臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

The increasing of the population number in Indonesia in 1980-1990 addressed Indonesia to have an increasing of the number of unemployment. Therefore, the government recognized that more job opportunities should be created particularly in the private sector. Forestry industry was one of the some possibilities that can be the key to overcome the number of unemployment. An unavoiding activities such as changing natural trees turned to be timber plantations by planting eucalyptus and another “alien” trees species addressed the local communities lose the main livelihood resources and create tensions between the local communities with the certain forestry industry.

This study was done in Indonesia, North Sumatra province, Humbang Hasundutan regency , Sipituhuta village. There is one pulp and paper company name Toba Pulp Lestari tbk PT which is until now that its presence is still controversial. There are four groups of stakeholders to be identified; local communities, value chain actors, workers and societies. Different stakeholders have different perspective concerning the existence of Toba Pulp Lestari tbk PT. This study aims to assess the impacts of Toba Pulp Lestari tbk PT on local community social life and develops the alternatives to overcome the conflicts happened between the local communities and the company. The impacts are measured based on six constructs of social impact within thirty eight of sub-construct. Data were divided on two groups: primary data was obtained by answering the question listed in questionnaire scaled from 1-5, whereas the secondary data was obtained by reviewing the information generated from government document and the company website.

Determine the most important construct by applying MCDA using AHP technique and generate the value of the difference in means by running the data on SPSS find the result shows the first rank as the most important in the community life aspect is perceived well-being and the second the most important is conservation the community resources occupies the second rank in pairwise comparison table. This study develops alternatives to overcome the conflicts by suggesting Toba Pulp Lestari tbk PT to do environment impact analysis and social impact analysis.

Keywords: SIA, construct of SIA, Stakeholders

The increasing of the population number in Indonesia in 1980-1990 addressed Indonesia to have an increasing of the number of unemployment. Therefore, the government recognized that more job opportunities should be created particularly in the private sector. Forestry industry was one of the some possibilities that can be the key to overcome the number of unemployment. An unavoiding activities such as changing natural trees turned to be timber plantations by planting eucalyptus and another “alien” trees species addressed the local communities lose the main livelihood resources and create tensions between the local communities with the certain forestry industry.

This study was done in Indonesia, North Sumatra province, Humbang Hasundutan regency , Sipituhuta village. There is one pulp and paper company name Toba Pulp Lestari tbk PT which is until now that its presence is still controversial. There are four groups of stakeholders to be identified; local communities, value chain actors, workers and societies. Different stakeholders have different perspective concerning the existence of Toba Pulp Lestari tbk PT. This study aims to assess the impacts of Toba Pulp Lestari tbk PT on local community social life and develops the alternatives to overcome the conflicts happened between the local communities and the company. The impacts are measured based on six constructs of social impact within thirty eight of sub-construct. Data were divided on two groups: primary data was obtained by answering the question listed in questionnaire scaled from 1-5, whereas the secondary data was obtained by reviewing the information generated from government document and the company website.

Determine the most important construct by applying MCDA using AHP technique and generate the value of the difference in means by running the data on SPSS find the result shows the first rank as the most important in the community life aspect is perceived well-being and the second the most important is conservation the community resources occupies the second rank in pairwise comparison table. This study develops alternatives to overcome the conflicts by suggesting Toba Pulp Lestari tbk PT to do environment impact analysis and social impact analysis.

Keywords: SIA, construct of SIA, Stakeholders

ABSTRACT i
CONTENT ii
I. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Research Questions 5
1.3 Research Objectives 5
1.4 Study Process 6
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Social Impact 7
2.2 Social Impact Assessment 7
2.3 Social Impact Assessment (SIA) Process 9
2.4 Construct in SIA 13
2.4.1 Perceived Well-being 17
2.4.2 Social Capital 17
2.4.3 Quality of life 18
2.4.4 Social structure development 18
2.4.5 Rural and agricultural economic conditions 19
2.4.6 Conservation of community resources 20
III. METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research Design 21
3.1.1 Research Strategy 21
3.2 Research Subjects 23
3.3 Data Collection 24
3.4 Data Analysis 25
IV. RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS
4.1 The Impact of Toba Pulp Lestari tbk PT on Sipituhuta Village 29
4.1.1 General Description of Sipituhuta Village 29
4.1.2 Assessing Impacts 30
4.2. The Development of Alternatives for Solving the Conflicts 41
V. CONCLUSION 42
REFERENCES 45
APPENDICES
Appendix A- Questionnaire List to the local community
Appendix B- Questionnaire to the workers of Toba Pulp Lestari tbk PT

