臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

1980年代中起資本帳自由化風潮對開發中國家造成重大影響，依據新古典經濟成長理論，開發中國家資本帳自由化有助提升每人產出及消費，然而，實證研究結果甚為分歧。事實上，許多開發中國家在開放資本帳後發生各式各樣的金融危機。台灣在這一波全球資本帳自由化浪潮中並沒有缺席，但台灣開啟資本帳後的經濟表現卻多與理論預期相左，特別是經濟成長率呈現趨勢向下現象，問題徵點何在，仍有待推敲。
本文首先討論全球資本帳自由化的遞嬗，並論述台灣資本帳自由化的發展歷程，試圖從中了解兩者的連結。我們可以發現，台灣資本帳自由化固然與來自美國的壓力及國際組織的倡議脫離不了關係，但來自內部的力量亦不可輕忽。其次，台灣資本帳自由化採取漸進主義，亦即在經常帳持續出現巨額順差後才啟動，並循序開展。第三，台灣資本帳自由化後資本並未如所預期的流入，反而呈現流出現象，此或與之前的資本管制及長期國內超額儲蓄並存有關。
第二章建立一個跨期模型，據以探討資本移動對總體經濟的影響，並以台灣的資料作校準分析，得到三項重要的結論：首先，資本帳自由化對每人所得及消費的效果視金融市場的效率而定，這一結果呼應經濟自由化過程不應忽視自由化順序之論點。其次，資本流出時若國內利率上升幅度小於資本流出的變化幅度，將不致降低每人產出及消費。第三，產出之實體資本及人力資本彈性越大，則調整速度越慢，這一結果印證發展經濟學家所倡議之收斂理論。
第三章透過事件分析法探討「事實的」資本帳自由化之總體經濟效果，發現台灣在1980年代中解除外匯管制後，經歷相當長時間的負向產出缺口。其次，除了1990年代外，其他時段的投資成長率均下降，但波動度卻見提高；另1990年代初起開放外國人投資國內股市，卻未對股價產生推升效果；而無論是股票殖利率或Tobin q值，幾乎都指向資本帳自由化對降低資本成本並無助益。第三，台灣資本帳自由化並未使得產出和其組成項目以及各項目彼此的相關趨淡。
第四章深入探討台灣資本帳自由化後，資本的流動及對總體經濟變數的影響、經濟榮枯循環、以及台灣與主要貿易夥伴及對手國家經濟波動關係之變化。發現早在1980年代中解除外匯管制之前，台灣實際上是不缺乏投資資金的，1990年代初開放外資投資國內證券市場後，甚至可觀察到資金的淨流出。其次，台灣開放資本帳後資本自發性移動的跡象逐漸明顯，但資本帳衝擊下，除了外匯準備及貨幣供給M2對資本帳衝擊的反應符合預期外，其他變數在多數時段的反應並不明顯。第三，台灣資本帳自由化並未導致景氣榮枯循環，因其從未引發資本的大量移入。最後但卻是最重要的，過去20年台灣與美、日GDP波動相關係數呈現下降，與中國大陸GDP波動相關係數則明顯提高。

The widespread capital account liberalization (CAL henceforth) has shed a strong influence on most developing countries since mid-80s. According to neoclassical growth theory, CAL should help lift per capita output and consumption in developing countries. However, empirical studies fail to give a definite result. In fact, many developing countries have encountered various kinds of financial crisis after opening up capital account. Taiwan has not been absent in the CAL movement, the economic performance after CAL were in general at odds with what the theory tells us. Specifically, economic growth rate has followed a downward trend ever since. The reasons why it happened have yet to be scrutinized.
In this dissertation I started with a discussion of the evolution of global CAL and the development of CAL in Taiwan, aiming to find a link between them. I found that in addition to the pressures from the US and the initiatives of international organizations, endogenous forces should not be ruled out in understanding the underpinning factors in Taiwan’s CAL. Secondly, Taiwan adopted a gradualism approach in opening up its capital account namely not before it had enjoyed a huge amount of current account surplus and moved forward step by step. Thirdly, Taiwan experienced capital outflow rather than inflow after CAL. This should be due to the coexistence of capital control and excess domestic savings before CAL.
An intertemporal model is built in chapter two to derive the effects of CAL on macroeconomic variables. A model calibration exercise has been performed by applying Taiwan’s data. Several findings are concluded as the following: Firstly, the effect of CAL on per capita income and consumption lies heavily on the efficiency of its financial market. This result echoes the proposition that the issue of optimal sequencing should not be left aside in the process of economic liberalization. Secondly, per capita income and consumption may not decline in the case of capital outflow as long as the magnitude of increase in domestic interest rate is lower than that of capital outflow. Thirdly, it takes time for the effects of liberalization to be fully materialized. Lastly, a higher output elasticity of capital implies a lower rate of adjustment. This result lends support to the convergence theory initiated by most development economists.
