臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

依據剩餘盈餘評價模型認為企業若是具有創造愈高剩餘盈餘的能力，其公司的內涵價值(intrinsic value)會愈高，本研究主要探討台灣股票市場上剩餘盈餘(Residual Earnings)與公司價值之間的關係，以驗證其與剩餘盈餘評價模式的觀點是否一致：高剩餘盈餘的公司其市場會給予較高的評價。本文利用等級排序相關係數法(Rank-order correlation coefficient )來檢定股價淨值比與剩餘盈餘排名之間是否呈現正向關係，並同時採用史比爾曼(Spearman)與肯爾德(Kendall)兩種統計方法進行檢定，結果發現在台灣股票市場上，股價淨值比與剩餘盈餘之間在統計上是呈現顯著的正向關係，同時為了確保我們的研究方法不會受到樣本選擇差異而失去解釋能力，本文亦同時探討成長型與價值型產業是否會對股價淨值比與剩餘盈餘的關係性產生影響，進而使其失去剩餘盈餘模型中所推估的正向關係，本研究結果發現股價淨值比與剩餘盈餘之間的正向關係不會因為其為成長型或是價值型產業而有所不同，也就是在不同產業特性下，股價淨值比與剩餘盈餘皆會呈現正向的關係，剩餘盈餘模型具有可靠性，不因樣本產業選取之差異而影響其解釋力，適用於台灣股票市場。

Based on residual earnings model, those companies could create higher residual earnings, their intrinsic value would be higher, and this study primarily investigates the relationship between residual earnings and company value in Taiwan stock market to proof that our result is consistent with residual earnings model. That is, the market would give companies higher valuation if they have higher residual earnings. Our research use rank-order correlation coefficient to test whether price book ratio and residual earnings are positively correlated, we use two statistics methods: Spearman and Kendall rank-order correlation coefficient to test. The results show us that price book ratio and residual earnings have significant positive correlation in Taiwan stock market. In order to ensure that our research on the relationship between price book ratio and residual earnings would not lose explanatory power by sample selection, our paper also investigate whether the relationship between price book ratio and residual earnings would be influenced by growth or value industry and let the original positive relation change. We find that the positive relation between price book ratio and residual earnings cannot be affected by belonging to growth or value industry. In other words, residual earnings model have reliability and is suitable for Taiwan capital market because its explanatory power would not be affected by different stock characteristics.

摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 v
圖目錄 vi
一、緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 研究流程與研究架構 3
二、文獻回顧 5
2.1 剩餘盈餘之相關文獻 5
2.2 綜合淨利之定義 9
2.3 成長型與價值型股票之比較 11
三、研究方法 13
3.1樣本選取標準與資料來源 13
3.1.1 樣本選取標準 13
3.1.2 資料來源 14
3.2 變數說明 14
3.3 研究假說 17
3.4 研究方法 18
3.4.1 Spearman等級相關性檢定 18
3.4.2 Kendall等級相關性檢定 20
四、實證結果與分析 21
4.1 樣本描述與敘述統計 21
4.2.1樣本敘述與敘述統計-以本益比分群 21
4.2.2樣本敘述與敘述統計-以股價淨值比分群 24
4.2.3產業樣本公司 27
4.2 實證結果分析 28
4.2.1 探討股價淨值比與剩餘盈餘的關係-以本益比分群 28
4.2.2 探討股價淨值比與剩餘盈餘的關係-以股價淨值比分群 31
4.2.3 敏感度分析-以本益比分群 33
4.2.4 敏感度分析-以股價淨值比分群 37
五、結論 42
參考文獻 43

