臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究探討靜態物體的非空間特徵屬性（顏色與本體）在位置負向促發裡扮演的角色。實驗一以少量的刺激重複呈現來增加刺激的激發量，提高干擾刺激的競爭力。結果顯示位置的正向以及負向促發效果。實驗二中，大量刺激作為材料使刺激的激發量低，降低干擾刺激的競爭力。結果顯示有位置正向但沒有負向促發效果。實驗三採用少量不同刺激，但偵測嘗試的刺激顏色與其促發嘗試的刺激顏色無關，結果顯示只有位置負向促發效果。綜合三個實驗結果顯示，本體與空間的處理可以是獨立的，本體的激發量會影響物體整體激發量。只有整體激發量高時，抑制機制才會啟動，並選擇性地作用於與作業相關的位置屬性，而非抑制物體的所有屬性。此外，當顏色與目標及干擾刺激無特定關連性，且偵測嘗試與促發嘗試裡的刺激顏色無對應關係時，只需要位置表徵的重複即可展現位置負向促發效果。物體的非空間特徵屬性在選擇處理的不同階段，影響位置的定位、選擇、及抑制，但不會影響其提取。

Using static displays, we investigated the role of non-spatial features in the location negative priming effect. Participants responded to the location of a pre-defined color while ignoring a distractor on screen. Identity was irrelevant to the task. A small set of stimuli was presented repetitively in Experiment 1 so that the activation of each stimulus identity was high and competition from the distractor was strong. Location positive and negative priming effects were observed. A large set of non-repeated stimuli was used in Experiment 2 to reduce the competition imposed by the distractor. Location negative priming was not found, although positive priming was still observed. Experiment 3 used a small set of repeated stimuli, but the target and the distractor colors were randomly defined in each trial while the stimulus colors in the probe trials were unrelated to those of the prime stimuli. Negative location effects were observed, but identity priming effects were not observed. The results showed that identity and location are processed independently. Strong competition based on the whole object including the task-irrelevant identity feature is important to activate the inhibitory mechanisms. Once instigated, inhibition operated selectively on the goal-relevant feature of location. Color, the task-defining feature for selection, influences how location is processed but is inessential in triggering the retrieval of location information.

目次
頁碼
前言-------------------------------------------------------------- 1
實驗一---------------------------------------------------------- 11
方法---------------------------------------------------------- 12
結果---------------------------------------------------------- 14
討論---------------------------------------------------------- 16
實驗二---------------------------------------------------------- 19
方法---------------------------------------------------------- 19
結果---------------------------------------------------------- 19
討論---------------------------------------------------------- 20
實驗三---------------------------------------------------------- 22
方法---------------------------------------------------------- 23
結果---------------------------------------------------------- 23
討論---------------------------------------------------------- 25
綜合討論 ------------------------------------------------------- 26
空間位置的定位、選擇、抑制與提取------------------------------ 27
本體表徵的處理與提取------------------------------------------ 29
無關訊息的影響------------------------------------------------ 29
參考文獻--------------------------------------------------------32
作者註---------------------------------------------------------- 39
圖表目次
頁碼
表一：實驗一各情況的平均正確率（％）與反應時間（毫秒）------------------40
表二：實驗二各情況的平均正確率（％）與反應時間（毫秒）------------------ 41
表三：實驗三各情況的平均正確率（％）與反應時間（毫秒）------------------42
附圖說明-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 43
圖一：七個位置配對情境與在實驗中所使用的刺激-反應配對
之示意圖。 T代表目標刺激，D代表干擾刺激------------------------- 44
圖二：三個實驗裡，中性本體脈絡裡的位置促發效果。只有當
刺激整體激發量高，才有顯著的位置負向促發效果----------------- 45