In chapter three I investigate the macroeconomic effects of CAL by performing event study of “de facto” liberalization. I found that Taiwan has in general experienced a long period of negative output gap ever since it lifted foreign exchange controls in mid-80s. Secondly, the rate of investment growth has plummeted except for 1990s with a higher volatility. Furthermore, the opening up of security market beginning from early 90s proved to have no effect on lifting stock prices, and either the dividend yield or Tobin’s q has pointed to the failure of CAL in lowering the cost of capital. Thirdly, CAL has no effect on brining down correlation of output with and among its components.
In chapter four I probed into the effects of capital flows on macroeconomic variables, and investigate the so called boom-bust cycle and the co-movement phenomena among Taiwan and her major trading partners or competitors. It was found that Taiwan did not have any problem in the supply of investment funds prior to it lifting foreign exchange controls back in mid-80s. We can even observe capital outflow in early 1990s when it opened up its security market. However, autonomous capital flows became evident as a result of CAL. The impulse responses of macroeconomic variables to autonomous capital flows were not significant though except for foreign exchange reserves and money supply M2. Thirdly, I found that CAL did not result in boom-bust cycle because it had not brought in massive capital inflows. Last but not least, the correlation of GDP between Taiwan and the US or Japan has been declining while increasing with China in the past two decades.

口試委員會審定書………………………………………………………i
謝辭……………………………………………………………………iii
中文摘要…………………………………………………………………v
英文摘要………………………………………………………………vii
第一章 緒論 …………………………………………………………1
第一節 緒言…………………………………………………………1
第二節 全球資本帳自由化的遞嬗…………………………………2
第三節 資本帳自由化的經濟效果………………………………12
第四節 資本帳自由化的批判……………………………………17
第五節 台灣資本帳自由化的歷程………………………………21
第六節 台灣主要經濟指標………………………………………31
第七節 小結………………………………………………………35
第二章 新古典成長模型分析 ……………………………………37
第一節 模型………………………………………………………38
第二節 資本帳自由化……………………………………………49
第三節 基準解與分析……………………………………………55
第四節 模型校準…………………………………………………60
第五節 小結………………………………………………………64
第三章 總體經濟效果 ……………………………………………66
第一節 理論與實證………………………………………………66
第二節 台灣資本帳自由化的衡量………………………………80
第三節 台灣資本帳自由化及經濟表現…………………………88
第四節 交叉相關分析……………………………………………97
第五節 小結………………………………………………………99
第四章 資本流動及影響…………………………………………102
第一節 資本流動與經常收支 …………………………………102
第二節 資本移動的性質 ………………………………………105
第三節 資本帳自由化的效果 …………………………………109
第四節 景氣榮枯循環 …………………………………………118
第五節 經濟共循環 ……………………………………………121
第六節 小結 ……………………………………………………129
第五章 結論………………………………………………………131
參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………135
附錄 …………………………………………………………………144

一、中文部分
于宗先、王金利(2005)，台灣金融體制之演變，台灣經濟論叢12，聯經出版事業
毛維凌、王高文(2001)，「再探恆常所得模型的跨期替代彈性估計問題」，台灣經濟學會年會論文集2001年，頁1-32。
李秀雲(1992)，經濟成長、國內外景氣波動與小型開放體系之貿易收支—台灣的實證分析，國立台灣大學經濟研究所博士論文。
胡春田（1999），「由東亞金融風暴看資本帳之結構問題與開放政策―中、泰、印、韓之比較」，中央銀行季刊，第二十一卷第三期，頁13-48。
許振明(2001)，「由金融自由化與國際化的過程談金融監理」，國家政策論壇，第一卷第八期。http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/FM/090/FM-R-090-039.htm
馬千惠（2001），「資本管制開放與資本移動關係的再探討」，中央銀行季刊，第二十三卷第一期，頁63-94。
張雅棻、官德星(2005)，「總要素生產力與經濟成長：台灣的實證研究」，經濟法制論叢，第36期,行政院經濟建設委員會,頁111-154。
黃仁德、趙振瑛(1997)，「人力資本對台灣經濟成長貢獻的評估」，勞資關係論叢，第6期，頁119-140。
黃建中、周宏智、苗坤齡、章本垚(2001)，生產力統計衡量方法之檢討與改進，行政院主計處研究報告，No：90-05-01.
