跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.14) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/12/26 18:43
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:鍾玉君
研究生(外文):Yi-Chun CHUNG
論文名稱:供應鏈設計、供應鏈能力與供應鏈績效之關聯性研究
論文名稱(外文):The Relationship among Supply Chain Design , Capabilities and performance
指導教授:劉基全劉基全引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ji-Chyuan LIOU
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國防管理學院
系所名稱:資源管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:中文
論文頁數:67
中文關鍵詞:供應鏈設計供應鏈能力供應鏈績效結構方程模式
外文關鍵詞:supply chain designsupply chain capabilitiessupply chain performanceSEM(Structural Equation Modeling)
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:264
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
企業面對經營環境的劇烈變化,已不再把自己當作獨立個體,而紛紛致力於建立自己的供應鏈體系,使得供應鏈的整體概念受到重視。有鑑於此,本研究嘗試對台灣製造業之供應鏈能力上進行研究,探討供應鏈能力對供應鏈設計及供應鏈績效之影響,並建立完整之因果關係模式,以線性結構模式(SEM)驗證企業進行供應鏈設計及能力之利益。藉此了解供應鏈能力程度的增加是否能使企業之供應鏈績效提昇。研究結果可作為業者進行長期規劃與策略佈局之依據。
本文旨在從與供應鏈設計探討供應鏈能力與供應鏈績效之關聯性。依據相關文獻以邏輯建立研究模式,針對供應鏈設計(供應網路結構、減少供應商基礎、長期關係、溝通、跨功能小組、供應商參與、物流整合)、供應鏈能力與供應鏈績效等研究變數,以台灣製造業為研究對象,採郵寄問卷蒐集資料,並以線性結構關係(LISREL)驗證研究模式。
研究發現供應網路結構顯著正向影響供應鏈能力、物流整合顯著正向影響供應鏈能力、供應鏈能力顯著正向影響供應鏈績效、物流整合顯著正向影響供應鏈績效;供應鏈能力確在供應鏈設計與供應鏈績效間扮演部分中介效果。
One of the most significant changes in the paradigm of business management is the fact that an individual business no longer competes as solely autonomous entity, but rather as supply chains. Unfortunately, empirical studies have rarely focused on supply chain management in Taiwan. The objective of this study is to examine the relationship among supply chain design, supply chain capabilities and supply chain performance and manufacturing industries in Taiwan utilizing the SEM approach. The findings of this research can provide the industry the reference to select the proper supply chain capabilities in order to achieve supply chain design and supply chain performance.
Based on the theories, the research model of supply chain design (supply network structure, supplier base reduction, long-term relationships, communication, cross-functional teams, supplier involvement, logistics integration), supply chain capabilities, and supply chain performance was identified. A survey of manufacturing industries in Taiwan was undertaken in order to examine the research model, utilizing LISREL.
The results of this research can be summarized as follows:supply network structure demonstrated a positive association with supply chain capabilities;logistics integration affect supply chain capabilities;supply chain capabilities affect supply chain performance, logistics integration affect supply chain performance;and supply chain capabilities competency plays a partially moderated role between supply chain design and supply chain performance.
