臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

朝鮮半島由於地理位置特殊，在戰略上極具重要性，長久以來一直為列強覬覦爭奪之地。第二次世界大戰之後，朝鮮半島亦籠罩在兩極對峙的氣氛裡，首先是南北韓的分裂，而韓戰的發生，使美蘇在東亞地區的對抗局面更為激化，冷戰時期的朝鮮半島遂成為東亞地區內兩極對峙氣氛最為明顯的「火藥庫」，因而獲得「東方的巴爾幹」的稱號。隨著東歐變天、蘇聯瓦解，雖然冷戰時期的兩極對峙局面已不復見，國際瀰漫一片和解氣氛，然而東亞地區並未因此脫離冷戰的陰影，尤其是朝鮮半島的南北對抗依然持續、北韓引發的核武危機更使東亞地區陷入隨時可能爆發衝突的臨界點。由於朝鮮半島的局勢不僅攸關區域安全，亦與東亞列強間的權力平衡息息相關，後冷戰時期朝鮮半島已然成為國際關注的焦點，不論是區域傳統強權──美國與俄羅斯，抑或東亞新興的力量──中共與日本，皆極力爭取在朝鮮半島事務的發言權，一方面確保自身國家利益，另一方面更意圖在區域內發揮影響力，提升國際地位。
綜觀諸強權對朝鮮半島的政策，以美國最為大眾所知，各種期刊與學者論著足以證明美國影響之深度與廣度。中共與日本的參與和影響，亦有諸多學者研究，然而關於俄羅斯與朝鮮半島關係之研究卻少之又少。事實上俄羅斯在冷戰前後對於朝鮮半島的政策有相當幅度的變化，也是朝鮮半島穩定局勢的重大變數之一。從冷戰時期為與美國制衡、確保區域強權地位，極力與北韓維持密切關係，並刻意斷絕與南韓的接觸，到八０年代為求內部經濟發展，極力塑造周邊環境的穩定，開始與南韓接觸，乃至蘇聯解體後為求取經濟資源向南韓一面倒、以及1996年之後為維持在朝鮮半島的影響力而採取「等距離外交」，皆對朝鮮半島局勢產生相當程度的影響。基於意識型態與國家利益，對朝鮮半島所採取的政策因時而異，筆者欲就後冷戰時期俄羅斯的朝鮮半島政策作一番通盤整理，將莫斯科在朝鮮半島政策上的變化加以分析。
本文主要目標係探討後冷戰時期俄羅斯對朝鮮半島的政策，因此對於冷戰時期蘇聯對兩韓的政策著墨不多，僅以少部分篇幅對戈巴契夫主政前各蘇聯領導人的朝鮮半島政策作一番概述，提供讀者了解莫斯科當局在決定對兩韓政策時的歷史背景。筆者除了對葉爾欽時期俄羅斯對朝鮮半島的政策詳細加以整理與歸納之外，由於朝鮮半島的安全穩定攸關東亞區域的安全，並涉及周邊列強的國家利益，筆者認為在探究俄羅斯朝鮮半島政策時，亦須對美國、中共、日本的朝鮮半島政策有基本認知，因此亦以一個章節來討論列強在此地的競逐與制衡。俄羅斯長期以來為維持周邊環境的穩定，推動亞太安全不遺餘力，而朝鮮半島事務是當前俄羅斯最能發揮區域影響力的議題，本文亦將探討俄羅斯朝鮮半島政策對亞太安全的影響，諸如兩韓統一、核武問題皆在研究範圍之內。
本文共分七章，第一章為緒論，第二章先概述冷戰時期朝鮮半島的地緣政治與蘇聯的關係，並以蘇聯領導人作為區隔，就戈巴契夫主政前蘇聯與兩韓的關係加以探討。第三章分析戈巴契夫新思維對蘇聯亞太政策產生的衝擊，並分析朝鮮半島在戈氏新思維當中扮演的角色，此外更詳述戈巴契夫時期對朝鮮半島政策的調整。第四章為本論文的主要章節，筆者先就俄羅斯內部自蘇聯解體後持續進行的對外政策激辯過程加以概述，分析俄羅斯對外政策的重大變化，並探究朝鮮半島政策受到的影響，以及俄羅斯與南北韓關係的發展；其次筆者就俄羅斯1996年之後對朝鮮半島政策的調整過程加以分析，「等距離外交」的執行與障礙亦為研究重點。第五章係討論有關朝鮮半島周邊列強在此地的競逐與制衡，筆者分別就美國、中共與日本的朝鮮半島政策加以論述。第六章俄羅斯對兩韓統一與核武問題的立場有詳細說明，此外讀者亦可自本章得知俄羅斯朝鮮半島政策與亞太安全的關聯，第七章為結論。

Summary
Based on the specialty of its location, the Korean Peninsula has been extremely important on strategy, and the surrounding major powers have fought for it for a long time. After the World War II, the Korean Peninsula was also under the atmosphere of confrontation like other regions and the Korean War made the confronting situation more irrigated. Although the international society has been filled with reconciliation since the sudden change of Eastern Europe and the disintegration of the Soviet Union, East Asia didn’t get rid of the shadow of the Cold War. The situation of confrontation between North and South on the Korean Peninsula has still existed, and the nuclear crisis caused by DPRK made the East Asia Region involved in a critical point, at which various of conflicts would burst out at any time. The situation of the Korean Peninsula not only affects the regional security, but also concerns about the balance of power among the East Asian major powers. In the post-Cold War Era the Korean Peninsula has been an international focus, concerned by both the traditional regional powers, such as U.S.A. and Russian, and the new powers, such as PRC and Japan. All the surrounding nations are trying to have the floor in the Korean Peninsula affairs, not only to secure their own national interests, but also to produce a marked effect in the region and promote national status.
