跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.172) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/11 12:39
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳尉平
研究生(外文):Wei-Ping Chen
論文名稱:由河川流量資料與流量歷線推估地下水補注量
論文名稱(外文):Estimate Ground-Water Recharge From Streamflow Hydrographs
指導教授:李振誥李振誥引用關係
指導教授(外文):Cheng-Hwa Lee
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:資源工程學系
學門:工程學門
學類:材料工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:1999
畢業學年度:87
語文別:中文
論文頁數:123
中文關鍵詞:地下水補注量歷線
外文關鍵詞:Groundwater RechargeHydrograph
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:385
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究主要在於利用由河川流量資料建立地下水補注量之模式,並將其應用於估計濁水溪、烏溪及北港溪三流域地下水補注量之研究,以了解該區地下水補注與排出之動態平衡。
本研究在不考慮集水區之地質及水文地質狀況下,選擇在一單純環境的假設下進行消退曲線位移法與基流資料估計法兩模式之分析,而模式一則以河川流量歷線地下水消退部分之消退行為,為一近似直線之曲線為假設來進行估算地下水補注量,由河川流量資料之流量歷線消退部分,藉由收集研究區三流域及其支流現有之水文測站的流量資料,來建立三流域研究時期的消退行為,而估計消退指數此一參數,並利用此消退指數方可求得主要消退曲線,以便進行由三流域之河川流量歷線求得地下水補注量之評估;模式二為一基流分離法,藉由將河川流量歷線分離出地表逕流與基流兩部分,將所分離出基流歷線下之部分假設為為地下水排水量,並在分析時間夠長時可視之為有效地下水補注量。在此之補注量,皆為水文學上,降雨入滲至地表後,經深層滲漏至地下含水層之水量。
分析結果顯示,消退曲線位移法所得之估算結果,由消退指數所控制,經由對其作敏感度分析可得知,由分析者主觀決定之消退指數值在合理誤差範圍內,對所分析之結果影響不大,亦即求得主要消退曲線代表河川之特性曲線後,其估算之結果可信度為佳。並將兩模式分析所得之結果作一比較可得兩者有相當的契合度。
應用消退曲線位移法與基流資料估計法於濁水溪、烏溪及北港溪三流域地下水補注量之研究,其中選用三流域共十七個測站進行分析,兩模式所估計出之地下水補注量以入滲率表示。1.消退曲線位移法分析結果入滲率和年補注量分別為:濁水溪流域126.54 ,13.98億噸;烏溪流域141.16 ,10.81億噸;北港溪流域91.7 ,3.6億噸。2.基流資料估計法分析結果入滲率和年補注量分別為:濁水溪流域105.4 ,11.97億噸;烏溪流域119.62 ,9.06億噸;北港溪流域76.99 ,2.86億噸。
For investigating the balance of recharge and discharge of ground-water, the methods under mentioned are adduced. The methods are intended for analysis of the daily streamflow record of a basin where one can reasonably assume that all, or nearly all, ground water discharges to the stream except for that which is lost to riparian evapotranspiration, and where regulation and diversion of flow can be considered to be negligible. And the methods under mentioned are applied at three drainage basins, Cho-Shui Shi, Wu Shi and Pei-Kang Shi in Taiwan.
The analysis of the recession-curve-displacement method and the method of base-flow-record estimation are based on a simply assumptive environment without considering difference hydrogeological conditions. The first method estimates ground-water recharge, it is assumed that the linearity of the Master Recession Curve during times when surface(direct) runoff is not significant or when the profile of the ground-water head distribution has become nearly stable. The second method is one of base-flow separations,it is a relatively arbitrary procedure of estimating a continuous record of ground-water discharge, or base flow, under the streamflow hydrograph. And when the period of analysis is long enough that the effect on the water balance of changes in storage can be considered negligible, the mean ground-water discharge can be considered the effective recharge. The ground-water recharge noticed here is considered equal to the deep percolation in hydrography. Finally, ground-water recharge and discharge estimating by the recession-curve-displacement method and the method of base-flow-record estimation are compared.
