跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.104) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/12/03 15:34
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:駱韋綱
研究生(外文):Wei-Kang Lo
論文名稱:產品稀少性透過獨特性需求和從眾行為對知覺價值與購買意願之影響
論文名稱(外文):Effects of Product Scarcity on Consumers’Perceived Value and Purchase IntentionThrough Need for Uniqueness and Conformity
指導教授:吳長生吳長生引用關係
指導教授(外文):Paul C.S. Wu
口試委員:王又鵬胡同來
口試委員(外文):Yu-Peng WangTUNG-LAI HU
口試日期:2013-06-10
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:真理大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
語文別:中文
論文頁數:122
中文關鍵詞:供給性稀少需求性稀少獨特性需求從眾行為知覺價值購買意願
外文關鍵詞:Scarcity due to SupplyScarcity due to DemandNeed for UniquenessConformityPerceived ValuePurchase Intention
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:51
  • 點閱點閱:3393
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:659
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
論文提要內容:
強調稀少性訊息在行銷實務中屬於常見手法,業者為了刺激消費者的購買意願,利用由於供給性稀少 (如限量版)或需求性稀少 (如暢銷品)訊息,使得消費者透過獨特性需求或從眾行為提高其對產品的知覺價值與購買意願。
據此,本研究旨在探討不同產品類型 (外顯性產品/非外顯性產品)與不同稀少性類型 (供給性稀少/需求性稀少)對消費者的產品知覺價值與購買意願的影響。同時檢驗獨特性需求與從眾行為在供給性稀少或需求性稀少與產品知覺價值間的中介效果。
研究產品為手機 (外顯性產品)與沐浴乳 (非外顯性產品),研究品牌為虛擬品牌,以傳單文字操弄產品稀少性訊息。以問卷方式透過網路收集消費者樣本,共收集923份有效問卷,利用LISREL進行資料分析。結果發現:(1)供給性稀少會直接,也會透過獨特性需求間接提昇消費者對於產品的知覺價值,進而提高購買意願;獨特性需求會提高購買意願。(2)需求性稀少會直接,也會透過從眾行為間接提昇消費者對於產品的知覺價值,進而提高購買意願;從眾行為會提高購買意願。(3)不論外顯性產品或非外顯性產品,供給性稀少與需求性稀少對消費者的產品知覺價值與購買意願認知並無顯著差異。

Emphasizing scarcity is a common technique in marketing practices. Practitioners stimulate the intention of purchase by giving message of scarcity due to supply (Limited) or the scarcity due to demand (Sold out) to increase the perceived value and purchase intention of consumer through the need for uniqueness or conformity.
Accordingly, this research is to probe the effects in perceived value and purchase intention of consumer through different product types (conspicuous consumption / non-conspicuous consumption) and different scarcity (scarcity due to supply/ scarcity due to demand). And also inspect the mediating effects of need for uniqueness and conformity in the perceived value of scarcity due to supply/demand.
Using mobile phone (conspicuous consumption products) and shampoo (non-conspicuous consumption products) as research product, both with fiction brand and using leaflets slogan to manipulate the message of product scarcity. This research collects consumer questionnaire samples through Internet, and by collecting 923 effective samples, using LISREL to carry out analysis. The result has found: (1) The Scarcity due to supply will directly and indirectly (through need for uniqueness) rise the perceive value of consumer to increase purchase intention; need for uniqueness will increase purchase intention. (2)The scarcity due to demand will directly and indirectly (through conformity) rise the perceive value of consumer to increase purchase intention; conformity will increase purchase intention. (3)Regardless of conspicuous consumption products or non-conspicuous consumption products, scarcity due to supply or demand makes no significant difference in the perceive value and purchase intention of consumers.

