臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究以2002年1月至2009年12月128支國內股票型基金之月資料探討共同基金流量波動性對基金績效之影響，並利用Panel Data模型分別就個別與整體方面，檢視基金流量波動性及其他基金特性變數是否會對基金績效產生影響？實證結果顯示，個別基金流量波動性的確會對基金績效產生顯著且負面的影響，現金持有比率也會和基金績效呈現顯著的負相關，至於規模與申購手續費率不會影響基金績效。此外週轉率與基金流量則對績效有正面且顯著的影響。整體基金之流量波動性、費用率、申購手續費率、規模與報酬率之波動性對整體基金績效沒有顯著影響，而基金整體週轉率和流量對績效有顯著正向關係。最後，基金整體現金持有比率對績效則有顯著的負向影響。

This paper uses 128 open-end domestic equity mutual funds of monthly data from January 2002 to December 2009 to examine how mutual fund flow volatility affect fund performance. We use Panel Data Model to examine how mutual fund flow volatility and fund characteristics influence fund performance. The results show that individual fund flow volatility has significantly and negatively affected fund performance; cash holdings also have significant and negative relationship with fund performance. Fund size and load do not affect the fund performance, but fund turnover and flow have significant and positively affected performance. Aggregate fund flow volatility, expenses, load, size and return volatility have no significant relationship with aggregate fund performance. Aggregate fund turnover and flow are positively related to performance. Finally Aggregate fund cash holdings have significantly and negatively affected performance.

中文摘要……………………………………………………......I
英文摘要……………………………………………….…......II
誌謝 …………………………………………………………...III
目錄……………………………………………………………….IV
表目錄 ………………………………………………………....VI
圖目錄……………………………………………………......VII
第壹章 緒論…………………………………………………….1
第一節 研究背景與動機…………………………………...1
第二節 研究目的………………………………………………4
第三節 研究範圍………………………………………………5
第四節 研究限制……………………………………………….8
第五節 論文結構……………………………………………….9
第貳章 文獻探討……………………………………………..11
第一節 國內文獻……………………………………………..11
第二節 國外文獻………………………………………………12
第參章 研究設計……………………………………………..16
第一節 研究架構……………………………………………..16
第二節 研究假說……………………………………………..18
第三節 變數定義……………………………………………..21
第四節 研究方法…………………………………………....25
第肆章 實證結果…………………………………………....27
第一節 樣本敘述性統計……………………………………27
第二節 迴歸分析…………………………………………..30
第伍章 結論與建議………………………………………...37
第一節 結論…………………………………............37
第二節 建議………………………………………………..38
參考文獻…………………………………………………………40

一、中文部份
1.王瑋蓮，2008，股票型基金規模、週轉率和績效關係的分量迴歸分析，中華大學經營管理研究所，碩士論文。
2.李柏毅，2000，以個別和整體的觀點探討共同基金流量之決定因素，國立高雄第一科技大學金融研究所，碩士論文。
3.李純瑩，2004，國內股票型基金績效之影響因素研究，世新大學經濟學究所，碩士論文。
4.李鳳美，2000，基金流量與績效評估之實證研究-以國內開放型股票基金為例，輔仁大學管理學研究所，碩士論文。
5. 林世峻，2000，影響台灣股票型基金績效之特性因素研究，淡江大學管理科學研究所，碩士論文。
6.陳登源、巫慧燕、黃建勝，1997，基金管理，雙葉書廊有限公司。
7.陳炳聰，1999，基金流量、基金績效與市場報酬關係之探討，國立高雄第一科技大學金融研究所，碩士論文。
8.陳勁宏，2009，基金規模對投資組合決策的影響，國立高雄第一科技大學金融研究所，碩士論文。
9.張志宏，1996，台灣共同基金投資績效評估之研究，國立成功大學企業管理研究所，碩士論文。
10.楊凱婷，2002，共同基金流量與證券市場報酬率關聯性之研究，東吳大學企業管理研究所，碩士論文。
11.蔣惟佾，2009，基金經理人的兼任行為對基金異常報酬的影響，國立高雄第一科技大學金融研究所，碩士論文。
12.盧敬忠，2003，以績效評估指標探討經理人更換對績效之影響，國立中央大學企業管理研究所，碩士論文。
二、英文部份
1.Alexander, G., Cici, G., and Gibson, S., 2007,“Does Motivation Matter when Assessing Trade Performance? An Analysis of Mutual Fund”, Review of Financial Studies, 20, 125-150.
2.Breusch, T. S., and Pagan, 1980, A.R., “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics”, Review of Economic Studies, 47, 239-254.
3.Carhart, M.M., 1997, “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance”, Journal of Finance, 52, 57-82.
4.Chen, J., Hong, H., Hung, M., and Kubik, J.D., 2004, “Does Fund Size Erode Mutual Fund Performance? The Role of Liquidity and Organization”, The American Economic Review 94, 1276-1302.
5.Chevalier, J., and Ellison, G., 1999, “Are some Mutual Fund Managers Better Than Others? Cross-Sectional Patterns in Behavior and Performance”, The Journal of Finance, 54, 875-899.
6.Chordia, T., 1996, “The Structure of Mutual Fund Charges”, Journal of Financial Economics, 41, 3-39.
7.Dellva, W.L., and Olson, G.T., 1998“The relationship between Mutual Fund Fees and Expenses and Their Effects on Performance”, The Financial Review, 33, 85-104.
8.Edelen, R.M., 1999, “Investor Flows and the Assessed Performance of Open-End Mutual Fund”, Journal of Financial Economics 53, 439-466.
9.Edelen, R.M., and J.B. Warner., 2001, “Aggregate Price Effects of Institutional Trading:A Study of Mutual Fund Flow and Market Return”, Journal of Financial Economics, 59, 195-220.
10.Jason, G., Hodges, C. and Rakowski, D., 2002, “Redemption Policies and Daily Mutual Fund Flows ”, working paper, Georgia State University.
11.Grinblatt, M. and S. Titman., 1994, “A Study of Mutual Fund Returns and Performance Evaluation Techniques”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29, 419-444.
12.Ippolito, R. A., 1992,“Consumer Reaction to Measure of Poor Quality : Evidence From Mutual Fund Industry”, Journal of Law and Economics, 35, 45-70.
13.Malkiel, B., 1995, “Returns from Investing in Equity Mutual Funds”, Journal of Finance, 50, 549-572.
14.Prather, L., Bertin, W.J., and Henker, T., 2004, “Mutual Fund Characteristics, Managerial Attributes, and Fund Performance”, Review of Financial Economics, 13, 305-326.
15.Rakowski, D., 2010, “Fund Flow Volatility and Performance”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45, 223-237.
16.Roston, Marc., 1996,“Mutual Fund Managers and Lifecycle Risk:An Empirical Investigation”, Manuscript . Chicago:Univ. Chicago.Dept. Econ.
17.Sharpe, W.F., 1966, “Mutual Fund Performance”, Journal of Business 39, 119-138.
18.Simth, K.V., 1978, “Is Fund Growth related to Fund Performance?”, Journal of Portfolio Management, 49-54.
19.Sirri, E.R. and P. Tufano., 1998, “Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows”, Journal of Finance 53, 1589-1621.
20.William, G. D. and A. W. David, 1996, “Mutual Fund Investment Performance”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 36, 347-363.