跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.142) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/08/12 05:32
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:歐陽毅
研究生(外文):Ou Yang. I
論文名稱:功能設計法之層間變位檢核需求探討
論文名稱(外文):Estimation of story drift demand for Seismic Performance Evaluation
指導教授:林炳昌林炳昌引用關係張正博
指導教授(外文):Bing-Chang,LinCheng-Po,Chang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中原大學
系所名稱:土木工程研究所
學門:工程學門
學類:土木工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2001
畢業學年度:89
語文別:中文
論文頁數:165
中文關鍵詞:功能設計法改進容量震譜法層間變位角
外文關鍵詞:Performance-based designImproved capacity methodStory drift index
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:377
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
摘 要
美國SEAOC Blue Book提出之功能設計法草案中,要求檢核建築物在各回歸期地震下的非線性層間變位角,以確保結構體在各危害度等級下仍可保持其應有的功能性水準。
本文藉由改進容量震譜法求出建築物之屋頂層變位角ADI 值、最大層間變位角(SDI)max值並歸納出台灣地區之COD值(COD=(SDI)max/ADI)。結果顯示,COD值會隨著結構物之週期升高而增加,而對低樓房(4樓)其COD值約為1.3,而對中、高樓房結構(12樓、20樓)可保守地取1.7為其 COD值。
文中並比較不同型態算例之差異性,並對進行改進容量震譜法分析時所選用的側力型式、降伏點決定方式之適用性進行探討,最後並與 Drain-2D+ 非線性時間歷時分析之結果印證之。
ABSTRACT
According to the tentative guideline for performance-based seismic design in Blue Book provided by SEAOC, the designer is required to check the story drift ratio in order to assure the behavior of the building remaining in the desired levels of seismic performance corresponding to different specified levels of earthquake.
This thesis used the improved capacity spectrum method to estimate the average drift index(ADI), the maximum story drift index((SDI)max), and furthermore concluded the ratio of (SDI)max to ADI, the value of COD. Based on the results, COD increases with the period of structure and the values of COD for low rise buildings and high rise buildings are approximately equal to 1.3 and 1.7 respectively.
Moreover this study discussed the effects of lateral load patterns and the representations of idealized bilinear models of capacity curve during the procedure of improved capacity spectrum method analysis. The results are compared to that of Drain-2D+ using time history analysis.
目 錄
頁 碼
第一章緒論
1-1 前言 1
1-2 文獻回顧 2
1-2-1使用簡化模型之分析方法 2
1-2-2容量震譜法 3
1-3 本文內容 5
第二章非線性靜力分析與容量震譜之繪製
2-1 前言 6
2-2 非線性分析程式 7
2-2-1 Drain-2D+程式 7
2-2-2 塑性分析模式 9
2-2-3 梁柱構材之勁度計算 10
2-2-4 剛性域 11
2-3非線性靜力分析之理論背景與容量震譜的製作 12
2-3-1 多自由度擬單自由度化 12
2-3-2 容量震譜之繪製 15
2-4 影響容量震譜之變因探討 17
2-4-1側力形式的影響 17
2-4-2雙線性化過程的影響 21
2-4-3形狀向量 的影響 23
第三章需求震譜之建立及目標位移之求取
3-1 前言 25
3-2 Nonspec 程式簡介 25
3-2-1 勁度分析模式 25
3-3 彈性需求震譜的建立 26
3-3-1 危害度曲線的使用 26
3-3-2 彈性反應譜與彈性需求震譜 27
3-4 非彈性需求震譜的建立 29
3-3-1 之定義 30
3-3-2 非彈性需求譜線之建立與目標位移的決定 32
第四章功能設計法
4-1 初步設計 34
4-2 ADI、SDI與COD之應用 39
4-3 功能設計法之層間變位角檢核流程 40
第五章算例研究
5-1 不同降伏點決定方式之算例探討 47
5-1-1 結構概述及初步設計 48
5-1-2 層間變位角檢核 50
5-2 層變位角檢核失敗之算例探討 53
5-2-1 算例概述及初步設計 54
5-2-2 層間變位角檢核 55
5-3 不同側力形式之算例探討 57
5-3-1 結構概述及初步設計 57
5-3-2 層間變位角檢核 59
5-4 立面不規則結構之探討 62
5-4-1 質量不規則結構之算例探討 62
5-4-1-1 層間變位角檢核 63
5-4-2 勁度不規則結構之算例探討-挑高結構級退縮結構 64
5-4-2-1 層間變位角檢核 64
5-5 高層結構算例 65
5-5-1 結構概述及初步設計 65
5-5-2 層間變位角檢核 67
5-6 有關COD之討論 68
5-7 依文獻【49】進行功能設計檢核法之算例研究 69
5-7-1 依文獻【49】進行功能設計檢核法 70
5-7-2 討論 74
第六章結論與建議
6-1 結論 75
6-2 建議 77
參考文獻 79
表 83
圖 103
參考文獻1.「新修正建築技術規則建築構造篇耐震設計條文及規範講習會」,內政部營建署,民國85 年11月。2.中華民國土木技師公會全國聯合會,「1999年9月21日集集大震結構物破壞模式研討 會」,民國88年11月18日。3.國家地震工程研究中心,「1994年元月美國洛杉磯北嶺地震賑災訪查報告書」,民國83年 3月22日。4.中華民國建築學會,「1995年1月17日日本阪神大地震勘災訪問報告」,1995年4月。