中文摘要…………………………………………………………………Ⅰ
英文摘要…………………………………………………………………Ⅱ
誌謝………………………………………………………………………Ⅲ
目錄………………………………………………………………………IV
圖目錄……………………………………………………………………VII
表目錄……………………………………………………………………VIII
第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………1
1.1研究背景與動機……………………………………………………1
1.2研究目的……………………………………………………………2
1.3研究流程……………………………………………………………3
第二章 文獻探討與假設建立…………………………………………4
2.1 供應鏈管理………………………………………………………4
2.1.1 供應鏈之定義…………………………………………………4
2.1.2 供應鏈管理之定義……………………………………………6
2.2 供應鏈設計相關文獻……………………………………………8
2.3 供應鏈能力相關文獻……………………………………………11
2.4 供應鏈績效相關文獻……………………………………………13
2.5 供應鏈設計與供應鏈能力之關聯性……………………………16
2.6 供應鏈能力與供應鏈績效之關聯性……………………………19
2.7 供應鏈設計、供應鏈能力與供應鏈績效之關聯性……………20
2.8 供應鏈設計與供應鏈績效之關聯性……………………………22
第三章 研究方法………………………………………………………25
3.1 研究架構…………………………………………………………25
3.2 操作性定義與衡量工具…………………………………………26
3.2.1 供應鏈設計……………………………………………………26
3.2.2 供應鏈能力……………………………………………………27
3.2.3 供應鏈績效……………………………………………………28
3.2.4 個人基本變項…………………………………………………29
3.3 研究對象…………………………………………………………29
3.4 預試問卷之信度分析……………………………………………30
3.5 分析方法…………………………………………………………31
第四章 料分析與結果…………………………………………………33
4.1 樣本結構分析……………………………………………………33
4.2 正式問卷信度、效度分析………………………………………34
4.2.1 信度分析………………………………………………………34
4.2.2 效度分析………………………………………………………38
4.3 變異數膨脹係數…………………………………………………40
4.4 各變項間相關分析………………………………………………41
4.5 研究假設之驗證…………………………………………………43
4.5.1 結構化方程模式………………………………………………43
4.5.2 路徑分析………………………………………………………44
第五章 結論與建議……………………………………………………48
5.1 研究結論…………………………………………………………48
5.2 管理意涵…………………………………………………………53
5.3 研究限制…………………………………………………………54
5.4 後續研究建議……………………………………………………55
參考文獻………………………………………………………………56
附錄一、研究問卷……………………………………………………64
附錄二、 各變數題項負荷量及T檢定值彙整表……………………68
圖 目 錄
圖1.1 研究流程圖……………………………………………………3
圖3.1 研究架構圖……………………………………………………25
圖4.1 最適化模式路徑分析圖………………………………………47
表 目 錄
表2.1 供應鏈之定義…………………………………………………5
表2.2 供應鏈管理之定義……………………………………………7
表2.3 SCOR第一階層衡量尺度……………………………………14
表3.1 預試問卷各構面之Cronbach’s α係數彙整表…………31
表4.1 研究樣本分析………………………………………………34
表4.2 供應鏈設計之平均值、標準差與相關係數分析…………35
表4.3 供應鏈能力之平均值、標準差與相關係數分析…………36
表4.4 供應鏈績效之平均值、標準差與相關係數分析…………36
表4.5 各變項之驗證性因素分析結果彙整表……………………37
表4.6 各構面之收斂效度檢定……………………………………39
表4.7 供應鏈設計構面間區別效度檢定表………………………40
表4.8 變異數膨脹係數檢定表……………………………………41
表4.9 相關係數矩陣表……………………………………………42
表4.10中介效果巢狀模式比較分析結果…………………………43
表4.11假設路徑驗證結果…………………………………………44
表5.1 研究假設驗證結果彙整表…………………………………49
中文文獻:
李忠傑(民90),「由進化的觀點探討國際供應鏈的設計與管理─以台達電子為研究個案」,台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
邱皓政(民91),社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析-SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北:五南。
葉詠滋(民92),「影響供應鏈策略及其效益之相關因素研究-以台灣製造業為例」,成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(民92),多變量分析方法-統計軟體應用。台北:五南。
孫儷芳(民91),「與供應商夥伴關係、外部供應鏈整合能力和經營績效關係之研究-以台灣資訊電子產業為例」,台北大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
英文文獻:
Battaglia, A. J. (1994). Logistics as a Competitive Weapon. Chief Executive, 99, pp.50-66.
Beamon, B. M. (1998). Supply Chain Design and Analysis:Models and Methods. International Journal of Production Economics, 55, pp.281-294.
Beamon, B. M. (1999). Measuring Supply Chain Performance.International Journal of Operations & Production Management. Vol. 19, No. 3 , pp.275-292.
Birou, L. and Stanley E. Fawcett (1993). International Purchasing:Benefits, Requirements, and Challenges.International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Spring, pp.28-37.
Brewer, P.C. and T.W. Speh(2000). Using the Balanced Scorecard to Measure Supply Chain Performance.Journal of Business Logistics, Vol.21, No.1,pp.75-93.
Chen, I. J. and Paulraj A.(2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management:the constructs and measurements.Journal of Operations Management, Vol.22,pp. 119-150.
Christopher, M. (1994). Logistics and Supply Chain Management. London:Financial Times.
Cooper, M.C. and L. M. Ellram (1993). Characteristics of Supply Chain Management and the Implications for Purchasing and Logistics Strategy.Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 14,No. 2,pp. 13-24.
