臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究以超音波美容儀為例，主要的研究目的為探討消費者特性、創新採用者類型和不同的創新產品屬性會如何影響消費者對創新產品的購買意願，以及這三者變數之間的關係，同時也探討了不同的創新採用者類型在生活型態上的差異。
首先，本研究先以文獻探討的方式界定各變數的構面，在消費者特性方面採用了人口統計變數和生活型態兩構面；在新產品屬性的部分則採用了相對優勢、相容性和複雜性三構面。在確定了研究架構後，再發展出問卷調查消費者對新產品屬性的重視程度、消費者的生活型態、消費者的創新採用者類型以及購買意願。本研究共回收了278份有效問卷，透過SPSS統計分析結果發現，人口統計變數當中的年齡和教育程度與創新採用者類型之間存在顯著相關；而有部分的生活型態和創新採用者類型之間存在顯著相關。另外，除了晚期大眾外，其餘創新採用者類型之間的生活型態皆有明顯的差異。
在不同創新採用者類型的生活型態中發現，愈早期使用創新產品的族群愈會追求流行、喜歡擔任領導性職務、具有冒險犯難的精神、易受他人的影響、不具有品牌忠誠且對於多功能複雜的產品較感興趣。本研究也發現創新採用者類型在新產品的相對優勢和相容性上皆具有顯著相關，其中分別又和超音波美容儀能「促進臉部保養和吸收」此相對優勢和「對臉部保養清潔的重視程度」此相容性最具相關性，而早期大眾對於新產品相對優勢和相容性的重視程度又明顯高於落後者。另外，除了對「產品偏好程度」此一衡量構面不具有顯著正相關外，新產品屬性當中的相對優勢和相容性與購買意願皆具有正向的顯著關係，表示當產品的相對優勢和相容性愈高時，消費者的購買意願就會愈高。
本研究透過不同的消費者特性、不同的創新採用者類型和對新產品屬性重視程度的不同來研究消費者的購買意願，希望能對廠商在行銷規劃和產品的研發改良上有所幫助。

This research takes ultrasound beauty for example, mainly explores how consumer characteristics, adopter categories, and characteristics of new product affect consumers’ purchase intentions, and it also discusses the relationship among these three variables. At the same time, this research explores the various life styles among different adopter categories.
First, this research defines the aspects of three variables by literature review. In the dimension of consumer characteristics, this research adopts demographic and life style aspects; in the dimension of characteristics of new product, this research adopts relative advantage, compatibility, and complexity aspects. After confirming the research framework, the questionnaire is designed to survey the consumers’ values to characteristics of new product, consumers’ life styles, consumers’ adopter categories and consumers’ purchase intentions. There are 278 effective questionnaires for this research. Through SPSS statistical analysis, this research finds that age, education and a part of life styles are significant correlated with adopter categories and except for late majority, there are obvious differences of life styles among adopter categories.
The people who adopt new product earlier tend to pursue fashion, like to be a leadership, have the adventure characteristic, be influenced by others, not to be brand loyalists, and interest in complex and multi-functional products. This research also finds that adopter category has significant correlation with relative advantage and compatibility. In relative advantage aspect, adopter category has most significant correlation with “ultrasound spa will facilitate maintenance and absorption of face”; in compatibility aspect, adopter category has most significant correlation with “what degree I value the maintenance and cleaning of my face”. And the value degree of relative advantage and compatibility to early majority are much higher than laggards. Besides, except for “preference to products” aspect, relative advantage and compatibility are significant positive correlated with purchase intentions. It means that the higher of relative advantage and compatibility, the higher of consumers’ purchase intentions.
This research explores consumers’ purchase intentions by various consumer characteristics, different adopter categories and different value degree to characteristics of new product. The researcher hopes this research can help firms in marketing plans, product development and product improvement.

目錄
摘要………….. I
Abstract .…. II
目錄……… III
圖目錄……. IV
表目錄…… V

第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究流程 2
第貳章 文獻探討 4
第一節 創新產品的概念 4
第二節 創新產品採用模式 7
第三節 新產品屬性 10
第四節 消費者特性 12
第五節 創新擴散理論 18
第參章 研究方法與問卷設計 22
第一節 研究架構與研究假設 22
第二節 問卷設計 23
第三節 研究方法 26
第肆章 資料分析 28
第一節 樣本人口統計分布 28
第二節 消費者特性和創新採用者關聯性分析 29
第三節 創新採用者類型和新產品屬性關聯性分析 41
第四節 新產品屬性和創新產品購買意願關聯性分析 42
第五節 實證結果 44
第五章 結論與建議 45
第一節 研究結論 45
第二節 研究貢獻 47
第三節 研究建議 47
參考文獻 49
附錄：問卷 53



