跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.152) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/02 05:12
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:劉蕙雯
研究生(外文):Liu Hui-Wen
論文名稱:團隊心智模型、團隊協調過程與團隊績效之關係---以團隊成員認知需求為干擾變項
論文名稱(外文):The relationship of team mental models,team coordination processes and team performance--moderated by team members' need for cognition.
指導教授:蔡啟通蔡啟通引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:人力資源管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:中文
論文頁數:99
中文關鍵詞:團隊心智模型團隊外顯協調過程團隊內隱協調過程團隊績效團隊成員認知需求
外文關鍵詞:team mental modelsteam explicit coordination processteam implicit coordinaiton processteam performanceteam members' need for cognition
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:454
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
科技與環境快速的變遷,以個人之力獨立運作,容易受限於知識與資訊的不足,因此,「團隊」運作逐漸受到業界的重視,本研究便企圖從團隊議題著手,以團隊心智模型瞭解團隊資訊流通與團隊績效之關聯性。而協調也與團隊間的資訊流通息息相關,本研究便將協調納入為中介變項,其中協調又包含外顯協調與內隱協調。此外,成員是否願意接受挑戰也與團隊績效有所關連,因此以團隊成員認知需求為干擾變項,探討是否會影響協調過程與團隊績效之關係。
本研究採問卷調查法,針對研發團隊進行隨機抽樣,一共回收98組有效配對樣本,利用階層迴歸分析進行假設驗證,研究發現:團隊心智模型確實會透過內隱協調進而影響團隊績效;相反地,團隊心智模型卻不會透過外顯協調過程影響團隊績效。此外,本研究也發現團隊成員認知需求與團隊績效息息相關。本研究則針對研究結果提出團隊運作可藉由資料庫的建立與知識分享行為,讓成員們能清楚瞭解團隊運作方向,也讓成員們對於任務相關知識、技能更容易上手,以提升團隊整體績效。最後,本研究也提出未來研究建議與研究限制供後續讀者參考。

Technology and environment changed quickly, to complete the task by one person is easy to restrict to the short of knowledge and information, so “team” is more and more important. This study try to research from the team issue, to understand the relationship of team mental models and team performance. And the coordination also have relationship with team information, this research let the coordination to be the mediator, and the coordination included the explicit coordination and implicit coordination. Besides, do the team member want to receive the challenge is also related to team performance, so this study let team members’ need for cognition to be the moderator, to understand this variable would connect with the relationship of coordination process and team performance.
Questionnaire survey was used in the study. The 98 team samples were collected from R&D teams of Taiwan’s company. The research conduct the multi-regression to test the hypotheses. There are some findings:Team mental model is definitely through the implicit coordination to effect the team performance; inversely, team mental model is not through the explicit coordination to effect the team performance. Besides, this study also found team members’need for cognition have relationship to team performance. This research according the findings to bring up some ideas. Teams can establish databank to shared knowledge, it let team members understand team’s goal easily, it also let team members make use of some skill on task easily, these actions can make team performance better. Finally, the limitations and future research suggestion will be discussed.