The intent of the thesis is trying to study Russia’s policy toward the Korean Peninsula in the post-Cold War Era. In order to introduce the historical background of Moscow’s policy making toward Korea, the thesis is classified into several parts according to various Kremlin leaderships. After a series of arrangement and analysis, we can find that Moscow’s policy toward the Korean Peninsula since 1945 has been influenced by the changes of the international environment, but also by the development of domestic politics and economy in Russia. In addition, the latter affects Moscow’s foreign policy in the post- Cold War Era much more than the former.
Based on the need of democratic policy and economic reform after the disintegration of Soviet Union in 1991, Russia decided to approach the West to get political and economic support. Therefore, getting along with ROK, which has democratic experience and strong economic capability, while cutting original ties with DPRK gradually, is the best choice for Moscow. As for ROK, Russia’s influence on DPRK can promote direct dialog between the two sides, and then secure the peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula. Under the consideration of economy and politics, Russia and ROK accordingly established formal diplomatic relations on September 30, 1991, and the bilateral relationships has been developed smoothly. On the other hand, based on the differences of political structure and economic system, Russia and DPRK have departed for a long distance.
Although Moscow insisted to develop full-scale relations with ROK without regarding to the objection of DPRK, the achievement of developing relations with ROK couldn’t fit the expectation of Russian people. The bare economic situation hadn’t been improved, and at the same time, Russians felt be treated as a debtor by ROK. Based on the poor economy and the declining nation status in the international society, Russia had been filled with a conservative atmosphere since 1993. The extreme complaint about the domestic and external affairs provoked the Communism and Nationalism, and the foreign policy inclining to the West suffered from fierce critics. Judging from the distribution of the Duma in 1993 and 1995, we can easily find the dramatic change of Russian domestic politics. To preserve national interest and dignity, Kremlin decided to change its policy toward the Korean Peninsula in 1996. The former policy inclining to ROK has been given up, and Moscow makes efforts to regain close relationships with DPRK while developing normal ties with ROK to maintain Russia’s importance and floor not only on the Korean Peninsula, but also in East Asia affairs. In addition, keeping in touch with DPRK and providing any possible assistance will prevent the sudden collapse of Pyongyang Government, which might result in dramatic turbulent in the region. In short, maintaining close ties with North and South at the same time not only promote peace and stability in the region, but also fit Russia’s national interests.

