跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.106) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/04/04 08:45
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:詹淑惠
研究生(外文):Shu-Hui Chan
論文名稱:技職體系學校原文教科書之使用研究
論文名稱(外文):The Study of the Use of English Original Content Area Textbooks in Technological and Vocational Universities and Colleges
指導教授:林世忠林世忠引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shih-Chung Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立屏東商業技術學院
系所名稱:應用外語系
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:英文
論文頁數:185
中文關鍵詞:原文教科書老師的信念及目的學習動機學習態度學習困難度
外文關鍵詞:learning difficultiesEnglish original content area textbooksteachers’ beliefs and purposeslearning motivationlearning attitudes
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:369
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
在技職體系學校裡,原文教科書普遍被用於專業科目之教學。民國九十三年,教育部更將推行原文教科書於專業科目教學納入教學國際化之政策的重點項目之一。然而,在學生的英文程度參差不齊的情況下,授課教師的教學可能與學生的學習成效間產生落差。因此,本文旨在藉由問卷方式了解教師的觀點及學生的反應來探究技職院校使用原文教科書教授專業科目的可行性。主要的問卷研究結果顯示 : 第一,技職院校學生的英文能力(尤其是單字量)及背景知識還不足以應用於原文教科書學習。第二、技職院校教師相信也偏好使用原文教科書,但也同時認為學生的專業科目學習成效及學習興趣並未因此有所提升。第三、技職院校學生對使用原文教科書抱持正面態度,不過,由於對教師上課方式及專業科目學習成效產生挫折感,因此,學習動機和學習興趣趨向低落。第四、雖然教育部訂定的政策仍未獲得老師及學生的支持但技職院校的老師大多能接受使用原文教科書上課。本研究結果建議學校應針對各專業科目不同需求以分科方式在大一及大二設立專業英語課程,而專業科目老師再於大三及大四時開始使用原文教科書做教學。 另外,小型教學研究應在政策推行前於各大技職院校實施以便利於所有技職體系學校之推動。
English original content area (EOCA) textbooks are commonly used in technological and vocational education universities and colleges (TVUC) to instruct specialist subjects. In 2004, the Ministry of Education initiated an internationalization policy to enhance students’ English proficiency, and promoted the application of EOCA textbooks in specialist subject learning. However, due to the diverse levels of students’ English proficiency, there might be gaps between learning effect and instruction. Thus, the aim of the current study was to examine the feasibility and the use of EOCA textbooks in TVUC by distributing questionnaires, which were designed to assess teachers’ perceptions and freshmen’s reflections towards the use of EOCA textbooks. Descriptive statistics presented the following four major findings. First, TVUC students did not have sufficient English proficiency, vocabulary size, and background knowledge towards the use of EOCA textbooks. Second, TVUC teachers preferred to use EOCA textbooks; however, they also understood that it did not enhance students’ specialist subject learning effects and learning interests. Third, students had positive attitudes towards the use of EOCA textbooks, but their learning motivation and interests were low because of their dissatisfaction with teachers’ teaching methods in using EOCA textbooks and the frustration of unsatisfactory performance in the specialist subject learning. Fourth, although teachers and students did not agree with the educational policy, EOCA textbooks have already been adopted in TVUC. Thus, the study recommended TVUC have a series of ESP courses for the freshmen and sophomores. After they studied ESP in the first two year programs, specialist subject teachers use EOCA textbooks in class instructions during the last two years. Moreover, in order to determine a feasible and effective implementation model for all TVUC to adopt, the policy should be conducted first in various TVUC with different levels.