圖目錄
圖1-1 本研究研究流程 3
圖2-1 創新產品的類型 6
圖2-2 創新產品採用過程 8
圖2-3 創新產品採用過程模式 9
圖2-4 創新產品試用-採用過程 10
圖2-5 新產品採用模型 10
圖2-6 消費者特性的連續尺度 13
圖2-7 生活型態在不同階層的應用模式 15
圖2-8 Rogers創新擴散模型 19
圖3-1 研究架構 22










表目錄
表2-1 創新的定義 4
表2-2 生活型態的定義 15
表2-3 生活型態構面 17
表2-4 Rogers和Bass創新採用者分類比較 20
表3-1 超音波美容儀「相對優勢」衡量題項 23
表3-2 超音波美容儀「相容性」衡量題項 23
表3-3 超音波美容儀「複雜性」衡量題項 24
表3-4 消費者生活型態衡量題項 24
表3-5 創新採用者類型衡量題項 25
表3-6 創新產品購買意願衡量題項 26
表4-1 樣本之人口統計分布 28
表4-2 Rogers創新採用者分類之卡方適合度檢定 29
表4-3 人口統計變數和創新採用者之卡方獨立性檢定 30
表4-4 生活形態之KMO與Bartlett檢定 33
表4-5 生活形態因素主成分分析結果 33
表4-6 模型適合度資訊表 36
表4-7 生活形態和創新採用者類型多項式logistic迴歸分析 36
表4-8 各集群人數分布表 39
表4-9 各集群之最後集群中心點 39
表4-10 各集群和創新採用者類型之獨立性檢定表 40
表4-11 創新採用者類型在新產品相對優勢上之檢定 41
表4-12 創新採用者類型在新產品相容性上之檢定 41
表4-13 創新採用者類型在新產品複雜性上之檢定 42
表4-14 新產品屬性與一年內之購買可能性多元迴歸分析 43
表4-15 新產品屬性與產品偏好程度多元迴歸分析 43
表4-16新產品屬性與產品價格為市價1800時之購買可能性多元迴歸分析 43
表4-17 本研究假說的實證結果 44

一、中文部分
別蓮蒂(2000)，生活型態白皮書－2000年台灣消費習慣調查報告，台北市：商周出版。
林俊宏(2002)，消費者特性、新產品屬性及環境變數對創新購買意願之影響，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
林勝恩(2008)，女性臉部清潔保養行為及美顏家電使用需求之探討， 國立雲林科技大學工業設計研究所碩士論文。
楊世瑩(2005)，SPSS統計分析實務，台北市：旗標出版。
王保進(2004)，多變量分析－套裝程式與資料分析，台北市：高等教育出版。