第一章　　緒論
　　第一節　　研究動機與目的..................................1
　　第二節　　研究方法與限制..................................2
　　第三節　　論文架構........................................3
第二章　　冷戰時期蘇聯的朝鮮半島政策
第一節 二次大戰結束後的東亞局勢與韓國的處境...............5
第二節 蘇聯的東亞政策與朝鮮半島地緣政治...................6
第三節 第二次世界大戰結束後蘇聯與南北韓的關係............11
第三章　　戈巴契夫時期蘇聯的朝鮮半島政策
第一節 戈巴契夫「新思維」與俄羅斯外交政策之轉變..........33
第二節 戈巴契夫初期蘇聯對朝鮮半島的政策..................42
第三節 蘇聯對兩韓政策之轉變..............................45
第四章　　葉爾欽時期的朝鮮半島政策
　　第一節　　蘇聯解體與俄羅斯對外政策大辯論.................69
第二節 「新東方政策」與朝鮮半島..........................74
第三節 俄國對兩韓的等距離外交............................96
第五章　　朝鮮半島周邊其他列強之角逐
　　第一節　　美國朝鮮半島政策……………………………………..131
　　第二節　　中共朝鮮半島政策……………………………………..145
　　第三節　　日本朝鮮半島政策……………………………………..161
第六章　　俄羅斯朝鮮半島政策與亞太安全
　　第一節　　俄羅斯對兩韓統一之看法………………………………175
　　第二節　　俄羅斯對核武問題之立場………………………………182
　　第三節　　俄國朝鮮半島政策對亞太安全之意義………………..192
第七章　　結論…………………………………………………………..213
參考書目……………………………………………………………………217

中文書籍
李明，南北韓政經發展與東北亞安全。台北：五南圖書出版公司，民國87年。
延上模君，蘇聯對南韓政策之研究：1985-1990。國立政治大學外交研究所碩士論文，民國81年7月。
姚金祥，中共對朝鮮半島外交政策轉變之分析。國立政治大學外交研究所碩士論文，民國83年9月。
畢英賢，蘇聯末期的對外關係。台北：黎明文化事業公司，民國81年9月。
畢英賢主編，俄羅斯。台北：國立政治大學國際關係研究中心，民國84年。
郭耀隆，蘇聯南韓關係正常化。淡江大學俄羅斯研究所碩士論文，民國83年6月。
黃薳玉，戈巴契夫的東北亞政策。國立政治大學外交研究所碩士論文，民國82年7月。
葉自成，俄羅斯政府與政治。台北：揚智文化事業股份有限公司，民國86年初版。
劉漢民，一九八０年代美國對朝鮮半島政策之研究。國立政治大學外交研究所碩士論文，民國81年8月。
劉德海，南韓對外關係。台北，民國86年。
潘世偉，投身亞太新合縱的韓國。台北：五南圖書出版有限公司，民國82年。
中文期刊
丁宗裕，「北韓為何能在朝鮮半島興風作浪」，共黨問題研究，第12卷第7期，頁42- 54。
丁宗裕，「金日成死後對朝鮮半島情勢觀察」，共黨問題研究，第12卷第10期， 頁74- 85。
于美華，「朝鮮半島形式與中國政策分析」，現代國際關係，1996年第10期，頁34- 38。
于美華，「新時期美日俄對朝鮮半島政策特點及其走勢」，現代國際關係，1997年第1期，頁32- 35。
孔其道，「縱論圖們江國際開發計劃前景」，大陸經濟研究，民國81年7月，頁17-19。
王承宗，「俄羅斯經濟改革現況」，問題與研究，第33卷，第7期，民國83年7月，頁11-27。
王承宗，「前蘇聯與俄羅斯對朝鮮半島政策之研究」，問題與研究，第38卷，第1期，民國88年1月，頁17- 32。
王純銀，「朝鮮半島安全形式展望」，現代國際關係，1996年，第6期，頁10- 12。
王喬保，「四方會談與朝鮮半島局勢」，外國問題研究(長春)，1996年3月，頁28- 31。
朱松柏，「金日成猝逝與朝鮮半島局勢」，問題與研究，民國83年9月，第33卷第9期，頁15- 27。
朱松柏，「美國與北韓簽訂核子協議及其影響」，問題與研究，民國84年1月，第34卷第1期，頁11- 18。
朱松柏，「朝鮮半島四邊會談的構想與實際」，問題與研究，民國86年8月，第36卷第8期，頁19- 28。
朱松柏，「朝鮮半島的核武危機」，問題與研究，民國83年7月，第33卷第7期，頁1- 10。
朱松柏，「韓國與蘇聯的政經關係」，問題與研究，第30卷，第6期，民國80年6月，頁20。
宋魁，「90年代東北亞經濟的回顧與展望」，東北亞論壇，1996年第3期，頁16。
李巧石，「戈巴契夫在克拉斯諾亞爾斯克演說摘要」，問題與研究，第28卷第2期，民國77年11月，頁81。
李忠誠，「俄羅斯強化新東方政策」，現代國際關係，1996年第4期，頁13- 17, 38。
李明，「北韓領導權轉移和兩韓關係」，問題與研究，民國84年2月，第34卷第2期，頁32- 41。