Abstract (Chinese) .i
Abstract .ii
Acknowledgments .iv
Table of Contents v
Figures .viii
Tables .viii
CHAPTER 1 1
Introduction 1
Background of the Study 2
Problem Statement of the Study 7
Purpose of the Study 8
Research Questions 9
Definition of Terms .10
Significance of the Study .12
Limitation of the Study 14
CHAPTER 2 16
Literature Review 16
The Development of EOCA Textbooks in TVUC Education 17
The Educational Policy towards the Use of EOCA Textbooks
in TVUC Education in Taiwan 20
The Essential Elements towards the Use of EOCA Textbooks 25
Vocabulary Size in EOCA Textbooks 26
Background Knowledge in EOCA Textbooks 30
The Influence of the Use of EOCA Textbooks in Specialist
Subject Courses…..……………. 32
The Influence of EOCA Textbooks towards Teaching Beliefs…………….35
The Influence of EOCA Textbooks towards Learning Motivation and
Attitudes……………...…………………………………………………….39
Summary 42
CHAPTER 3 44
Methodology 44
Pilot Study 45
Instrument 46
Participants 49
Procedure 51
Data Analysis 55
CHAPTER 4 57
Results 57
Demographic Data 57
Questionnaire Analysis 58
TVUC Students’ English Proficiency and Background Knowledge
for Conducting EOCA Textbooks Study. 58
TVUC students’ English proficiency 59
TVUC teachers’ background knowledge 60
Findings of Teachers’ Perceptions towards EOCA Textbooks 62
TVUC teachers’ general perceptions 62
Differences among the northern, central and southern TVUC teachers 70
Differences between the public and private TVUC teachers 71
TVUC teachers’ beliefs towards EOCA textbooks 72
The advantages and disadvantages 75
Findings of TVUC Teachers’ Main Purposes in Selecting
EOCA Textbooks 76
Findings of Students’ Opinions towards EOCA Textbooks 79
TVUC students’ general opinions 79
Differences among the northern, central and southern TVUC students 87
Differences between the public and private TVUC students 89
Differences between the technological university and
technological college students 91
TVUC students’ motivation and attitudes 92
The advantages and disadvantages 96
Findings of TVUC Students’ Difficulties in the Use of
EOCA textbooks ..98
Finding of the Relationship between Teachers’ Perceptions
and Students’ Opinions 100
Findings of the Executive Effect of the Educational Policy 105
TVUC teachers and students’ understandings 106
TVUC teachers and students’ thoughts 107
The distribution of the use of EOCA textbooks in TVUC 109
Brief Summary of the Results 115
CHAPTER 5 119
Conclusion 119
Findings of the Study 119
Discussion 123
Pedagogical Implications 128
Suggestions for Future Studies 132
References 134
Appendix A: Teacher’s Questionnaire 147
Appendix B: Teacher’s Questionnaire (Chinese Version) 157
Appendix C: Student’s Questionnaire 165
Appendix D: Student’s Questionnaire (Chinese Version) 175
Appendix E: Distribution of the Participants 183
Appendix F: Demographic Data 184
Reference
Apple, M. W. (2000). Official knowledge (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Apple, M. W., & Christian-Smith, L. K. (1991). The politics of the textbook. In M. W. Apple & L. K. Christian-Smith (Eds.), The politics of the textbook (pp. 1-21). N. Y.: Routledge.
Applebee , A. N. (1981). Writing in the second school. Urbanan, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Bean, T. W., & Readence, J. E. (1994). A comparative study of content area literacy. Retrieved April 12, 2008, from the ERIC on-line database. ED 378566.
Billmeyer, R. T., & Barton, M. L. (1998). Teaching Reading in the Content Areas; If Not Me. Then Who? (2nd ed.). Aurora, Colorado: McREL.
Blanton, L. L. (1984). Using a hierarchical model to teach academic reading to advance ESL students: How to make a long story short. The ESP Journal, 3, 37-46.
Brand-Gruwel, S., Aarnoutse, C. A. J., & Van den Bos, K. P. (1998). Improving text comprehension strategies in reading and listening settings. Learning and Instruction, 8(1), 63-81.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.

Bruner, J. (1977). The process of education. Harvard: Harvard University.
Castell, S. D., Luke, A., & Luk. C. (1989). Language, authority and criticism. Reading on
the school textbook. New York: The Falmer Press.
Chall, J. S., & Conard, S. (1991). Should textbooks challenge students: A case for easy or hard textbooks? New York: Teachers College.