目錄 I
圖目錄 III
表目錄 IV
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 5
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 產品稀少性 6
第二節 獨特性需求 13
第三節 從眾行為 18
第四節 知覺價值 27
第五節 購買意願 33
第三章 研究方法 36
第一節 觀念性架構 36
第二節 研究假說 37
第三節 變數衡量 46
第四節 研究設計 50
第五節 資料分析方法 54
第四章 資料分析 55
第一節 基本分析 55
第二節 衡量模式分析 58
第三節 共同方法變異分析 64
第四節 樣本同質性分析 66
第五節 結構方程模式分析 69
第六節 中介效果分析 77
第七節 產品類的干擾效果分析 79
第五章 結論 81
第一節 研究結果 81
第二節 理論意涵 83
第三節 行銷意涵 84
第四節 研究限制與後續研究建議 85
參考文獻 87
附錄一 前測問卷 99
附錄二 正式問卷 101

圖目錄
圖2-1 Lynn S-E-D模式 9
圖2-2 產品稀少性類型 11
圖2-3 從眾行為模型 23
圖2-4 知覺價值模式 27
圖2-5 價格、品質與價值的手段-目的鏈模式 29
圖2-6 交易效用理論 34
圖3-1 觀念性架構 36

表目錄
表2-1 獨特性需求衡量之相關量表 17
表2-2 影響從眾行為因素 24
表3-1 產品稀少性之衡量問項 47
表3-2 獨特性需求之衡量問項 48
表3-3 從眾行為之衡量問項 49
表3-4 知覺價值之衡量問項 49
表3-5 購買意願之衡量問項 50
表3-6 前測衡量問項(以牛仔褲為例) 51
表3-7 前測產品外顯性與興趣之信度分析 52
表3-8 產品外顯性與興趣衡量結果 52
表4-1 正式問卷分配與回收情形 55
表4-2 樣本結構 56
表4-3 供給/需求性稀少模式的Cronbach’s α值 57
表4-4 供給性稀少樣本之驗證性因素分析 60
表4-5 需求性稀少樣本驗證性因素分析 61
表4-6 供給性稀少樣本區別效度分析變數相關係數 62
表4-7 需求性稀少樣本區別效度分析變數相關係數 63
表4-8 共同方法變異分析 65
表4-9 供給性稀少樣本敘述性統計 66
表4-10 需求性稀少樣本敘述性統計 67
表4-11 人口統計變數在供給性與需求性稀少樣本之平均數差異 67
表4-12 人口統計變數在供給性稀少樣本之平均數差異 68
表4-13 模式配適度標準表 73
表4-14 供給性稀少結構模式之路徑係數與假說驗證 76
表4-15 需求性稀少結構模式之路徑係數與假說驗證 76
表4-16 外顯性產品之平均數差異性檢定表 79
表4-17 非外顯性產品之平均數差異性檢定表 80
表5-1 假說驗證彙整表 82

吳瑛茵(2009),產品稀少性和消費者獨特性需求對購買意願之影響,國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩博士班碩士論文。
李佳勳(2004),探討數量稀少性對個人決策偏離原有偏好之影響,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
李美慧(2007),探究從眾性購買和衝動性購買之關係,經濟管理論叢,3(2),頁117-127。
周怡璇(2008),品牌知名度、商品稀有性及消費者獨特性需求對於消費者態度之影響 —以限量包包為例,國立政治大學廣告研究所碩士論文。
林彩梅、李美慧、鄧旭如(2007),物質主義與從眾性購買行為關係之研究,中華管理學報,8(1),頁113-134。
林億涵(2009),網路口碑對購買意願之影響:以從眾觀點探討之,國立台北科技大學商業自動化與管理研究所碩士論文。
邱魏頌正,林孟玉(2000),從當代流行文化看消費者從眾行為-以日本流行商品為例,廣告學研究,第十五期,頁115-137。
陳佳興(2009),消費者物質主義、虛榮特質、從眾行為與衝動性購買行為關係之研究,大葉大學事業經營研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。
楊貽婷(2010),稀少性訴求效果之探討:消費者自我監控與選擇情境之角色,東吳大學國際經營與貿易學系碩士論文。
鄭芯慧(2002),物以稀為貴?----消費者獨特性需求初探性研究,國立政治大學廣告研究所碩士論文。

Allen, V. L. (1965), “Situational Factors in Conformity,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol 2, ed. Leonard Berkowitz, New York, NY: Academic Press, pp.133-175.