5.Structural Engineers Association of California,”Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary”,1999 Seventh Edition.6.Blume,J. A., ”Dynamic characteristics of multi-story buildings”, Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE,94(1968)337~402.7.Heidebrecht,A. C.and B.Stafford Smith. ,”Approximate analysis of tall wall- frame structures”, Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE,99:199~221.8.Edural Miranda, ” Approximate seismic lateral deformation demand in multistory buildings”, Journal of Structural Engineering, April 1999.9.Heidebrecht,A. C. and Avigdor Rutenberg, “Applications of drift spectra in seismic design”, Proceedings of the 12th World Conferences on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, CD-ROM, Paper1884, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering..10.Freeman, S. A., Nicoletti,J. P.,and Tyrell, J. V., ” Evaluations to existing buildings for seismic risk- A case study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard”, Washington,Proceeding of 1st U.S. Nationl Conference on Earthquake Engineering,EERI,Berkeley,113-112.11.Saiidi,M. and Sozen,M. A. ,”Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of R/C structures”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE,(107)937~952.12.Mayhaney J. A., Freeman, S. A., Paret, T, F., and Kehoe, B. E., ” The Capacity Spectrum Method of Evaluating Structural Response During the Loma Prieta Earthquake” Proc. 1993 National Earthquake Conference,pp.501~510,Memphis, 1993.13.Applied Technology Council(ATC),Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings,Vol.1,ATC 40,Redwood City, CA,1996.14.FEMA, NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington ,D.C., October 1996.15.Reinhorn,A. M. ,”Inelastic analysis techniques in seismic evaluations”, P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, Seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes,Balkema,Rotterdam,(1997)277~287.16.Chopra,A. K and Goel, R. K., ”Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems, Report PEER-1999/02,Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA. April 1999.17.Fajfar Peter , ”Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra”,Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 28(1999)979~993.18.Graham H. Powell, “DRAIN-2D User’s Guide”, Earthquake Engineering Research Center College of Engineering University of California Berkeley, California, Report No. EERC 73-22, October 1973.19.Keh-Chyuna Tsia, Jeng-Wei Li, “DRAIN2D+ VIEW2D User’s Guide”, Center for Earthquake Engineering Research National Taiwan University, Report No. CEER/R83-03, June 1994.20.“Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete with Design Application (ACI 318-95)”, American Concrete Ins-titute, 1995.21.林炳昌、張正博、林志忠、陳政杰、蕭志民,”功能設計法檢核樓房層間變位角時構材 EI值之考量”,投稿中。22.P. Hidalgo, R. W. Clough, “Earthquake Simulator Study of a Reinforced Concrete Frame”, Earthquake Engineering Research Center College of Engineering University of California Berkeley, Report No. 74-13, December 1974.23.Helmut Krawinkler, “Pros and Cons of a Pushover Analysis of Seismic Performance Evaluation”, Engineering Structures,20(1998)451~464.24.W. K. Tso and A. S. Moghadam, ”Pushover Procedure for Seismic Analysis of Building”, Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials,1998(3)337~344.25.Y. Roger Li,and James O. Jirsa, ”Nonlinear Analyses of an Instrumented Structure Damage in the 1994 Northridge Earthquake”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 14,No. 2, May 1998.26.M. A. Aschheim, J. P. Moehle and A. Lynn, ”Earthquake Performance Assessment of Concrete Structures”, Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials,1998(4)370~377.27.Pu Yang and Yayong Wang, “A Study on Improvement of Pushover Analysis”, Proceedings of the 12th World Conferences on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, CD-ROM, Paper1940, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering..28.Balram Gupta and Sashi K. Kunnath, ”Adaptive Spectra-based Pushover Procedure for Seismic Evaluation of Structures”, Earthquake Spectra,Vol. 16, N0. 