臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

對於一家以製造為本業的企業而言，採購生產設備的成本是企業總生產成本最主要的來源之一。優良的採購管理係期望採購之各項生產設備及原物料能於企業預計時間內送達，且符合企業既定品質、數量及價格、配合生產作業達成企業營運目標。如時間延誤或數量不足影響生產線之排程進行，生產成本過高則增加企業營運成本，品質不良會造成生產過程中不良品的產生。在同一類型的生產設備產品可能有兩家以上的供應商的提供。因此在採購管理中，如何慎選合適供應商的生產設備產品即顯得非常重要。本研究係以整體顧客知覺價值(Customer Perceived Value)與系統整體績效(System’s Overall Performance)作為研究架構的基礎，從企業效益及成本和生產設備的效率多方面來探討，綜合採購、生產、研發、工程、財務和設備單位人員的觀點，來購買生產設備，使其能夠購買最符合企業需求的生產設備。研究中採用層級分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)為決策分析模式，並建立一套評選決策標準，期使能縮短群體決策時間，增進執行效率，並提供企業作為參考。

For a manufacturing-based industry to businesses, the cost of procurement of production equipment is the total cost of production enterprises of the most important sources. Expectations of good procurement management system of procurement of raw materials, production equipment and estimated time to be served within the enterprise and are consistent with the established quality, quantity and price, with production operations to achieve corporate business objectives. Such as time delay or lack of impact on the number of scheduling the production line, high production costs while increasing business operating costs, poor quality will result in the production process in the production of defective products. In the same type of equipment may have two or more products suppliers provide. Therefore, procurement management, how to carefully choose the right supplier of production equipment product that is very important. In this study, the Customer Perceived Value and System's Overall Performance as a research-based foundation, and corporate efficiency and cost efficiency of production equipment to explore various aspects, integrated procurement, production, research and development, engineering, finance and equipment unit's point of view, to purchase equipment to enable them to best meet the business needs to purchase production equipment. Study used Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) to decision analysis model, and establish a set of selection criteria decision making, group decision-making stage to shorten the time to improve execution efficiency and provide enterprises as reference.

摘要 ii
目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
圖目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機與目的 2
1.3 研究範圍 4
1.4 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 6
2.1 供應鏈管理相關文獻 6
2.2 層級分析法 (Analytical Hierarchy Process) 7
2.3 顧客知覺價值 8
2.4 系統整體的績效 13
第三章 研究方法 15
3.1 研究流程 15
3.2 顧客知覺價值模型 15
3.3 AHP 變數定義 16
3.4 AHP 分析架構建立 18
3.5 系統整體績效 23
3.5.1 生產能力績效 24
3.5.2 可用度績效 24
第四章 研究結果與分析 26
4.1 顧客知覺價值結果 27
4.2 生產設備的評選 29
4.3 系統整體績效 30
4.3.1 系統整體績效結果 33
第五章 結論與建議 35
參考文獻 37

1. 王小潘(2005)。多準則決策分析，滄海書局。
2. 林於杏、呂明男(2008)。VMI供應商評選模式之建立-以半導體氣體分析儀器商為例，明新學報，第三十四卷第一期，227-246。
3. 洪新原、游寶達、王俊程、黃士銘、古政元、張嘉銘(2002)。應用差異理論來評估學員訓練績效之研究：以商業電子化人才培訓計畫為例，資訊管理學報，第九卷專刊期，143-162。
4. 陳光榮(1996)。企業的社會責任與倫理，經濟情勢暨評論季刊，第一卷第四期，150-158。
5. 陳月香、王天津(2005)。建立模糊決策支援系統－以供應商選擇策略為例，管理與系統，第十二卷第一期，117-131。
6. 許振邦、社團法人中華採購與供應管理協會(2007)。採購與供應管理，智勝文化事業有限公司。
7. 顏榮祥、張子明(2005)。整合灰關聯分析與層級分析法在供應商評選之應用研究，運籌研究集刊，第一期，15-42。

1. Parasuraman. A, Berry. L. L, and Zeitbaml. V. A. (1991). Understanding Customer Expectation of Service. Sloan Management Review. 39-48.
2. Muralidharan. C, Anantharaman. N, and Deshmukh. S.G. (2002). A Multi-Criteria Group Decision-making Model for Supplier Rating. The Journal of Supply Chain Management. 22-33.
3. Garvin. D. A. (1987). Competing on the Eight Dimensions of Quality. Harvard Business Review. 65(6). 101-109.
4. James A. F., Mona J. F. (2009). Service Management. McGraw-Hill.
5. Dickson. G. W. (1966). An Analysis of Vender Selection Systems and Decisions. Journal of Purchasing. 5-17.
6. Chamodrakas. I., Batis. D., and Martakos. D. (2010). Supplier Selection in Electronic Marketplaces Using Satisfying and Fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications. 490-498.
7. Eti. M. C., Ogaji. S.O.T., and Probert. S. D. (2004). Implementing Total Productive Maintenance in Nigerian Manufacturing Industries. Applied Energy. 385-401.
8. Kotler. P., and Keller. K. (2008). Marketing Management. Prentice Hall.
9. Bridger. R. S. (1995). Introduction to Ergonomics. McGraw-Hill. 1-28.
10. David. S., Philip. K., and Edith. S. (2008). Designing and Managing the Supply Chain： Concepts, Strategies, and Case Studies 3e. McGraw-Hill.
11. Disney. S., and Towill. D. (2006). A methodology for benchmarking replenishment-induced bullwhip. Supply Chain Management： An International Journal. 160-168.
12. Saaty. T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarch Process. McGraw-Hill. 1980.