跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.152) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/05 09:49
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:韓光宗
研究生(外文):Kuangt-Tsung Han
論文名稱:知識分享意圖之研究-以高雄市高中職軍訓教官為例
論文名稱(外文):A study on knowledge sharing intention — An example of Kaohsiung city military instructors in senior high school
指導教授:梁鐿徽梁鐿徽引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yi-Hui Liang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:義守大學
系所名稱:資訊管理學系碩士在職專班
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:67
中文關鍵詞:信任關係組織承諾知識分享意圖期望報酬
外文關鍵詞:Knowledge Share IntentionOrganizational CommitmentExpected ReturnTrusting Relationship
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:579
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
企業面臨經濟全球化及知識化快速發展的環境,唯有不斷的創新、追求更佳的績效,才能保有競爭優勢。創新策略的實行,必須透過知識管理活動,讓組織有系統地獲得、創造及整合知識資源,而知識所創造的價值在於分享,唯有分享知識才能對組織產生真正價值,提高組織競爭力。
知識管理可說是從知識分享開始,組織推動知識管理的最大障礙在此,最終能獲成功的關鍵也在此。既然推動知識分享是如此的重要及困難,於是如何引發組織成員產生知識分享的意圖,並促進知識分享行為,最後達到知識分享的成效,成為一個相當重要且值得深入探討的議題。然而,知識分享行為與人類的本性相違背,成員會擔心自身所擁有的專業知識與他人分享後,會威脅到自己在組織中的地位,因而造成分享意願不高,使許多組織的知識管理策略最終都成為失敗案例。究其原因除這些組織過於倚重資訊科技,而忽略了成員的態度亦是影響分享行為中重要的關鍵因素之一。
本研究主要在探討影響知識分享意圖相關因素,先以文獻探討取得相關理論依據後,提出組織承諾、信任關係及期望報酬三個影響因素,並以高雄市高中職軍訓教官為研究對象,探討這些因素與個人「知識分享態度」之間的關係,並檢驗「知識分享態度」對於「知識分享意圖」之影響。
本研究採用便利抽樣法進行研究樣本的抽取,總共發出326份問卷,回收有效問卷276份,問卷回收率為85%。本研究資料經過多變量分析方法,以驗證各研究構面的影響關係。問卷資料經過分析後得到以下結論:
ㄧ、個人對知識分享的組織承諾,對知識分享態度無顯著的影響。
二、個人對知識分享的信任關係,對知識分享態度有顯著的影響。
三、個人對知識分享的期望報酬,對知識分享態度無顯著的影響。
四、個人的知識分享態度,對知識分享意圖有顯著的影響。
Enterprises are faced with the rapid economic globalization and knowledge-based development environment, the only constant innovation and the pursuit of better performance, in order to maintain competitive advantage. Implementation of innovative strategies must be through the knowledge management activities, enabling organizations to systematically acquire, create and integrate knowledge resources,and knowledge is to share the value created, only the sharing of knowledge to produce real value to the organization to improve organizational competitiveness.
The knowledge management may say that is starts from the knowledge share, the organization promotes the knowledge management the biggest barrier here, to be able to attain the successful key finally also in this. Since the promotion of knowledge sharing is so important but also so difficult, therefore how to initiate organizes the member to have the knowledge share intention, and promotes the knowledge share behavior, finally achieves the knowledge share the result, becomes one quite importantly, and is worth the subject which discusses thoroughly. However, the knowledge sharing behavior and contrary to human nature, fear for their members will have expertise to share with others, it will threaten their position in the organization, resulting willingness to share is not high, so many organizations, knowledge management strategy has become failures. One of the reasons, in addition to these organizations rely too heavily on information technology, while ignoring the attitude of the members, but also affect the sharing behavior in important key factor.
This research mainly in the discussion influence knowledge share intention correlation factor, first obtains the correlation theories basis after the literature discussion, proposed that the organizational commitment , the trusting relationship and the expected return three influencing factors, and take the Kaohsiung city military instructors in senior high school as the objects of study, discusses these factors with individual “the knowledge share manner” between relations, and examines “the knowledge share manner” regarding “the knowledge share intention” the influence.
This research used convenience sampling methods of sample extraction, a total of 326 questionnaires sent, 276 valid questionnaires, the questionnaire return rate was 85%. After this study, multivariate data analysis methods to verify the dimensions of the research relationship. After analyzing the questionnaire data obtained the following conclusions:
The organization commitment and the expected return to the knowledge share manner is not remarkable influence. The trusting relationship to the knowledge share manner is remarkable influence. The knowledge share manner will have to the knowledge share intention remarkable influence.
