跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.152) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/02 02:23
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:王雅奇
論文名稱:六頂思考帽訓練課程對提高國小資優生問題解決能力成效之研究
論文名稱(外文):The Effect of “Six thinking Hats ” Training Course On Improving Problem Solving Ability of Elementary Gifted Students
指導教授:郭靜姿郭靜姿引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:特殊教育研究所
學門:教育學門
學類:特殊教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2003
畢業學年度:91
語文別:中文
中文關鍵詞:資優生六頂思考帽問題解決能力
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:64
  • 點閱點閱:1008
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:10
本研究旨在根據de Bono的六頂思考帽訓練課程編擬一套適合五年級資優生的思考訓練課程,並經由十次的實驗教學後,探討此課程對增進國小資優生問題解決能力之成效。
本研究採不等組前後測實驗設計,以立意取樣方式選取台北市碧湖國小及胡適國小五年級資優生為樣本,其中碧湖國小十四名為實驗組,胡適國小十四名資優生為對照組,共三十四名。實驗組學生參加十次的教學課程(每次一單元,時間為二節,每節四十分鐘),對照組則接受原資優班之教學,無實驗處理。本研究之主要研究工具為「問題解決測驗」與「問題解決實作題」,所得資料以單因子共變數分析進行假設考驗。
本研究主要發現如下:
一、在問題解決測驗方面:
1.實驗組與對照組在總分之差異達到顯著水準(F=8.51 , p<.05)。
2.實驗組在「解釋推論」(F=24.44,P<.05)、「猜測原因」(F=22.34,P<.05)、「逆向原因猜測」(F=8.75,P<.05)、「決定解決方法」(F=7.87,P<.05)等分測驗前後測得分差異之進步量達到顯著水準,而在「預防問題」(F=1.46,P>.05)分測驗差異則未達顯著水準。
因此,本訓練課程對國小資優生問題解決能力之訓練成效頗佳。
二、在問題解決實作題目方面:
1. 實驗組與對照組在總分之差異達到顯著水準(F=19.12, p<.05)。
2. 實驗組與對照組在「界定問題」(F=1.17,P>.05)與「蒐集資料」,(F=0.68,P>.05)兩分測驗中,並未達顯著差異,而在「應用策略以解決問題」(F=4.32,P<.05)以及「評估問題解決方案的有效性」(F=5.09,P<.05)兩分測驗實驗組與對照組則達到顯著差異。
三、在教學回饋問卷方面,此課程受到多數學生的肯定與喜愛。
The main purposes of this study were to design a thinking training course for 5th grade gifted students bases on de Bono''s “Six Thinking Hats”, and to investigate the impacts of ten-times training course on problem solving ability of gifted students in the elementary school.
An nonequivalent pretest-posttest experimental design was employed. The subjects of this study involved thirty-four students selected from Taipei Municipal Bi-Hu and Hu-Shi elementary schools.The experiment group consisting of 14 studnents from Bi-Hu elementary school attended a ten-units thinking training course.The instruments are the Test of Problem Solving(TOPS) and performance assessment of problem solving.Tthe data were analyzed by one-way ANCOVA.
The major finding of this study were concluded as follows:
1.The assessment results of the Test of Problem Solving(TOPS):
(1)The were significant differences between the experiment group and the matched group on total scores(F=8.51 , p<.05).
(2) The were significant differences between the experiment group and the matched group in the following subtests: explaining inferences(F=24.44 , P<.05), determining causes(F=22.34,P<.05), negative why questions(F=8.75,P<.05) and determining solutions(F=7.87,P<.05). But no significant difference in the “avoiding problems” subtest(F=1.46,P>.05).
Therefore, there was significant training effect on improving the problem solving ability of the experiment group.
2.The assessment results of the performance assessment:
(1)The were significant differents between the experiment group and the matched group on total scores(F=19.12, p<.05).
(2) The were significant differents between the experiment group and the matched group in the following subtests:”applying techniques to solve problems “(F=4.32,P<.05)and “evaluating effectiveness of solutions to problems” (F=5.09,P<.05).But no significant differences in the “identifying problem” (F=1.17,P>.05) and “collecting information” (F=0.68,P>.05)subtest.
3.The subjects reported that they enjoy the training course .
