跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.61) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/09/05 09:23
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:張志遠
研究生(外文):Chih-Yuan Chang
論文名稱:時間觀對組織公民行為之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of Polychronic Value on Organizational Citizenship Behavior
指導教授:郭建志郭建志引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chien-Chih Kuo
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中原大學
系所名稱:心理學研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:心理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:中文
論文頁數:74
中文關鍵詞:組織公民行為關係取向情境績效多元時間價值
外文關鍵詞:relationship orientationcontextual performanceorganizational citizenship behaviorperceived: polychromic value
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:362
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:2
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
個體對於時間的利用,可能受社會文化、個人的經驗、價值的影響。在組織中,對員工時間的知覺和使用可能因為對時間的價值與使用的不同,而產生溝通與工作上的困擾。而多元時間價值是種使用時間的偏好,多元時間價值高的個體,喜歡同時進行多件事,並認為這樣是最好的做事方式。過去探討多元時間價值和工作行為的研究不多,結果也不一致。本研究著重探討多元時間價值與組織公民行為的關係。另外,關係取向文化和多元時間有許多概念相契合,因此,本研究也探討關係取向的文化是否會調節其間的關係。本研究採用問卷蒐集資料、並採對偶方式收集,受試者為營利單位員工及該員工直屬主管。採用便利性抽樣,總共收集201筆配對資料。本研究的結果顯示:個人的多元時間價值對個人面的組織公民行為有正向的影響;在組織文化與個人多元時間的交互作用中發現,在低關係取向時,個人的多元時間價值對組織面的組織公民行為有正向的影響。最後本研究將根據研究結果,進一步說明未來研究方向以及管理上的實務意涵。

Social culture, individuals’ experience and value will affect individuals’ time use. The organization may get in trouble on work and communication due to the difference of employees’ time perception and time use. People who have polychronic value prefer to engage in multiple tasks simultaneously and believe their preference is the best way to doing thing. Previous researches about the relationship between polychromic value and working behavior were few, and their outcome were inconsistent. This research not only emphasizes the relation between polychromic value and organizational citizenship behavior(OCB), but also focuses on the moderate effect of relationship orientation. The relationship orientation culture is compatible with polychromic value. There are 201 survey questionnaires were finished by some employees and their supervisors. The result of the research indicates that individuals’ polychronic value has positive influence on more organizational citizenship behavior - individual(OCB-I). In addition, relationship orientation has moderate effect; when relationship orientation was lower, more polychromic value employees have more organizational citizenship behavior – organization(OCB-O). Further implications and possible application were also discussed.

目 錄
中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
第一章 研究動機與目的 1
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 多元時間價值 5
第二節 組織公民行為 13
第三節 多元時間價值與組織公民行為 19
第三章 研究方法 25
第一節 研究假設與架構 25
第二節 研究樣本 26
第三節 研究工具 30
第四節 研究步驟 36
第四章 研究結果 37
第一節 相關分析結果 37
第二節 階層迴歸分析 40
第五章 討論與建議 47
第一節 研究結果討論 47
第二節 未來研究方向與限制 52
第三節 管理意涵 54
參考文獻 55
附錄一 書面指導語 62
附錄二 主管填寫之「主見意見調查表」 63
附錄三 員工填寫之「工作意見調查表」 66

表目錄
表一 多元時間和單一時間展現行為的比較表 7
表二 多元時間行為和Type A行為比較表 8
表三 各學者對組織公民行為的構面 16
表四 個人層次多元時間與其他變項相關表 21
表五 問卷回收狀況 26
表六 員工基本資料-樣本組成 27
表七 網路與書面問卷各變項比較-t檢定 29
表八 個人多元時間價值量表之因素分析 31
表九 組織公民行為之因素分析 32
表十 關係取向文化之因素分析 33
表十一 時間有形資源之因素分析 34
表十二 高低脈絡之因素分析 34
表十三 角色內工作行為之因素分析 35
表十四 各變項相關分析表 39
表十五 多元時間價值對個人面組織公民行為的影響 40
表十六 多元時間價值對組織面組織公民行為的影響 41
表十七 多元時間價值對角色內行為的影響 43
表十八 時間有形資源對組織公民行為、角色內行為的影響 45
表十九 高低脈絡對組織公民行為、角色內行為的影響 46
表二十 研究結果彙整 47

