臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究探討企業在做研發委外決策時之考量因素與影響結果。以『研發委外動機』、『研發委外交易成本』與『研發委外風險』三個構面為主，探討此三個構面與『研發委外績效』的關係。
本研究樣本以台灣產業廠商中之電腦及其周邊設備產業為主要研究對象，藉以探討企業研發委外動機、策略。由研究結果顯示，企業在新產品研發過程中，常會因為內部人力、能力不足因素並且希望能縮短產品的研發時程與速度，建構內部研發能力與新核心能力，而作研發委外的考量，而由於新產品的研發設計本身便具其風險性及不確定性存在，所以企業在其委外過程中雖有遭遇交易成本與委外風險問題，但仍在企業的可承受範圍內。
在研發委外績效中，以能力提升績效對企業研發委外各個構面關係最為顯著。可見得企業的研發委外，是希望透過委外過程整合外部企業的技術，並在委外過程中獲得或學習到新的技術能力，來建構或提升企業內部研發能力與產生新的核心技術。並且希望透過研發委外過程讓企業之新產品能提早推入市場以獲得競爭優勢。
本研究更發現，雖然企業對研發委外的成本與風險有其承受力，但，如果企業在研發委外考量中有將委外的交易成本及委外風險問題合併考量，則更能提升企業研發委外績效。

This study examines how different sourcing strategies during new product development influence development R&D outsourcing cost, motive, risk and outsourcing Preformance.
Show by the research result, the enterprise is in new product development process, often will make the consideration of developping the outsourcing because internal manpower, ability not enough factor and hope development timing and speeds that can shorten the product, construction inner part development ability and new core ability,, and due to the development design of the new product oneself have its risk and indetermination existences then, so the enterprise is within the scope of its outsourcing process in although have the situation bargain cost and outsourcing risk problems, still can bear in the enterprise.
In developping outsourcing results, promote the results with the ability to develop outsourcing each factor relation to the enterprise the most obvious.This research even finds, although the cost and risks of the enterprise for development outsourcing have it bears the power, if the enterprise is developping the outsourcing has in the consideration to merge outsourcing of bargain cost and outsourcing risk problem consider, then can also promote the enterprise development outsourcing results.

目錄
頁次
目錄...................................................I
圖目錄................................................III
表目錄.................................................1
頁次
第一章 緒論............................................1
第一節 研究背景及動機...............................1
第二節 研究目的......................................2
第三節 論文架構......................................3
第四節 研究流程......................................3
第二章 文獻探討........................................5
第一節 企業委外與研發委外策略.......................5
第二節 研發委外之動機..............................12
第三節 研發委外成本................................13
第四節 研發委外風險................................15
第五節 研發委外績效................................17
第三章 研究方法.......................................20
第一節 研究架構.....................................20
第二節 變項操作性定義與問卷設計.....................21
第三節 研究對象及問卷回收...........................28
第四節 資料分析方法.................................28
第四章 資料分析與實證結果.............................31
第一節 敘述性統計及相關分析.........................31
第二節 模型及假說統計分析結果.......................34
第五章 結論與建議.....................................45
第一節 研究結論.....................................46
第二節 研究建議.....................................52
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議.......................54
參考文獻..............................................57
附錄..................................................61

