跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.59) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/10/15 04:38
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:邱俊睿
研究生(外文):Chiu, Jiun-Ruei
論文名稱:金融海嘯前後台股指數現貨、期貨與選擇權市場關聯之探討
指導教授:莊益源莊益源引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chuang, I-Yuan
口試委員:陳和全劉清標
口試委員(外文):Chen, Ho-ChyuanLiu, Chin-Piao
口試日期:2012-05-25
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:財務金融研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:35
中文關鍵詞:價格發現資訊傳遞
外文關鍵詞:Price discoveryInformation transmissionPut-call parity
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:805
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:216
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究探討在整理、空頭和多頭行情下台股加權股價指數、台股指數期貨及台股指數選擇權間的市場整合程度,分析個別市場價格發現的能力,並描述市場間資訊傳遞的行為。本文沿用謝文良(2007)的研究,以PCP關係式(Put-Call Parity)取代傳統文獻以B-S模型(或二項式模型),應用在將選擇權價格反推隱含現貨價格的過程。在實證研究上,本文發現台股指數商品市場具有穩定的長期均衡關係,本文發現台股指數商品市場具有穩定的長期均衡關係,且商品價格的變化主要來自短期個別市場交互傳遞落後期價格差異的資訊。整理和空頭行情的台股指數期貨在價格發現上表現較具效率性,其次為台股現貨,而台股指數選擇權表現最差;多頭行情則是台股現貨表現最不具效率性。
在市場連動關係方面,空頭和多頭行情的台股指數期貨與台股指數選擇權存在雙向的資訊回饋,對指數現貨在整理、空頭及多頭行情則僅有單向的資訊傳遞;整理和空頭行情的台股現貨對台股指數選擇權是單向的資訊傳遞;多頭行情的衍生性商品對台股現貨也是單向的資訊傳遞。另外,變異數拆解發現三市場在整理、空頭及多頭行情的平均解釋能力是相近的,但台股指數期貨優於台股指數選擇權與台股現貨,而台股現貨最差。衝擊反應則顯示三市場對資訊的衝擊,幾乎在約15分鐘內反應完畢,並收斂至正常水準。

This study investigates the integration condition, information transmission and price discovery between spot, futures and options of Taiwan index in deer, bear and bull markets, adapting a put-call parity (PCP) approach to recover the spot index embedded in the options premiums. The empirical evidence suggests that there exists stable balance in long-term period among three markets and the price change comes from the lag terms of each market in short-term period. In deer and bear markets the sequence of price discovery efficience is futures, spot and then options. But in bull market spot is the poorest efficience.
For the dynamic relationships among markets, futures and options in bear and bull markets have information feedback each other. In deer, bear and bull markets only transmits information from futures to spot. Also in deer and bear markets spot transmits information to options by single direction. In addition, variance disassembly finds the explaination percentage of futures, spot and options is similar. Innovation response shows three index commodities can reflect information impact within 15 minutes and back to normal level.

中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
目錄 iii
圖表目錄 iv
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究架構 3
第二章 文獻回顧 4
第一節 價格發現與資訊傳遞 4
第二節 市場結構性比較 4
第三節 市場連動相關文獻 5
第三章 研究方法與模型設定 12
第一節 資料選取 12
第二節 單根檢定 13
第三節 共整合檢定與向量誤差修正模型 14
 第四節 Granger因果關係、變異數拆解與衝擊反應 15
第四章 實證結果分析 18
 第一節 基本統計分析與單根檢定 18
 第二節 共整合檢定 19
 第三節 價格互動關係 21
 第四節 市場連動關係 23
第五章 結論與建議 27
 第一節 結論 27
 第二節 建議 28
參考文獻 29