圖目錄
圖一 研究架構圖 25
圖二 關係取向文化與多元時間價值交互作用圖示 42
參考文獻
中文部分
林鉦棽(1996)。組織公正、信任、組織公民行為之研究:社會交換理論之觀點。「管理科學學報」,卷13(3):391-415。
郭建志(1999)。「文化契合與效能:台灣集團企業之個案研究」。台北:國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
蔡孟真 (2003)。「角色定義幅度與組織公民行為:前置要素之探討。」桃園:私立中原大學心理學研究所。
黃芳銘 (2004)。「結構方程模式裡問與應用」。台北:五南圖書出版公司。

英文部分
Aiken, L. S. & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Alas, R., Vadi, M. (2003), The Impact Of Organizational Culture On Organizational Learning At Six Estonian Hospitals , Trames, 7(2), 336-44.
Arndt, A., Arnold, T., & Landry, T. (2006). The effects of polychronic-orientation upon retail employee satisfaction and turnover. Journal of Retailing, 82(4), 319-330.
Bateman, T. S. & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good solder: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595.
Batson, C.D., Cochran, P. J., Biederman, M.F., Blosser, J. L., Ryan, M. J., and Vogt, B., (1978). Failure to Help When in a Hurry: Callousness or Conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 4 (1), 97-101.
Beaty, J., Cleveland, J., & Murphy, K. (2001). The relation between personality and contextual performance in 'strong' versus 'weak' situations. Human Performance, 14(2), 125-148.
Bluedorn, A. (2002). The human organization of time: Temporal realities and experience. Stanford University Press.
Bluedorn, A. C., (2000), Time and organizational culture, Handbook of organizational culture and climate, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bluedorn, A., Kalliath, T., Strube, M., & Martin, G. (1999). Polychronicity and the Inventory of Polychronic Values (IPV): The development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(3), 205-230.
Bluedorn, A.C., Kaufman, C.F. and Lane, P.M. (1992), “How many things do you like to do at once? An introduction to monochromic and polychromic time”, Academy of Management Executive, 6(4), 17-26.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt, & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
Conte, J., & Gintoft, J. (2005). Polychronicity, Big Five Personality Dimensions, and Sales Performance. Human Performance, 18(4), 427-444.
Conte, J., & Jacobs, R. (2003). Validity evidence linking polychronicity and Big Five personality dimensions to absence, lateness, and supervisory performance ratings. Human Performance, 16(2), 107-129.
Conte, J., Rizzuto, T., & Steiner, D. (1999). A construct-oriented analysis of individual-level polychronicity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(3-4), 269-287.
Cotte, J., & Ratneshwar, S. (1999). Juggling and hopping: What does it mean to work polychronically?. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(3), 184-204.
Cropanzano, R., Howes, J., Grandey, A., & Toth, P. (1997). The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(2), 159-180.
Darley, J., & Batson, C. (1973). 'From Jerusalem to Jericho': A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1), 100-108.
Deluga, R. J. (1994). Supervisor trust building, leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(4), 315-326.
Frah, J, L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 421-444.
Graham, J. W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4(4), 249-270.
Gudykunst, W., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., & Nishida, T. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22(4), 510-543.
Hall, E. T. (1984). The dance of life: the other dimension of time. Anchor Press, New York:
Hall, E. T. and Hall, M. R. (1990). Understanding Cultural Differences, Intercultural Press, Yarmouth, MA.
Hall, E. T.(1959). The Silent Language. New York: Doubleday
Hecht, T., & Allen, N. (2005). Exploring links between polychronicity and well-being from the perspective of person-job fit: Does it matter if you prefer to do only one thing at a time?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(2), 155-178.
Hogan, J., Rybicki, S., Motowidlo, S., & Borman, W. (1998). Relations between contextual performance, personality, and occupational advancement. Human Performance, 11(2), 189-207.
Hui, C., Organ, D., & Crooker, K. (1994). Time pressure, Type A syndrome, and organizational citizenship behavior: A laboratory experiment. Psychological Reports, 75(11), 199-208.