Amaldoss, W. and Jain, S. (2005), “Conspicuous Consumption and Sophisticated Thinking,” Management Science, 51(10), pp.1449-1466.

Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W. (1988), “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach,” Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), pp.411-423.

Asch, S. E. (1951), “Effect of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments,” Journal of Marketing Research, 16(3), pp.394-400.


Asch, S. E. (1956), “Studies of Independence and Conformity: A Majority of One Against a Unamimous Majority,” Psychological Monographs, 20(3), pp.70-79.

Atlas, M.S. and Snyder, C. R. (1978), The Effects of Need-For-Uniqueness Upon Valuation of Scarce and Non-Scarce Objects. Unpublished honors thesis at the University of Kansas.

Avolio, B., Yammarino, F.J. and Bass, B.M. (1991), “Identifying Common Methods Variance with Data Collected from a Single Source: An Unresolved Sticky Issue,” Journal of Management, 17(3),pp.571-587.

Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y. (1988), “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), pp.74-94.

Bagwell, L. S. and Bernheim, B. D. (1996), “Veblen Effects in a Theory of Conspicuous Consumption,” The American Economic Reviews, 86(3), pp.349-373.

Baron R. M. and Kenny D. A. (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp.1173-1182.

Bass, B.M and Berg, I. A., (1969), “Conformity and Deviation,” in Experimental Social Psychology, Judson, Mills (ed.), Ontario: Macmillan, pp. 233-306.

Bearden, W. O. and Etzel, M. J. (1982), “Reference Group Influnce on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), pp.183-194.

Bearden, W. O. and Rose, R. L. (1990), “Attention to Social Comparison Information: An Individual Difference Factor Affecting Consumer Conformity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16(4), pp.461-471.

Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G. and Teel, J. E. (1989), “Measurement of Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(4), pp. 473-481.

Becker, G. S., (1991), “A Note on Restaurant Pricing and Other Examples of Social Influence on Price,” Journal of Political Economy, 99(5), pp.1109-1116.
Belk, R., Wallendorf, M., and Sherry, J. J. (1989), “The Sacred and the Profane in Consumer Behaviour: Theodicy on the Odyssey,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), pp. 1-38.

Belk, Russell W. (1985), “Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in the Material World,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (12), pp.265-280.

Blackwell, R. D, Miniard, P.W. and Engel, J. F. (2006). Consumer Behavior, 10th edition, Ohio: South-Western, College Publisher.

Brehm, J. W. (1966), A Theory of Psychological Reactance, New York: Academic Press.

Brehm, S. S., and Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control, New York: Academic Press.

Brock, T. C. (1968), “Implication of Commodity Theory for Value Change,” in Psychological Foundations of Attitude, eds. A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, and T. M. Ostrom, New York: Academic Press, pp.243-275.

Burnkrant, R. E. and Cousineau, A. (1975), “Informational and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2(3), pp.206-215.

Chang, T. Z. and Albert, R. W. (1994), “Price, Product Information, and Purchase Intention: An Empirical Study,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(1), pp. 16-27.

Chi, C., Lin, C.S. and Chin, S.P. (2011), “Optimizing Time Limits for Maximum Sales Response in Internet Shopping Promotions,” Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), pp.520–526.

Chi, T. and Peter, P. D. (2011), “Understanding Consumer Perceived Value of Casual Sportswear: An Empirical Study,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18(5), pp.422-429.

Chryssochoou, X. and Breakwell, G. M. (2000), “The Distinctiveness Principle Identity, Meaning and the Bounds of Cultural Relativity,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(4),pp. 337-354.
Cialdini, R. B. (1985). Influence: Science and Practice. New York: Harper Collin.

Corneo, G. and Jeanne, O. (1997), “Conspicuous Consumption, Snobbism and Conformism,” Journal of Public Economics, 66(1), pp.55-71.

