臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

With the continual expansion of the global population, demand for goods and services has risen logarithmically. With this in mind, it is necessary for leaders to weigh the needs of today against those of the future generations. Sustainable development is a concept designed to achieve the fulfillment of both short-term and long-term demand requirements. The United Nations (UN) has launched 17 goals of sustainable development with the intent of transforming the world. And sustainable development is one of big challenge in this time. Triple Bottom Line (TBL) is a concept comprised of three factors (economic, social, and environment) which same aimed at sustainable development. TBL can answer the challenge of sustainable development by executing TBL approaches. Case studies of two Multinational Enterprises (MNE) in Indonesia which have applied TBL theory will be analyzed for lessons which can be applied to other business. The research will provide an effective TBL framework for other business in Indonesia as the application of the concept represents the tremendous potential to enhance the sustainable capabilities of Indonesian commerce.

Keywords: Triple Bottom Line, TBL, Sustainable Development, Indonesia, Sustainability.

Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1 1
1.1. Research Motivation 2
1.2. Research Objective 3
CHAPTER 2 4
2.1 Sustainable Development 4
2.2 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) 5
2.3 Triple Bottom Line (TBL) 7
Economic Line 7
Social Line 7
Environmental Line 8
CHAPTER 3 9
3.1 Research Methodology 9
3.2 Research Design 9
CHAPTER 4 11
4.1 Nestlé Background 11
4.2 Creating Shared Value (CSV) of Nestlé in Indonesia 12
4.2.1 Economic 13
4.2.2 Social 15
4.2.3 Environment 16
4.2.4 Learning from Nestlé Indonesia 18
4.2 PT Semen Padang Background 20
4.2.1. Economic 21
4.2.2 Social 22
4.2.3 Environment 23
4.2.4 Learning from PT. Semen Padang 24
4.3 Summary of TBL (Triple Bottom Line) Activities from Nestle Indonesia and Semen Padang Company 27
4.4 Framework of TBL for Other business 29
CHAPTER 5 30
5.1 Limitations 31
5.2 Future Research 31
5.3 Recommendations 32
6 References 33
Appendix 1 38
7.1 Nestle Additional Data 38
7.2 Learning from Nestlé Indonesia 40
Appendix 2 43
8.1 Semen Padang Additional Data 43


List of Figures
Figure 1 Sustainability framework 4
Figure 2 Pyramid of CSR (Caroll,1996) 6
Figure 3 Research Framework 10
Figure 4 Process of CSV Nestlé Indonesia ( (Nestlé, 2013) 12
Figure 5 Principles to conduct sustainability report (Semen Padang,2015) 20
Figure 6 TBL Framework for business in Indonesia 29

List of Tables
Table 1. 17 Goals of Sustainable Development (United Nations,2016) 2
Table 2 Learning from Nestlé Indonesia 18
Table 3 Learning from PT. Semen Padang 24
Table 4 Summary Activities from Nestlé Indonesia and PT. Semen Padang 27
Table 5 History time of Nestlé 38
Table 6 Timeline of Nestlé's presence in Indonesia 40