茆訓城，「朝鮮半島局勢的反覆及其原因」，上海師範大學學報，1996年3月，頁100- 102。
馬仲可，「北韓退出防止核武器擴散條約和朝鮮半島的核問題」，問題與研究，第32卷，第6期，民國82年6月，頁40。
張玉山，「論朝鮮經濟政策的變化」，社會科學戰線(長春)，1996年4月，頁75-79。
畢英賢，「俄羅斯共黨概況與發展」，問題與研究，第34卷，第4期，民國84年4月，頁1- 11。
畢英賢，「俄羅斯的亞太政策及其可能扮演的角色」，問題與研究，民國85年12月第34 卷，第12期，頁24- 34。
畢英賢，「俄羅斯的新國會與新政府」，問題與研究，第33卷，第3期，民國83年3月，頁1- 10。
畢英賢，「俄羅斯國會改選之研析」，問題與研究，第35卷，第4期，民國85年4月，頁28- 40。
許湘濤，「俄羅斯的政治發展1990-1996」，問題與研究，第35卷，第12期，民國85年12月，頁29- 58。
郭武平，「俄羅斯總統選情探析」，問題與研究，第35卷，第5期，民國85年5月，頁53- 62。
陸俊元，「朝鮮半島的地緣戰略特徵」，外國問題研究(長春)，1996年2月，頁6- 9。
趙龍庚，「俄羅斯當前政治形勢的特點及走向」，現代國際關係，1997年第2期，頁17- 22。
劉德海，「九０年代中共的朝鮮半島政策與兩韓研究」，韓國學報，第13期，84年6月，頁183- 204。
蔣莉，「葉爾欽亟待解決的難題及對策」，現代國際關係，1997年第2期，頁23- 25。
戰旭英，「俄羅斯與東北亞的新秩序」，濟南發展論壇，1996年4月，頁38- 41。
中文報紙
中國時報
聯合報
中央日報
文匯報
人民日報
青島日報
明報
大公報
英文書籍
Cho, Myung Hyun. Korea and the Major Powers. Seoul: The Research Center for Peace and Unification of Korea, 1989.
Chung, Ching O. Pyongyang between Peking and Moscow: North Korea’s Involvement in the Sino-Soviet Dispute, 1958-1975. Alabama: University of Alabama Press, 1978.
Chung, Il Yung. Korea in a Turbulent World. Seoul: The Sejong Institute, 1992.
Clough, Ralph N. Embattled Korea: the Rivalry for International Support. Boulder:Westview Press, 1987.
Curtis, Geald L., ed. Japan’s Foreign Policy after the Cold War: Coping with Change. New York: The East Asian Institute of the Columbia University, by M E. Sharp, Inc. 1993.
Donald, Robert H., ed. The Soviet Union in the Third World: Successes and Failures. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1981.
Eberstadt, Nicholas. Korea Approaches Reunification. New York: The National Bureau of Asian Research, 1995.
Ellison, Herbert J. The Soviet Union and Northeast Asia. New York: University Press of America, 1989.
Foster, Richard D. et al. eds. Strategy and Security in Northeast Asia. New York: Crane, Russak & Co., 1979.
Henriksen, Thomas H. and Jongryn Mo, eds. North Korea after Kim Il Sung: Continuty or Change? California: Hoover Institute Press, 1997.
Hirsch, Steve, ed. Soviet Examine Foreign Policy for a New Decade. Washington D. C.: The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., 1991.
Jacobsen, Carl G., ed. Soviet Foreign Policy. Macmillan: Macmillan Press LTD, 1989.
