跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.50) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/06/09 09:27
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:盧龍潤
研究生(外文):Lung-Jun Lu
論文名稱:彭博資訊系統市場每股盈餘預測的資訊內涵–台灣實證
論文名稱(外文):The Information Content of Bloomberg’s Consensus Forecast of Adjusted EPS – Evidence in Taiwan
指導教授:邱顯比邱顯比引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shean-Bii Chiu
口試委員:何耕宇莊文議
口試委員(外文):Keng-Yu HoWen-I Chuang
口試日期:2013-07-10
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:財務金融學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
語文別:英文
論文頁數:65
中文關鍵詞:資訊內涵彭博市場預測調整後每股盈餘異常報酬預測修正
外文關鍵詞:information contentBloombergconsensus forecastadjusted EPSabnormal returnsforecast revision
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:591
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
彭博是一個追蹤賣方分析師發布預測數字的即時資訊系統,也是市場參與者廣泛查閱的資訊平台。本論文檢視摩根史丹利資本國際台灣指數(MSCI Taiwan Index) 的成份股於2005至2012年在彭博資訊系統上市場預測的調整後每股盈餘的資訊內涵。相對於過去股票評等變動的研究,我們發現市場預測的調整後每股盈餘沒有避免向下修正的跡象,說明市場預測的調整後每股盈餘是較少偏誤也可能是較好且中性的分析師預測修正指標。

我們發現市場預測的調整後每股盈餘的預測修正在事件日及事件日隔日皆存在統計上顯著的資訊內涵,然而該預測修正似乎僅捕捉到資訊內涵的末端因為事件日之前的交易日總是產生較高的累積平均異常報酬。此外我們發現預測修正通常緊接著市場反轉的訊號,該訊號在預測上修時於事件日後三日內出現,預測下修時則於後六日內才出現,暗示市場反應好消息的速度快過壞消息面。就產業而言,非科技類股的市場反轉訊號又較科技類股至少晚一日出現。

我們也利用預測修正建立簡單的交易策略以顯示可能潛在的獲利,但是發現這些獲利很容易在計入合理的交易成本之後消逝。儘管如此,我們的結果有較高的信心在買進股票的策略上當預測修正幅度較大時與金融類股小幅度向上預測修正時(假設我們有足夠的交易成本折扣)。


A financial terminal that market participants refer to extensively, Bloomberg is a timely information system that tracks all forecasts issued by sell-side analysts. This paper examines the information content in the consensus forecast of adjusted EPS changes on the Bloomberg for constituents of MSCI Taiwan Index starting from 2005 to 2012. We document that there is no sign of downward revisions avoidance on consensus adjusted EPS as opposed to stock recommendations changes in past research. Our finding implies that consensus forecast of adjusted EPS are less biased and may be a better and neutral indicator of analysts’ forecast revision.

We also find statistically significant information content to exist in ex post consensus adjusted EPS revisions on the event day and the next day. However, such revision changes seems to simply capture the end of information content as trading days prior to the event day always yield higher cumulative average abnormal returns. Separately, we discover that the revisions are followed by market reverse signals. The reverse signals show up within 3 days for upward revisions and 6 days for downward revisions, thereby suggesting that the market exploits good news faster than bad news. In terms of industry level, the reverse signals in non-technology sector are at least one day later as compared to technology sector.

We also demonstrate potential profits from using a simple trading strategy based on the revision changes, but find that these profits could vanish easily after accounting for reasonable trading costs. Nonetheless, our findings note that there is higher confidence in buying share strategies for larger level of revision changes and small level of upward revision changes in financial sector, given that we had sufficient discount for transaction cost.


Chinese Abstract i
Abstract ii
Content iii
Figures iv
Tables vi
1. Introduction 1
2. Sample Description 8
3. Distribution of Changes in Earnings Revisions 11
4. Research Method 16
4.1 Event-time Analysis 16
4.2 Statistical testing 18
5. Empirical Findings 21
5.1 All samples – upward revisions 22
5.2 All samples – downward revisions 24
5.3 Summary – all samples 25
5.4 Industry Study 34
5.4.1 Technology 34
5.4.2 Non-technology 42
5.4.3 Financial 48
5.4.5 Summary – industry 48
6. Conclusion 53
Reference 56
Appendix 59

Asquith, Paul, Michael B. Mikhail and Andrea S. Au (2005), ‘Information Content of Equity Analyst Reports’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 75 Issue 2, pp. 245–282.

Brenner, Menachem (1979), ‘The Sensitivity of the Efficient Market Hypothesis to Alternative Specifications of the Market Model’, Journal of Finance, Vol. 34, pp. 915–929.

Chen, Xiaomeng (2010), ‘Australian Evidence on the Accuracy of Analysts'' Expectations – The Value of Consensus and Timeliness prior to the Earnings Announcement.’, Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 23 Issue 1, pp. 94–116.