Deutsch, M. and Gerard, H. B. (1955), “A Study of Normative and Informational Social Influences Upon Individual Judgment,” Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 51(3), pp.629-636.

Dickson, P. R. and Sawyer, A. G., (1990) “The Price Knowledge and Search of Supermarket Shoppers,” Journal of Marketing, 54(3), pp.42-53.

Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B. and Grewal, D. (1991), “Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), pp.307-319.

Eagly, A. H. (1978), “Sex Differences in Influenceability”, Psychological Bulletin, 85(1), pp.86-116.

Engel, J. F., Kollat, D. J. and Blackwell, R. D. (1984), Consumer Behavior, Chicago, MI: The Dryden Press.

Festinger, L. (1953), “An Analysis of Compliant Bechavior,” in Group Relations at the Crossroads, eds. M. Sgerif and M. O. Wilson, New York, NY: Harper, pp.232-256

Festinger, L. (1957), A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, CA:Standford University Press, pp.13.

Fiore, A. M., Lee, S.E. and Kunz, G. (2004), “Individual Differences, Motivations, and Willingness to Use a Mass Customization Option for Fashion Products,” European Journal of Marketing, 38(7), pp.835-49.

Fisher, R. J. and Price, L. L. (1992), “An Investigation Into the Social Context of Early Adoption Behavior, ”Journal of Consumer Research, 19(12), pp.477-486.



Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), pp.39-50.

Franke, N., and Schreier, M. (2008), “Product Uniqueness as a Driver of Customer Utility in Mass Customization,” Marketing Letters, 19(2), pp. 93-107.

Fromkin, H. L. (1973), The Psychology of Uniquenss: Avoidance of Similarity and a Seeking of Differences, Institute for Research in Behavioral, Economic and Management Sciences. Purdue University.

Fromkin, H. L. (1972), “Feelings of Interpersonal Undistinctiveness-Unpleasant Affective State,” Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6(1), pp.178-185.

Fromkin, H. L., Olson, J. C., Dipboye, R. L., and Barnaby, D. A. A. (1971), “A Commodity Theory Analysis of Consumer Preferences for Scarce Products,” Proceedings of the 79 th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, ed. American Psychological Association, 6(2), pp.653-654.

Gaski, J. F. and Nevin, J. R. (1985), “The Differential Effects of Exercised and Unexercised Power Sources in a Marketing Channel,” Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), pp.130-142.

Gefen, D., Straub, D. and Boudreau, M. (2000), “Structural Equation Modeling Techniques and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), pp.2-76.

Gierl, H. and Huettl, V. (2010), “Are Scarce Products Always More Attractive? The Interaction of Different Types of Scarcity Signals with Products' Suitability for Conspicuous Consumption,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(3), pp.225-235.

Gierl, H., Plantsch, M. and Schweidler, J. (2008), “Scarcity Effects on Sales Volume in Retail,” The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 18(1), pp.45-61.


Grewal, D., Krishnan, R., Baker, J. and Borin, N. (1998), “The Effects of Store Name, Brand Name and Price Discounts on Consumers' Evaluations and Purchase Intentions,”Journal of Retailing, 74(3), pp.331-352.

Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B. and Kenrick, D. T. (2009), “Fear and Loving in Las Vegas: Evolution, Emotion, and Persuasion,” Journal of Marketing Research, 46(3), pp.384-395.

Gronholdt, L., Martensen, A., and Kristensen, K. (2000), “Customer Satisfaction Measurement at Post Demark: Results of Application of the European Customer Satisfaction Index Methodology,” Total Quality Management, 11(7), pp.1007-1015.

Gross, H. E. (1977), “Micro and Macro Level Implications for a Sociology of Virtue: The Case of Draft Protesters to the Vietnam War,” Sociological Quarterly, 18(3), pp.319-339.

Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. and Tatham, R. L. (2006), Multivariate Data Analysis (6th Ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Harris, J., and Lynn, M. (1996), “Manifestations of the Desire for Unique Consumer Products,” paper presented at the American Marketing Association's Winter Educator's Conference, Hilton Head, South Carolina.

