臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

現今已有越來越多的企業體認到從事企業社會責任的重要性及所帶來的好處，因此紛紛投身於從事企業社會責任的行列，然而企業不免疑惑哪些行為或活動才是真正屬於企業社會責任的範疇?又其內涵與程度應該高於自發性內容，或是以當地法令作為基礎即可? 此外，從事企業社會責任需投資額外的成本，在此同時，該如何滿足相關利害關係人(Stakeholders)的期待?企業該如何從「從事企業社會責任活動」與「企業原有的營運活動」兩者間，取得一個正確的平衡，並創造新的營運模式?目前多數的企業仍以表面上的公關活動，作為其企業社會責任之主軸，但這僅能引起短期的效應，並不是個長遠之道。
已有許多研究發現，唯有策略性的從事企業社會責任，才能真正為企業創造優勢。企業必須將社會責任融入其日常營運中，配合自身核心能力，發展競爭策略才有可能進而創造獨特優勢，並帶來永續發展。
目前全球上已發展出許多為企業社會責任評比的公信機構，這些機構每年都會公布永續經營的企業，表揚其在企業社會責任上的努力與成果。讓我們感興趣的是，這些在各產業中得以躍升標竿企業的公司，於企業社會責任面向中究竟付出了何等的努力，並且是否真能像資源基礎觀點所述，確實配合其產業的特性，發展出不一樣的策略。因此，本研究選定道瓊永續指數作為研究永續企業從事企業社會責任的取樣來源，觀察2008年至2011年間曾入選DJSI成分股的產業與企業，觀察不同產業與企業在道瓊永續指數各項評比指標下之評比結果，利用統計方法以實證研究方式推論企業之企業社會責任策略，進而觀察不同策略群組的企業社會責任績效與財務績效。

More companies start to put more efforts in doing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) after they became aware of the importance and coming benefits. However, most of companies still cannot distinguish which kinds of actions or activities are actually belonging to CSR. Should they do CSR spontaneously or just meet legal standard? Furthermore, it obviously needs to invest additional costs to do CSR, how can a company still be benefited from pursuing maximum profits and satisfy the expectations from variety stakeholders while doing CSR at the same time?
In this study, we want to know how can organizations achieve“operating activities”and“doing CSR”simultaneously for balanced organizational earning. Presently, most companies still focus on public relation as the main event for doing CSR, but it will just cause short-term effects, not really suitable for long term development. The growing number in literatures indicated that only strategic CSR can lead to long term competitive advantages. Companies must consider their own core competences and internalize corporate social responsibility into their operating activities as competitive strategies to form unique competitive advantages and moreover, create sustainable development.
To further verify the RBV theory and strategic CSR from the leading sustainability-driven companies worldwide. This study chose Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI) and benchmark companies in each supersector by using the scores received in each criterion during 2008-2011, and later used empirical approaches of statistical methods to conclude their CSR strategies and then tracking the CSR performance and financial performance of different strategic groups.

目錄
中文摘要 i
英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………………...ii
致謝…………………………………………………………………………………………...iii
目錄…………………………………………………………………………………………...iv
表目錄………………………………………………………………………………………vii
圖目錄………………………………………………………………………………………vii
第一章、緒論…………………………………………………………………………………...1
第一節、研究背景與動機 1
第二節、研究目的與範圍 3
第三節、研究方法與架構 5
第二章、理論基礎與文獻回顧 7
第一節、理論基礎 7
第二節、國際企業永續性評比系統之現狀 14
第三章、道瓊永續指數與標竿企業之經營績效歷年評比資料分析 20
第一節、道瓊永續指數於各產業間的共同評核指標分析 22
第二節、道瓊永續指數於四年評比資料之產業競爭優勢分析 24
第三節、道瓊永續指數歷年評比資料之標竿企業競爭優勢分析 27
第四節、永續標竿企業於不同集群間之經營績效差異分析 34
第四章、結論與建議 41
第一節、綜合分析 41
第二節、研究貢獻、限制與未來方向 45
參考文獻 48