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機
第二節 研究目的
第三節 研究問題與假設
第四節 名詞釋義
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 問題解決能力之內涵與歷程
第二節 問題解決策略
第三節 問題解決能力之教學
第四節 問題解決能力之評量
第五節 資優生與問題解決
第六節 國內對資優生問題解決能力之研究
第七節 六頂思考帽訓練課程
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究設計
第二節 研究對象
第三節 研究工具
第四節 研究程序
第五節 資料處理與分析
第四章 結果與討論
第一節 問題解決測驗之表現
第二節 問題解決實作題目之表現
第三節 六頂思考帽課程教學回饋問卷
第四節 教師教學回饋與省思
第五章 總結與建議
第一節 總結
第二節 研究限制
第三節 建議
參考書目
附錄
附錄一 六頂思考帽訓練課程教案與作業單
附錄二 問題解決實作題目(甲)
附錄三 問題解決實作題目(乙)
附錄四 教學回饋問卷
一、中文部分
王春展(民 86):專家與生手問題解決能力的差異及其在教學上的啟示。教育研究資訊,5卷2期,80-92頁。
呂金燮(民 89):資優兒童問題解決能力實作評量之建構研究。特殊教育研究學刊,19期,279-308頁。
李茂興、陳夢怡編譯(民89):心理學:適應環境的心靈。台北:弘智文化。
李震甄(民 91):高低成就學童科學問題解決能力之比較研究。國立屏東師範學院碩士論文(未出版)。
江麗美譯(民 85):六頂思考帽。台北:心理。
汪榮才(民 80):資賦優異學生創造性問題解決的教學。台南師院學報,24期。27-38頁。
汪榮才(民 87): 國小資優學生與普通學生後設認知與自然科創造性問題解決之比較。國民教育研究集刊,4期,1-53頁。
吳淑敏(民 84):創造性問題解決之心像教學方案對國小資優班學生問題解決能力、創造力、自我概念及認知風格之影響。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
岳修平譯(民87):教學心理學-學習的認知基礎。台北:遠流。
芸生、杜亞琛譯(民88):教孩子思考。台北:桂冠。
林志忠(民 88): 後設認知策略對資優兒童科學解題能力影響之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
林幸台(民 89):創造力評量。載於毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台編:創造力研究(263-327頁)。台北:心理。
莊明貞(民88):多元文化的動態評量與教學─從維高斯基觀點談起。教師天地,99期,25∼31頁。
張玉成(民82):思考技巧與教學。台北:心理。
張世彗(民 76):創造性問題解決方案對國小資優班與普通班學生創造性問題解決能力、創造力和問題解決能力之影響。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
張志豪(民89):高中生活科技課程創造思考教學對學生學習成效之影響。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
張振松(民 90):自然科創造性問題解決教學對國小學童創造力及問題解決能力之研究。台北市立師範學院科學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
張劭勳、張劭評、林秀娟(民89):SPSS For Windows統計分析─初等統計與高等統計(下冊)。台北:松崗。
張蘭畹(民85)。建構主義的教學評量。載於國立臺中師範學院初等教育系「建構主義的教學」研討會手冊,18-27。
教育部(民 90):身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定標準。
郭有遹(民83):創造性的問題解決法。台北:心理。
黃秀瑄、林瑞欽編譯(民80):認知心理學。台北:師大書苑。
黃幸美(民92):兒童的問題解決思考研究。台北:心理。
詹秀美,吳武典(民 80):問題解決測驗。台北:心理。
鄭昭明(民 82):認知心理學--理論與實踐。台北:桂冠。
鄭麗玉(民 82):認知心理學。台北:五南。
趙淑美(民 79):資優學生與普通學生解決空間旋轉問題之正確杜、速度及策略的比較研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
梁仲容(民 88):自主學習者方案對特殊才能資優班學生學習效果之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所博士班論文(未出版)。
鄔瑞香(民82):我的數學教學模式-探索、反省與成果。載於甯自強主編:八十三學年度數學教育研討會論文暨會議實錄彙編,295-325。嘉義:國立嘉義師範學院。
蔣明珊(民 83):台北市國小資優資源班課程課程實施狀況之調查分析。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
劉貞宜(民89): 數學資優生的解題歷程分析-以建中三位不同能力的資優生為例。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
二、英文部分
Anderson, M. A. (1986). Protocol analysis: A methodology for exploring the information processing of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 28-32.