中文摘要...................................................I
Abstract..................................................Ⅱ
目錄......................................................Ⅲ
表目次....................................................VI
圖目次..................................................VIII
第一章 緒論...............................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機......................................1
第二節 研究目的...........................................5
第三節 研究流程...........................................6
第四節 名詞釋義...........................................7
第二章 文獻探討............................................9
第一節 團隊心智模型.........................................9
第二節 團隊協調過程.........................................11
第三節 團隊成員認知需求.....................................14
第四節 團隊外顯協調過程的中介效果.............................16
第五節 團隊內隱協調過程的中介效果.............................21
第六節 團隊成員認知需求干擾團隊外顯協調過程與團隊績效...........24
第七節 團隊成員認知需求干擾團隊內隱協調過程與團隊績效關係........29
第三章 研究方法............................................32
第一節 研究架構與假設.......................................32
第二節 研究對象............................................33
第三節 研究工具............................................34
第四節 調查實施............................................37
第五節 資料分析............................................39
第四章 研究結果與討論......................................41
第一節 樣本描述............................................41
第二節 問卷之信度與效度.....................................48
第三節 研究變項之皮爾森積差相關分析...........................56
第四節 外顯協調過程中介團隊心智模型與團隊績效之關係.............59
第五節 內隱協調過程中介團隊心智模型與團隊績效之關係.............61
第六節 團隊成員認知需求之干擾效果............................63
第七節 從團隊心智模型到團隊績效的結構方程模型分析..............66
第五章 結論與建議..........................................68
第一節 研究主要發現.........................................68
第二節 研究結論............................................70
第三節 研究建議............................................75
第四節 研究限制............................................77
參考文獻..................................................78
附錄A 員工問卷............................................94
附錄B 主管問卷............................................98
表目次
表 3-1:團隊層次研究變項填答一致性之檢驗結果 ...37
表 3-2:問卷發放與有效回收統計 ...........................38
表 4-1:團隊樣本特性統計 ..............................42
表 4-2:受測者之團隊成員樣本基本背景資料 .........44
表 4-3:團隊主管樣本基本背景資料 ......................46
表 4-4:團隊心智模型量表之因素分析 ..................50
表 4-5:協調過程量表之因素分析 .......................51
表 4-6:團隊成員認知需求量表之因素分析 .............52
表 4-7:任務相依程度量表之因素分析 ...................53
表 4-8:團隊績效量表之因素分析 .........................54
表 4-9:驗證性因素分析結果 .............................54
表 4-10:樣本之各量表信度分析結果 ....................55
表 4-11:研究變項之平均數、標準差及變項間之相 關係數 .........58
表 4-12:外顯協調過程對團隊心智模型與團隊績效 之中介效果 .......59
表 4-13:內隱協調過程對團隊心智模型與團隊績效 之中介效果 ......61
表 4-14:團隊成員認知需求對外顯協調與團隊績效 關係之干擾效果 ...64
表 4-15:團隊成員認知需求對內隱協調與團隊績效 關係之干擾效果 ...65
表 4-16:結構方程式模型指標 ..........67

圖目次
圖3-1:研究架構 .............................32
圖4-1:本研究架構之結構方程模型分析 ...........67
一、 中文部分
沈其泰、黃敏萍與鄭伯壎(2004)。團隊共享心智模型與知識分享行為:成員性格特質與性格相似的調節效果。管理學報,21(5),553-570。
林鉦棽與彭台光(2006)。多層次管理研究:分析層次的概念、理論和方法。管理學報,23(6),649-672。
武欣與吴志明(2006)。基於共享心智模型的團隊知識管理研究。研究與發展管理,18(3),9-17。
高泉豐(1994)。認知需求的概念與測量。中華心理學刊, 36(1),1-20。
鄭仁偉與廖華立(2001)。團隊能力、工作滿足、組織承諾與團隊績效的關。人力資源管理學報,1(3), 83-142。
二、 英文部分
Aldag, R. J.,& Fuller, S. R. (1993). Beyond fiasco: A reappraisal of the groupthink phenomenon and a new model of group decision processes. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 533-552.
Amason, A. C.,& Mooney, A. C. (1999). The effect of past performance on top management team conflict in strategic decision making. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 10(4), 340-359.
Anand, V., Clark, M. A.,& Zellmer-Bruhn, M. (2003). Team knowledge structures: Matching task to information environment. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15(1), 15-31.
Anderson, M. (2008). Social networks and the cognitive motivation to realize network opportunities: A study of managers' information gathering behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(1), 51-78.
Argote, L. (1982). Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 3(27), 420-434.
Axsom, D., Yates, S.,& Chaiken, S. (1987). Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 30-40.
Badke-Schaub, P., Neumann, A., Lauche, K.,& Mohammed, S. (2007). Mental models in design teams: A valid approach to performance in design collaboration? CoDesign, 3(1), 5-20.
Baron, R. A.,& Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 10.