Ahmadvan. M & Karami, E. 2009. A Social impact assessment of the floodwater spreading project on the Gareh-Bygone plain in Iran: A causal comparative approach. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 29: 126-136.
Arce-Gomez, A., Donovan J.D.,Bedggood R.E. 2015. Social impact assessment: Developing a consolidated conceptual framework. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 50: 85-94
Anukwa, F. No going back on forest management practice. Cross River State community forest news. (2002). 1 (3) 20-22.
Barrow CJ. Social impact assessment: an introduction. London: Arnold; 2000.
Bertram D (2007). Likert Scales. CPSC681Topic Report. http://poincare.matf.bg.ac.rs/~kristina//topic-danelikert.pdf (Accessed 17/06/2015)
Bhaff, S. (2004).Conservation through community Enterprise.InOgar, D.A (Ed.) community forestry and forest stakeholders’ participation in sustainable forest management (12-36).
Branch, Kristi, Douglas A Hooper, James Thompson and James C Creighton (1984), Guide to Social Impact Assessment (Westview Press, Boulder CO) ISBN 0-86531-717-8.

Bubandt, N. 1998. Timber plantations in Indonesia approaching the predicaments of a modern utopia. Working paper No. 15. School for Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University: Canberra
Burdge, Rabel J (2004), A Community Guide to Social Impact Assessment: 3rd Edition (Social Ecology Press, PO Box 620863,Middleton WI 53562) ISBN 0-941042-17-0.

Centre for Good Governance. 2006. A Comprehensive Guide for Social Impact Assessment.
Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design. 1 st ed. Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications
Department for Communities and Local Government: London. 2009. Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. London.
Diener E. Understanding scores on the satisfaction with life scale. 2006.
Erickson, R. & Jonsson, J.O. 2001. How to ascertain the socio-structural position of the individual in society. Chapter 2.
Esteves AM, Barclay M-A. Enhancing the benefits of local content: integrating social and economic impact assessment into procurement strategies. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2011;29(3):205–15.
Faisal, N. 2007. Pengaruh PT. Toba Pulp Lestari, tbk Terhadap Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Porsea. The Impact of Toba Pulp Lestari tbk PT to Social-Economic of Local Community in Porsea. Master Thesis. University of Sumatra Utara. Indonesia.
FAO. 1996. Indonesian Forestry: Status and Trend. Country report-Indonesia. FAO CORPORATE DOCUMENT REPOSITORY.
Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). 2012. FSC guidelines for the implementation of the right to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Version 1. FSC.
Fortune, A. et al. 2013. Qualitative Research in Social Work. 2nd ed: Columbia University Press.
Franks D. Social impact assessment of resource projects. Mining for development: guide to Australian practice. Crawley (WA): International Mining for Development Centre; 2012.
Grootaert, Christiaan, Deepa Narayan, Veronica Nyhan Jones, and Michael Woolcock. 2004. Measuring social capital: An integrated questionnaire. World Bank Working Paper No. 18. World Bank, Washington, DC.
Group Empresarial ENCE. 2009. Sustainable Forest Management and Eucalyptus. Bulletin.
Gunawan, A. Farmers, business cooperate to boost incense production. 2015. (http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/02/28/farmers-business-cooperate-boost-incense-production.html#sthash.YlsKIh2n.dpuf)
Hayati D, Karami E, Slee B. Combining qualitative methods in the measurement of rural poverty: the case of Iran. 2006; 75: 361-394
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rural_community_development
http://news.mongabay.com/2014/0507-hadinaryanto-frankincense-forests-sumatra.html
(access in 25 May 0:005 am)
http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kabupaten_Humbang_Hasundutan
(accsess in 25 may 9:10 am)
http://issuu.com/haslanucuptambunan/docs/27_april/1
(access in 23 May 01.00 am)
Ishizaka, A. & Nemery P. (2013). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods and Software. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Kanowski. 1997. Plantation forestry for the 21st century. In: Proc. XI World Forestry Congress. 3: 23-34.
Kinsella S. et al., 2007. The State of the Paper Industry Monitoring the Constructs of Environmental Performance, A collaborative report by the Steering Committee of the Environmental Paper Network: Environmental Paper Network-USA.
Lockie S. SIA in review: setting the agenda for impact assessment in the 21st century. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2001;19(4):277–87.
Manik Y, Leahay J, Halog A. 2014. Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 18:1386–1392.
McDowel. 2009. Measures of Self-Perceived Well-Being. Psychosomatic Research. 69: 69-79.
Mikkelsen C. 2013. The Indigenous World 2013: Copenhagen-Denmark.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mulyana W. 2014. Rural-Urban Linkages: Indonesia Case Study. Document No 126. Working Group: Development with Territorial Cohesion
(OECDD) Oregon Economic and Community Development Department. 2001. Community and Economic Development Readiness Assessment. Guidebook. Oregon.Salem.(http://www.rdiinc.org/files/eco_dev_guidebook_and_assessment.pdf)
Pavot, W. G., & Diener,E. Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment. 1993; 5: 164-172.
Pavot W, Diener E. Review of the satisfaction with life scale. 2009; 39: 101-117
QDIP (Queensland Department of Infrastructure and Planning). Social impact assessment: guideline to preparing a social impact management plan; 2010 .Brisbane.
Robinson, OC. (2014). Sampling in Interview- Based Qualitative Research: A Theoritical and Practical Guide, Qualitative research in Psychology, 11: 1, 25-41
Central Bureau of Statistic. 2015. Humbang Hasundutan Regency in Figures. Humbang Hasundutan-Indonesia.
Shander SS. A Social Impact Analysis of How Geoparks Contribute to Sustainable Economic Development: A Case Study of Meteorum Geopark in Dalarna, Sweden. Uppsala University. Master Thesis
Suprapto RA. Social Impact Assessment and Planning: The Indonesian Experience.
2012; 8:2-28.
Taylor, Nicholas C, Hobson Bryan and Colin G. Goodrich (2004), Social Assessment: Theory, Process and Techniques. (Social Ecology Press, PO Box 620863,Middleton WI 53562) ISBN: 0- 941042-37-5.

