臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究旨在探討單一財務報表與合併報表對於公司價值之關聯性，藉此瞭解投資人是否能藉由合併報表及母公司財務報表所揭露之資訊，辨別公司真實營運狀況。本研究以2005年至2009年台灣上市櫃公司為研究樣本，採用Tobin’s Q作為研究模型中用來衡量公司價值的之應變數。以追蹤資料模型（Panel Data），透過公司規模、財務結構、經營能力等變數，探討單一報表與合併財務報表對於公司價值的影響及產業特性與重要財務報表資訊之差異與公司價值的關係。
實證結果發現：（1）單一報表與合併報表之財務資訊均能反映公司價值，但單一報表資訊內涵稍較合併財務報表顯著；（2）以產業特性區分，高科技產業之財務報表資訊對於公司價值，比傳統產業更為顯著；(3）合併財務報表資訊反映公司價值，且顯著性逐年增加，表示投資者對於合併財務報表愈發重視；(4）比較單一報表與合併財務報表所揭露資訊之差異，對於公司價值，單一報表較合併財務報表具有顯著性。

This study aims to explore the association of stand-alone financial statements and consolidated financial statements with the disclosure of firm value, so as to understand whether investors are able to identify the real operating conditions of a company through disclosed information in the financial statements of the parent company and consolidated statements. In this study listed companies from Taiwan stock market and over-the-counter are selected as our research samples covering the years 2005 to 2009, and Tobin's Q is applied as our research model to measure dependent variable of firm value. The panel data are tracked by company size, financial structure, management capacity and other variables to explore the effects of stand-alone financial statements and consolidated financial statements on the disclosure of firm values, and the effects of industry characteristics and important differences in financial statement information on the firm value.

Empirical results indicated that (1), regardless of stand-alone financial statements and consolidated statements, disclosed financial information from both financial statements reflects the firm value, but the information content in stand-alone financial statement is more meaningful than consolidated financial statement; (2) to distinguish industry characteristics, the information disclosed on financial statements of high-tech industry is more significant than the financial statements of traditional industries; (3) not only disclosed information from consolidated financial statements reflect company value, its significance increases by each year, indicating that investors have attached increasing importance to the consolidated financial statements; (4) to compare disclosed information between stand-alone financial statements and consolidated financial statements, the disclosure of firm value is more significant from the single company financial statements than the consolidated financial statements.

中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
致　　謝 iv
目　　錄 v
圖表目錄 vi
第一章　緒論 1
1.1　研究背景與動機 1
1.2　研究目的 3
1.3　研究架構及流程 3
第二章　文獻探討 5
2.1　合併財務報表及相關規定 5
2.2 合併財務報表相關實證文獻 8
2.3 公司價值研究文獻 15
第三章　研究方法 16
3.1　研究樣本 16
3.2　研究假說 19
3.3 研究方法 21
3.4　變數的定義與衡量 23
3.5　實證模型 30
第四章　實證結果與分析 33
4.1　敘述統計分析與檢定 33
4.2　基本檢定 37
4.3　模型迴歸結果分析 43
第五章　研究結論與建議 53
5.1　研究結論 53
5.2　研究建議 54
參考文獻 55

中文部分
(1) 方偉廉，民94 年，「合併財務報表與企業融資行為之關聯性」，國立台灣大學會計所學術論文。
(2) 李進宏，民98 年，，「合併報表與母公司財務報表差異對投資人之影響」，國立中央大學財務金融研究所，碩士論文。
(3) 劉志明，民83 年，「交易量面之合併報表資訊內涵研究」，國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。
(4) 林家華，民95 年，「半年度合併財務報表資訊內涵之研究」，國立東華大學企管研究所碩士論文。
(5) 洪榮華、陳香如、王玉珍，民94，「公司內部治理機制與公司績效之關係---股權結構與董事會特性的觀點」，輔仁管理評論，第十二卷，第三期，23-40。
(6) 朱博湧、彭火樹，民91年，「影響台灣產業托賓Q 值差異的策略變數之探討」，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
(7) 中華民國會計研究發展基金會財務會計準則委員會，2005 年修訂，財務會計準則公報第七號「合併財務報表」。
(8) 中華民國會計研究發展基金會財務會計準則委員會，財務會計準則公報第二十號「部門別財務資訊之揭露」。
(9) 張福星，民86 年，「合併財務報表與母公司財務報表盈餘組成成分相對資訊內涵之研究」，國立政治大學會計研究所博士論文。
(10) 張琡珮，民97 年，「合併財務報表與企業價值之攸關性—從第七號公報變革談起」，國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。