Ackoff, R. (1979). Resurrecting the future of operational research. J. Opl. Res. Soc., 189-200.
Adebiyi Julius, K. A. (2016, March). Strategic Management and Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Development: A Review of Literature.
Alhaddi, H. (2015). Triple Bottom Line and Sustainability.
Alhaddi, H. (n.d.). Triple Bottom Line and Sustainability: A Literature Review.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2015). Retrieved 2016, from www.bps.go.id
Browne, J. (2010). Securing a sustainable future for higher education. An independent review of higher education and student finance.
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock Publications.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). (I. U. Kelley School of Business, Ed.) The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders.
Checkland, P. (1978). The origins and nature of 'hard' systems thinking. J. Appl. Sys. Anal, 99 -110.
Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: Wiley.
Chen, C. (2007). Information Technology, Organisational Structure, and New Product Development – The Mediating Effect of Cross- Functional Team Interaction. IEEE Trans. Eng. Mgt., 687–696.
Commission, E. (2015). Three Projects Meet the European Job Challenge and Receive the Social Innovation Prize. (EC, Ed.)
Davis, S. (1987). Future Perfect. Reading, MA: Addison - Wesley.
Dunnion, J., & O'Donovan, B. (2014). Systems thinking and higher education: the Vanguard Method. Systems Practice and Action Research, 27(1), 23-37.
Duray, R. (2002). Mass customization origins: mass or custom manufacturing? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 314-328.
Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (2001). SODA - The principles. In J. Rosenhead, & J. Mingers, Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited (pp. 21-41). Chichester: Wiley.
Elkington, J. (1997). Enter the Triple Bottom Line.
Emas, R. (2015). The Concept of Sustainable Development: Definition and Defining Principles.
Enterprise Surveys. (2015). Retrieved 2016, from http://www.enterprisesurveys.org
Farahnaz Orojali Zadeh, A. E. (2012, September). Firm Size As Company’s Characteristic and Level of Risk Disclosure: Review on Theories and Literatures.
Goldstein, S., Johnston, R., Duffy, J., & Rao, J. (2002). The service concept: the missing link in service design research? . Journal of Operations Management, 121-134.
Haeckel, S., & Nolan, R. (1993). Managing by wire. Harvard Business Review, 122 - 133.
Harris, J. M. (2000). Basic Principles of Sustainable Development.
Harris, J. M. (2000, June). Basic Principles of Sustainable Development .
Hudson, J. (2006). Whole Systems Working: A Guide and Discussion Paper. Care Services Improvement Partnership, Integrated Care Network, 4-23.
Institute of Business Ethics. (2009). How Does Business Ethics Relate to Corporate Responsibility (CR)? Retrieved from (http://www.ibe.org.uk/faq.htm#crApril)
Jaaron, A. A., & Backhouse, C. J. (2016). Operationalising "Double-Loop" Learning in Service Organisations: A systems Approach for Creating Knowledge. Syst Pract Action Res.
Jaaron, A., & Backhouse, C. (2011). Value-adding to public services through the adoption of lean thinking. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 2(3), 33-50.
Jahja Hamdania, C. W. (2012). Open Innovation Implementation to Sustain Indonesian SMEs.
John Hagedoorn, N. R. (2010, December). Small Entrepreneurial Firms and Large Companies in Inter Firm R&D Network.
Jose, A., & Tollenaere, M. (2005). Modular and platform methods for product family design: literature analysis. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 371 - 390.
Kennedy, K., Lassk, F., & Goolshy, J. (2002). Customer mind-set of employees throughout the organization. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 159 -171.
Krisztina Szegedi, G. F. (2016). Relationship between Social Entrepreneurship, CSR and Social Innovation: In Theory and Practice. 10.
Mechinda, P., & Patterson, P. (2011). The impact of service climate and service provider personality on employees' customer-oriented behavior in a high-contact setting. Journal of Services Marketing, 101 -113.
Mourougane, A. (2012, October). Promoting SME Development in Indonesia .
Nations, U. (1987). Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development.
Nestlé. (2013). Sustainability Report Nestlé Indonesia. Nestlé Indonesia. Nestlé Indonesia.
Nurhalim, Y. (2014). Reforming Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Indonesia: Proposal of a New Legal Entity.
O'Donovan, B. (2010). System thinking in adult social care: how focusing on a customer's purpose leads to better services for the vulnerable in society and enhances efficiency. In K. Zokaei, J. Seddon, & B. O'Donovan (Eds.), Systems Thinking: From Heresy to Practice, Public and Private Sector Studies (pp. 40-66). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
OECD. (2004). Innovation in the knowledge economy. Paris: OECD.
Padang, S. (2015). Sustainability Report. Semen Padang. Semen Padang.
Padang, S. (2015). Sustainability Report Semen Padang. Semen Padang. Semen Padang.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1985). A concept model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 41 -50.
Parisa Salimzadeh, J. C. (2013). Sustainability in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Regional Australia: A Framework of Analysis.
Pekkarinen, S., & Ulkuniemi, P. (2008). Modularity in developing business services by platform approach. International Journal of Logistics Management, 84-103.
Rasa Dainiene, L. D. (2015). A TBL Approach Based Theoretical Framework for Measuring Social Innovations.
Reid, D. (1995). Sustainable Development.
Robey, D., & Sales, C. (1994). Designing Organizations. Irwin: USA: McGraw- Hill.
Salvador, F. (2007). Towards a product modularity construct: literature review and reconceptualization. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 219 - 240.
Seddon, J. (2005). Freedom from Command and Control (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Vanguard Press.
Seddon, J. (2008). Systems Thinking in Public Sector. Axminster, UK: Triarchy Press.
Sony, M., & Mekoth, N. (2012). A typology for frontline employee adaptability to gain insights in service customisation: a view point. Int. J. Services and Operations Mangement, 12(4), 490-508.
Stenzel, P. L. (2010). Sustainability, the Triple Bottom Line, and the Global Reporting Initiative.
Survey, E. (2015). Retrieved 2016, from http://www.enterprisesurveys.org
Toffler, A. (1970). Future Shock. New York: Random House.
van Liere, D., Hagdorn, L., Hoogeweegen, M., & Vervest, P. (2004). Embedded coordination in a business network. Journal of Information Technology, 261 - 269.
Wang, G., Liu, D., & Wang, X. (2011). Effects of perceived organizational support and guanxi on salesperson performance: the mediation of customer need knowlegde. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 422 -435.
Winkler, G., & Schwaiger, M. (2004). Is Customer satisfaction driving revenue - A longitudinal analysis with evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 2(1).
Winkler, G., & Schwaiger, M. S. (2004). Is Customer Satisfaction Driving Revenue – A Longitudinal Analysis With Evidence From The Banking Industry. Journal of Business & Economics Research.
Zokaei, K. (2011). How Systems Thinking Provides a Framework for Change: A Case Study of Disabled Facilities Grant Service in Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council. In K. Zokaei, J. Seddon, & B. O’Donovan (Eds.), Systems Thinking: From Heresy to Practice, Public and Private Sector Studies (pp. 17-39). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zokaei, K., Seddon, J., & O'Donovan, B. (2011). Systems Thinking: From Heresy to Practice : Public and Private Sector Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.