跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.141) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/08/24 05:44
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳偉政
研究生(外文):Chen Wei-Cheng
論文名稱:價格分割對消費者購買意願之影響:以知覺利益作為干擾變數
論文名稱(外文):Consumer's Reaction to Partitioned Price and the Moderating Role of Perceived Benefit
指導教授:方文昌方文昌引用關係
指導教授(外文):Fang Wen-Chang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:英文
論文頁數:46
中文關鍵詞:訂價策略價格分割知覺利益購買意願
外文關鍵詞:partitioned priceperceived benefitpurchase intention
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1183
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:390
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
在市場上,一項產品或是服務的價格經常被分割成兩個或兩個以上,儘管這些產品或服務常常是消費者必須一起購買。舉例來說,許多汽車修理廠會將汽車零件以及裝置的人工費用分開收取,儘管這兩者都是消費者必須負擔的費用。過去的研究顯示,一項分割過價格的產品會比沒有分割過的來的更引人注意。分割價格在國內已經是常見的訂價方式,國外雖然已有文獻在探討分割價格的影響,但國內卻非常少文獻在研究這類議題。有鑑於過去的文獻都只專注於探討基本費用加上附加費用的分割價格情況,本篇研究將重點放於一項產品但包含了兩個組成零件(主要零件+非主要零件)的分割價格來做比較,並且檢驗知覺利益在分割價格中的干擾關係。實驗中顯示出消費者的購買意願會因為不同的分割價格而有所差異,並且這種關係會被對於組成零件的知覺利益所干擾。結論顯示,當消費者在評估一項總價格相同的分割價格時,對於知覺利益高的零組件會偏好將價格分割較高。
The total price of a product or service is usually partitioned into two or more mandatory components that the consumers have to purchase together. Nowadays, firms often use partitioned price as their pricing strategy to increase seller’s benefit. Research on partitioned pricing suggests that separating the price makes the partitioned components more salient than when the prices are not partitioned. Whereas previous research has examined the case with base price and surcharge and investigated the effect of partitioned prices containing a variable number of price components, this article focuses on one product consist of two price components (focal and nonfocal component) of partitioned price and examine the moderating role of perceived benefit. In study 1, we show that consumer’s reactions to different partitioned pricing of nonfocal component. Characteristics of the nonfocal component attributes such as perceived benefit can therefore determine whether partitioned price stimulates demand. Secondary we conduct Study 2 and study 3 to examine the moderating role of perceived benefit and how it influences consumer’s perception. The result indicates that consumers prefer partitions in which they pay a lower price for the nonfocal component. The result also shows that perceived benefit will moderate consumers’ purchase intention. Consequently, when considering different partitions of the same total price, consumers prefer partitions in which the low-benefit component is lower and the price of the high-benefit component is higher.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter 1 Introduction…………………………………………..………. 1
Chapter 2 literature review and Hypothese……………………………...... 3
2.1 Partitioned Price……………………………………………………… 3
2.2 Perceived Benefit 5
2.3 Purchase Intention 7
Chapter 3 Methodology…………………………………………………… 8
3.1 Overview of our Studies  8
3.2 Sampling  9
3.3 Study 1  10
3.4 Study 2  12
3.5 Study 3 15
Chapter 4 Analysis………………………………………………………… 17
4.1 Study 1 Manipulate Check and Analysis 17
4.2 Study 2 Manipulate Check and Analysis 18
4.3 Study 3 Manipulate Check and Analysis 19
Chapter 5 Discussion and Implication……………… …………………….. 21
5.1 Discussion 21
5.2 Implications and Future Research 22
Reference…………………………………………………………………… 23
Appendix…………………………………………………………………… 27
Reference
Anderson, Eugene (1996), ‘Customer Satisfaction and Price Tolerance’. Marketing Letter, 7 (3): 265-74.
Bolton, Ruth N. and James H. Drew (1991), ‘A Multistage Model of Customers’ Assessments of Service Quality and Value’. Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (March), 375-84.
Burman, Bidisha. Biswas, Abhijit (2007). ‘Partitioned pricing: Can we always divide and prosper?’. Journal of Retailing. 83(4):423-436.
Bertini, Marco. Wathieu, Luc (2008). ‘Attenetion arousal through price partitioning’. Marketing Science, 27(2),236-246.
Calder, B. J., Phillips, L. W. and Tybout, A. M (1981), ‘Design research for application’. Journal of Consumer Research, 8,197-207.