(11) 陳瑩珊，民95 年，「企業合併報表地位對其價值攸關之影響」，國立成功大學會計研究所碩士論文。
(12) 蘇敏賢，民89 年，「合併財務報表、母公司財務報表之比較及其與企業風險之關聯性」，國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
(13) 蘇煥文，民90 年，「關係企業合併報表、合併財務報表與母公司財務報表
(14) 之盈餘組成成分資訊內涵研究」，東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。
(15) 蘇心盈，民93 年，「以財務比率預測未來盈餘及股價異常報酬之研究—比
(16) 較母公司財務報表與合併財務報表」，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
(17) 王貞懿，民97 年，「合併報表編制對企業盈餘管理行為之影響」，國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
(18) 王詩韻，民92 年，「以投資損益論合併報表與母公司報表之相對資訊內涵」，國立成功大學會計研究所碩士論文。
英文部分
(1) Anthon, H.J., and K. Ramesh, 1992, “Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15, pp.203-227.
(2) Bushee, B. J. (1998), “The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior.”Accounting Review, 73, No. 3, pp.305-33.
(3) Francis, J.R., 1986, “Debt reporting by parent companics : parent-only versus consolidated statements”, Journal of Buiness Finance and Accounting 13(3) : 393-403
(4) Hansen, G. C. and C. W. L. Hill (1991), “Are institutional investor myopic? A Time-Series Study of Four Technology-Driven Industry.” Strategic Management Journal, 12, No. 1, pp. 1-16.
(5) Herrmann, D., T. Inoue, and W. B. Thomas, 2001 , “The relation between incremental subsidiary earnings and future stock returns in Japan”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 28: 1115–1139.
(6) Jose, Manuel L, Len M Nichols, and Jerry L Stevens, 1986, “Valuation Impact of Strategic Investment Contributions of Diversification, Promotion, and R&D to the Value of Multiproduct Firms: A Tobin's q Approach. ” Financial Management (1986-1998). Tampa: Winter 1986. Vol. 15, Iss. 4; pg. 33
(7) Lang, Larry H.P. and René M. Stulz, （1994）, "Tobin's q, Corporate Diversification, and Firm Performance," Journal of Political Economy, 102, 1248-1280.
(8) Lowe, H., 1990, “Shortcomings of Japanese consolidated financial statements”, Accounting Horizons (4), pp. 1-9.

(9) Mansi, Sattar A, and David M Reeb, 2002, “Corporate Diversification: What gets discounted?”, Journal of Finance, 57. 2167-2183.
(10) McConnell, John J., and Henri Servaes, 1990, “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value”, Journal of Financial Economics. Amsterdam:. Vol. 27, Iss. 2; p. 595
(11) Morck, Randall, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny, 1988, “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis ”,Journal of Financial Economics. Amsterdam: Jan/Mar 1988. Vol. 20, Iss. 1,2; p. 293
(12) Niskanen, J., J. Kinnunen, and E. Kasanen, 1998, “A note on the information content of parent company versus consolidated earnings in Finland”, European Accounting Review 7: 31–40.
(13) Shuto, A., 2005, Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases: “ A comparative analysis of consolidated earnings and parent-onlyearnings”. Working paper, Kobe University.
(14) Tobin, J., and W. Brainard, 1968, “Pitfalls in financial model buildind”. American Economic Review 58 : 99-122
(15) Wahal, S. and John J. McConnell (2000), “Do Institutional Investors Exacerbate Managerial Myopia?”Journal of Corporate Finance, 6, No. 3, pp.307-29.
(16) Yermack, David, 1996, Higher market valuation of companies a small board of directors, Journal of Financial Economics 40, 185-202.