跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.17) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/03 15:22
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:許晏瑜
研究生(外文):HSU, YEN-YU
論文名稱:董事會連結及屬性與CSR關係之探討
論文名稱(外文):How is Board External Connectedness Related to Firm's CSR Engagement ?
指導教授:許培基許培基引用關係
指導教授(外文):SHU, PEI-GI
口試委員:江淑貞孫梅瑞
口試委員(外文):JIANG,SHU-JHENSUN,MEI-RUEI
口試日期:2013-06-19
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:輔仁大學
系所名稱:金融與國際企業學系金融碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
語文別:中文
論文頁數:51
中文關鍵詞:企業社會責任董事外部連結
外文關鍵詞:Corporate Social ResponsibilityBoard External Connectedness
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:324
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:31
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
本研究探討董事外部連結與企業社會責任(CSR)之關係。研究樣本為2007 ~2011年上市上櫃公司扣除金融業,實證結果指出公司規模影響董事外部連結,董事外部連結越高會使公司更會去從事企業社會責任及公司對企業社會責任投入越多。我們用三個先前的假說說明公司為何會從事企業社會責任:過度投資假說(Barnea and Rubin, 2006),產品訊號假說(Fisman, Heal, and Nair, 2005)及策略選擇假說(Cespa and Cestone, 2000)。本研究結果主要與策略選擇假說的預測一致。有較強的管理防禦的管理者較不會去從事企業社會責任。

另外,我們更進一步發現,當做企業社會責任的邊際貢獻較低(管理者的位子鞏固,管理防禦強)以及當做企業社會責任的邊際成本較高(董事持股高)時,公司做企業社會責任的傾向就會被降低。

In this study we explore how board external connectedness is related to corporate social reasonability. Our result from 1,120 listed firms in the Taiwan stock market indicates that firm size dictates board external connectedness which in turn positively associated with firm’s engagement of social responsibility and the extent of social responsibility. We use three previously-developed hypotheses to illustrate why firms would engage in social responsibility: overinvestment (Barnea and Rubin, 2006), product signaling (Fisman, Heal, and Nair, 2005), and strategic choice (Cespa and Cestone, 2000). Our result is mainly consistent with the prediction of the strategic choice hypothesis in the sense that a well-entrenched CEO (as manifested in CEO/chairman duality) is less likely to engage in social responsibility.
Moreover, we find that firm’s CSR engagement is positively related to size-dictated board external connectedness, but is somewhat thwarted by a lower marginal benefit (high managerial entrenchment) and a higher marginal cost (high directors’ shareholding) of CSR engagement.

第一章 緒論........................................................1
第一節 研究背景及動機...........................................1
第二節 研究目的.................................................4
第二章 文獻探討.....................................................5
第一節 企業社會責任.............................................5
第二節 董事會與公司治理.........................................9
第三節 董事會(公司治理)與企業社會責任之關聯....................12
第三章 研究方法....................................................13
第一節 研究假說................................................13
第二節 研究樣本與資料來源......................................16
第三節 變數操作行定義與衡量....................................18
第四章 實證結果....................................................24
第一節 敘述性統計..............................................24
第二節 羅吉斯迴歸分析..........................................31
第三節 董事連結、管理防禦與董事持股............................37
第五章 結論與建議..................................................46
第一節 研究結論................................................46
第二節 研究建議................................................48
參考文獻............................................................49
表目錄
表3-3-1 Entrenchment指標彙總表......................................21
表3-3-2 變數彙總表..................................................23
表4-1-1 樣本分佈....................................................24
表4-1-2 基本統計量..................................................25
表4-1-3 單變量差異檢定..............................................27
表4-1-4 Pearson相關係數矩陣表.......................................29
表4-2-1 羅吉斯迴歸(Logistic Regresion)-大公司 V.S 小公司................31
表4-2-2 董事連結配適值與企業社會責任迴歸分析........................33
表4-3-1 管理防禦、董事連結配適值與企業社會責任羅吉斯迴歸分析.........38
表4-3-2 董事連結及管理防禦交乘項與企業社會責任羅吉斯迴歸分析........40
表4-3-3 董事連結及董事持股交乘項與企業社會責任羅吉斯迴歸分析........42
表4-3-4 董事持股及管理防禦交乘項與企業社會責任羅吉斯迴歸分析........44