Cooper, M.C., D. M. Lambert and J. D. Pagh (1997). Supply Chain Management:Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities.The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 9,No. 2,p.p 1-19.
Chopra, S. and P. Meindl (2001). Supply chain management:Strategy, Planning, and Operation, Pearson-Education.
Dornier, P. P., R.Ernst, M. Fender, and P. Kouvelis (1998).Global Operations and Logistics.Published by Wiley & Sons.
Ellram, L.M.(1991). Supply Chain Management.International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 21,No. 1,pp.13-33.
Fisher, M. L.(1997).Effective Supply Chains.Harvard Business Review, March-April, pp.105-116.
Fawcet, Stanley Et al, 1997. Developing a logistics capability to improve theperformance of international operations. Journal of business logistics.18(2).
Gregory L Schlegel, Richard C Smith (2005). The Next Stage of Supply Chain Excellence.Supply Chain Management Review, Mar,pp.16-22.
Hahn C. K., A. Duplaga and J. L. Hartley(2000). Supply Chain Synchtonization Lesson from Hyundai Motor Company.Interface, Vol. 30, No. 4,pp. 32-45.
Handfield, R. B. and E. L. Nichols(1999). Introduction to Supply Chain Management, Prentice Hall.
Harrington, L. H. (1997). Supply Chain Integration from the Inside.Transportation and Distribution, Vol. 38, Iss. 3,pp. 35-38.
Huan, S. H., S. K. Sheoran and G. Wang (2004). A review and analysis of supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model.Supply Chain Management, Vol. 9, Iss. 1,pp.23-29
Janda, S. and S. Seshadri (2001). The influence of Purchasing Strategies on Performance.Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, Vol.16,No.4.
Jones, T. C. and D. W. Tailey (1985). Using Inventory for Competitive Advantage through Supply Chain Management.The International Journal of Physical Distribution and Material Management, Vol. 15,No. 5,pp. 16-26.
Johnson, J. I., J. B. Cullen, T. Sakano and H. Takenouchi(1996). Setting the stage for trust and strategic integration in Japaness-U.S. cooperative alliances. Journal of International Business studies, Vol.27, Iss.5,pp.981-1004
Kalakota, R. and A. B. Whinston (1997). Frontiers of Electronic Commerce, Addison-Wesley.
Lambert, D. M., D. C. Cooper and J. D. Pagh(1998). Supply Chain Management:Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities.The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 9,No. 2,pp. 1-19.
Landeros, R. and R. M. Mnczka(1989). Cooperative Buyer/Seller Relationships and a Firm’s Competitive Posture, Journal of Purchasing and Material Management ,fall, pp.9-18.
Landeros, R., P. Reck and R. E. Plank(1995). Maintaining Buyer-Supplier Partnerships. International Journal of Purchasing and Management, Vol.31, No.3, pp.3-11.
Lee, H. L. and C. Bilington(1992). Managing Supply Chain Inventory:Pitfalls and Opportunities.Sloan Management Review, Spring, pp. 65-73.
Lockamy, A., R. M. Beal and W. I. Smith(2000). Supply Chain Excellence for Accelerated Improvement.Interface, July-August, pp. 23-31.
Lummus, P. R., R. J. Vokurka and K. L. Alber(1998). Strategic Supply Chain Planning.Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol. 39,pp.49-58.
Lynch, Keller, & Ozment(2000). The Effects of Logistics Capabilities and Strategy On Firm Performance.Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 21,pp. 47-50.
Maloni, M. J. and W. C. Benton(1997). Supply Chain Partnerships:Opportunities for Operations Research, European Journal of Operation Research, Vol.101, No.3, pp.419-429.
Michigan State University Supply Chain Benchmarking Research Team (MSUSCBRT) (1999). 21 Century Logistics:Marking Supply Chain Integration a Reality, Oak Brook, IL:Council of Logistics Management.
Monczka, R., G. Ragatz, R. Handfield, R. Trent and D. Frayer(1997). Executive Summary:Supplier Integration into New Product Development:A Strategy fro Competitive Advantage. The Global Procurement and Supply Chain Benchmarking Initiative, Michigan State University, The EliBroad Graduage School of Management.
Morash, & Cliton(1995). The Role of Transportation Capabilities in International Supply Chain Management.Transportation Journal, Spring, pp.5-8
Morash, E., Droge, C., & Vickery(1996).Strategic Logistics Capabilities for Competitive Advantage and Firm Success.Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 17,pp.1-21.