Johnson, Teresa Pelton and Steven E. Miller, eds. Russian Security after the Cold War: Seven Points from Moscow. Washington: Brassey’s, Center for Science and International Affairs, 1994.
Kanet, Roger E and Alexander V. Kozhemiakin, eds. The Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation. New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc., 1997.
Kihl, Young Whan, ed. Korea and the World: Beyond the Cold War. Boulder: Westview Press, 1994.
──────────. Korea and the World. Boulder: Westview Press, 1994.
Kim, Gye-Dong. Foreign Intervention in Korea. Brookfield USA: Dartmouth, 1993.
Kubalkova, V. and A. A. Cruickshank. Thinking New about Soviet “New Thinking”. California: Institute of International Studies, 1989.
Kwak, Tae-Hwan, ed. The Two Koreas in World Politics. Seoul: Kyungnam University Press, 1983.
Laird, Robbin F., ed. Soviet Foreign Policy. New York: The Academy of Political Science, 1987.
Lee, Chung Min. The Emerging Strategic Balance in Northeast Asia. Seoul: Research Center for Peace and Unification of Korea, 1989.
Lee, Manwoo and Richard W. Mansbach, eds. The Changing Order in Northeast Asia and the Korean Peninsula. Seoul: The Institute for Far Eastern Studies, Kyungman University, 1993.
Malcilm, Neil and Alex Pravda. Internal Factors in Russian Foreign Policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Mazarr, Michael J.and John Q. Blogett, eds. Korea 1991: The Road to Peace. Boulder: Westview Press, 1991.
Oberdorfer, Don. The Two Koreas: A Contemporary History. Massachusetts: Addison- Wesley, 1997.
Park, Jae Kyu and Joseph M. Ha, eds. The Soviet Union and East Asia in the 1980’s. Seoul: Kyungnam University Press, 1983.
Rubinstein, Alvin Z. Soviet Foreign Policy since World War II: Imperial and Global. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1985.
Rudolph, Philip. North Korea’s Political and Economic Structure. New York: Institute of Pacific Relations, 1959.
Sanford, Dan C. South Korea and the Socialist Countries: The Politics of Trade. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1990.
Scalapino, Robert A. and Hongkoo Lee, eds. North Korea in a Regional and Global Context. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, 1986.
Shulman, Marshall D., ed. East-West Tensions in the Third World. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1986.
Source Materials on Soviet Relations with the Korean Peninsula, 1986-1991. Seoul: Sejong Institute, 1991.
Soviet Capabilities in the Pacific. Washington, D.C.: Technical Service Division, Intelligence Center Pacific, 1989.
United States Institute of Peace. United States Institute of Peace Special Report. Washington, D.C., 1996.
Wu, Jaushieh Joweph, ed. Divided Nations: The Experience of Germany, Korea, and China. Taipei: Institute of International Relations of Chengchi University, 1995.
Zwick, Peter. Soviet Foreign Relations: Process and Policy. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1990.
英文期刊
Ahn, Byung-Joon. “South Korean-Soviet Relations: Issues and Prospects,” Korea and World Affairs, vol. 14, no. 4, Winter 1990, pp. 680- 694.
Akaha, Tsuneo. “Russia and Asia in 1995,” Asian Survey, vol. XXXVI, no. 1, January 1996, pp. 100- 108.
Bazhanov, Eugene and Natasha Bazhanov. “Russia and Asia in 1993,” Asian Survey, vol. 39, no. 1, January 1994, pp. 87- 97.
Blank, Stephen. “Diplomacy at an Impasse: Russia and Japan in a New Asia,” The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, vol. V, no. 1, Summer 1993, pp. 141- 164.
Blank, Stphen. “Russian Policy and the Changing Korean Question,” Asian Survey, vol.XXXV, no. 8, August 1995, pp. 711- 725.
Brown, Eugene. “Japanese Security Policy in the Post-Cold War Era,” Asian Survey, vol. XXXIV, no. 5, pp. 430- 446.
Buszynski, Leszek. “Russia and the Asia-Pacific Region”, Pacific Affairs, vol. 65, no. 4, Winter 1992-1993, pp. 486- 509.
Cha, Victor D. “Engaging China: Seoul-Beijing Detente and Korean Security,” Survival, vol. 41, no 1, Spring 1999, pp. 73- 98.