Barrick, M., Stewart, G., Neubert, M.,& Mount, M. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377-391.
Behfar, K., Peterson, R., Mannix, E.,& Trochim, W. (2008). The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 170-188.
Bell, S. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 595-615.
Bradach, J.,& Eccles, R. (1989). Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 97-118.
Brannick, M. T., Prince, A., Prince, C.,& Salas, E. (1995). The measurement of team process. Human Factors, 37(3), 641-651.
Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Salas, E., Pierce, L.,& Kendall, L. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1189-1207.
Cacioppo, J. T.,& Petty, R. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116-131.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R., Feinstein, J.,& Jarvis, W. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197-253.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Kao, C. F.,& Rodriguez, R. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 1032-1043.
Cannella, J. A., Park, J.,& Lee, H. (2008). Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance : Examining the role of team member colocation and environment uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 768-784.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A.,& Salas, E. (2001). Reflections on shared cognition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 195-202.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E.,& Converse, S. A. (1990). Cognitive psychology and team training: Shared mental models in complex systems. Human Factors Bulletin, 33(10), 1-4.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E.,& Converse, S. A. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In J. N. J. Castellan(Ed.), Individual and group decision making(pp. 221-246.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.
Cheng, J. L. C. (1980). Coordination and the performance of research teams: An organizational study. Academy of Management Proceedings, Academy of Management, 380-384.
Cohen, A., Stotland, E.,& Wolfe, D. (1955). An experimental investigation of need for cognition. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(2), 291-194.
Colbert, A., Kristof-Brown, A., Bradley, B.,& Barrick, M. (2008). CEO transformational leadership : The role of goal importance congruence in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 81-96.
Cooke, N. J., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A.,& Stout, R. J., 2000. Measuring team knowledge. Human Factors, 42(1), 151-173.
Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352-364.
DeRue, D., Hollenbeck, J., Johnson, M., Ilgen, D.,& Jundt, D. (2008). How different team downsizing approaches influence team-level adaptation-and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 182-196.
Dyer, J. L. (1984). Team research and team training: A state-of-the-art review. In F. A. Muckler(Ed.), Human factors review(pp. 285-323). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
Eccles, D. W.,& Tenenbaum, G. (2004). Why an expert team is more than a team of experts: A cognitive conceptualization of team coordination and communication in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26(4), 542-560.
Edwards, B., Day, E., Arthur, W.,& Bell, S. (2006). Relationships among team ability composition, team mental models, and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 727-736.
Eisenbeiss, S., van Knippenberg, D.,& Boerner, S. (2008). Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1438-1446.
Ellis, A. P. J. (2006). System breakdown:The role of mental models and transactive memory in the relationship between acute stress and team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 576-589.
Entin, E. E.,& Serfaty, D. (1999). Adaptive team coordination. Human Factors, 41(2), 312-325.
Espinosa, J. A., Kraut, R. E., Lerch, F. J., Slaughter, S. A., Herbslab, J. D.,& Mockus, A. (2001). Shared mental models and coordination in large-scale, distributed software development, International Conference in Information Systems, New Orleans, LA.
Espinosa, J. A., Lerch, F. J.,& Kraut, R. E. (2004). Explicit vs. implicit coordination mechanisms and task dependencies: One size does not fit all. In E. Salas&S. M. Fiore(Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance(pp.107-129).Washington, DC: American Psychological Association,
Espinosa, J. A., Slaughter, S. A., Kraut, R. E.,& Herbsleb, J. D. (2007). Team knowledge and coordination in geographically distributed software development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 135-169.
Faraj, S.,& Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46(12), 1554-1568.
Fiore, S. M., Salas, E.,& Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). Group dynamics and shared mental models development. In E. A. Fleishman. M.(Ed.), How people evaluate others in organizations(pp. 309-336). London: Psychology.
Geers, A. L.,& Lassiter, G. D. (2003). Need for cognition and expectations as determinants of affective experience. Basic and lied Social Psychology, 25(4), 313-325.
George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 107-116.
Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9-41.
Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 601-616.
Henningsen, D. D.,& Henningsen, M. L. M. (2004). The effect of individual difference variables on information sharing in decision-making groups. Human Communication Research, 30(4), 540-555.
Hoegl, M., Weinkauf, K.,& Gemuenden, H. (2004). Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organization Science, 15(1), 38-55.
Humphrey, S., Morgeson, F.,& Mannor, M. (2009). Developing a theory of the strategic core of teams: A role composition model of team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 48-61.
JöreskoJöreskog, K. G.,& Sörbom, D. (1996). Lisrel 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS.
James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceprual agreement., Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219-229.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G.,& Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias., Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85-98.
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Oxford, England: Houghton Mifflin Boston.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive science, 4(1), 71-115.
Johnson, T., Lee, Y., Lee, M., O'Connor, D., Khalil, M.,& Huang, X. (2007). Measuring sharedness of team-related knowledge: Design and validation of a shared mental model instrument. Human Resource Development International, 10(4), 437-454.
Joshi, A.,& Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 599-627.
Karen, A. B.,& Susan, E. J. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking : Does the composition of the TOP team make A difference. Strategic Management Journal, 10(3), 107-124.
Kearney, E., Gebert, D.,& Voelpel, S. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team member's need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 581-598.
Kearney, E., Voelpel, S.,& Gebert, D. (2008). Examining the interaction of diversity and personality-the role of need for cognition, Academy of Management Proceedings.
Kellermanns, F., Floyd, S., Pearson, A.,& Spencer, B. (2008). The contingent effect of constructive confrontation on the relationship between shared mental models and decision quality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(1), 119-137.
Kim, H.,& Kim, D. (2008). The effects of the coordination support on shared mental models and coordinated action. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 522-537.
Klimoski, R.,& Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor. Journal of Management, 20(2), 403-438.
Kraiger, K., Salas, E.,& Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1995). Measuring knowledge organization as a method for assessing learning during training. Human Factors, 37(4), 804-816.
Kraut, R.,& Streeter, L. (1995). Coordination in software development. Communications of the ACM, 38(3), 69-81.
Lahroodi, R. (2007). Evaluating need for cognition: A case study in naturalistic epistemic virtue theory. Philosophical Psychology, 20(2), 227-245.
Lang, K.,& Eaton, B. (2009). The value analysis team: A shared mental model. The Health Care Manager, 28(2), 165-171.
Langan-Fox, J., Anglim, J.,& Wilson, J. R. (2004). Mental models, team mental models, and performance: Process, development, and future directions. Human Factors and Ergonomics in manufacture, 14(4), 331-352.
Lee, G., Shin, J., Park, J., Song, S., Kim, Y.,& Bao, L. (2005). Alternative conceptions, memory, and mental models in physics education, AIP Conference Proceedings.
Levine, J., Higgins, E.,& Choi, H. (2000). Development of strategic norms in groups. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 88-101.
Lim, B.,& Klein, K. (2006). Team mental models and team performance: a field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 403-418.
Lowry, P., Roberts, T., Dean, D.,& Marakas, G. (2009). Toward building self-sustaining groups in PCR-based tasks through implicit coordination: The case of heuristic evaluation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(3), 170-195.
Malone, T. W.,& Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87-120.
Marks, M. A., Sabella, M. J., Burke, C. S.,& Zaccaro, S. J. (2002). The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness., Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 3-13.
Marks, M. A., Zaccaro, S. J.,& Mathieu, J. E. (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 971-986.
Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Cannon-Bowers, J. A.,& Salas, E. (2005). Scaling the quality of teammates' mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(1), 37-56.
Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E.,& Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273-283.
Mathieu, J. E.,& Rapp, T. L. (2009). Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 90-103.
McComb, S.,& Green, S. (1999). Project goals, team performance, and shared understanding. Engineering Management Journal, 11(3), 1-7.
Michael, J., Barsness, Z., Lawson, L.,& Balkundi, P. (2004). Focus please: Team coordination and performance at a wood manufacturer. Forest Products Journal, 54(12), 250-255.