Arter, J.A., & Spandel, V. (1992). Using portfolios of student work in instruction and assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11(1), 36-44.
Batchelor, S.(1996). The six thinking hat model--a tool for participation in community development, the Experience of an NGO in Cambodia. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No EJ537141).
Beyer,B. K.(1988).Identifying thinking skill procedure.In B.K.Beyer(Ed.).Developing a thinking skills program.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
Beyer B. K.(2001).What research says about teaching thinking skills. In L.A.Costa. Developing minds:a resource book for teaching thinking(3rd ed.).Alexandria,VI:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Bernardo,A.B.I.(1997).The psychology of Mathematical learning and problem solving:implications for mathematics education.Paper presented at the meeting of the Proceedings mathted''97 Conference,Manila,Philippines.
Bleedorn,B.D.(1993).Toward an integration of creativity and critical thinking.American Behavioral Scientist,37,10-20.
Britz, J.(1993).Problem solving in early childrenhood classrooms.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 355 040)
Buschman, L. (2003).children who enjoy problem solving.Teaching Children Mathematics,9,539-544.
Burke, K. (2001).Performances to assess standards and intellectual growth. In L.A.Costa. (Ed.). Developing minds:a resource book for teaching thinking(3rd ed.).Alexandria,VI:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Byrnes, J. P. (1996).Higher-order thinking.In J. P.Bynes.(Ed.).Cognition development and learning.(2nd ed.).MA:Allyn & Bacon.
Campion, J. C., Brown, A. L., & Connell, M. L.(1988).Metacognition:On the importance of understanding what you are doing.In R. I. Charles & E. A. Silver(Eds.).The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving(pp.93-114).Reston,VA:Lawrence Erlbaum,National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Chi, M. T. H., & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem solving ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.).Human abilities: An information processing approach.
New York: W. H. Freeman.
Costa, L. A. & Kallick, B.(2001). Buildindg a system for assessing thinking. In L.A.Costa. (Ed.). Developing minds:a resource book for teaching thinking(3rd ed.).Alexandria,VI:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1998). The development of the person. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Theoretical models of human development.Handbook of psychology. New York: Wiley.
De vall, Y. L. (1982). Some cognitive and creative characteristics and their relationship to reading comprehension in gifted and non-gifted fifth graders. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 5(4), 259-273.
Dewey, J.(1991).How we think.Buffalo, NY:Prometheus Books.(Original work pubilished 1910).
Davies, Phil (2000), Computerized Peer Assessment, Innovations in Education and Training International, vol 37(4), 346-355.
Davison, J. E.(1986).The role of insight in giftness.In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davison(Eds.),Conceptions of giftness.New York:Cambridge University Press.
Dyck, B.(2002). Turn a Sad Goodbye into a "Problemtunity".Retrieved September 23,2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.middleweb.com/MWLresources/dyckarticle2.html.
de Bono, E.(1985).Six thinking hats.Boston:Little,Brown and Company.
de Bono, E. (1992). Six thinking hats for schools.Australia. Hawker Brownlow.
Francis, D.(1990).Effective problem solving. London:Routledge.
Fennimore, T. F. & Tinzmann M. B.(1990).What is a thinking curriculum?North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. .Retrieved May 23, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ncrel.org/
Gabel, D. L. & Bruce, D. M.(1994). Research on Problem solving: Chemistry. In: D. L. Gabel (Ed.). Handbook of research on science teaching and learning :a project of the national science teachers association. New York: Macmillan.
Gagn''e, R. M.(1970), The conditions of learning(2rd ed.), Holt, Reinhard & Winston.
Gallapher, J. J.(1985).Teaching the gifted child.Newton, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
Gifford, R. & O''Connor C.(1993).Measuring Higher Level Thinking.In Changing assessments-alternative views of apititude,achievement and instruction. Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Greeno, J.(1978).Natures of Problem-Solving Ability. Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (pp.239-270). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hayes, J. R.(1981).The complex problem solver.Philadelphia, PA:The Franklin Institute Press.
Hiebert, E. & Calfee, R. C.(1988).The teacher''s role in using assessment to improve learning.In C. V. Bunderson(Ed.),Assessment in service of learning.Princeton,NJ:Educational Testing Service.
Holzman, T. G., Pellegrino, J. W. & Glaser, R. (1983). Cognitive variables in series completion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 603-618.