Cronin, Richard P. “The United States and Asia in 1994,” Asian Survey, vol. XXXV, no. 1, January 1995, pp. 111- 125.
Crow, Suzanne. “Soviet-South Korean Rapprochement,” Radio Liberty Report on the USSR, vol. 2, no. 25, June 15, 1990, pp. 10- 21.
Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press, vol. XIIV, no. 41, November 11, 1992, pp.20-22.
Davydov, Oleg V. “Russia’s Foreign Policy in Transition: Prospects and Challenges in the Asia Pacific Region,” Asian Perspective, vol. 22, no. 1, Spring 1998, pp. 53- 69.
Denisov, Valery. “The Problem of Nuclear Nonproliferation in Korea,” International Affairs (Moscow), August 1994, pp. 35- 43.
Dobrovolski, Vassili N. “The Asia Pacific Security Dialogue Agenda: A Russian Perspective,” The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, vol. VIII, no. 2, Winter 1996, pp. 101- 116.
Drobishev, Yevgeni. “Russia’s Korea Policy in Need of an Overhaul,” Far Eastern Affairs, no. 1, 1996, pp. 3- 13.
Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS)/EAS/Northeast Asia, March 31, 1994, p. 26.
Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS)/ EAST ASIA (EAS), April 1, 1994, p. 10
Gao, E. “The Situation in Korea and Sino-Korean Relations, The Korean Journal of International Studies, vol. XXIV, no. 3, Autumn 1993, pp. 319- 330.
Garrett, Banning and Bonnie Glaser. “China’s Pragmatic Posture toward the Korean Peninsula,” The Journal of Defense Analysis, vol. IX, no. 2, Winter 1997, pp. 63- 92.
Hao, Jia and Zhuang Qubing. “China’s Policy toward the Korean Penisula,” Asian Survey, vol. XXXII, no. 12, December 1992, pp. 1137- 1156.
Hong, Kwan-hee. “ROK-US-Japan Ties in Changing Security Situation,” Korea Focus, vol. 6, no. 6, 1998, pp. 63- 74.
Hoon, Shim Jae. “Diplomatic Drive: Seoul Expands Ties with Moscow, Eastern Europe,” Far Eastern Economic Review, April 5, 1990, p. 17.
───────. “Russian Roulette,” Far Eastern Economic Review, October 7, 1993, p. 30.
Hughes, Christopher W. “Japanese Policy and the North Korean ‘Soft Landing’,” The Pacific Review, vol. 11, no. 3, 1998, pp. 389- 415.
──────. “The North Korean Nuclear Crisis and Japanese Security,” Survival, vol. 38, no. 2, Summer 1996, pp. 79- 103.
Irgebaev, A. T. ”On the South Koreans’ Social Portrait,” Far Eastern Affairs (Moscow), no. 5, 1996, pp.75- 83.
Jhe, Seong-ho. “North Korea’s Rapprochement with U.S. and Japan,” Korea Focus, vol. 4, no. 4, 1996, pp. 64- 75.
Johnson, Chalmers. “Japanese-Soviet Relations in the Early Gorbachev Era,” Asian Survey, vol. 27, no. 11, November 1987, pp. 1145- 1160.
Joo, Seung-Ho. “Russian Policy on Korean Unification in the Post-Cold War Era,” Pacific Affairs, vol. 69, no.1, Spring 1996, pp. 32- 48.
Kang, C. S. Eliot. “Korean Unification: Pandora’s Box of Northeast Asia,” Asian Perspective, vol. 20, no. 2, Fall-Winter 1996, pp. 9- 43.
Kang, Sung Hack. “Korea-USSR Relations in the 20th Century”, Korea and World Affairs, vol. 15, no. 4, Winter 1991, pp. 695- 708.
Kim, Dong Sung. “China’s Policy toward North Korea and Cooperation between South Korea and China,” The Korean Journal of International Studies, vol. XXV, no. 1, 1994, pp. 29- 46.
Kim, Doug-joong. “A Balance Sheet on U.S.-N. Korea Relations,” Korea Focus, vol. 4, no. 2, March-April 1996, pp. 50- 59.
Kim, Hakjoon. “Emerging Relations between South Korea and the Soviet Union,” Far Eastern Affairs, no. 4, 1991, pp. 68- 85.