The recession-curve-displacement method is preceded by the assignment of a value to the recession index. The sensitivity test of recession index shows that changing the recession index causes slight variation in recharge. The comparison of estimates of recharge and discharge is, if ground-water withdrawals are negligible, the difference between mean rate of ground-water recharge and discharge is riparian evapotranspiration-the loss of water from steram channels and the saturated zone near stream channels to the atmosphere.
The results of the infiltration rate and ground water recharge from the recession-curve-displacement mothod : Cho-Shui Shi basin is 126.54 , 13.98 billion ton, Wu Shi basin is 141.16 , 10.81 billion ton, Pei-Kang Shi basin is 91.7 , 3.6 billion ton; the results of the infiltration rate and ground water recharge from the method of base-flow-record estimation : Cho-Shui Shi basin is 105.4 , 11.97 billion ton, Wu Shi basin is 119.62 , 9.06 billion ton, Pei-Kang Shi basin is 76.99 , 2.86 billion ton.
摘要……………………………………………………………………….I
英文摘要………………………………………………………………..III
誌謝……………………………………………………………………...V
目錄……………………………………………………………………..VI
表目錄………………………………………………………………...IX
圖目錄…………………………………………………………………..X
符號說明……………………………………………………………….XII
第一章、 緒論………………………………………………………….1
1.1 前言及研究目的………………………………………………..1
1.2 前人相關研究…………………………………………………..2
1.3 研究方法與流程………………………………………………..4
第二章、 理論模式發展………………………………………………..8
2.1 逕流現象分析…………………………………………………..9
2.1.1 未飽和層逕流分析…………………………………….14
2.2 流量歷線……………………………………………………….15
2.3 模式之適用性及假設條件…………………………………….17
2.4 消退曲線位移法……………………………………………….18
2.4.1 地下水排水之消退分析……………………………….18
2.4.1.1 理論基礎……………………………………18
2.4.1.2 建立主要消退曲線…………………………21
2.4.2 地下水補注量之估計………………………………….22
2.4.2.1 模式之理論及其發展………………………23
2.5基流資料估計法……………………………………………….25
2.5.1 模式發展……………………………………………….25
2.5.2 模式應用………………………………………………32
第三章、 研究區域概述……………………………………………….35
3.1 流域概述……………………………………………………….39
3.1.1 濁水溪流域…………………………………………….39
3.1.2 烏溪流域……………………………………………….43
3.1.3 北港溪流域…………………………………………….46
3.2 測站資料……………………………………………………….48
第四章、 結果分析與討論…………………………………………….51
4.1 消退曲線位移法……………………………………………….51
4.1.1 地下水排水消退行為分析?主要消退曲線………….51
4.1.2 地下水補注量估計…………………………………….55
4.1.3 參數敏感度分析?消退指數………………………….57
4.2 基流資料估計法……………………………………………….59
4.2.1 地下水排水分析……………………………………….59
4.2.2 地表逕流基期………………………………………….63
4.2.3 地下水排水?基流分析結果………………………….63
4.3 兩模式結果比較與分析……………………………………….68
4.4 濁水溪流域地下水補注量相關研究………………………….72
第五章、 結論與建議………………………………………………….73
5.1 結論……………………………………………………………73
5.2 建議…………………………………………………………….75
參考文獻……………………………………………………………….76
附錄A 消退曲線位移法各測站分析結果………………………….84
A.1主要消退曲線圖……………………………………………..84
A.2分析年限內各月結果表……………………………………..93
附錄B 基流資料估計法各測站分析結果…………………………104
B.1河川流量歷線與基流歷線關係圖………………………….104
B.2分析年限內各月結果表…………………………………….113
Anderson, M.G., and Burt, T.P., 1980. Interpretation of recession. Journal of Hydrology, v.46, p. 89-101.