參考文獻
吳瑞屯、劉英茂（1987）。常用中文字、詞、與音節的出現次數計算。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（報告編號：NSC75-0301-H002-24）。
葉怡玉、黃金蘭、及趙軒甫（2000）。選擇注意力的彈性：位置與本體的交互作用。「中華心理學刊」，42，217-231。
Chao, H.-F., & Yeh, Y.-Y. (2004). Distractors of low activation can produce negative priming. Memory & Cognition, 32, 979-989.
Chao, H.-F. & Yeh, Y.-Y. (2005). Location negative priming in identity discrimination relies on location repetition. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(5), 789-801.
Chen, Z. (2005). Selective attention and the perception of an attended nontarget object. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1493–1509.
Chen, Z., & Cave, K. R. (2006). When Does Visual Attention Select All Features of a Distractor? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(6) 1452-1464
Christie J., & Klein, R. (2001). Negative priming for spatial location? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 24-38.
Connelly, S. L., & Hasher, L. (1993). Aging and the inhibition of spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1238-1250.
Connor, C. E., Preddie, D. C., Gallant, J. L., & Van Essen, D. C. (1997). Spatial attention effects in macaque area V4. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 3201–3214.
Driver, J. (1994). Object segmentation and visual neglect. Behavioral Brain Research, 71, 135-146.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
Duncan, J. (1996). Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and Performance IV: Information integration in perception and communication(pp. 549-578). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Duncan, J. (2001). An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex. Nature Review of Neuroscience, 2, 820-829.
Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performances, 11, 583-597.
Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2004). Attention is not selection: Dimensional gating in object- and space-based attention tasks. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, MN.
Fox, E. & de Fockert, J. W. (1998). Negative priming depends on prime-probe similarity: Evidence for episodic retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 107-113.
Heinke, D. & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Attention, spatial representation and visual neglect: Simulating emergent attention and spatial memory in the Selective Attention for Identification Model (SAIM). Psychological Review, 110, 29-87.
Hopf, J. M., Schoenfeld, M. A., & Heinze, H. J. (2005). The temporal flexibility of attentional selection in the visual cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 183-187.
Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216.
Hommel, B. (2002). Responding to object files: Automatic integration of spatial information revealed by stimulus-response compatibility effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 567-580.
Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2004). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition, 5, 483-521.
Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach, & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53-112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & R. Davies (Eds.) Varieties of Attention, pp.29- 61.
Kane, M. J., May, C. P., Hasher, L., Rahhal, T., & Stoltzfus, E. R. (1997). Dual mechanisms of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 632-650.
Kim, M. S., & Cave, K. R. (2001). Perceptual grouping via spatial selection in a focused-attention. Vision Research, 41, 611-634.
Kramer, A. F., & Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267-284.
Lamy, D., & Tsal, Y. (2001). On the status of location in visual attention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 305-342.
Liu, T., Stevens, S. T., & Carrasco, M. (2007). Comparing the time course and efficacy of spatial and feature-based attention. Vision Research, 47, 108-113.
Livingstone, M., Hubel, D. H. (1988). Segregation of form, colour, movement and depth: anatomy, physiology and perception, Science, 240, 740–750.
Lowe, D. (1998). Long-term positive and negative identity priming: Evidence for episodic retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 26, 435-443.
Lu, J., & Itti, L. (2005). Perceptual consequences of feature-based attention. Journal of Vision, 5(7):2, 622-631.
Luck, S. J., Fan, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (1993). Attention-related modulation of sensory-evoked brain activity in a visual search task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 188–195.
MacLeod, C. M., Chiappe, D. L., & Fox, E. (2002). The crucial roles of stimulus matching and stimulus identity in negative priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 521-528.
Malley, G. B., & Strayer, D. L. (1995). Effect of stimulus repetition on positive and negative identity priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 657-667.
Maunsell, J. H. R., & Treue, S. (2006). Feature-based attention in visual cortex. Trends in Neuroscience, 29, 317-322.
Merigan, W. H., & Maunsell, J. H. (1993). How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annual Review of Neuroscience, 16, 369-402.
Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., & Weaver, B. (1994). Negative priming in a spatial localization task: feature mismatching and distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 624-646.
Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., Houghton, G., & Lupiáñz, J. (2000). Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1280-1296.
Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1291–1305.
Neill, W. T., & Joordens, S. (2002). Negative priming and multiple repetition: A reply to Grison and Strayer. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 855-860.
Neill, W. T., & Mathis, K. M. (1998). Transfer-inappropriate processing: Negative priming and related phenomena. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 38, pp. 1–44). San Diego: Academic.
Neill, W. T., & Valdes, L. A. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 565–576.
Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., & Gorfein, D. S. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 993–1000.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quartely Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
Remington, R. W., & Folk, C. (2001). A Dissociation between Attention and Selection, Psychological Science, 12(6), 511 – 515.
Reynolds, J. H., & Chealzzi, L. (2004). Attentional modulation of visual processing, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 611-647.
Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: the state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1-46.
Schoenfeld, M. A., Tempelmann, C., Martinez, A., Hopf, J. M., Sattler, C., Heinze, H. J., & Hillyard, S. A., (2003). Dynamics of feature binding during object-selective attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 100(20), 11806-11811.
Sereno, A. B., & Amador, S. C. (2006). Attention and memory-related responses of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during spatial and shape-delayed match-to-sample tasks. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95(2), 1078-1098.
Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., & Albert, R. W. (2002). Negative priming and stimulus repetition: A reply to Neill and Joordens (2002). Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 861-865.
Strayer, D. L., & Grison, S. (1999). Negative identity priming is contingent on stimulus repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 24-38.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321-343.
Tipper, S. P., Meegan, D., & Howard, L. A. (2002). Action-centered negative priming: Evidence for selective inhibition. Visual Cognition, 9, 591-614.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Houghton, G. (1994). Behavioural goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 809-840.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Milliken, B. (1995). Spatial negative priming without mismatching: Comment on Park and Kanwisher (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1220-1229.
Treisman, A. (1988). Features and Objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries, Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 459-478.
Wong, K. E. (2000). Dissociative prime-probe contextual similarity effects on negative priming and repetition priming: A challenge to episodic retrieval as a unified account of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1411-1422.