Kim, Hong Nack. “Japan’s North Korea Policy in the Post-Cold War Era,” Korea and World Affairs, vol. 18, no. 4, Winter 1994, pp. 669- 694.
──────. “Japanese-North Korean Relations: Problems and Prospects,” Korea Observers, vol. XXII, no. 2, Summer 1991, pp. 189- 206.
Kim, Joung Alexander. “ Soviet Policy in North Korea,” World Politics, vol. 22, no. 2, January 1970, pp. 237-254.
Kim, Kook-Chin. “South Korea’s Policy toward Russia: A Korean View,” Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, Fall 1994, pp. 3- 12.
Kim, Kyung-won. “Korea-U.S. Relationship in Post-Cold War World,” Korea Focus, vol. 2, no. 2, March- April 1994, pp. 5- 22.
Kim, Samuel S. “Chinese and Russian Perspectives and Policies toward the Korean Reunification Issue,” Korea and World Affairs, vol. 18, no. 4, Winter 1994, pp. 695- 729.
Kim, Sung-Han. “US Policy toward the Korean Peninsula and ROK-US Relations,” The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, vol. IX, no. 1, Summer 1997, pp. 135- 158.
───────. ”Response to U.S. Policy toward the Korean Peninsula,” Korea Focus, vol. 5, no. 2, 1997, pp. 18- 25.
Kim, Sun-hon. “Present Trends and Priorities in Economic Cooperation Between Russia and the Republic of Korea ”, Far Eastern Affairs, no. 4, 1996, pp. 51- 63.
Kimura, Hiroshi. “Primakov’s Offensive: A Catalyst in Stalemated Russo-Japanese Relations?,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 365- 377.
Kislov, Alexander. “Russia and Northeast Asia,” The Korean Journal of International Studies, vol. XXIII, no. 4, Winter 1992, pp. 533- 544.
Lee , Eugene. “N. Korea-Japan Rapprochement and Inter-Korea Relations,” Korea Focus, vol. 3, no. 3, 1995, pp. 22- 38.
Lee, Chang Jae. “Problems and Prospects in Korea-Soviet Economic Cooperation,” The Korean Journal of International Studies, vol. 23, no. 3, Autumn 1992, pp. 359-376.
Lee, Hong-yung. “China’s Triangle with Two Koreas,” China Studies, no. 4, Spring 1998, pp. 89- 106.
Lee, Myung-Sik. “The Soviet Power in Northeast Asia and Its Impact on the Korean Peninsula,” The Korean Journal of International Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, Spring 1985, pp. 153- 170.
Lho, Kyongsoo. “Seoul-Moscow Relations,” Asian Survey, vol. XXIX, no. 12, December 1989, pp. 1153- 1166.
Lilley, Jeff. “What is to be Done? South Korean Companies Find Russia a Quagmire,” Far Eastern Economic Review, June 16, 1994, p. 77.
Liu, Hong. “The Sino-South Korean Normalization: A Triangular Explanation,” Asian Survey, vol. XXXIII, no. 11, November 1993, pp. 1083- 1094.
Marantz, Paul. “Russian Foreign Policy During Yeltsin’s Second Term,“ Communist and Post-Communist Studies, vol. 30, no. 4, 1997, pp. 345- 351.
Institute of Far East. Materials of the “Economic and Social Aspects of Korean Unification,” (Conference of Russia Scholars, Moscow), December 11-12, 1996.
Mikheev, Vasily V. “North Korean Regime and Russian Political Power,” The Journal of East Asian Affairs, vol. XII, no. 2, Summer/ Fall 1998, pp. 553- 576.
───────. ”USSR-Korea: Economic Aspects of Relations,” Sino- Soviet Affairs, vol. 13, no. 1, Spring 1989, pp. 74- 86.
───────. "Russian Policy toward Korean Peninsula after Yeltsin''s Re-election as President", The Journal of East Asian Affairs, vol. XI, no. 2, Summer/ Fall 1997, pp. 348- 377.
Moiseyev, V. “Russia and the Korean Peninsula,” International Affairs (Moscow), vol. 42, no. 1, January-February 1996, pp. 106- 114.
Moltz, James Clay. “Russia in Asia in 1996: Renewed Engagement,” Asian Survey, vol. XXXVII, no. 1, January 1997, pp. 88- 94.