二、英文部分
Andreason, AlanR.(1967), Leisure, Mobility and Life Style Pattern, Chicago：Proceedings of AMA Conference.
Antil, John H. (1988), “New Product or Service Adoption: When Does It Happen?” Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 5-16.
Barnett, Homer G. (1953), Innovation: The Basis of Cultural Change, New York：McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Bass, Frank M. (1969), “A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables,”Management Science, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 215-227.
Blackwell, Roger D., Miniard, Paul W. &; James F.Engel (2006), Consumer Behavior, 10th Ed., South-Western：Thomson Learning Company.
Cooper, Robert G. (1993), Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch, 2thEd, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley Publishing.
Crawford, Charles M. (1994), New Product Management, Boston：Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
Davis, Fred D. (1989), “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319-340.
Demby, Emanuel H. (1994), “Psychographics Revisited: The Birth of A Technique,” Marketing Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 26-29.
Dhebar, A. (1995), “Complementarity, Compatibility, and Product Change: Breaking with the Past?” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 136-152.
Dickerson, Mary D. &; James W. Gentry (1983), “Characteristics of Adopters and Non-adopters of Home Computers,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 225-235.
Dodds, William B., Monroe, Kent B., &; D. Grewal (1991), “Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 307-319.
Engle, James F. (1984), Consumer Behavior, New York：Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Gatignon, H &; Thomas S. Robertson (1991),“Innovative Decision Process” in Hand Book of Consumer Behavior, NJ：Prentice Hall.
Guiltinan, Joseph P. (1999), “Launch Strategy, Launch Tactics, and Demand Outcomes,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 509-529.
Holak, Susan L. (1988), “Determinants of Innovative Durables Adoption: An Empirical Study with Implications for Early Product Screening,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp.50-69.
Holak, Susan L. &; Donald R. Lehmann (1990), “Purchase Intentions and the Dimensions of Innovation: AnExploratory Model,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 59-73.
Im, S., Bayus, Barry L. &; Charlotte H. Mason (2003), “An Empirical Study of Innate Consumer Innovativeness, Personal Characteristics, and New-Product Adoption Behavior,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 61-73.
Kelly, George A. (1975), The Psychology of Personal Constructs, 5th Ed., New York：N.W. North &; Co.
Kleinschmidt, Elko J.&; Robert G. Cooper (1991), “The Impact of Product Innoativeness on Performance,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 240-251.
Kotler, P. (1996), Marketing Management-Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 9th Ed., N.J.：Prentice-Hall Inc.
Kotler, P. &; G. Zaltman (1976), “Targeting Prospects for a New Product”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 7-18.
Labay, Duncan G. &; Thomas C. Kinnear (1981), “Exploring the Consumer Decision Process in the Adoption of Solar Energy Systems,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 271-278.
Lazer, W. (1963), “Life Style Concepts and Marketing” in Toward Scientific Marketing, Chicago：AMA.
Lesser, Jack A. &; Marie A. Hughes (1986), “The Generalizability of Psychographic Market Segments across Geographic Locations,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 18-27.
Levitt, T. (1966), “Innovative Imitation” in Harvard Business Review, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 63-70.
Mahajan, V., Muller, E. &; Rajendra K. Srivastava (1990), “Determination of Adopter Categories by Using Innovation Diffusion Models,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 37-50.
Midgley, David F. &; Grahame R. Dowling (1993), “A Longitudinal Study of Product Form Innovation: The Interaction between Predispositions and Social Messages,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 611-625.
Midgley, David F. &; Grahame R. Dowling (1978), “Innovativeness: The concept and its Measurement,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 229-242.
Morrison, Donald G. (1979), “Purchase Intentions and Purchasing Behavior,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 65-74.
Ostlund, Lyman E. (1974), “Perceived Innovation Attributes as Predictors of Innovativeness,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 23-29.
Plummer, Joseph T. (1974), “The Concept and Application of Life Style Segmentation,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 33-37.
Ram, S. (1987), “A model of innovation resistance,” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 208-212.
Reynolds, Fred D. &; William D. Wells (1977), Consumer Behavior, New York：McGraw-Hill.
Richards, Elizabeth A. &; Stephen S. Sturman (1977), “Life-Style Segmentation in Apparel Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 89-91.
Robertosn, Thomas S. (1967), “The Process of Innovation and the Diffusion of Innovation,”Journal of Marketing, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 14-19.
Rogers, Everett M. (2003), Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Ed., New York：The Free Press, a Division of Simon &; Schuster, Inc.
Rogers, Everett M. &; Floyd F. Shoemaker (1971), Communication of Innovations, New York：Free Press.
Schiffman, Leon G. &; Leslie L. Kanuk (2000), Consumer Behavior, 7th Ed., New York：Prentice Hall Inc.
Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1939), Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, New York：McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Sobel, Michael E. (1981), Lifestyle and Social Structure, New York：Academic Press, Inc.
Tornatzky, Louis G. &;Katherine J. Klein (1982), “Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption-Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 28-45.
Uhl, K., Andrus, R. &; L. Poulsen (1970), “How Are Laggards Different? An Empirical Inquiry,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 51-54.
Usher, Abbott P. (1954),A History of Mechanical Inventions, Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
Veryzer, Jr. &; W. Robert (1998), “Discontinuous Innovation and the New Product Development Process,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 304-321.
Wells, William D. (1975), “Psychographics: A Critical Review,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 12, No. 2, PP. 196-213.
Wells, William D. &; Douglas J. Tigert (1971), “Activities, Interests and Opinions,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 27-35.
Weelwright, Steven C. &; Kim B. Clark (1992), Revolutionizing Product Development, New York：Free Press.
Wind Yoram H. &; Paul E. Green (1974), “Some Conceptual Measurement and Analytical Problems in Life Style Research” in Life Style and Psychograohics, Chicago：AMA.
Zaltman, G. &; M. Wallendorf (1983), Consumer Behavior: Basic Findings and Management Implications, New York：John Wiley &;Son.
Ziff, R. (1971), “Psychographics for Market Segmentation,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 3-9.