Joreskog, K. G. & Sorbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 User’s Reference Guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software, INC., 1989.
Kaufman, C., Lane, P.M., & Lindquist, J. (1991). Time congruity in the organization: A proposed quality-of-life framework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 6(1), 79-106.
Kaufman, C.F., Lane P.M. and Lindquist, J.D. (1991a). Exploring more than 24 hours a day: a preliminary investigation of polychromic time use. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 392-401.
Kaufman, J., Stamper, C., & Tesluk, P. (2001). Do supportive organizations make for good corporate citizens?. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13(4), 436-449.
Kaufman-Scarborough, C., & Lindquist, J. (1999). Time management and polychronicity: Comparisons, contrasts, and insights for the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(3), 288-312.
Konig, C., Buhner, M., & Murling, G. (2005). Working Memory, Fluid Intelligence, and Attention Are Predictors of Multitasking Performance, but Polychronicity and Extraversion Are not. Human Performance, 18(3), 243-266.
Konovsky, M. A. & Organ, D. W. (1996). Dispositional and contextual determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(3), 253-266.
Konovsky, M. A. & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3): 656-669.
LePine, J., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 52-65.
Lindquist, J., & Kaufman-Scarborough, C. (2007). The polychronic-monochronic tendency model: PMTS scale development and validation. Time & Society, 16(2), 253-285.
Madjar, N., & Oldham, G. (2006). Task rotation and polychronicity: Effects on individuals' creativity. Human Performance, 19(2), 117-131.
Masterson, S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B., & Taylor, M. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 738-748.
Moorman, R. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845-855.
Moorman, R. H., & Blakely, G. L. (1995). Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(2), 127-142.
Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee's perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6): 1543-1567.
Motowidlo, S., & Van Scotter, J. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475-480.
Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., McKee, D. O. & McMurrian, R. (1997). An investigation into the antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviors in a personal selling context. Journal of Marketing, 61(3), 85-98.
Onken, M. (1999). Temporal elements of organizational culture and impact on firm performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(3), 231-243.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 12, 43-72. Greenwich CT: JAI Press.
Organ, D., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 157-164.
Organ, D., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 775-802.
Palmer, D., & Schoorman, F. (1999). Unpackaging the multiple aspects of time in polychronicity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(3), 323-344.
Persing, D. (1999). Managing in polychronic times: Exploring individual creativity and performance in intellectually intensive venues. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(5), 358-373.
Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M. & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2): 262-270.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G.. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theroetical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management. 26(3), 513-563.
Puffer, S. M. (1987). Prosocial behavior, noncompliant behavior, and work performance among commission salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), 615-621.
Rupp, D. E. & Cropanzano, R. (2002). The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionProcesses, 89(1), 925-946.
Schein, E. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership(2ed). San Francisco, CA US: Jossey-Bass.
Schriber, J., & Gutek, B. (1987). Some time dimensions of work: Measurement of an underlying aspect of organization culture. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), 642-650.
Slocombe, T. (1999). Applying the theory of reasoned action to the analysis of an individual's polychronicity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(3), 313-322.
Slocombe, T., & Bluedorn, A. (1999). Organizational behavior implications of the congruence between preferred polychronicity and experienced work-unit polychronicity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(1), 75-99.
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653-663.
Van Dyne, L., Graham, J. W., & Dienesch, R. M. ( 1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 765-802.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3): 601-617.
Wright, L. (1988). The Type A behavior pattern and coronary artery disease: Quest for the active ingredients and the elusive mechanism. American Psychologist, 43(1), 2-14.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top