Chambliss, M. J., & Calfee, R. C. (1998). Textbooks for learning: Nurturing children’s minds. Malden: Blackwell.
Chen, Aleck S. W., & Liu, G. Z. (2007). The impact of English exit policy on motivation and motivated learning behaviors. Proceedings of the 24th conference on English teaching and learning, 104-105.
Chen, C. M., Huang, C. C., Yang, Y. F., & Yu, H. Y. (2006). English proficiency of colleges’ students and the language certification threshold of graduation. The 23rd International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China-Changes, Chances, and Challenges in English Teaching & Learning, 523-535.
Chen, E. S. (2002). Some aspects of teaching English for specific purposes (ESP) versus teaching ESL: A focus on teaching ob business English. The Proceedings of 2002 Conference and Workshop on TEFL & Applied Linguistic, 27-37.
Chen, H. J. (1998). A preliminary investigation on Taiwanese EFL learners’ vocabulary size. Proceedings of the 15th Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China, 193-211.
Chen, H. J. (1999). How many words do they know? Assessing Taiwanese college EFL students’ receptive and productive vocabularies. Proceeding of the 16th Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China, 83-97.
Christian-Smith, L. K. (1989). Power, knowledge and Curriculum: Constructing femininity in adolescent romance novels. In S. D. Castell & A. Luke & C. Luke (Eds.), Language, authority and criticism: Reading on the school textbook. London: Falmer.
Christopher, D. B., & Wayne, W. (1995). Middle school science teachers’ perception of textbook congruency with classroom needs. Retrieved January 22, 2007, from the ERIC on-line database. ED 389696.
Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. The Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 287-311.
Combs, A. W. (1988). Changing our assumptions about educational reform. The Education Digest, 54(2), 3-6.
Davies, S. (2003). Content based instruction in EFL contexts. The Internet TESL Journal, IX (2).

Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal. 78(3), 273-284.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. (1998). Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Edge, J., & Wharton, S. (1998). Autonomy and development: living in the materials world. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 295-310). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Fang, Y. C. (2004). Investigating students’ and teachers’ views about the English language curriculum. Selected Papers from the Thirteenth International Symposium and Book Fair on English Teaching, 372-384.
Gamble, M. W., & Gamble, T. K. (1983). Textbook development. Retrieved April 20, 2008, from the ERIC on-line database. ED 236740.
Gardner, R. C. (1968). Attitudes and motivation: Their role in second-language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 2(3), 141-150.
Gardner, R. C., & Tremblay, P. F. (1994). On motivation, research agendas, and theoretical frameworks. The Modern Language Journal. 78(3), 359-368.
Goodman, K. S. (1971). Psycholinguistic universals in the reading process. In P. Pimsleur & T. Quinn (Eds.), The psychology of second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Gower, R., Phillips, D., & Walters, S. (1995). Teaching Practice Handbook (2nd ed.). Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann.
Hirsch, JR. E. D. (2007). The knowledge deficit: Closing the shocking education gap for American children. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Hsieh, L.T. (1999). The effects of pre-reading vocabulary instruction and cultural background knowledge activation on Chinese Junior College Fourth-Year students’ EFL reading. Proceedings of the 16th Conference of English Teaching &Learning in Republic of China, 227-239.
Hsieh, L.T. (2003). Pre-reading activities and EFL reading. Journal of Applied Foreign Languages. 1, 1-21.
Hsu, W. L. (2003). Fei yu wun jhuan ye si k eying wun jiao syue jhih zai sih kao. [Re-thought of non-English majors’ English instruction.] The Proceeding of 2003 International Conference and Workshop on TEFL & Applied Linguistics, 148-156.
Huang, C. C. (2000). A threshold for vocabulary knowledge on reading comprehension. Proceedings of the 7th Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China, 132-143.
Huang, C. C. (2001). An investigation of ESP students’ vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension. Selected Papers from the 10th International Symposium on English Teaching. 436-445.
Huang, C. C. (2003). Senior high students’ vocabulary knowledge, content knowledge, and reading comprehension. Selected Papers from the 12th International Symposium on English Teaching. 391-402.