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景1
第二節 研究動機2
第三節 研究目的4
第四節 研究範圍5
第五節 研究流程6
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 知識與知識管理7
第二節 知識分享13
第三節 理性行為理論理17
第四節 知識分享的影響因素20
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構30
第二節 研究假設31
第三節 問卷題項設計發展34
第四節 研究對象及資料蒐集39
第四章 資料分析
第一節 研究前測分析40
第二節 樣本結構分析41
第三節 信度與效度43
第四節 結構方程式結果分析44
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 研究結論45
第二節 研究建議48
參考文獻
中文部分50
英文部分51
附錄
附錄A 問卷調查內容57
表次
表1-1 研究範圍5
表3-1 組織承諾之衡量問項35
表3-2 信任關係之衡量問項36
表3-3 期望報酬之衡量問項37
表3-4 知識分享態度量問項37
表3-5 知識分享意圖之衡量問項38
表4-1 前測樣本資料信度整理40
表4-2 樣本基本資料描述41
表4-3 正式問卷資料信度整理43
表4-4 假說及驗證分析結果44
圖次
圖1-1 研究流程7
圖2-1 資料、資訊、知識和智慧關係圖9
圖2-2 知識管理活動12
圖2-3 知識轉換的模式15
圖2-4 理性行為理論架構17
圖2-5 期望理論之簡化模型28
圖3-1 研究架構30
圖4-1 結構方程式因徑係數結果分析44
圖4-2 結構方程式t 値結果分析44
中文部份
[1]宋鎧、黃俊宇(2007)。維基百科知識分享現象之研究。國立中央大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
[2]宋曦光(1989)。組織承諾對組織效能的影響-以高科技廠商為實證研究的對象。交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
[3]林月盛(2003)。國民中學教改壓力、組織衝突、權力運用與組織承諾關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系,未出版之博士論文。
[4]林素真、林麗娟、方世杰、陳建智(2009)。以期望理論觀點探討部落格互動行為與滿足。資訊社會研究,第16期,33–55頁。
[5]林東清(2003)。知識管理。台北:智勝文化。
[6]林東清(2008)。資訊管理─e化企業的核心競爭能力。台北:智勝文化。
[7]林鉦棽(1996)。組織公正、信任、組織公民行為之研究:社會交換理論之觀點。管理學報,第13卷,第6期:391–415頁。
[8]林鉦棽、蕭淑月、何慧清(2005)。社會交換理論觀點下組織支持、組織知識分享行為與組織公民行為相關因素之研究:以信任與關係為分析切入點。人力資源管理學報,第5卷,第1期,77–110頁。
[9]范熾文(2002)。國小校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所,未出版之博士論文。
[10]范熾文(2004)。國小教師組織承諾與學校組織績效關係之研究。教育研究資訊,12卷,第1期,29–48頁。
[11]徐楊順(2001)。知識分享意願、組織公平與信任關係之研究。朝陽科技大學企業管理研究所,未出版碩士論文。
[12]陳進江(2004)。組織正義、信任與知識分享行為關係之研究─以台灣高科技產業研發部門為例。真理大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
[13]曾南薰(1998)。我國教師組織承諾之整合分析。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
[14]粟四維、莊友豪(2010)。虛擬社群成員知識分享意圖探討。資訊管理學報第十七卷,第三期,181–203頁。
[15]黃國忠、王俊翔(2009)。信任關係、工作滿足、知識分享與組織創新關係之研究—以新竹地區資訊業者為例。南華大學企業管理系管理科學碩士論文。
[16]勤業管理顧問公司(2000)著。知識管理的第一本書(劉京偉譯)。台北:商周出版。
[17]劉春榮(1993)。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士學位論文。
[18]劉常勇(2000)。知識管理網站,http://www.cme.org.tw/know。
[19]鄭仁偉、黎士群(2001)。組織公平、信任與知識分享行為之關係性研究。人力資源管理學報,1卷,第2期,69–85頁。
[20]蘇永富(2001)。轉換型領導、組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究–以派外人員為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
[21]David J.Skyrme(2001)著。知識商務(胡瑋珊2002譯)。台北:中國生產力中心。
[22]Housel T. & Bell A.H.(2002)。知識管理:理論、評估與應用(李書政譯)。台北:麥格羅希爾。
英文部份
[1]Ajzen,I. & Fishbein,M.(1975), Belief,attitude,intention,and behavior:An introduction to theory and research. Reading,MA:Addison-Wwsley.
[2]Ajzen,I. & Fishbein,M.(1980),Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior.Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice-Hall.
[3]Armbrecht, F., Jr., Richard B., Chapas, Cecil C. Chappelow, Farris, Georage F., Friga, Paul N.,Hartz, Cynthia A., Mcilvaine, McIlvaine, M. Elizabeth, Postle, Stephen R., and Whitwell, George E.(2001). Knowledge Management in Research and Development. Research Technology Management,.44(2),28–48.
[4]Blau, P. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York:Wiley J.
[5]Bock G.W, Zmud R.W, Kim Y.G & Lee J.N.(2005).Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological factors, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly 29(1), 87–111.
[6]Bock, G. W. & Kim, Y. G.( 2002). Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 15 (2), 14–21.
[7]Bowman, B. J.(2002).Building knowledge management systems. Information Systems Management, 19(3), 32–40.
[8]Buchanan, B.II.(1974).Building organizational commitment: The social of mangers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(3): 533–546.
[9]Cook, J. & Wall, T. D.(1980).New Work Attitudes Measures of Trust. Organizational Commitment and Personal Need Non-Fulfillment. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 53(1)39–52.