2, May 200029.Fischinger. M and Fajfar P., ”N2-a method for non-linear seismic analysis of regular structures”,Proc. 9th World Conf. Earthq. Engng. Vol.5,Tokyo- Kyoto, Japan, 1988,pp.111~116.30.A. Ghobarah, ”Seismic Assessment of Existing RC Structures”, Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials,2(2000)60~71.31.Mario E.Rodriguez and Juna C. Aristizabl, ”Evaluation of A Seismic Damage Parameter”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,28(1999)463~477.32.International Conference of Building Officials, Uniform Building Code, Whitter, California, 1997.33.R. Park, “Evaluation of Ductility of Structures and Structural Assemblages from Laboratory Testing”, Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol.22, No.3, September,1989.34.T.Albanesi, C. Nuti, and I. Vanzi, ”A Simplified Procedure to Assess the Seismic Response of Nonlinear Structures”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol.16, No.4, November ,2000.35.Xiaoxuan Qi, Jack P. Moehle, “Displacement Design Approach for Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Earthquakes”, Earthquake Engineering Research Center College of Engineering University of California Berkeley, California, Report No. UCB/EERC 91/02, January 1991.36.Kevin R. Collins, M. EERI, “A Reliability-Based Dual Level Seismic Design Procedure for Building Structures”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 11, No. 3, Auguest, 1995, pp.417-429.37.S. A. Mahin and J. Lin, “Construction of Inelastic Response Spectra for Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems’’, Earthquake Engineering Research Center College of Engineering University of California at Berkeley, Report No. UCB/EERC-83/17, June, 1983.38.鄭錦桐,台灣地區地震危害度分析-使用新的震源分區,1997,國立中央大學地球物理 研究所碩士論文。39.Helmet Krawinkler, “Effects of Vertical Strength Irreqularities on Seismic Behavior of Frame Structures”, Proceedings of Seminar on Seismic Design for the Next Century, NCREE-99-034, December 1999.40.Stavros V. Tolis and Ezio Frccioli, “Displacement Design Spectra”, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 1(1999) 107-125.41.Julian J. Bommer and AMR S. Elnashai, “Displacement Spectea for Seismic Design”, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 1(1999) 1-32.42.Eduardo Miranda, and Vitelmo V. Bertero, ”Evaluation of Strength Reduction Factors for Earthquake-Resistant Design”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1994, pp.357-379.43.Peter Fajfar, Tomaz Vidic ,and Matej Fischinger, ”Consistent Inelastic Design Spectra: Strength and Displacement”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,23(1994)507~521.44.M. El-Attar, A. Ghobarah, ”Performance Based Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings”,Eurpean Earthquake Engineering,2(1998),22~29.45.Ashraf Habibullah, “ETABS Three Dimensional Analysis of Building System User Manual, Version 6.1”, 1995.46.Ashraf Habibullah, “CONKER — Design of Concrete Frame, A Postprocessor for ETABS”, Computer and Structure Inc. Berkeley, California, 1989.47.Sozen, M. A., “Review of Earthquake Response of R.C. Building with a View to Drift Comtrol”, Ststs-of-the-Art in Earthquake Engineering-1981,ed.by O. Ergunay and M. Erdik, Ankara, October 1981,pp.383~418.48.Akshay Gupta and Helmut Krawinkler, “Estimation of Seismic Drift Demands for Frame Structures”, Proceedings of Seminar on Seismic Design for the Next Century, NCREE-99-034, December 1999.49.林志峰,「功能設計檢核台北盆地樓房」,中原大學土木工程學系碩士論文,民國89年7 月。
電子全文 電子全文(本篇電子全文限研究生所屬學校校內系統及IP範圍內開放)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top