Hayduk, L., and Glaser, D. N. (2000), “Jiving the four-step, waltzing around factor analysis, and other serious fun,” Structural Equation Modeling, 7(1), pp.1-35.

Heckert, D. M. (1989), “The Relativity of Positive Deviance: The Case of the French Impressionists,” Deviant Behavior, 10(2), pp.131-144.

Higgins, E. T. (1987), “Self-discrepancy: A Theory Relating Self and Affect,” Psychological Review, 94(3), pp.319-340.

Jeffrey R. P., Donald R. L. (2011), “When Shelf-Based Scarcity Impacts Consumer Preferences,” Journal of Retailing, 87(2) , pp.142-155.



Jung, J. M., and Kellaris, J. J. (2004), “Cross-National Differences in Proneness to Scarcity Effects: The Moderating Roles of Familiarity, Uncertainty Avoidance, and Need for Cognitive Closure,” Psychology and Marketing, 21(9), pp.739-753.

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,” Econometrica, 47(2), pp.263-291.

Katz, M. L., and Shapiro, C. (1985), “Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility,” American Economic Review, 75(3), pp.424-440.

Kelly, H. H. and Shapiro, M. M. (1954), “An Experiment on Conformity to Group Norms Where Comformity is Detrimental to Group Achievement,” American Sociological Review, 19(6), pp.667-677.

Kelman, H. C. (1961), “Processes of Opinion Change,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 25(1), pp. 57-78.

Koford, K., and Tschoegl, A. E. (1998), “The Market Value of Rarity,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 34(3), pp.45.

Kotler, P. (2003), Marketing Management, 11th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Kron, J. (1983), Home-Psych: The Social Psychology of Home and Decoration. New York: Potter.

Kumar, A., Lee, H. J., and Kim, Y. K. (2009), “Indian Consumers' Purchase Intention Toward a United States Versus Local Brand,” paper presented at the Fall Conference of the American-Collegiate-Retailling-Association, Charleston, SC.

Lascu, D. N. and Zinkhan, G. (1999), “Consumer Conformity: Review and Applications for Marketing Theory and Practice,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), pp.1-12.

Lascu, D. N., Bearden, W. O. and Rose, R. L. (1995), “Norm Extremity and Interpersonal Influences on Consumer Conformity,” Journal of Business Research, 32(3), pp.201-212.


Leibenstein, H. (1950), “Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64 (5), pp.183-207.

Liang, B and He, Y. B. (2011), “The Effect of Culture on Consumer Choice: The Need for Conformity vs. the Need for Uniqueness,” International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(3), pp.352-359.

Lippa, R. A. (1990), Introduction to Social Psychology, California:Wadsworth, Inc., pp.521-545.

Lynn, M. (1989), “Scarcity Effects on Desirability: Mediated by Assumed Expensiveness,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 10(2), pp.257-274.

Lynn, M. (1991), “Scarcity Effects on Value: A Quantitative Review of the Commodity Theory Literature,” Psychology and Marketing, 8(1), pp. 43-57.

Lynn, M. (1992), “Scarcity’s Enhancement of Desirability: The Role of Naïve Economic Theories,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), pp.67-78.

Lynn, M. and Bogert, P. (1996), “The Effect of Scarcity on Anticipated Price Appreciation,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(22), pp.1978-1984.

Lynn, M., and Harris, J. (1997), “The Desire for Unique Consumer Products: A new Individual Differences Scale,” Psychology and Marketing, 14(6), pp.601-616.

MacInnis, H. (1997), Consumer Behavior, Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, pp.393-394.

Malar, L., Krohmer, H., Hoyer, W. D. and Nyffenegger, B. (2011), “'Emotional Brand Attachment and Brand Personality: The Relative Importance of the Actual and the Ideal Self,” Journal of Marketing, 75(4), pp.35-52.

Mandel, N. (2003), “Shifting Selves and Decision Making: The Effects of Self-Construal Priming on Consumer Risk-Taking,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), pp.30-40.