Anthony, R., 1973, Accounting for the cost of equity, Harvard Business Review 51, 88-102.
Bauman, Conover, and Miller, 1998, Growth versus value and large-cap versus small-cap stocks in international markets, Financial Analysts Journal 75-89.
Canning, J., 1929. The economics of accoutancy. (New York).
Capual, C., Rowley, I. , and Sharpe, W., 1993, International value and growth stock returns, Financial Analysts Journal 49, 27-36.
Chan, Louis K. C., Hamao, Y., and Lakonishok, J., 1991, Fundamental and stock return in japan, Journal of Finance 46, 1739-1764.
Chen, S., and Dodd, J. , 1997, Economic value added: An empirical examination of a new corporate performance measure, Journal of Managerial Issues 9, 70-77.
Courteau, L., Kao, J., O'Keefe, T., and Richardson, G., 2006, Relative accuracy and predictive ability of direct valuation methods, price to aggregate earnings method and a hybrid approach, Accounting and Finance 46, 553-575.
Edey, H., 1957, Business valuation, goodwill and the super-profit method, Accountancy.
Edwards, E., and Bell, P., 1961, The theory and measurement of business income, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R., 1992, The cross-section of expected stock returns, Journal of Finance 47, 427-465.
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R., 1995, Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns, Journal of Finance 50, 131-155.
Feltham, G., and Ohlson, J., 1995, Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities, Contemporary Accounting Research 11, 689-731.
Francis, J., Olsson, P., and Oswald, D., 2000, Comparing the accuracy and explainability of dividend, free cash flow, and abnormal earnings equity value estimates, Journal of Accounting Research 38, 45-70.
Grant, J. L., 1996, Foundations of eva (tm) for investment managers - just in him, eva!, Journal of Portfolio Management 23, 41-48.
Griffin, J. M., and Lemmon, M. L., 2002, Book-to-market equity, distress risk, and stock returns, Journal of Finance 57, 2317-2336.
Kay, J., 1976, Accountants, too, could be happy in a golden age: The accountant's rate of profit and the internal rate of return, Oxford Economic Papers 28, 447-460.
Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W., 1994, Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk, Journal of Finance 49, 1541-1578.
Lehn, K., and Makhija, A. K. , 1996, Eva & mva: As performance measures and signals for strategic change, Planning Review 24, 34-38.
Marshall, A., 1890. Principles of economics (New York).
Myers, J., 1999, Implementing residual income valuation with linear information dynamics, The Accounting Review 74, 1-28.
O' Byrne, F., 1996, Eva and market value, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 9, 116-125.
Ohlson, J., 1995, Earnings, book value, and dividends in equity valuation, Contemporary Accounting Research 11, 661-687.
Peasnell, K., 1982, Some formal connections between economic values and yield and accounting numbers, Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting 9, 361-381.
Penman, S. H., 2001. Financial statement analysis and security valuation (Singapore).
Penman, S., and Sougiannis, T., 1998, A comparison of dividends in equity valuation, Contemporary Accounting Research 15, 343-384.
Preinreich, G., 1938, Annual survey of economic theory: The theory of depreciation., Econometrica 6, 219-241.
Solomons, D., 1965. Division performance: Measurement and control (New York).
Stern, J., 1993, E.V.A. Share options that maximize value, Corporate Finance 105, 31-32.
Stern, J. M. G., Donald, H., Stewart, B., and R., Chew J., 1996, EvaR：an integrated financial management system, European Financial Management 22, 223-245.
Stewart, G. BennettⅢ, 1990. The quest for value: A guide for senior managers (New York).
Tully, S., 1993, The real key to creating wealth, Fortune 128, 38-50.
吳啟銘, and 政大EMBA企業評價小組, 2005年, 臺 灣 五 十 eva 排 行, 會計研究月刊 第 230 期, 32-51.
張仲岳, and 邱士宗, 2000年, 經濟附加價值與公司股價之關聯性研究, 第九屆會計理論與實務研討會.
梁德榮, 周齊武, and 吳安妮, 2002年, 探 討 經 濟 附 加 價 值 (eva) 績 效 衡 量 在 台 灣 企業 中 的 有 用 及 可 行 性 （ 上 ）, 會計研究月刊 第 203 期, 113-121.
梁德榮, 周齊武, and 吳安妮, 2002年, 探 討 經 濟 附 加 價 值 (eva) 績 效 衡 量 在 台 灣 企業 中 的 有 用 及 可 行 性 （ 下 ）, 會計研究月刊 第 205 期, 110-118.
陳依蘋, 2005年, 從 eva 觀 點 看 企 業 價 值 提 昇 — 與 市 值 高 度 相 關 和 股 東 利 益 同步, 會計研究月刊 第 230 期, 28-31.
管玉儷, 2003年, 經濟附加價值、異常盈餘和異常現金流量與公司權益值之關聯性研究, 私立中原大學會計學系研究所碩士論文.
劉紀芬, 2001年, 穩健性原則對會計基礎評價模式之影響, 國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文.