[10]Davenport, T. (1997).Ten Principles of Knowledge Management and Four Case Studies. Knowledge and Process Management, 4(3),187–208.
[11]Davenport,T. H. and Prusak, L.(1998).Working Knowledge: how organizations manage what they know, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
[12]David Skyrme Associates(2001). Knowledge management assessment: a practical tool from David Skyrme Associates. From. http://www/skyrme.com.
[13]Dirks,K.T.(1999).The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 445–455.
[14]Droege,S.B.,Anderson,J.R., & Bowler, M.(2003).Trust and Organizational Information Flow. Journal of Business and Management, 9(1), 45–59.
[15]Drucker, P. F.(1965). Is business letting young people down?, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
[16]Drucker,P.F.(1999).Knowledge-Worker Productivity:The Biggest Challenge. California Management Review, 41(2), 79–94.
[17]Galford,R. & Drapeau, A.S.(2003).The enemies of trust. Harvard Business Review, 81(2), 88–95.
[18]Hall,H.(2001).Input-friendliness: Motivating Knowledge Sharing Across Intranets. Journal of Information Science, 27(3), 139–146.
[19]Hendriks, P. (1999).Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on Motivation for Knowledge Sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91–100.
[20]Homans,G.C.(1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.
[21]Jarvenpaa,S.L. & Staples,D.S.(2001).Exploring Perceptions of Organizational Ownership of Information and Expertise. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 151–183.
[22]Jones,G.R.,& George,J.M.(1998). The Experience and Evolution of Trust: Implications for Cooperation and Teamwork. Academy of Management Review,23(3),531–546.
[23]Kankanhalli,A.,Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. K. (2005).Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29 (1), 113–143.
[24]Kantor,R.M.(1968). Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in ,Utopian communities. Americal Sociological Review,33(3): 499–517.
[25]Kim,W.C. & Mauborgne, R.A.(1998).Procedural Justice, Strategic Decision Making, and the Knowledge Economy. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 323–338.
[26]Kolekofski Jr.,K.E. & Heminger,A. R.(2003). Beliefs and attitudes affecting intentions to share information in an organizational setting. Information & Management, 40, 521–532.
[27]Lewis,J.D.,&Weigert,A.(1985). Trust as a Social Reality, Social Force, 63(4),967–985.
[28]Liebowitz,J., & Chen,Y.(2001). Developing knowledge-sharing proficiencies. Knowledge Management Review, 3, 12–15.
[29]Madhok,A.(1995). Revisiting Multinational Firm’s Tolerance For Joint Ventures: a Trust Based Approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(1), 117–137.
[30]Mayer,R.C., Davis,J.H. & Schoorman,F.D.(1995).An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
[31]McCauley, D., & Kuhnert, K.(1992). A theoretical review and empirical investigation of employee trust in management. Public Administration Quarterly, 16, 265–265.
[32]McKnight, D.H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L.(1998). Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 472–490.
[33]Mowday, R. T., Steer, R. M. & Porter, L. M. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 223–247.
[34]Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.M. & Steers, R.M.(1982). Employee-Organizational Linkage. New York, Academic Press.
[35]Nelson, K. & Cooprider, J.(1996). The Contribution of Shared Knowledge to IS Group Performance. MIS Quarterly (20:4) December, 409–429.
[36]Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H.(1995).The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press , New York.
[37]O’Reilly, C.A., Chatman, J.A., & Anderson, J.C. (1987). Message Flow and Decision Making. Handbook of Organizational Communication: An nterdisciplinary Perspective (F. Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts, & L.Porter). Newbury Park: SAGE Publications,600–623.
[38]Rempel,J.K., Holmes,J.G., & Zanna, M.P.(1985). Trust in Close Relationships”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,49(1), 95–112.
[39]Robbins, S. P.( 2001). Organizational Behavior, 9th Ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
[40]Schein, E. H. (1996). Three cultures of management: The key toorganizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 9–21.
[41]Senge, P. (1997). Sharing Knowledge. Executive Excellence. 14 (11), 17–18.
[42]Sheldon,M.E.(1971). Investment and involvement as mechanisms producing commitment to the organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(2), 143–150.
[43]Skinner, B. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
[44]Stauffer, D. (1999). Why people hoard knowledge. Across the board, ,36(8), pp.16-21.
[45]Van den Hooff,B. & De Ridder,J.A.(2004). Knowledge sharing in context: The influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Managemen,. 8/6, 117–130.
[46]Vroom,V.H.(1964).Work and Motivation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[47]Whitener,E.M., Brodt,S.E., Korsgaard,M.A & Werner,J.M.(1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 513–530.
[48]Yang, J.T., & Wan, C.S.(2004). Advancing organizational effectiveness and knowledge management implementation. Tourism Management,25(5),593–601.
[49]Zack, M.(1999). Developing a Knowledge Strategy. California Management Review, 41(3), spring, 125–143.
電子全文 電子全文(本篇電子全文限研究生所屬學校校內系統及IP範圍內開放)
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top