, bully-victims and children not involved in bullying. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 7–24.

Walker, C. M., Sockman, B. R., & Koehn, S. (2011). An Exploratory Study of Cyberbullying with Undergraduate University Students. TechTrends, 55(2), 31-38.

Wang, J., Nansel, T. R., & Iannotti, R. J. (2011). Cyber and traditional bullying: Differential association with depression. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(4), 415-417.

Willard, N. E. (2007) Cyberbullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress (pp.5-25). Champaign, IL, US: Research Press.

Williams, K. R., & Guerra, N. G. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S14-S21.

Zacchilli, T. L., & Valerio, C. Y. (2011). The knowledge and prevalence of cyberbullying in a college sample. Journal of Scientific Psychology, 11-23.