Hunt, E.(1994).Problem solving.In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.),Thinking and problem solving.(pp.215-228).San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
Isaksen, S. & Murdock, M.(1988).The outlook for the study of creativity:an emerging discipline.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Higher Education during a session on”Creativity in Higher Education,”Washington, DC.
Javis, C. K.(1998).Using Postman and de Bono as guiding principles in an interdisciplinary standards based approach to technology analysis for secondary school students.(ERIC Documeny Reproduction Service ED 429 551).
Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Johnstone, A. H. (1993). Introduction. In Wood, C. and Sleet, R. (Eds.).Creative problem solving chemistry.London: The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Kitchener, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26, 222-232.
Klein, G. & Crandall, B. W.(1995).The role of mental simulation in problem solving and decision making.In P. Hancock,J. Flach,J. Caird, & K. J.Vicente(Eds.),Local applications of the ecological approach to human machine systems(pp.324-358).Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lochhead, J. & Zietsman, A.(2001).What is problem solving. In L.A.Costa. (Ed.).Developing minds:a resource book for teaching thinking(3rd ed.).Alexandria, VI:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Lynch,C. L.,Wolcott,S. K. & Huber, G. E.(2002).Steps for better thinking.Retrieved May 23,2002 from the World Wide Web:http://www.WolcottLynch.com.
Montagna, J. A.(1980). Math is everywhere:a problem solving unit. Retrieved May 20,2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.yale.edu/ynhti/curriculum/units/1980/
Maker, J.(2002,October).problem solving.論文發表於問題解決與多元智能研討會,台北,台灣。
Mayer, R.E. & Wittrock, M.C. (1996). Problem-Solving Transfer. In D. Berliner and R. Calfee (Ed.) .Handbook of educational psychology. NY: Macmillan.
Mayer, R. E.(1998).Cognitive,metacognitive and motivational aspects of problem solving.Instructional Science,26(1-2),49-63.
Meacham, J. A., & Emont, N. M. (1989). The Interpersonal basis of everyday problem solving. In J. D. Sinnott (Ed.).Everyday problem solving: Theory and applications(pp.7-23). New York: Praeger.
O''Neil F. H. & Schacter S. (1997).Test specifications for problem-solving assessment.(Tech. Rep. No.463).Los Angeles:University of California,“Center for the Study of Evaluation.”
Painter, J.(1996). Questioning techniques for gifted students.Retrieved November 15,2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.nexus.edu.au/teachstud/gat/painter.htm
Palmer. S.(1997). Leadership styles and problem solving - de Bono’s six hats’.Retrieved November 15,2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.deakin.edu.au/~spalm/srp70733.html
Perkins, D.N., & Salomon, G.(1989).Are thinking skills context-bound?Educational Researcher,18,16-25.
Polya, G. (1957).How to solve it.Garden City,NY:Doubleday A
nchor.A mathematician explains how to solve problems.
Resnick L. B. & Galser, R.(1980).Problam solving and intelligence.In L.B. Resnick(Ed.),The nature of intelligence.Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence.
Resnick L. B.(1987).Education and learning to thetThink.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
Renzulli, J. S (1997). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for gifted and talented. Mansifield Center, CN: Creative Learning Press.
Resnick L. B. & Resnick D. P.(1999).Assessing the thinking curriculum:new tools for educational reform.Developing and validating multiple-choice test items.(2nd ed). Mahwah, N.J. : L. Erlbaum Associates
Rowe, H.A. H.(1985).Problem solving and intelligence.Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Scribner, S.(1984).Studying working intelligence.In B.Rogoff,&J. Lave(Eds.). Everyday cognition:its development in social context.Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press.
Simon,D. P., & Simon, H. A.(1978).Individual differences in solving physics problems.In R. Siegler(Ed.),Children''s thinking:what develops?(pp.325-348).Hillsdale,Nj:Lawrence Erlbaum.
Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1989). Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Solso, R. L.(1991).Cognitive psychology(3rd Ed.).Needham Heights,MA:Allyn and Bacon.
Stiggins, R.(1996).Student-centered classroom assessment.Columbus,Ohio:Merrill Publishing.
Sternberg, R. (1981).A componential theory of intellectual giftedness.Gifted Child Quarterly,25,86-92.(Beyond IQ).