曾昭玲、李姿宜、黃玉伶(2005)，「我國企業發行海外可轉換公司債之決定因素及發行前後直接與間接融資變化之探討」，台灣管理季刊，第五卷第二期，頁287-310。
趙耀東(1987)，「當前我國面臨之經濟挑戰與因應對策─七十六年十月二十二日向立法院經濟委員會報告」，自由中國之工業，第六十八卷第四期，頁5-10。
詹維玲(1998)，「金融自由化與投資：台灣實證研究」，1998年總體經濟計量模型研討會，中央研究院經濟研究所。
二、英文部分
Alfaro, L., S. Kalemli-Ozcan and V. Volosovych (2008), “Why doesn’t Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries? An Empirical Investigation,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90, 347-368.
Allegret, J.-P. and E. Essaadi, (2009), “Synchronization in Business Cycle of East Asian Economy: Evidence from Time Varying Coherence Study,” Submission at the 13th Internationl Conference on Macroeconomic Analysis and International finance, May 28-30, 2009. Available at http://www.gate.cnrs.fr/IMG/pdf/Allegret_Essaadi_2009.pdf
Arteta, C., B. Eichengreen, and C. Wyplosz, (2003), “When Does Capital Account Liberalization Help More than It Hurts?” in Economic Policy in the International Economy: Essays in Honor of Assaf Razin, ed. by E. Helpman and E. Sadka, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Balassa, B., and J. Williamson, (1987), Adjustment to Success: Balance of Payments Policy in the East Asian NICS, Policy Analysis in International Economics, No. 17, Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.
Barajas, A., R. Steiner, and N. Salazar, (2000), “The Impact of Liberalization and Foreign Investment in Columbia’s Financial Sector,” Journal of Development Economics, 63, 157-196.
Barro, R.J., N.G. Mankiw and X. Sala-i-Martin, (1995), “Capital Mobility in Neoclassical Model of Growth,”The American Economic Review, 85, 103-115.
Barro, R.J. and X. Sala-i-Martin, (1991), “Convergence Across States and Regions,” Brookings Papers of Economic Activity, 22, 107-182.
Beck, T., R. Levine, and N. Loayza, (2000), “Finance and the Sources of Growth,’ Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 261-300.
Bekaert, G. and C.R. Harvey, (1995), “Time-Varying World Market Integration,” The Journal of Finance, 50, 403-444.
Bekaert, G., C.R. Harvey, and C.T. Lundblad, (2001), “Does Financial Liberalization Spur Growth?”NBER Working Paper No. 8245.
, (2005), “Does Financial Liberalization Spur Growth?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 77,.3-55.
, (2009), “Financial Openness and Productivity,”. NBER Working Paper No. 14843.
Bhagwati, J. (2004), In defense of Globalization, Oxford University Press, New York.
Bruce, N. and A. Guisinger, (2003), “The Diffusion of Capital Account Liberalization in Developing Countries,” Prepared for delivery at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August28- August 31, 2003
Calvo, G.A. and E.G. Mendoza, (2000), “Rational Contagion and the Globalization of Securities Markets,” Journal of International Economics, 51, 79-114.
Camdessus, M. (1997), “Global Capital Flows: Rasing the Returns and Reducing the Risks,” Addressed at the World Affairs Council of Los Angeles, California, June 17, 1997.
Campbell, C.J., G.J. Papaioannou and A. Rai, (2007), “Cost of Capital and Operating Performance Effects following ADR Listings,” Working Draft.
Chinn, M.D. and H. Ito, (2005), “What Matters for Financial Development? Capital Controls, Institutions and Interactions,” NBER Working Paper No. 11370.
Claessens, S., A. Demirguc-kunt, and H. Huizinga, (2001), “How Does Foreign Entry Affect Domestic Banking Market?” Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, 891-911.
Clarke, G.R.G., R. Cull, L. D''Amato and A. Molinari, (1999), “The Effect of Foreign Entry on Argentina’s Domestic Banking Sector,” The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, No 2158.
Demirguc-Kunt, A. and V. Maksimovic, (1998), “Law, Finance and Firm Growth,” Journal of Finance, 53, 2107-2137.
Desai, P., (2003), Financial Crisis, Contagion, and Containment: From Asia to Argentina, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Dooley, M., D. Folkerts-Landau and P. Garber, (2005), “Are Official Capital Flows Important?” International Financial Stability: Asia, Interest Rates, and the Dollar, CH10,111-129, Deutsche Bank Global Markets Research
Dornbusch, R., (1998), “Capital controls: An Idea Whose Time is Past,” in Should the IMF Pursue Capital- Account Convertibility? Essays in International Finance, No. 207, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Dowrick, S. and D.-T. Nguyen, (1989), “OECD Comparative Economic Growth 1950-85: Catch-Up and Convergence,” American Economic Review, 79, 1010-1030.