Barnes, B.S., 1939. The structure of discharge recession curves. Transactions of American Geophysical Union 20, p. 721-725.
Bevans, H.E., 1986. Estimating stream-aquifer interactions in coal areas of eastern Kansas by using streamflow records, in Subitzky, Seymour, ed., Selected papers in the Hydrologic Sciences. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2290, p. 51-64.
Boussinesq, J. 1877. Essa sur latheories des eaux courantes. Memoires presentes par divers savants a l''Academic des Sciences de l''Institut national de France. Tome XXIII, no. 1 .
Butler, S.S., 1957. Engineering Hydrology. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 356 pp.
Chow, V.T., 1964. Handbook of applied hydrology. New York, McGraw-hill, [variously paged].
Daniel, C.C., III, and Sharpless, N.B., 1983. Ground-water supply potential and procedures for well-site selection in the upper Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina. North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development and U.S. Water Resources Council, 73 p.
Daniel, J.F., 1976. Estimating groundwater evapotranspiration from streamflow records. Water Resources Research, v. 12, no. 3, p. 360-364.
Daniel, J.F., Cable, L.W., and Wolf, R.J., 1970. Ground water-surface water relation during periods of overland flow, in Geological Survey Research 1970. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 700-B, p. 219-223.
Dzhamalov, R.G., 1973. Ground-water flow of the Terek-Kuma artesian basin. Nauka Publ., Moscow. (in Russian).
Evaldi, R.D., and Lewis, J.G., 1983. Base flow and ground water in Upper Sweetwater Valley, Tennessee. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 83-4068. 30 p.
Faye, R.E., and Mayer, G.C., 1990, Ground-water flow and stream-aquifer relations in the northern coastal plain of Georgia and adjacent parts of Alabama and South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 88-4143, 83 p.
Gerhart, J.M. and Lazorchick, G.J., 1988. Evaluation of the ground-water resources of the lower Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania and Maryland. U.S. Geological Survey Water-supply Paper 2284, 128p.
Glover, R.E., 1964. Ground-water movement. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Engineering Monograph Series, no. 31, p. 31-34.
Ground-water flow map of Central and Eastern Europe on a 1 : 1,500,000 scale, VSEGINGEO Publ., Leningrad, 1983.
Ground-water flow of area of Central and Eastern Europe (Edited by Konoplyantsev A.A.), VSEGINGEO Publ., Leningrad, pp. 288, 1982 (in Russian).
Hall, F.R. 1968. Base-flow recessions?A review. Water Resources Research. V. 4, no. 5, pp. 973-983.
Hoos, A.B., 1990. Recharge rates and aquifer hydraulic characteristics for selected drainage basins in middle and east Tennessee. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 90-4015, 34 p.
Hornberger, G.M., Ebert, Janet, and Remson, Irwin, 1970. Numerical solution of the Boussinesq Equation for aquifer-stream interaction. Water Resource Research, v. 6, no. 2, p. 601-608.
Horton, R.E. 1933. The role of infiltration in the hydrologic cycle. Transactions of American Geophysical Union 14, p. 446-460.
Ibrahim, H.A. and Brutsaert, Wilfried, 1965. Inflow hydrographs from large unconfined aquifers. American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, v. 91, no. IR 2, p. 21-38.
Ineson, J. and Downing, R.A., 1964. The ground-water component of river discharge and its relationship to hydrogeology. Journal of the Institution of Water Engineers, v. 18, no. 7, p. 519-541.
Kudelin, B.I., 1960. Principles of regional assessment of natural ground-water resources. MGU Publ., Moscow, 344p. (in Russian).
Kulandaiswamy, V.C., and Seetharaman, S., 1969. A note on Barnes'' method of hydrograph separation. Journal of Hydrology, v. 9, p. 222-229.