黃玉娟、徐守德 (1997),台股指數現貨與期貨市場價格動態關聯性之研究,證券市場發展季刊,第九卷第三期,頁1-27
莊忠柱 (2000),股價指數期貨與現貨的波動性外溢;台灣的實證,證券市場發展季刊,第十二卷第三期,頁479-515
莊忠柱 (2001),現貨、近月期與近季期股價指數期貨市場間價格與價格波動性的資訊傳遞:台灣的早期經驗,管理學報,第十八卷第二期,頁311-332
周雨田、李志宏、巫春周 (2002),台灣期貨對現貨市場的資訊傳遞效果分析,財務金融學刊,第十卷第二期,頁1-22
謝文良 (2002),價格發現、資訊傳遞、與市場整合—台股期貨市場之研究,財務金融學刊,第十卷第三期,頁1-31
杜化宇、王凱蒂 (2003),台股指數期貨日內價格發現與週日效應型態之研究:初期的證據,東吳經濟商學學報,第四十三期,頁41-78
黃柏凱、張元晨、臧大年 (2004),影響股價指數期貨定價誤差因素之研究—以台股期貨為例,證券市場發展季刊,第十六卷第二期,頁81-114
詹錦宏、施介人 (2005),台股指數現貨、期貨與選擇權價格發現之研究資訊,台灣金融財務季刊,第六卷第一期,頁31-51
謝文良、李進生、袁淑芳、林惠雪 (2007),台灣股價指數現貨、期貨與選擇權市場之價格發現研究—Put-Call-Parity之應用,中華管理評論國際學報,第十卷第二期,頁1-24
Booth, G., So, R., and Tse, Y. (1999), Price discovery in the German equity index derivatives markets, Journal of Futures Market, Vol. 19, 619-643.
Chakravarty, S., Gulen, H., and Mayhew, S. (2004), Informed trading in stock and option markets, Journal of Finance, Vol. 59, 1235-1255.
Chu, Q., Hsieh, G., and Tse, Y. (1999), Price discovery on the S&P 500index markets: An analysis of spot index, index futures and SPDRs, International Review of Financial-Analysis, Vol. 8, 21-34.
Chung, Y. (1991), A transaction data test of stock index futures markets efficiency and index arbitrage profitability, Journal of Finance, Vol. 46, 1791-1809.
deJong, F., and Donders, M. (1998), Intraday lead-lag relationships between futures-options and stock market, European Finance Review, Vol. 1, 337-359.
Engle, R., and Granger, C. (1987), Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing, Econometrica, Vol. 55, 251-276.
Fama, E. (1970), Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work, Journal of Finance, Vol. 25, 383-417.
Fleming, J., Ostdiek, B., and Whaley, R. (1996), Trading costs and the relative rates of price discovery in stock, futures and option markets, Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 16, 353-387.
Gwilym, O. (2001), Forecasting volatility for options price of the U.K. stock market, Journal of Financial Management and Analysis, Vol. 14, 56-62.
Hasbrouck, J. (1995), One security, many markets: Determining the contributions to price discovery, Journal of Finance, Vol. 50, 1175-1199.
Herbst, A., McCormack, J. and West, E. (1987), Investigation of a lead-lag relationship between spot stock indices and their futures contracts, Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 7, 373-381.
Hiliard, J., and Schwarts, A. (1996), Binomial option pricing under stochastic volatility and correlated state variables, The Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 14, 23-39.
Hull, J. and White, A. (1987), The pricing of options on assets with stochastic volatility, Journal of Finance, Vol. 42, 281-300.
Johansen, S. (1988), Statistical analysis of co-integration vectors, Journal of Economic dynamics and Control, Vol. 12, 231-254.
Johansen, S., and Juselius, K. (1990), Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on co-integration with application to demand for money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 52, 169-210.
Kamara, A., and Miller, T. (1995), Daily and intra-daily tests of European put-call parity, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 30, 519-539.
Kawaller, I., Koch, P., and Koch, T. (19987), The temporal price relationship between S&P 500 futures and S&P 500 index, Journal of Finance, Vol. 42, 1309-1329.
Kim, M., Szakmary, A., and Schwarz, T. (1999), Trading costs and price discovery across stock index futures and cash markets, Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 19, 475-498.
Merton, R. (1973), The relationship between put and call option prices: Comment, Journal of Finance, Vol. 28, 183-184.
Mittnik, S., and Rieken, S. (2000), Put-call parity and the informational efficiency of the German DAX-index options market, International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 9, 259-279.
Roope, M., and Zurbruegg, R. (2002), The intra-day price discovery process between the Singapore exchange and Taiwan futures exchange, Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 22, 219-240.
Stephen, J., and Whaley, R. (1990), Intrday price change and trading volume relations in the stock and stock option markets, Journal fo Finance, Vol. 45, 191-220.
Stoll, H. (1969), The relationship between put and call options prices, Journal of Finance, Vol. 24, 319-332.
Stoll, H., and Whaley, R. (1990), The dynamics of stock index and stock index futures return, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 25, 441-468.
Subrahmanyam, A. (1991), A theory of trading in stock index futures, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 4, 17-51.
Tse, Y. (1998), International linkages in Euromark futures markets: Information transmission and market integration, Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 18, 128-149.
Wahab, M., and Lashgari, M. (1993), Price dynamics and error correction in stock index and stock index futures markets: A co-integration approach, Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 13, 711-742.
Hsieh, W. L., C. S. Lee and S. F. Yuan (2008), Price Discovery in the Options Markets: An Application of Put-call Parity, Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 28, 354-375.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top