Muratov, A. “The Friendship Will Grow Stronger,” International Affairs (Moscow), no. 9, September 1985, pp. 26- 41.
Nam, Si-uk. “Future of Korea-Japan Relations,” Korea Focus, vol. 3, no. 6, 1995, pp. 17- 30.
Olsen, Edward A. “The American and Japanese Stake in Korean Unification,” Journal of East Asia Affairs, Spring- Summer 1983, pp. 1- 16.
Pae, Jae-shik. “New Direction of Korea-Japan Relations for 21st Century,” Korea Focus, vol 4, no. 4, 1996, pp. 24- 31.
Park, Bong-shik. “Changing Korea-U.S. Relations,” Korea Focus, vol. 3, no. 5, September-October 1995, pp. 13- 23.
Park, Jongchul. “The US-DPRK Relations and Comprehensive Arms Control on the Korean Peninsula,” State Strategy, vol. 2, no. 2, Fall/ Winter 1996, pp. 151- 178.
──────. “US Policy towards North Korea: Strategy, Perception, and Inter-Korean Relations,” The Journal of East Asian Affairs, vol. XII, no. 2, Summer/ Fall, pp. 529- 552.
Park, Kyung Ae. “China’s Korean Policy and the role of the Korean-Chinese in Inter-Korean Relations, Korea Observers, vol. XXII, no. 2, Summer 1991, pp. 207- 228.
Park, Sang- Seek. “Northern Diplomacy and Inter-Korea Relations,” Korea and World Affairs, Winter 1988, pp. 706- 736.
Park, Sang-sop. “Resurgence of Korean Nationalism, Its Impact on Korea-U.S. Ties,” Korea Focus, vol. 4, no. 6, 1996, pp. 24- 35.
Pavliatenko, Victor. “Russian-Japanese Relation: Time to Act,” Far Eastern Affairs, no. 6, 1997, pp. 8- 16.
Petrovsky, Vladimir. “APR International Security Regimes: Russian Participation Options,” Far Eastern Affairs, no. 5, 1997, pp. 20- 38.
Pye, Lucian W. “The United States and Asia in 1997,” Asian Survey, vol. XXXVIII, no. 1, January 1998, pp. 99- 106.
Rees, David. “The New Pressures from North Korea,” Conflict Studies, February March, 1970.
Robinson, Thomas W. “The Soviet and Asia in 1981,” Asian Survey, vol. 22, no. 1, January 1982, pp. 13- 32.
Rubinstein, Alvin Z. “Russia and North Korea: The End of an Alliance?” Korea and World Affairs, Fall 1994, pp. 486- 508.
Sarkisov, Konsantin. “The Northern Territories Issues after Yeltsin’s Re-election: Obstacles to a Resolution from a Russian Perspective,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 353- 363.
Shuja, Sharif M. “Moscow’s Asia Policy,” Contemporary Review, vol. 272, no. 1587, April 1998, pp. 169- 176.
Taylor, William J. Jr. “Korean Security in an Insecure Post-Cold War Era,” Change and Challenge on the Korean Peninsula: Developments, Trends, and Issues, vol. 6, August 1996, pp. 16- 39.
Tkachenko, Vadim. “The Consequences of Korea''s Unification for Russia and Security in Northeast Asia,” Far Eastern Affairs, no. 4, 1997, pp. 23- 40.
Yongchun, Qin. “US-Russian Partnership and Its Implication for Northeast Asia,” The Korean Journal of International Studies, vol. XXIV, no. 3, Autumn 1993, pp. 289- 308.
Zhebin, Alexander. “Russia and North Korea: An Emerging, Uneasy Partnership,” Asian Survey, vol. XXXV, no. 8, August 1995, pp. 726- 739.
政府出版品
U. S. Department of State Bulletin
EIU Country Report
Diplomaticheskii Vesnik Ministerstva Inostrannykh del USSR(蘇聯外交部公報)
Diplomatic Bulletin of MOFA of Russia
Soobshchenie(俄羅斯外交部報導)
外文報紙
Segodnya
Izvestyia(消息報)
Pravda(真理報)
Wall Street Journal (Seoul)
New York Times
Washington Post
Daily Report
Korea Times
New Times