Sternberg, R. (1981).Teaching problem solving as a way of life. In L.A.Costa. (Ed.).Developing minds:a resource book for teaching thinking(3rd ed.).Alexandria,VI:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Sternberg, R. & Davison, J. E.(1992).Problem Solving.In M. Alkin(Ed.),Enchcyclopedia of educational resesrch(6th ed.,pp.1037-1045).New York:Macmillan.
Schacter, J.,Herl, H.E.Chung,G. K. W. K., O''Neil, H. F. ,Jr.,Dennis,R.A. & Lee, J.L.(1997).Feasibility of a Wed-based Assessment of Problem Solving.In H.F.O''Neil,Jr.(Chair),An integration simulation approach to assessment.Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association,Chicago.
Stone. R.(2001).How teachers can assess the thinking skill they are teaching. In L.A.Costa. (Ed.).Developing minds:A resource book for teaching thinking(3rd ed.).Alexandria,VI:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Taggart, J. & Reid, T.(1994).Problem solving. Retrieved September 23,2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.gov.on.ca/OMAFRA/english/rural/facts/94-079.htm
Treffinger, D. J. (1986). Fostering effective, independent learining through individualized programming. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp.429-460). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Van Tassel-Baska, J.(1994).Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners.(2nd ed.).Needham,MA:Allyn & Bacon.
Voss, J. F. (1988). Problem solving and reasoning in ill-structured domains. In C. Antaki (Ed.).Analyzing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods (pp.74-93). London: SAGE Publications.
Wallas, G.(1926).Art of Thought.Harcourt Brace, New York.
Walter,J. C.(1996).Six thinking hats:argumentativeness and response to thinking model.Paper presented at the annual conference of Southern States Communication Association.Retrieved November 10,2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.jshubbs.com/PDFs/
Wechsler, D. (1958). Measurement and appraisal of adult
intelligence (4th ed.) Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins
Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 703-713.
Wiiliams C.(2001). Overcoming Depression:A Five Areas Approach--Practical problem solving. University of Glasgow, UK.
Wood, T., Cobb, P. Yackel, E. & Dillon, D.R.(1993). Rethinking elementary school mathematics: Insights and issues. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Woolfolk, A. E. (1987). Educational psychology (3rd ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Zuboff, S.(1988).In the age of the smart machine.The future of work and power.New York:Bacic Books.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 蔡瑜卿. 1991. 我國拖鞋蘭培植場登記制度及拖鞋蘭種苗出口現況.種苗科技專訊41: 14-18.
2. 蔡智賢、劉家瑞、郭銀港、李堂察. 2000. 離水時間對洋桔梗切花瓶插壽命和品質之影響. 嘉義大學學報 68: 1-11.
3. 張錦興、林棟樑. 1999. 薑荷花切花瓶插壽命與貯藏條件之研究. 中國園藝 45(1): 65-74.
4. 黃肇家、陳雪姿、王自存. 1995.貯藏溫度與藥劑處理對蝴蝶蘭切花品質之影響. 中華農業研究44(4): 439-455.
5. 黃肇家. 1998. 文心蘭切花之乙烯生成以及外加乙烯與去除花藥蓋對花朵品質之影響. 中華農業研究 47(2): 125-134.
6. 林瑞松、徐懷恩、賴淑芬. 1998. 文心蘭除葉處理與花梗剪除對開花的影響. 農林學報 47(4): 55-66.
7. 林瑞松. 1998. 文心蘭切花採收後重切及蔗糖、8-hydroxyquinoline sulfate對切花品質之影響. 農林學報 47(4): 115-123.
8. 林瑞松. 1999. 文心蘭切花老化及品質保鮮. 農林學報 48(2): 63-83.
9. 李哖、林雨森. 1992. 蝴蝶蘭花朵之呼吸作用. 中國園藝 38: 228-240.
10. 李哖. 1975. 切花之採後生理. 中國園藝21: 211-221.
11. 莊明貞(民88):多元文化的動態評量與教學─從維高斯基觀點談起。教師天地,99期,25∼31頁。
12. 呂金燮(民 89):資優兒童問題解決能力實作評量之建構研究。特殊教育研究學刊,19期,279-308頁。
13. 王春展(民 86):專家與生手問題解決能力的差異及其在教學上的啟示。教育研究資訊,5卷2期,80-92頁。