Michel, S., Kreuzer, M., Kühn, R. and Stringfellow, A. (2006), “Mass-Customized Products: Are They Bought for Uniqueness or to Overcome Problems with Standard Products?” The Garvin School of International Management, working paper.

Monroe, K. B. and Petroshius, S. M. (1981), “Buyers Perceptions of Price: An Update of the Evidence,” Perspectives in Consumer Behavior, 5(12), pp.43-55.

Monroe, K. B., and Krishnan, R. (1985), “The Effect of Price on Subjective Product Evaluations,” in Perceived Quality:How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise, Jacoby, J. and Olson, J. ed.. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, pp.209-232.

Mowen, J. C., and Minor, M. (1998), Consumer Behavior, 5th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, pp. 487-489.

Mueller, R. O. (1997), “Structural equation modeling: Back to basics,” Structural Equation Modeling, 4(4), pp. 353-369

Nunnally, J. C. (1987), Psychometric Theory, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Park, W. C., and Lessig, P. (1977), “Students and Housewive: Differences in Susceptibility to Reference Group Influence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 4(2), pp.102-110.

Parker, J. R. and Lehmann, D. R. (2011), “When Shelf-Based Scarcity Impacts Consumer Preferences,” Journal of Retailing, 87(2), pp.142-155.

Peterson, Gary W., Boyd C. Rollins and Darwin L. Thomas (1985), “Parental Influence and Adolescent Conformity,” Youth and Society,16(4), pp.397-420.

Petrick, J. F. (2002), “Development of a Multi-Dimensional Scale for Measuring Perceived Value of a Service,” Journal of Leisure Research, 34(2), pp.119-136.

Podsakoff, P.M. and Organ, D.W. (1986), “Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects,” Journal of Management, 12 (4), pp.531-544.

Roselius, T. (1971), “Consumer Ranking of Risk Reduction Methods,” Journal of Marketing, 35(1), pp.56–61.
Ross, L., Bierbrauer, G. and Hoffman, S. (1976), “The Role of Attribution Processes in Conformity and Dissent:Revisiting the Asch Situation,” American Psychologist, 31(2), pp.148-157.

Sanchez, J., Callarisa, L., Rodriguez, R. M., and Moliner, M. A. (2006), “Perceived Value of the Purchase of a Tourism Product,” Tourism Management, 27(3), pp.394-409.

Schiffman, L. G. and Kanuk, L. L. (2000), Consumer Behavior, 7th ed., New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Sedikides, C. and Strube, M. J. (1997), “Self-Evaluation: To Thine own Self be Good, to Thine Own Self be Sure, to Thine Own Self be True, and to Thine Own Self be Better,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, pp.209-269.

Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., and Gross, B. L. (1991), “What We Buy: A Theory of Consumption Values,” Journal of Business Research, 22(2), pp. 159-170.

Singh, J. and Sirdeshmukh, D. (2000), “Agency and Trust Mechanisms in Consumer Satisfaction and Loyalty Judgments,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), pp.150-167.

Smith, A. (1976), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the wealth of Nations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Snyder, C. R. (1992), “Product Scarcity by Need for Uniqueness Interaction: A Consumer Catch-22 Carousel,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), pp.9-24.

Snyder, C. R. and Fromkin, H. L. (1977), “Abnormality as a Positive Characteristic: The Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Need for Uniqueness,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86 (5), pp.518-527.

Snyder, C. R., and Fromkin, H. L. (1980), Uniqueness: The Human Pursuit of Difference, New York: Plenum.

Swami, S., and Khairnar, P. J. (2003), “Diffusion of Products with Limited Supply and Known Expiration Date,” Marketing Letters, 14(1), pp.33-46.
Sweeney, J. C., and Soutar, G. N.(2001), “Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale,” Journal of Retailing, 77(2), pp.203-220.

Szybillo, G. J. (1975), “A Situational Influence on the Relationship of a Consumer Attribute to New Product Attractiveness,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(5), pp.652–655.

Szybillo, G. J. and Jacoby, J. (1974), “Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Cues As Determinants of Perceived Product Quality,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(1), pp.74-78.