Chakravarti, Dipankar, Rajan rish, Pallab Paul, and Joydeep Srivastava (2002), ‘Partitioned Presentation of Multicomponent Bundle Price: Evaluation, Choice and Underlying Processing Effects’. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 215-29.
Calson and Weathers (2008), ‘Examining differences in consumer reactions to partitioned prices with a variable number of price components’. Journal of Business Research, 61(7), 724-731.
Daripa, A., & Kapur, S. (2001). ‘Pricing on the Internet’. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 17(2), 202.
Dodds, William B., Kent B. Monroe, and Dhruv Grewal (1991), ‘Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations’. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(August), 307-319.
Guiltinan, Joseph P. (1987). ‘The price bundling of service: A normative framework’. Journal of Marketing, 51, 74-85.
Hitch (1978). ‘The Role of Short-Term Working Memory in Mental Arithmetic’. Cognitive Psychology, 10(3), 302-323.
Homburg, Christian, Wayne D. Hoyer, and Nicole Koschate (2005). ‘customers’ Reactions to Price Increases: Do Customer Satisfaction and Perceived Motive Fairness Matter?’. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(1), 36-49.
Lancaster, k. (1966). ‘ A New Approach to Consumer Theory’. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132-57.
Luo, L., P.K. Kannan, and B. T. Ratchford (2008). ‘Incorporating subjective characteristics in product design and evaluations’. Journal of Marketing Research,45(3), 182-194.
Morwitz, Vicki, Eric A. Greenleaf, and Eric J. Johncon (1998). ‘Divide and Prosper: Consumers’ Reactions to Partitioned Prices’. Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (November), 453-63.
Monroe, Kent B (1971). ‘ Measuring Price Thresholds by Psychophysics and Latitudes of Acceptance’. Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (November), 460-64.
Monroe, Kent B. (1990). ‘Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions’. New York: McGraw-Hill.

McFadden, Daniel (1986). ‘The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research’. Marketing Science, 5(4), 275-97.
Rebecca W. Hamilton and Joydeep Srivastava (2008). ‘When 2+2 is Not the Same as 1+3: Variations in Price Sensitivity Across Components of Partitioned Prices’. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol XLV (August 2008), 450-461.
Schindler wt al., 2005 R.M. Schindler, M. Morrin and N. Bechwati. ‘ Shipping charge and shipping-change skepticism: Implications for direct marketers’ pricing formats’. Journal of Interact Marketing, 19 (1). 41-53.
Smith, Michael D. and Erik Brynjolfsson (2001). ‘Consumer Decision Making at an Internet Shopbot: Brand Still Matters’. Journal of Industrial Economics, 49(4), 541-58.
Sweeney, Jillian C. and Geoffery N. Soutar (2001). ‘Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale’. Journal of Retailing, 77 (2), 203-220.
Sheth, Jagdish N., Bruce I. Newman, and Barbara L, Gross (1991). ‘Why We Buy What We Buy: A Theory of Consumption Values’. Journal of Business Research, 22 (2), 159-170.
Sandra Forsythe, Chuanlan Liu, David Shannon, and Liu Chun Gardner (2006). ‘Development of a Scale to Measure The Perceived Beneits and Risk of Online Shopping’. Journal of Interactive Marketing ,Volume/Number 2/Spring.
Shao, C. Y., J. Baker, and J. A. Wanger (2004). ‘The effects of appropriateness of service contact personnel dress on customer expectation of service quality and purchase intention: The moderating influences of Involvement and Gender’. Journal of Business Research, Vol.57,Iss.10,1164-1176.

Woodruff, Robert B (1997). ‘Customer Value: The Next Source of Contingent Weighting in Judgment and Choice’. Psychological Review, 95(July), 371-84.
Xia, Lan and Kent B. Monroe (2004). ‘Price Partitioning on the Internet’. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(4), 63-73.
Yadav, Manjit (1994). ‘How Buyers Evaluate Product Bundles: A Model of Anchoring and Adjustment’. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 342-53.
Yoo, B. and N, Donthu (2001). ‘Developing and Validating a Multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale’. Journal of Business Research, Vol.52, Iss. 1,1-14.
Yih Hwailee ,and Cheng Yuen Han (2002). ‘Partitioned Priceing in Advertising: Effects on Brand and Retailer Attitudes’. Marketing Letters, 13:1, 27-40.
Zeithaml, Valarie (1988). ‘Consumer Perception of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence’. Journal of Marketing, 52(July), 2-22.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