Huang, S. C. (2006). Reading English for academic purposes- what situational factors may motivate learners to read? System, 34(2006), 371-383.
Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315-328.
Huhn, R. H. (1980). Readiness as a variable influence comprehension in content-area reading at the secondary level: A cognitive view. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 29-33.
Joe, S. G. (2000). Ke ji da syue syue sheng yue du yuan wun shu ji li jie sing wei yu syue si si guan yan join. [The study of technological university students’ EOCA textbooks reading comprehension and learning behaviors.] Taiwan: STPI. (NSC89-2411-H-224-003)
Johnson, P. (1981). Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity and cultural background of a text. TESOL Quarterly, 15(2), 169-181.
Johnson, P. (1982). Effects on reading comprehension of building background knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), 503-516.

Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for Academic Purposes: A guide and resource book for teacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Komoski, P. K. (1985). “Instructional material will not improve until we change the system.” Educational Learnership, 42(7), 31-37.
Li, S., & Munby, H. (1996). Metacognitive strategies in second language academic reading : A qualitative investigation. English for Specific Purposes, 15 (3), 199-216.
Lin, M. S. (1996). A comparison between senior high and vocational high schools of ROC in English instruction. Selected Papers from the 12th Symposium on English Teaching, 7, 1-20.
Lin, M. S. (2003). The challenge and response of TVES colleges’ English education. The Proceedings of 2003 International Conference and Workshop on TEFL & Applied Linguistics, 519.
Liu, T. R. (2000). Analysis of reading difficulties of ESL/EFL learners. Journal of Kangnam University, 35, 1-27.
Liying, C. (1995). What foreign language learners do in their academic reading? Retrieved January 18, 2007, from the ERIC on-line database. ED 386041.
Lo, Y. F. (2006). Jhuan ye ke mu jiao shih duei yi ying yu jiao shou fei yu wun lei jhuan ye ke cheng jhih tai du: ge an yan jiou. [A case study of specialist subject teachers’ attitude in using English to teacher specialist subject.] The 23rd International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China, 2, 924-937
Loew, H. Z. (1984). Developing strategic reading skills. Foreign Language Annals, 17(4), 301-303.
Masuhara, H. (1998). What do teachers really want from coursebooks? In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 239-260). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
McGrath, L. (2006). Teachers’ and learners’ images for coursebooks. ELT Journal, 60(2), 171-180.
Muther, C. (1985). What every textbook evaluator should know. Educational Leadership, 42(7), 4-8.
Ministry of Education (MOE). (2004). Jiou shin san nian du jiao yu bu ban li ji jhuan siao yuan ti shen syue sheng wai yu neng li jhuan an bu jhu yao dian. [2004 MOE implemented the policy for enhancing TVUC students’ English proficiency.] Retrieved October 20, 2006, from http://w2.hwc.edu.tw/account/04%E8%B2%A1%E5%8B%99%E8%B3%87%E8%A8%8A/m040601a/04060133.pdf
Nation, I.S.P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
Nebila, D. H. (2003). Evaluating the effectiveness of Metacognitive strategy training for reading research articles in an ESP context. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 387-417.
Noordin, N., & Samad, A. A. (2005). Examining the importance of EST and ESL textbooks and materials: Objectives, content and form. Retrieved December 20, 2006, from the ESP World on-line database. 1(9), 4.
O’Neill, R. (1982). Why use textbooks? ELT Journal, 36(2), 104-111.
Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513-536.
Readence, J., Bean, T. W., & Baldwin, R. S. (1995). Content Area Literacy: An Integrated Approach. (5th ed.). Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Pub.
Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can Curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Two fourth-grade teachers’ use of a new mathematics text. Elementary School Journal, 100, 331-350.
Richards, J. C. (1998). Beyond Training. New York: Cambridge University.
Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237-246.
Shen, Y. S., & Yuan, C. M. (2005). Applying extensive reading in freshmen English reading course at college level. The Proceedings of 2005 International Conference and Workshop on TEFL & Applied Linguistics, 331-341.
Simth, F. (2004). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read (6th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Publishing Co.