(一) 中文文獻：
[1] 唐振鵬，「論企業社會責任」，福州大學管理學院，福建福州，2007年。
[2] 池祥麟、林怡君，「企業社會績效與企業財務績效關聯性之分析-以道瓊STOXX永續性指數為例」，企業倫理和公司治理國際研討會，台北，2007年。
[3] 林尚平、羅旭華、許書銘，「組織條件與購併後組織管理之構形關係：以台灣金融產業為例」，管理評論，台灣，2010年
[4] 胡憲倫、許家偉、蒲彥穎，「策略的企業社會責任：企業永續發展的新課題」，應用倫理研究通訊，台北，第40期，第37-50頁，2006年。
[5] 陳茂成，「企業永續經營關鍵因素之研究」，國立成功大學，EMBA論文，2003年。
[6] 淩鴻、趙付春、鄧少軍，「雙元性理論和概念的批判性回顧與未來研究展望」，外國 經濟與管理，上海，第1期，第25～33頁，2010年。
[7] 潘玉葉，『台灣股票上市公司財務危機預警分析』，博士論文，淡江大學管理科學研究所，1900年。
[8] 吳澤欣，「企業社會責任融入企業競爭優勢之研究」，國立交通大學，碩士論文，2010年。

(二) 英文文獻：
[09] Prahalad C. and Hamel G., “The core competence of the corporation”, Harvard Business Review , 68(3), 79-92, May 1990.
[10] Wernerfelt, B., “A resource-based theory of the firm ”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, 171-180, 1984.
[11] Miller,D., “Toward a new contingency: The research for organizational gestalts.”, Journal of Management Studies, 18, 1-26, 1981.
[12] Werther, Jr. W. B. and D. Chandler, “Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility- Stakeholders in a Global Environment”, Sage Publications, London, UK., 2005.
[13] Weber, “The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR”, European Management Journal, 26, 247– 261, 2008.
[14] Wrigley, L. “Divisional autonomy and diversification”, Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard Business School, 1970.
[15] Hitt, M. and Ireland R., “Corporate Distinctive Competence, Strategy, Industry and Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 6, 273-293, 1985.
[16] Leonard-Barton, D., “Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, 111-125, 1992.
[17] Winterscheid, B.C., “Building capability from within: the insiders’ view of core competence”, Competence-based Competition, pp. 265–292, 1994.
[18] Hamel, G., “The concept of core competence”, Competence-based Competition, pp. 11–34 , 1994.
[19] Collis D. J. and C. Montgomery, “Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990s”, Harvard Business Review, 119–128, July-August 1995.
[20] Lei. D., “Competence-building, technology fusion and competitive advantage: the key roles of organizational learning and strategic alliances”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.14, 208-237, 1997.
[21] Porter, M. E., Competitive Advantage, New York: The Free Press, 1985.
[22] Hill, Charles W. L. and Jones, Gareth R., Strategic management: an integrated approach, Fifth Edition, Boston, 2001.
[23] Peteraf. M.A., “The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view”, Strategic Management Journal, Volume 14, pages 179–191, March 1993.
[24] Mahoney, J. T. and J. R. Pandian, “The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.13, 363-380, 1992.
[25] Barney, J.B., “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management,17(1), 99-120, 1991.
[26] Duncan, R. “The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation”, The management of organization, 167-188, New York, 1976.
[27] Mom, T J M, Van den Bosch, F A J, and Volberda, H W., “Understanding variation in managers' ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms”, Organization Science, 812-828, 2009.
[28] Gibson, C B, and Birkinshaw, J., “The antecedents, consequences and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity”, Academy of Management Journal, 209-226, 2004.
[29] Waddock SA., “Parallel universes: companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship”, Business and Society Review, 109(1) , 5–42, 2004.
[30] Margolis JD, Walsh JP., “Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative” , Science Quarterly, 48(2) , 268–305, 2003.
[31] Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL., “Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis”, Organization Studies , 24(3) , 403–441, 2003.
[32] McGuire JB, Sundgren A, Schneeweis T., “Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872, 1988.
[33] Waddock SA, Graves SB., “The corporate social performance-financial performance link”, Strategic Management Journal , 18(4) , 303–319, 1997.
[34] Jordi S, Josep A, Sandra W., “Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 31, 463–490, 2010.
[35] Spanos Y., Zaralis G. and Lioukas S.,“Strategy and industry effects on profitability: evidence from Greece”, Strategic Management Journal, Volume 25, 139–165, 2004.
[36] Gresov,C., R. Drazin, “Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organizational design”, Academy Management Review, 22(2), 403-426, 1997.
[37] Griffin, J.J. and J.F. Mahon., “The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research”, Business and Society, Vol. 26, pp.5-31, 1997.