Miyoung, L.,& Johnson, T. (2008). Understanding the effects of team cognition associated with complex engineering tasks: Dynamics of shared mental models, task-smm, and team-smm. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(3), 73-95.
Mohammed, S., Klimoski, R.,& Rentsch, J. R. (2000). The measurement of team mental models: We have no shared schema. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 123-165.
Montoya-Weiss, M., Massey, A.,& Song, M. (2001). Getting it together : Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1251-1262.
Morgan, R. M.,& Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.
Nair, K. U.,& Ramnarayan, S. (2000). Individual differences in need for cognition and complex problem solving. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(3), 305-328.
Park, H., Baker, C.,& Lee, D. (2008). Need for cognition, task complexity, and job satisfaction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 24(2), 111-117.
Rejc, A. (2004). Toward contingency theory of performance measurement. Journal for East European Management Studies, 9(3), 243-264.
Rentsch, J.,& Klimoski, R. (2001). Why do 'great minds' think alike: Antecedents of team member schema agreement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 107-120.
Rico, R. (2009). Shared mental models and performance in self-managing teams : Assessing the role of implicit coordination and task interdependence.unpublished manuscript, 1-39.
Rico, R., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F.,& Gibson, C. (2008). Team implicit coordination processes : A team knowledge-based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 163-184.
Ringberg, T.,& Reihlen, M. (2008). Towards a socio-cognitive approach to knowledge transfer. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 912-935.
Rouse, W. B.,& Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 349-363.
Rummel, N.,& Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: an instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201-241.
Scudder, J. N., Herschel, R. T.,& Crossland, M. D. (1994). Test of a model liking cognitive motivation, assessment of alternatives, decision quality, and group process satisfaction. Small Group Research, 25(1), 57-82.
Smith-Jentsch, K., Mathieu, J.,& Kraiger, K. (2005). Investigating linear and interactive effects of shared mental models on safety and efficiency in a field setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 523-535.
Stasser, G., Taylor , L. A.,& Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussion of three- and six-person group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(1), 67-78.
Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E.,& Milanovich, D. M. (1999). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors, 41(1), 61-71.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1-39.
Tajfel, H.,& Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory and intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel&W. Austin. (Eds.). Psychology of intergroup relations(pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
Tschan, F. (1995). Communication enhances small group performance if it conforms to task requirements: The concept of ideal communication cycles. Basic and Lied Social Psychology, 17(3), 371-393.
Undre, S., Sevdalis, N., Healey, A., Darzi, S.,& Vincent, C. (2006). Teamwork in the operating theatre: Cohesion or confusion. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12(2), 182-189.
Van De Ven, A. H., Delbecq, L. A.,& Koenig, R. J. (1976). Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41(2), 322-338.
van der Heijden, B.,& Verbaan, I. (2006). Team leaders' motivational behavior and Its influence upon team performance: A study on self-perceptions and team members' perceptions in a south african multinational. Journal of Transnational Management, 11(2), 31-51.
Van Der Vegt, G., Emans, B.,& Van De Vliert, E. (2001). Patterns of interdepedence in work teams : A two-level investigation of the relations with job and team satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 54(1), 51-69.
Van Kleef, G., Homan, A., Beersma, B., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B.,& Damen, F. (2009). Searing sentiment or cold calculation? The effects of leader emotional displays on team performance depend on follower epistemic motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 562-580.
Webber, S. S., Chen, G., Payne, S. C., Marsh, S. M.,& Zaccaro, S. J. (2000). Enhancing team mental model measurement with performance appraisal practices. Organizational Research Methods, 3(4), 307-322.
Weick, K. E.,& Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(2), 357-381.
Wilson, J. R.,& Rutherford, A. (1983). Mental models: Theory and application in human factors. In P. N. Johnson-Laird.(Ed.), Mental models(pp.617-634). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University.
Wittembaum, G. M., Stasser, G.,& Merry, C. J. (1996). Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(2), 129-152.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top