Teas, R. K. and Agarwal, S. (2000), “The Effects of Extrinsic Product Cues on Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality, Sacrifice, and Value,’’ Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), pp.278-290.

Thaler, R. H. (2008) , “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,” Marketing Science, 27(1), pp.15-25.

Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O. and Hunter, G. L. (2001), “Consumers’ Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), pp.199-214.

Van Herpen, E., Pieters, R. and Zeelenberg, M. (2005), “How Product Scarcity Impacts on Choice: Snob and Bandwagon Effects,” Advances in Consumer Research, 32, pp.623-624.

Van Herpen, E., Pieters, R. and Zeelenberg, M. (2009), “When Demand Accelerates Demand: Trailing the Bandwagon,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), pp. 302-312.

Veblen, T.B. (1970), The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions, London: Unwin Books.

Verhallen, T. M. M. (1982), “Scarcity and Consumer Choice Behavior,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 2(2),pp. 299-322.



Verhallen, T. M. M. and Robben, H. S. J. (1994), “Scarcity and Preference: An Experiment on Unavailability and Product Evaluation,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 15(2),pp. 315-331.

Wicklund, R. A. (1974), Freedom and Reactance, Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Wilkie, W. L. (1994), Consumer Behavior, 3rd ed., New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

Williams, L. and Hazer, J. (1986), “Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction and Commitment in Turnover Models: A Reanalysis Using Latent Variable Structural Equation Methods,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), pp.219-231.
Woodruff, R. B.(1997), “Customer Value: The Next Source of Competitive Advantage,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), pp.139-153.

Worchel, S., Lee, J. and Adewole, A. (1975), “Effects of Supply and Demand on Ratings of Object Value,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), pp.906-914.

Wright, R. A., Greenberg, J., and Brehm, S. S. (2004), Motivational Analyses of Social Behavior: Building on Jack Brehm's Contributions to Psychology, Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wu, C. and Hsing, S. S., (2006), “Less is More: How Scarcity Influences Consumers’ Value Perceptions and Purchase Intents Through Mediating Variables,” Journal of American Academy of Business, 9(2), pp.125-132.

Wu, W. Y., Lu, H. Y., Wu, Y. Y. and Fu, C. S. (2011), “The Effects of Product Scarcity and Consumers' Need for Uniqueness on Purchase Intention,” International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(3), pp.263-274.

Zeithaml, V. A. (1988), “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value:A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, 52(3), pp.2-22.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 產品稀少性和消費者獨特性需求對購買意願之影響
2. 品牌形象、品牌態度、品牌個性與自我概念一致性、從眾行為與購買意願之關係-以Apple品牌平板電腦為例
3. 網路團購消費者知覺風險、從眾行為與購買意願影響之研究
4. 價格促銷、善因行銷與從眾行為對消費者知覺價值及購買意願之研究-以美食團購為例
5. 產品知覺、從眾行為與購買意願間關係之研究 —以北部大學生購買智慧型手機為例
6. 品牌知名度與稀少性策略對消費者購買意願之分析-炫耀財與非炫耀財之比較
7. 網路口碑對消費者知覺需求性稀少與從眾行為之干擾效果的研究
8. 球鞋之品牌形象、品牌態度、從眾行為對消費者行為意圖之影響
9. 探討商品訊息框架與從眾行為對消費者衝動購買意圖之影響
10. 品牌延伸契合度、品牌態度、從眾行為 與購買意願之關係 -以三星品牌為例
11. 限時 vs. 限量稀少性訊息之效果-商品類型及消費者調節焦點之干擾
12. 產品稀少性對消費者購買 遊戲限量版商品意圖之影響
13. 以從眾行為探討大學生對智慧型手機購買意願之研究
14. 產品稀少性、產品知覺風險及預期產品價格對消費者購買意願的影響-以社會認同感需求度與炫耀型消費為調節變項
15. 網路口碑、品牌權益及從眾行為對使用親子飯店網頁遊客購買意願影響之研究