Tampubolon, H. 2006.Pengaruh Pembangunan Industri Terhadap Perkembangan Wilayah: Studikasus PT. Toba Pulp Lestari di KecamatanPorsea. (The impact of Industrial Establishment towards the Regional Development: Case study Toba Pulp Lestari, tbk PT in Porsea District). Yogyakarta: Gajahmada University.

Toba Pulp Lestari. 2015. Proper certificate (2010, 2011, 2012).http://www.tobapulp.com/event/aw rd.
Triguero-Mas, M., M. Olomi-Sola, N. Jha, F. Zorondo-Rodrigues, and V. Reyes-Garcia. 2010. Urban and rural perceptions of protected areas: a case study in Dandeli Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, India. Environmental Conservation 36:208-217.
UPOV. Technical Working Party on Automation and Computer Programs. 2007; 1-10.
US Bureau of Reclamation (USDI) (2002), Social Analysis Manuel Volume I: Manager’s Guide to Using Social Analysis; Volume II Social Analyst’s Guide to Doing Social Analysis (Resource Management and Planning Group. Technical Service Center, Denver Federal Center D-8580, Bldg. 67. Denver, CO 80225- 0007).
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1994. Guidelines and Principles for Social Impact Assessment. Prepared by The Interorganizational Committee on Guidelines and Principles for Social Impact Assessment.
Vanclay F. 2003. International Principles For Social Impact Assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal.21: 5-11.
Vanclay F. 2005. Principles for social impact assessment: A critical comparison between the international and US documents. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 26: 3-14.
Vanclay F. 2015. Social Impact Assessment: Guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. IAIA.
Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human Science for an actionsensitive pedagogy. Albany: State university of New York Press.
Williams LJ & Abdi H. Fisher's Least Significant Difference (LSD) Test. 2010. Encyclopedia of research design. Sage.
Woolcock M, Narayan D. Social capital implication for development theory, research and policy. 2000;15(2): 1-49.
Yin, R. (2003). Case study research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks. Sage Publications.
Yip W, Subramaniana S.V., Mitchella A, Leeb D.T.S, Wangc J, Kawachia I. 2007.Does social capital enhance health and well-being? Evidence from rural China. Social Science & Medicine. 64: 35-49.