中文文獻
1. 朱博湧、黃依達、蕭志同(2000)，『交易成本觀點下之台灣PC產業通路策略研究』，產業論壇，第二卷第二期。
2. 余峻瑜 譯(2003)，企業外包致勝：高效率低成本的委外經營模式。台北：台灣培生教育。
3. 吳思華(1996)，策略九說。台北：臉譜出版。
4. 高長(2002)，『科技產業全球分工與IT產業兩岸分工策略』，遠景季刊，第三卷第二期。
5. 陳明淵(2003)，『企業委外作業之探討－以家用品廠商為例』，成功大學碩士論文。
6. 陳琇玲 譯(2001)，創造競爭優勢-7大經營挑戰與5大成功法寶。台北：先覺出版股份有限公司。
7. 黃河川(2002)，『企業工作委外程度之影響因素分析-以國內生物科技廠商為例』，成功大學碩士論文。
8. 黃營杉、林清河、蔡明宏、歐嘉瑞、洪明洲(2000)，企業政策。台北縣。空大。
9. 葉匡時、蔡敦浩、周德光(1993)，『策略聯盟的發展策略─ 交易成本的觀點』
，管理評論。
10. 劉江彬、張孟元(2002)，『技術交易成本與評價模式之研究』，IT IS 產業論壇。
11. 盧娜 譯(2001)，企業外包模式：如何利用外部資源提升競爭力。台北：商周出版。
12. 賴仕葆、謝龍發、曾淑婉、陳松柏(1997) ， 科技管理。台北縣。空大。
13. 蔡明田、陳忠仁、程永明(2003)，『技術取得模式之交易情境模型與績效關係之實證研究』，IT IS 產業論壇。
14. 蔡明田、廖曜生、林彥廷(2000)，『高科技產業技術取得策略之研究-以半導體、電腦及周邊製造業為例』，中華管理評論。
15. 謝佳宏(2002)，『核心能力觀點下台灣工具機企業新事業發展類型之探討』，東海大學碩士論文。
16. 謝依辰(2002)，『從關係行銷觀點探討資訊系統之委外成效』，銘傳大學碩士論文。
17. 顧淑馨 譯(1996) ， 競爭大未來：掌控產業、創造未來的突破策略。台北。智庫股份有限公司。
英文文獻
1. Anderson, E., and Gatignon, H.,(1986),“Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions,”Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.17, pp.1-26。
2. Ansoff, H. I., and Stewart, J.M.,(1967),“Strategies for a Technology-Based Business,”Harvard Business Review,Vol.45, pp. 71-83。
3. Aubert, B. A., Rivard , S., and Patry, M.,(1996),“A Transaction Cost Approach to Outsourcing Behavior: Some Empirical Evidence,”Information and Management, Vol.30, pp. 51-64。
4. Barney, J. B.,(1991),“Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,”Journal of Management,Vol.17, pp. 99-120。
5. Blau, P. M.,(1964),“Exchange and Power in Social Life,” New York, Willey, pp. 1-5。
6. Coase, R. H.,(1937),“The Nature of the Firm,”Economics, Vol.4, pp.386-405.
7. Coase, R. H., and Ronald, H.,(1988),“ The firm, the market, and the law,”Chicago, Chicago University。
8. Due, R. T.,(1992),“The Real Costs of Outsourcing,”Information Systems Management , Winter, pp.78-81。
9. Earl, M. J.,(1996),“The risks of outsourcing IT,”Sloan Management Revies, Vol.37, pp.26-32。
10. Grant, R.M.,(1991),“The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation,”California Management Review, Spring,114-135.
11. Hamel, G.,(1991),“Competition For competence and Interpartner Learning Within International Strategic Alliances,”Strategic Management Journal, Vol.12, pp.83-103。
12. Howells, J.,(1996),“Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Technology Transfer,”
Technology analysis & Strategic Management, Vol.8, No.2, pp.91-109。
13. Howells, J.,(1999),“Research and technology outsourcing and innovation systems : An exploratory analysis,”Vol.6, pp.111-120。
14. Ireland, R. D., and Hitt,M. A.,(1999),“Achieving and Maintaining Strategic Competitiveness in the 21 st century : The Role of Strategic Leadership,”The Academy of Management Executive,Vol.13, pp.43-57。
15. Ireland, R. D., Hitt,M. A.,and Hoskisson, R. E.,(1997),“Competitiveness and Globalization,”Strategic Management, pp.94-95。
16. Kotter, J. P.,(1979),“Managing External Dependence,”Academy of Management Review, Vol.4, pp.87-92。
17. Labbs, J.J.,(1993),“ Successful Outsourcing Depends on Critical Factors,”Personnel
Journal, October, pp.51-60。
18. Lacity, M. C., and Hirschheim, R.,(1993),“Information Systems Outsourcing：Key Issues and Experiences of an Early Adopter,”Journal of General Management, Vol.19, No.1, Autumn , pp.17-30。
19. Likert, R.,(1967),“ The human organization: Its management and value,”New York,McGraw-Hill。
20.Leavy, B.,(1994),“Two strategic perspective on the buyer-supplier relationship”, Production and Inventory Management Journal,”Vol.35, pp.47-51。
21. Penrose, E.,(1959), “The Theory of the Growth of the Firm,” New York, Oxford University Press。
22. Prahalad,C.K., and Hamel, G.,(1989),“Strategic Intent,” Harvard Business Review, May June,pp63-76。
23. Prahalad,C.K., and Hamel, G.,(1990),“The Croe Competence of the Corporatio,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.168, pp.79-91。
24. Prahalad,C.K., and Hamel, G.,(1994),“Competing for the future,” Harvard Business School Press, Boston。
25. Porter, M. E.,(1980),“Competitive Strategiy Techniques for Analyzing industries and competitiors,”New York: Free Press。
26. Porter, M. E.,(1985),“Competitive Advantage Ceating and Sustaining Superior Performance,”New York: Free Press。
27. Quinn, J. B.,(1992),“Leveraging Knowledge and Severice Based Strategies through
Outsourcing,”Intelligent Enterprise, Free Press, pp.71-97。
28. Quinn,J.B., and Hilmer, F. G., (1994),”Strategic Outsourcing”,Sloan Management Review. Summer, pp.43-55。
29. Quinn, J. B.,(1999),“Strategic Outsourcing: Knowledge Capabilities,”Sloan Management Review, Summer, pp.9-21。
30. Rindfleisch, A.and Heide, J., (1997), “Transaction Cost Analysis: Past,” Present and Future Applications,Journal of Marketing, vol. 61, october, 30-54.
31. Roussel, P. A ,and Boston, M.A.,(1999) ,“Third Generation R&D,” Harvard Business School Press,pp.59-65。
32. Sharpe, M.,(1997),“Outsourcing, organizational competitiveness and wourk,”Journal of Labor Research, Vol.18, pp.535-549。
33. Stein, A.,(1997),“Sex after sexuality : From sexology to poststructuralism. In D. Owen ,”Sociology after postmodernism, pp.158-172。
34. Teece, D. J.,(1977),“Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How,” Economic Journal, Vol.87, pp.241-261.
35. Teece, D. J.,(1986),“Profiting from technology innovation：Implications for integration,
collaboration, Licensing and Public policy,”Research policy, Vol.15, pp.285-305。
36. Teece, D. J.,(1992),“Cooperation and Innovation Organization Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress,”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol.18, pp.1-25。
37. Venkatraman, N., and Vasudevan ,R.,(1986),“Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research : A Comparison of Approaches,”Academy of Management Review, Vol.11, pp.801-814。
38. Williamson, O. E.,(1975),“Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications,”New York: Free Press。
39. Williamson, O. E.,(1979),“Transaction Cost Economics: The Government of Contractual Relations,” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.22, pp.233-251。
40. Williamson, O. E.,(1981),“The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach,”American Journal of Sociology, Vol.87, pp.548~577。
41. Williamson, O. E., and Masten S.E.,(1995),“Transaction Cost Economics I, II” New York: Free Press。