Edison, H.J., M.W. Klein, L.A. Ricci and T. Slok, (2004), “Capital Account Liberalization and Economic Performance: Survey and Synthesis,” IMF Staff Papers, 51, 220-256.
Edwards, S., (2001), “Capital Mobility and Economic Performance: Are Emerging Economies Different?” NBER Working Paper, No. 8076.
ESCAP, (2007), Economic and Social Survey of Asia and the Pacific 2007: Surging ahead in uncertain time, Poverty and Development Division, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, 22-25, Available at: http://www.unescap.org
Escot, L. and M.-A. Galindo, (2000), “International Capital Flows and Convergence in the Neoclassical Growth Model,” International Advances in Economic Research, 6, 451-460.
Feldstein, M.and C. Horioka (1980), "Domestic Saving and International Capital Flows," Economic Journal ,.90, 314–329.
Fisher, I., (1930), The Theory of Interest, The Macmillan Company, New York.
Fischer, S., (1998), “Capital- Account Liberalization and the Role of he IMF,” in Should the IMF Pursue Capital- Account Convertibility? Essays in International Finance, No. 207, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Goldberg, L., (2004), “Financial-Sector Foreign Direct Investment and Host Countries: New and Old Lessons,” NBER Working Paper, No. 10441.
Gordon, M., (1962), The Investment, financing, and Valuation of the Corporation, Homewood, Illinois: R.D. Irving, Inc.
Gourinchas, P.and O. Jeanne, (2006), “The Elusive Gains from International Financial Integration,” Review of Economic Studies, 73, 715-741.
Grilli, V. and G.M. Milesi-Ferretti, (1995), “Economic Effects and Structural Determinants of Capital controls,” IMF Staff Papers, 42,.517-551.
Harvey, C.R., (1991), “The World Price of Covariance risk,” Journal of Finance, 46, 111-157.
Heathcote, J. and F. Perri, (2002), “Financial Globalization and Real Regionalization,” NBER Working Paper, No. W9292.
Henry, P.B., (2000), “Stock market liberalization, economic reform, and emergin market equity prices,” Journal of Finance, 55, 529-564.
Henry, P.B., (2003), “Capital-Account Liberalization, the Cost of Capital, and Economic Growth,” American Economic Review, 93, 91-96.
Henry, P.B., (2007), “Capital Account Liberalization: Theory, Evidence, and Speculation,” Journal of Economic Literature, 45,.887-935.
Hsu, C.M., (2001), “How could Taiwan Have been Insulated from the 1997 Financial Crisis?” NPF Research Report, No.090043, National Policy Foundation.
IMF (2002), “Capital Account Liberalization and Financial Sector Stability”, IMF Occasional Paper, No 211.
Ito, T., (2000), “ Capital Flows in Asia,” in Capital Floes and the Emerging Economies Theory, Evidence, and Controversies, ed. S. Edwards,255-297, The University of Chicago Press.
Jones, C.I., (2003), “Growth, Capital Shares, and a New Perspective on Production Functions,” Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
Kalemli-Ozcan, S., B.E. Sorensen and O.Yosha, (2001), “Economic Integration, Industrial Specialization, and the Asymmetry of Macroeconomic Fluctuations,” Journal of International Economics, 55, 107-137.
Karolyi, A.G., (1998) “Why Do Companies List Shares Abroad?: A Survey of the Evidence and its managerial Implications,” Financial Markets, Institutions &Instruments, 7, 1-60, New York University Salomon Center.
Kil, J.S., (2004), Korea, Taiwan, and the Asian financial crisis: Domestic institutional differences and impact of external pressure for liberalization, Ph. D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Kim, S., S.H. Kim and Y. Wang, (2001), Capital Account Liberalization and Macroeconomic Performance: The Case of Korea, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
, (2003), “Macroeconomic Effects of Capital Account Liberalization: The Case of Korea,” Macroeconomics Working Papers, No. 141, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research..
King, M., (2009), “Monetary Policy Developments,” Speech to the CBI Dinner, Nottingham, 20 January 2009.
King, R.and R. Levin, (1993), “Finance, Entrepreneurship, and Growth: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of Monetary Economics,.32, 513-542.
Klein, M.W., (2007), “Capital Account Liberalization and the Varieties of Growth Experience”, NBER Working papers, No9500, New version available at http://fletcher.tufts.edu/faculty/klein/pdf/Klein_CapAcctLib2007.pdf
Klein, M.W. and G.P. Olivei, (1999), “Capital Account Liberalization, Financial Depth, and Economic Growth,” NBER Working papers, No7384.