Lebedeva, N.A., 1972. Natural ground-water resources of the Moscow artesian basin. Nedra Publ., Moscow, 148p. (in Russian).
Linsley, R.K., Jr., Kohler, M.A., and Paulhus, J.L.H., 1982. Hydrology for Engineers(3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York. 508 pp.
Mau, D.P. and Winter T.C., 1997. Estimating ground-water recharge from streamflow hydrographs for a small mountain watershed in a temperate humid climate, New Hampshire, USA. Ground Water. V. 35, no. 2, pp. 291-304.
Meyboom, P., 1961. Estimating ground-water recharge from stream hydrographs. Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 66, no. 4, p. 1,203-1,214.
Moore, G.K. 1992. Hydrograph analysis in a fractured rock terrane. Ground Water. V. 30, no. 3, pp. 390-395.
Nash, J.E., 1960. Aunit hydrograph study, with particular reference to British catchments, Proc. Inst. Eng., 17, pp. 249-282.
Nathan, R.J., and McMahon, T.A., 1990. Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analysis. Water Resources Research, v. 26, no. 7, p. 1,465-1473.
Olmsted, F.H. and Hely, A.G., 1962. Relation between ground water and surface water in Brandywine Creek basin Pennsylvania. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 417-A, 21p.
Pinder, G.F., and Jones, J.F., 1969. Determination of the gounde-water component of peak discharge from the chemistry of total runoff. Water Resources Research. V. 5, no. 2, p. 438-445.
Rorabaugh, M. I. 1964. Estimating changes in bank storage and ground water contribution to streamflow. Intern. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. Publ. Vol. 63, pp.432~441.
Rorabaugh, M. I. and W. D. Simons. 1966. Exploration of methods relating ground water to surface water, Columbia River Basin-Second phuse. U.S. Geological Survey Openfile Report. 62 pp.
Rutledge, A.T. and C.C. Daniel III. 1994. Testing an automated method to estimate ground-water recharge from streamflow records. Ground Water. V. 32, no. 2, pp. 180-189.
Rutledge, A.T., 1991. A new method for calculating a mathematical expression for streamflow recession, in Ritter, W.F., ed., Irrigation and Drainage. National Conference on Irrigation and Drainage, American Society of Civil Engineers, Irrigation and Drainage Division, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1991, Proceedings, p. 337-343.
Rutledge, A.T., 1992, Methods of using streamflow records for estimating total and effective recharge in the Appalachian Valley and Ridge, Piedmont, and Blue Ridge physiographic provinces, in Hotchkiss, W.R. and Johnson, A.I., eds., Regional aquifer systems of the United States, aquifers of the southern and eastern states. American Water Resources Association Monograph Series, no. 17, p. 59-73.
Rutledge, A.T., 1993. Computer Programs for Describing the Recession of Ground-Water Discharge and for Estimating Mean Ground-Water Recharge and Discharge from Streamflow Records. U.S. Geological Survey. Water Resources Investigations Report 93-4121, 45 p.
Singh, K.P. and Stall, J.B., 1971. Derivation of base flow recession curves and parameters. Water Resources Research, v. 7,
Snyder, F.F., 1939. A conception of runoff-phenomena. Transactions of American Geophysical Union 20: p. 725-738.
Toebes, C., and Strang, D.D., 1964. On recession curves; 1, Recession equations. Journal of Hydrology(New Zealand), v. 3, no. 2, p. 2-14.
USSR Map of Ground-Water Runoff on a 1 : 2,500,000 scale, Moscow, 1965.
Vsevolozhskii, V.A., 1983. Ground-water runoff and water balance of platform structures. Nedra Publ., Moscow, 168p. (in Russian).
Vsevolozhskii, V.A., I.S., Zektser, A.A. Konoplyantsev, and I.F. Fidelli, 1977. The main principles of regional estimation and mapping of groundwater flow of the Central and Eastern European Area. Journal of Hydrological Sciences (Poland), Vol. 4, No. 2, p. 85-95.