Smith, F. R., & Feathers, K. M. (1983). Teacher and student perceptions of content area reading. Journal of Reading, 26, 348-354.
Su, F. S. (2005). A remarkable type of ESP- English for stressful purposes. Journal of Applied Foreign Languages, 3, 29-50.
Su, H. H. (2005). The development of ESP in Technological and Vocational higher education in Taiwan, with particular reference to the department of applied foreign languages, The Proceedings of 2005 International Conference and Workshop on TEFL & Applied Linguistics, 349-355.
Technological and Vocational Education. (2006). Historical Background of TVE System. Retrieved April 11, 2007, from http://www.tve.edu.tw/EngWeb/EngTveMenu.asp?Catid=3
Tsai, R. M., & Huang, S. H. (2003). A comparison between high and low English proficiency learners’ beliefs. Selected Papers from the Twelfth International Symposium on English Teaching, 552-558.
Uhlir, P. (2003). Improving student academic reading achievement through the

use of multiple intelligence teaching strategies. Retrieved April 9, 2006, from
the ERIC on-line database. ED 479914.
Uso-juan, E. (2006). The compensatory nature of discipline-related knowledge and Englsih-language proficiency in reading English for academic purposes. The Modern Language journal. 90(2), 210-227.
Vacca, R. T., & Vacca, J. L. (1999) Content Area Reading: Literacy and Learning across the Curriculum (6th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
Vacca, R. T., & Vacca, J. L. (2007) Content Area Reading: Literacy and Learning across the Curriculum (9th ed.). New York: Longman.
Vellenga, H. (2004). Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: How likely? Retrieved December 20, 2006, from the TESL on-line database. 8(2), ISSN: 1072-4303.
Wang, Y. H. (2003). Dang cian shang ye ji shu syue yue ying yu jiao syue chuang sin yu che lyu tan tao. [Innovation and strategy discussion on English teaching of the institutes of commerce.] Retrieved May 19, 2006, from database on the Continuing Education Chinese Culture University Web: http://w3.sce.pccu.edu.tw/tveb%5F20070326/68%2D73web/75thweb/
Warden, C. A., & Lin, H. J. (2000). Existence of integrative motivation in an Asian EFL setting. Foreign Language Annals, 33(5), 535-547.
Wu, S. R. (2002). TVES college English teachers’ pedagogical thoughts on reading instruction. Selected Papers from the 11th International Symposium on English Teaching/ 4th Pan-Asian Conference, 582-591.
Yang, Y. F. (2002). Developing vocabulary size and analysis test for identifying TVES college students’ reading levels. The Proceedings of the 19th International Conferences on English Teaching and Learning, 489-499.
Yakhontova, T. (2001). Textbooks, contexts, and learners. English for Specific Purposes, 20 (2001), 397-415.
Yao, C. K. (2004). Jhuan ye nei rong wei ben jhih jiao syue ke cheng-ge an yan join. [A case study in content based instruction.] Taiwan: STPI. (NSC92-2411-H-034-008)
Yao, S. J. (2007). Fe ying yu si da yi sheng duei siou da yi ying wun de tai du. [The attitude and motivation towards general English course of 1st grade non-language majors.] 2007 Pingtung University of Education Conference, 112-127.
Young, M. J., & Riegeluth, C. M. (1998). Improving the Textbook Selection Process. Retrieved July, 3, 2007, from the ERIC on-line database. ED 299699.
Young, W. J. (2004). The study of correlation between college students’ English proficiency and their performance in classes that require the use of English textbooks. Retrieved December 20, 2006, from database on the Chaoyang University of Technology Web: http://a-009.cyut.edu.tw/rpdata.php?code=26
Yu, K. H. (2003). English proficiency test and the orientation of English course in colleges. The Proceedings of 2003 International Conference and Workshop on TEFL & Applied Linguistics, 512-514.
Zacharias, N. T. (2005). Teachers’ beliefs about internationally-published materials: A survey of tertiary English teachers in Indonesia. Regional Language Centre Journal, 36(1), 23-37.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