Alexander, G. J., & Bucholtz, R. A. (1978). Corporate social performance and stock market performance. Academy of Management Journal, 21(3), 479-486.
Arrow, Kenneth J.(1973). Social Responsibility and Economic Efficiency.Public Policy,XXI,pp.303-17.
Aupperle, K., A, Carroll and J., Hatfield (1985). An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability.Academy of Management Journal, 28, pp 446-463.
Barnea, A., and A. Rubin( 2006). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders, working paper, University of Texas at Austin.
Becchetti, L., R. Ciciretti, and I. Hasan (2007).Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder’s
Value:An Event Study Analysis . Working Paper ,Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta .
Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper and Row.
Brammer, S., C. Brooks and S. Pavelin (2005). Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns: UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures . Financial Management, 35, pp. 97-116.
Cespa, G., and G. Cestone(2007) Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment.Journal of Economics and Management Strategy ,16, 741-771.
Davis, G. F.(1991). Agents without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill through the Intercorporate Network. Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (4):583.
Davis, G. F. and H. R. Greve(1997) . Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s . American Journal of Sociology 103(1), 1–37.
Demsetz, H. and K. Lehn (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences . Journal of Political Economy 93, 1155-1177.
Fama, E.(1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88, 288–307 .
Fama, E. and M. Jensen (1983). Separation of ownership and control, Journal of Law and Economics 26, 301–325.
Fich, E. M. and Shivdasani A.(2005).The impact of stock-option compensation for outside directors on firm value. Journal of Business,78: 2229-2254.
Fich, E. M. and A. Shivdasani (2006) . Are Busy Boards Effective Monitors? Journal of Finance, 61, 689-724.
Fisman, R., G. Heal, and V. Nair( 2005) Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good? Working paper,Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
Fisman, R., G. Heal, and V. Nair(2006) A model of corporate philanthropy .Working paper, Wharton School,University of Pennsylvania.
Fombrun, C. and Shanley, M.(1990) What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33,102-110.
Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits.New York Times Magazine.

Fuerst, O. and S. H. Kang (2000) . Corporate Governance, Expected Operating Performance, and Pricing . Working Paper, New Haven: Yale School of Management.
Griffin, J. J.,& Mahon, J. F.(1997).The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate. Business and Society, 36, 1: 5-31.
Haunschild, P. R. (1993). Interorganizational Imitation - The Impact of Interlocks on Corporate Acquisition Activity. Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (4):564-592.
Hill, R. P.,&T. Ainscough,& T. Shank, & D. Manullang(2007). Corporate social responsibility and socially responsible investing: A global perspective.Journal of Business Ethics ,70, 165-174.
Ibrahim, A.,& Angelidis, P. (1995). The corporate social responsiveness orientation of board members: Are there differences between inside and outside directors? Journal of Business Ethics, 14(5), 405-410.
Ibrahim, N., Howard, D. & Angelidis, J. (2003). Board members in the service industry : An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility orientation and directorial type. Journal of Business Ethics, 47 (4), p. 393-401.
Jo, H. and Harjoto, M.(2011). Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social
Responsibility .Journal of Business Ethics ,103, 351–383.
Johnson, R.A., & Greening, D.W.( 1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 5: 564-580.
Jovanovic, B.(1979) . Job Matching and the Theory of Turnover . Journal of Political Economy, 87 (5), 972–990.
Kaplan, S. N. and D. Reishus (1990).Outside Directorships and Corporate Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, pp.389-411.
Lerner, L. D., and G. D. Fryxell (1988).An empirical study of the predictors of corporate social performance: A multi-dimensional analysis . Journal of Business Ethics, 7, pp. 951–959.
Mackenzie, C. (2007). Boards, incentives and corporate social responsibility: The case for a change of emphasis. The Authors Journal Compilation, 15(5), 935-943.
Maharaj, R. (2009) .View from the top: what directors say about board process. Corporate Governance, Vol. 9 Iss: 3, pp.326 – 338.
McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2001).Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp.603-609.
Mizruchi, M. S., and L. B. Stearns(1988) A Longitudinal Study of the Formation of Interlocking Directorates . Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 194-210.
Moskowitz, M. R. (1972). Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review, 1(2), 71-75.
Nicholson, Gavin J., Alexander, Malcolm, & Kiel, Geoffrey C. (2004) . Defining the Social Capital of the Board of Directors: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Australian New Zealand Academy of Management (JANZAM), 10(1), pp. 54-72.
Orlitzky, M., F. L. Schmidt and S. L. Rynes (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis . Organization Studies, 24, pp. 403-441.
Parket, I. R., & Eibert, H. (1975). Social responsibility: The underlying factors. Business Horizons, 18(4), 5-10.
Patton, A. and J. C. Baker,(1987). Why Won’t Director Rock the Boat ? Harvard Business Review,1987,10-18.
Shane, Phillip B., and H. Spicer Barry (1983). Market response to environmental information produced outside the firm. Accounting Review, 58, 521-538.
Shivdasani, A., & Yermack, D.(1999). CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: an
empirical analysis. Journal of Finance 79, 1829–1853.
Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny (1986) . Large shareholders and corporate control .Journal of Political Economy 94, 461-488.
Turban, D.B. and Greening, D.W. (1997) Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective tmployees. Academy of management journal,40(3),1-13.
Ullmann, A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationship among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540-577.
Vance, S. (1975). Are socially responsible firms good investment risks? Management Review, 64(1), 18-24.
Waddock, S. & Graves, S. (1997) .The corporate social performance-financial performance link.
Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
Wang, J. & Coffey, B. S. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11: 771 – 778.
Weisbach, M. (1988). Outside Directors and CEO Turnover . Journal of Financial Economics 20: 431-60.
Yermack, D.(1996).Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Journal of Financial Economics, (40), 1996, pp.185-211.
Yermack, David.(2004). Remuneration, retention, and reputation incentives for outside directors. Journal of Finance 59, 2281–2308.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top