Wilder, H.B., and Simmons, C.E., 1978. Program for evaluating stream quality in North Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 764, 16p.
Wilson, E.M., 1974. Engineering Hydrology, 2nd ed., 232 pp., Macmillan, New York.
Wood, C.R., Flippo, H.N., Jr., Lescinsky, J.B., and Barker, J.L., 1972. Water Resources of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Geological Survey, 4th ser., Water Resources Report 31, 263 p.
Zektser, I.S. 1977. Laws of formation of groundwater runoff study. Nedra Publ., Moscow, 173p. (in Russian).
土木科技研究發展文教基金會,1997,地層下陷防治推動綜合計劃子計劃九?雲嘉地區安全出水量之估算,經濟部水資源局,共116頁。
中興工程顧問股份有限公司,1998,濁水溪沖積扇地表地下水聯合運用第二階段?濁水溪沖積扇地下水人工補注計劃?濁水溪沖積扇地下水人工補注環境影響評估報告,103P。
中興工程顧問股份有限公司,1998,濁水溪沖積扇地表地下水聯合運用第二階段?濁水溪沖積扇地下水人工補注規劃報告附錄,343P。
中興工程顧問股份有限公司,1998,濁水溪沖積扇地表地下水聯合運用第二階段?濁水溪沖積扇地下水開發及營運管理可行性規劃?濁水溪沖積扇地下水營運管理規劃報告,114P。
王如意、李如晃,1988,水文系統反向推估模式之研究及其應用於台灣主要流域之洪水預測,行政院農業委員會77農建-7.1-林-10F研究計劃報告。
王如意、易任,1979,應用水文學,國立編譯館出版,茂昌圖書有限司發行。
台灣水文年報,1997。台灣經濟部水資源局,378頁。
林再興,陳時祖,李振誥,1998,地層下陷防治綜合計劃子計劃四?彰化地層下陷區地下水入滲補注及安全出水量之評估,經濟部水資源局。
姜儷安、歐陽湘,1997,雲林地區地下水與水平衡初步分析,濁水溪沖積扇地下水及水文地質研討會論文集,經濟部水利司,台北,181-206頁。
張誠信,1996,雲林地區地下水流三維數值模擬,台灣大學農業工程研究所碩士論文,共90頁。
陳志忠,1997,彰化地區淺層土壤入滲行為之研究,國立成功大學資源工程研究所碩士論文。
陳俊焜,1998,濁水溪沖積扇地下水資源調配與管理之研究,國立成功大學資源工程研究所碩士論文。
陳進發,1998,彰化地區未飽和層水平衡分析之研究,國立成功大學資源工程研究所碩士論文。
陳進發等人,1998,未飽和層均質土壤入滲分析之研究,中國礦冶工程學會八十七年年會,p. A-11-1~A-11-8。
陳進發等人,1998,彰化地區未飽和層水平衡分析之研究,第九屆水利工程研討會,p. G145~G152。
陳進發等人,1999,應用未飽和層水平衡理論估計彰化地區地下水補注量之研究,台灣水利,v. 47,n. 1,13p。
葉文工,1998,台灣沿海地區地下水超抽改善方案研擬與評估(II),水資源局。
嘉義農專,1991,彰化縣和美地區地下水資源之研究,國立台灣師範大學地理學研究所碩士論文。
劉俊達,1997,彰化地區地下水資源調配與管理之研究,國立成功大學資源工程研究所碩士論文。
劉振宇等,1998,地層下陷防治推動綜合計劃子計劃九?濁水溪沖積扇扇央及扇尾平原地區地表垂向補注量評估,經濟部水資源局,共69頁。
劉聰桂,1996,濁水溪沖積扇之地下水資源?碳十四與氚定年/示蹤研究,濁水溪沖積扇地下水集水文地質研討會論文集,經濟部水利司,台北,181-206頁。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top