Morash, E. (2001). Supply Chain Strategies, Capabilities, and Performance.Transportation Journal, Fall, 41, pp.37-54.
Novack, Robert A, Rinehart, Lloyd M, Langley, C John Jr(1996). A Comparative Assessment of Senior and Logistics Executives’ Perceptions of Logistics Value.Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 17, No.1, pp.135-178.
Nunnally, J.,(1978). Psychometric Theory. New York:McGraw-Hill.
Oliver, K. R. and M. D. Webber(1982). Supply Chain Management:Logistics Catches Up with Strategy. Outlook, cit
Scannell, T., S. K. Vickery and C. Droge(2000). Upstream Supply Chain Management and Competitive Performance in the Automotive Supply Industry.Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 21,No. 1,pp. 23-48.
Schwarz, L. B. and Z. K. Weng (2000). The Design of a JIT Supply Chain:The Effect of lead time Uncertainty on Safety Stock.Journal of Business Logistics, Vol.21, No.2.
Scott, C. and Westbrook, R. (1991). New Strategic Tools for Supply Chain Management.International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 21,No. 1,pp. 23-33.
Simchi-Levi, D., P. Kaminsky and E. Simchi-Levi(2003). Designing and Managing the Supply Chain:Concepts, Strategies, and Case Studies. McGraw-Hill.
Stevens, S. (1989). Integrating the Supply Chain.International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, Vol.8, No. 8,pp. 3-8.
Stuart, F. I.(1993). Supplier Partnerships:Influencing Factors and Strategic Benefits. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol.29, No.4,pp.23.
Tian, C., Y. Chai, Y. Liu and S. Ren(2003). Performance Management in Supply Chain.The Institute of Electrical and Electronics, pp.4934-4939.
Vickery, S., R. Calantone, and C. Droge (1999). Supply Chain Flexibility:An Empirical Study.The Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 35 (3).
Vonderembse, M. A. and M. Tracey(1999). The Impact of Supplier-Selection Criteria and Supplier Involvement on Manufacturing Performance.The Journal of Supply Chain Management , Summer, pp.33-39.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 謝臥龍(民86)。優良國中教師特質之德懷術分析。教育研究資訊,第5 卷,第3 期,頁14-28。
2. 謝臥龍(民86)。優良國中教師特質之德懷術分析。教育研究資訊,第5 卷,第3 期,頁14-28。
3. 謝潮儀(民72)。德爾斐(Delphi)專家學者問卷法之應用~以台北都會區為例。法商學報,第18 期。頁109-132。
4. 潘裕豐(民82)。國小批判思考教學效果之實驗研究。特殊教育研究學刊,第9 期。頁233-248。
5. 潘裕豐(民82)。國小批判思考教學效果之實驗研究。特殊教育研究學刊,第9 期。頁233-248。
6. 葉運偉(民86)。屏東縣國民小學技術效率之研究-「四分區技術效率模式」之應用。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
7. 葉運偉(民86)。屏東縣國民小學技術效率之研究-「四分區技術效率模式」之應用。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
8. 曾慧超、梁德昭(民85)。電腦輔助教學軟體評量模式之建構。資訊與教育雜誌,第53 期。頁43-55。
9. 曾慧超、梁德昭(民85)。電腦輔助教學軟體評量模式之建構。資訊與教育雜誌,第53 期。頁43-55。
10. 謝潮儀(民72)。德爾斐(Delphi)專家學者問卷法之應用~以台北都會區為例。法商學報,第18 期。頁109-132。
11. 莊謙本(民88)。教育評鑑指標的建構。技術及職業教育雙月刊,第52期。頁7-9。
12. 莊謙本(民88)。教育評鑑指標的建構。技術及職業教育雙月刊,第52期。頁7-9。
13. 陳榮方(民87)。以資料包絡法評量我國大學校院之教育品質。高雄科學技術學院學報,第28 期。頁227-237。
14. 陳榮方(民87)。以資料包絡法評量我國大學校院之教育品質。高雄科學技術學院學報,第28 期。頁227-237。
15. 吳政達、郭昭佑(民86)。概念構圖法在國民小學教科書評鑑標準建構之應用。教育與心理研究,第20 期。頁217-242。