Chih, Hsiang-Hsuan and Chun-I Shiao (2005), ‘The Information Content of Stock Recommendations: Comparing Domestic and Foreign Security Firms’, Review of Financial Risk Management, Vol. 1 Issue 3, pp. 27–45.

Chou, Han-Wen (2011), ‘The Value of Analyst Recommendations – Evidence in Taiwan’, National Taiwan University Master Thesis.

Christodoulakis, George, Konstantinos Stathopoulos and Nikolaos Tessaromatis (2012), ‘The Term Structure of Loss Preferences and Rationality in Analyst Earnings Forecasts’, Journal of Asset Management, Vol. 13 Issue 5, pp. 310–326.

Conrad, Jennifer, Bradford Cornell, Wayne R. Landsman and Brian R Rountree (2006), ‘How Do Analyst Recommendations Respond to Major News’, Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 41 Issue 1, pp. 25–49.

Du, Ning and John E. McEnroe (2011), ‘Are Multiple Analyst Earnings Forecasts Better Than the Single Forecast’, Journal of Behavioral Finance, Vol. 12, pp. 1–8.

Gift, Michael J., Paul Gift and YeQing Yang(2010), ‘Financial Market Reactions to Earnings Announcements and Earnings Forecast Revisions: Evidence from the U.S. and China’, International Journal of Business and Finance Research, Vol. 4, pp. 85–96.

Green, T. Clifton (2006), ‘The Value of Client Access to Analyst Recommendations’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 41 Issue 1, pp. 1–24.

Guttman, Ilan (2008), ‘The Timing of Analysts'' Earnings Forecasts’, The Accounting Review, Vol. 85, No. 2, pp.513–545.

Irvine, Paul, Marc Lipson and Andy Puckett (2007), ‘Tipping’, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 29 Issue 3, pp. 741–768.

Jegadeesh, Narasimhan, Joonghyuk Kim, Susan D. Krische and Charles M. C. Lee (2004), ‘Analyzing the Analysts: When Do Recommendations Add Value’, Journal of Finance, Vol. 59 Issue 3, pp. 1083–1124.

Kadous, Kathryn, Molly Mercer and Jane Thayer (2009), ‘Is There Safety in Numbers? The Effects of Forecast Accuracy and Forecast Boldness on Financial Analysts'' Credibility with Investors’, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p933-968.

Kao, Wu-Chung (2006), ‘Reliability of Foreign Brokerage Houses’ Research Reports and Their Impacts on the Stock Price Performance’, National Taiwan University Master Thesis.

Knill, April, Kristina Minnick, Ali Nejadmalayeri (2012), ‘Experience, Information Asymmetry, and Rational Forecast Bias’, Review of Quantitative Finance & Accounting, Vol. 39 Issue 2, pp. 241–272.

Lee, Suzanne S. (2012), ‘Jumps and Information Flow in Financial Markets’, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 25 Issue 2, pp. 439–479.

Li, Wen-Yuan (2010), ‘A Study on the Effect of Recommendations of Foreign Agencies on the Stock Market’, National Taiwan University Master Thesis.

Loh, Roger K. and Rene M. Stulz (2011), ‘When Are Analyst Recommendation Changes Influential’, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 24 Issue 2, pp. 593–627.

Malmendier, Ulrike and Devin Shanthikumar (2007), ‘Are Small Investors Naive about Incentives’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 85 Issue 2, pp. 457–489.

Mayew, William J. (2008), ‘Evidence of Management Discrimination among Analysts during Earnings Conference Calls’, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 46 Issue 3, p627–659.

Mola, Simona and Massimo Guidolin (2009), ‘Affiliated Mutual Funds and Analyst Optimism’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 93 Issue 1, pp. 108–137.

Okada, Katsuhiko (2013), ‘Can Investors in the Stock Market Generate Profit from the Analysts? -An Empirical Analysis of Analysts'' Signals Disseminated from the Bloomberg Terminal’, Working Paper, Kwansei Gakuin University Business School.

O''Neill, Michele, Minsup Song, Judith Swisher (2011), ‘How Does Prior Information Affect Analyst Forecast Herding’, Academy of Accounting & Financial Studies Journal, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p105-128.

Savor, Pavel G. (2012), ‘Stock Returns after Major Price Shocks: The Impact of Information’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 106 Issue 3, pp. 635–659.

Shen, Chung-Hua and Jan-Zan Lee (2000), ‘Application in Empirical Research of Accounting and Finance’, Hwatai Culture.

Sorescu, Sorin and Avanidhar Subrahmanyam (2006), ‘The Cross Section of Analyst Recommendations’, Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 41 Issue 1, pp. 139–168.

Tetlock, Paul C., Maytal Saar-Tsechansky and Sofus Macskassy (2008), ‘More Than Words: Quantifying Language to Measure Firms'' Fundamentals’, Journal of Finance, Vol. 63 Issue 3, p1437–1467.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