臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

　　本研究旨在建構武器系統評選模式，俾於有限國防資源與支出預算下，求取滿足戰略目標與任務需求，以及各階層決策者偏好之最適戰力獲得組合及其戰力結構。上述國防決策問題，係屬多目標決策理論之領域。本研究中，先行採用分析層級程序法建立武器系統效能評估之相關參數，與各目標之權重，據此以建構戰力獲得組合模式，分別應用目標規劃法與Geoffrion法求解；另建構最適戰力結構模式，仍以Geoffrion法求最適解。繼而，輔以範例說明武器系統評選模式之演算過程。最後，從決策者偏好結構、戰力獲得與成本及各種戰力之間的抵換關係，針對上述兩種模式，以及目標規劃法與Geoffrion法，比較與分析其差異；並利用無異曲線表示決策者偏好結構、以及戰力獲得與降低成本可能曲線圖解並說明之。

　　This study constructs models for evaluating and selecting weapon systems for national defense decision. Constrained by the limited national defense resource and budget, the model is constructed to arrive at the most appropriate question portfolio and force structure to fulfill strategic targets, demands for missions and preferences of the decisio makers at different levels. The evaluation process is discussed within the field of Multiple Objective Decision Making. We establish relevant parameters to evaluate systems and the weights of objectives by using Analytic Hierarchy Process method. Then we construct the force acquisition portfolio model. Goal Programming method and Geoffrion method solve the model. And we construct the optimal force structure model. Geoffrion method finds the most appropriate solution of this model. Then we use a illusturaing exampole to introduce the algorithm in this model. Finally we compare those models by the preference structure of decision makers, and the trade-offs between force ququisition and cost or between different forces. Also we apply indifference curvve which denotes the preference structure of denotes the preference structure of decision makers, with force acquisition and cost reduction possibility curve to explain it.