, (2008), “Capital Account Liberalization, Financial Depth, and Economic Growth,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 27, 861-875.
Kose, A.M., E. Prasad, K. Rogoff, and S-J Wei, (2006), “Financial Globalization: A Reappraisal,” IMF Working Paper, WP/06/189.
Lang, L., and R. Stulz, (1992) “Contagion and Competitive Intra-Industry Effects of Bankruptcy Announcements: An Empirical Analysis,” Journal of Financial Economics, 32, 45-60
Levine, R., (2004), “Finance and Growth: Theory and Evidence,” NBER Working Papers, No.10766.
Levin, R., N. Loayza and Y. Beck, (2000), “Financial Intermediation and Growth: Causality and Causes,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 46, 31-77.
Liu, W.-C. and C.-M. Hsu, (2006), “The Role of Financial Development in Economic Growth: The Experiences of Taiwan, Korea, and Japan” Journal of Asian Economics, 17, 667-690.
Lucas, R.E., (1990), “Why doesn’t Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries?” American Economic Review, 80, 92-96.
Lundestad, G., (1986), “Empire by Invitation? The United States and Western Europe, 1945–1952,” Journal of Peace Research, 23, 263–277.
Mendoza, E.G., (2001), “Credit, Prices and Crashes: Business cycle with a sudden stop,” NBER Working Papers, No. W8338.
Mishkin, F.S., (2001), “Financial Policies and the Prevention of Financial Crises in Emerging Market Countries,” NBER Working Papers, No. W8087.
, (2007), “Is Financial Globalization Beneficial?” Journal of Money, credit and Banking, 39,259-294.
Neely, C.J., (1999), “An Introduction to Capital controls,” Review ,Novenber/December, 13-30.
Obstfeld, M. and A.M. Taylor, (2004), Global Capital Markets: Integration, Crisis and Growth, Cambridge University Press.
Polak, J.J., (1998), “The Articles of Agreement of the IMF and the liberalization of Capital Movement” in Should the IMF Pursue Capital- Account Convertibility?, Essays in International Finance, No. 207, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Prasad,E. and R. Rajan, (2008a), “A Pragmatic Approach to Capital Account Liberalization,” NBER Working Papers, No.14051.
, Rajan, (2008b), “Capital Account Liberalization :New Thoughts on an Old Topic,” VOX, Available at: http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/1530
Prasad,E., K.Rogoff, S.-J. Wei, and M.A. Kose, (2003), Effects of Financial Globalization on Developing Countries: Some Empirical Evidence, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC. .
Quinn, D., (1997), “The Correlates of Changes in International Financial Regulation,” American Political Science Review, 91, 531-551.
, (2003), “Capital Account Liberalization and Financial Globalization, 1890-1999: A Synoptic View,” International Journal of finance and Economics, 8, 189-204.
Rajan, R. G. and L. Zingales, (1998), “Financial Dependence and Growth,” American Economic Review, 88, 559-586.
, (2003), “The Great Reversals: the Politics of Financial Development in the 20th Century,” Journal of Financial Economics, 69, 5-50
Read, R., (2002), “Foreign direct investment and the growth of Taiwan and Korea,” Paper presented at the IBRG FDI: Country Case Studies Conference, Grange-over Sands, 13-14 Sept. 2002.
Rebelo, S., (1991), “Long-Run Policy Analysis and Long-Run Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, 99, 500-521.
Rodrik, D., (1998), “Who Needs Capital- Account Convertibility,” in Should the IMF Pursue Capital- Account Convertibility?, Essays in International Finance, No. 207,.55-65, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
, (2006), “The Social Cost of Foreign Exchange Reserves,” CEPR Discussion Papers, No.5483.
Romer, D., (2001), Advanced Macroeconomics, McGraw Hill, New York.
Romer, P.M., (1987), “Crazy Explanations for the Productivity Slowdown,” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1987, 163-202, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Solow, R., (1956), “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65-94.
Soros, G., (2002), George Soros on Globalization, George Soros Public Affairs, New York.
Stiglitz, J.E., (2000), “Capital Market Liberalization, Economic Growth, and Instability,” World Development, 25, 1075-1086.
, (2002), Globalization and its discontents, New York: Norton.
Tobin, J., (1969), “A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking,1, 15–29.
Unite, A. and M. Sullivan, (2003), “The Effect of Foreign Entry and Ownership Structure on the Philippine Domestic Banking Market,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 2325-2345.