跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.134) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/14 05:17
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林孟軍
研究生(外文):LIN, MENG-CHUN
論文名稱:週記寫作及回饋對學生英文寫作 流利度及正確性之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Effect of Journal Writing and Feedback on EFL College Students' Fluency and Accuracy
指導教授:陳淑珠陳淑珠引用關係
指導教授(外文):CHEN,SHU-CHU
口試委員:魏式琦王清煌
口試委員(外文):WEY,SHYH-CHIWANG,CHIN-HUAHG
口試日期:2016-06-22
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立雲林科技大學
系所名稱:應用外語系
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:英文
論文頁數:81
中文關鍵詞:英文週記流暢度準確度訂正回饋
外文關鍵詞:journal writingwriting fluencywriting accuracycorrective feedback
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:271
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:37
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究旨在探討週記寫作及訂正回饋對大一學生英文寫作表現、流暢度及正確度之影響。 研究對象為五十六名大一學生,分為實驗組(訂正回饋組)28名及控制組28名(未接受訂正回饋)。研究過程中兩組皆參與為期十五週的英文週記寫作計劃。每週週記要求學生寫下新習得單字、把書中情節與現實經驗作連結,寫下印象最深刻的段落,及讀後心得。其中,研究者對實驗組學生的週記會給予訂正回饋,而控制組的學生並未給予任何訂正回饋。研究開始前後學生均需接受多益英文能力測驗及寫作測驗。研究分析採用T檢驗、單因子共變數分析、卡方檢定以及錯誤分析來分析學生寫作表現、流暢度及準確度。實驗結果發現兩組在寫作表現、流暢度都有顯著提升,實驗組表現尤佳。在寫作準確度上,兩組前後測錯誤頻率並無明顯差異,然而實驗組透過訂正回饋後錯誤頻率實有微幅減少。因此,週記回饋對學生寫作表現、流暢度及準確度有其正面影響。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of corrective feedback on EFL college students’ writing performance on writing fluency and writing accuracy in a journal writing program. Fifty-six college freshmen participated in this study. They were equally assigned into the experimental group (n=28), which received corrective feedback and the control group (n=28), which received no feedback. Both groups participated in fifteen weeks of journal writing program. Every journal entry contained four parts: Word Watcher (writing down newly acquired words), Connector (connecting the book plot with own experiences), Illuminator (writing down the most impressive passage), and finally, the reflection. The experimental group received corrective feedback from their instructors in their journals while the control group did not. Students took the TOEIC tests and the writing tests in their pre- and posttests. The data was analyzed by using t-test, ANCOVA, and Chi-squared analyses. The result showed that the experimental group outperformed the control group on their writing performance and fluency, and both groups had significant improvement in writing and fluency. However, no significant group difference was observed in writing accuracy, even though the experimental group slightly exceeded the control group. In conclusion, journal writing conjoined with corrective feedback is helpful to students on their writing performance and fluency.
摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iii
TABLE OF CONTENT iv
LIST OF TABLES vii
LIST OF FIGURES ix
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Statement of Problems 3
1.3 Purpose of the Study 4
1.4 Research Questions 5
1.5 Significance of the Study 5
1.6 Definition of Terms 6
1.7 Organization of the Thesis 7
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 8
2.1 Journal Writing 8
2.2 Types of Journal Writing 9
2.3 The Influence of Journal Writing 10
2.3.1 The Influence of Journal Writing on Students’ Attitude Toward Writing 10
2.3.2 The Influence of Journal Writing on Students’ Writing Accuracy 12
2.3.3 The Influence of Journal Writing on Students’ Writing Fluency 12
2.4 Feedback 14
2.4.1 Types of Feedback 14
2.4.2 Benefits of Using Corrective Feedback 20
2.5 Journal Writing with Feedback 22
2.6 Error Classification Coding Scheme 23
CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 25
3.1 Participants 25
3.2 Training Program for the Experimental Group 26
3.3 Instruments and Writing Rubrics 27
3.3.1 TOEIC test 28
3.4 Error Classification Coding Scheme and T-Unit Analysis 30
3.5 Data Collection Procedure 31
3.6 Quantitative Data Analysis 33
CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 35
4.1 Results for Research Question 1 35
4.1.1 ANCOVA for two groups’ writing performance 36
4.1.2 Within-group analyses for two groups’ writing performance 39
4.2 Discussion for Research Question 1 40
4.3 Results for Research Question 2 41
4.3.1 Within-group t-unit analyses for two groups’ writing fluency 41
4.3.2 Between-group analysis for two groups’ writing fluency 42
4.5 Results for Research Question 3 43
4.5.1 Between-group Analyses for Two Groups’ Writing Errors 45
4.5.2 Within-group Analyses for Two Groups’ Error types and frequency 47
4.6 Discussion for Research Question 3 51
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS 53
5.1 Summary of the Major Findings 53
5.2 Pedagogical Implications 54
5.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Studies 55
References 57
Appendix A Topic of Pre and Post Test 65
Appendix B Error Classification Scheme Developed by Huang (2014) 66
Appendix C T-unit Counting Method Developed by Polio (1997) 70

Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227-257.
Baskin, R. S. (1994). Student feedback on dialogue journals. National Institute of Education, Educational Resources Information Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 375 627)
Biber, D., Nekrasova, T., & Horn, B. (2011). The Effectiveness of Feedback for L1‐English and L2‐Writing Development: A Meta‐Analysis. ETS Research Report Series, 1, 1-99.
Boud, D. (2001). Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. New Directions for Adult and Dontinuing Education, 90, 9-18.
Bray, E. & Harsch, K. (1996). Using reflection/review journals in Japanese classrooms. The Language Teacher, 20(12), 12-17.
Brown, H. N., & Sorrell, J. M. (1993). Use of clinical journals to enhance critical thinking. Nurse Educator, 18(5), 16-19.
Burniske, R. (1994). Creating dialogue: Teacher response to journal writing. English Journal, 83, 84-87.
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296.
Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409-426.
Chow, C.-h. (2001). Implementing journal writing in a freshman writing curriculum. Paper presented at the the Tenth International Symposium on English Teaching, Taipei.
Clark, P. G. (1994). Learning on interdisciplinary gerontological teams: Instructional concepts and methods. Educational Gerontology: An International Quarterly, 20(4), 349-364.
Cohen, A. D. (1989). Reformulation: A Technique for Providing Advanced Feedback in Writing. Guidelines: A Periodical for Classroom Language Teachers, 11(2), 1-9.
Crocker, M. (1982). Dialogue journals promote interpersonal relationships. Highway One: Canadian Journal of Language Education, 5(3), 34-41.
Davies, E. (1995). Reflective practice: A focus for caring. The Journal of Nursing Education, 34(4), 167-174.
El-Koumy, A. S. A. (1998). Effect of Dialogue Journal Writing on EFLStudents' Speaking Skill. Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), USA.
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97-107.
Fahim, M., & Ghanbar, H. (2014). Reactive Focus on Form through Negotiated Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback: Writing Fluency or Accuracy? Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(22), 56-59.
Fathman, A. W., E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Fazio, L. L. (2001). The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority-and majority-language students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), 235-249.
Fellner, T., & Apple, M. (2006). Developing writing fluency and lexical complexity with blogs. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(1), 15-26.
Ferris, D. (1995). Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple‐Draft Composition Classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 33-53.
Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161-184.
Grennan, K. F. (1988). The journal in the classroom: A tool for discovery. Equity & Excellence, 24(3), 38-40.
Hahnemann, B. (1986). Journal writing: a key to promoting critical thinking in nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 25(5), 213–215.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Heath, G. (1988). Journals in a Classroom: One Teacher's Trials and Errors. English Journal, 77, 58-60.
Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1996). Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert feedback in L2 writing. Modern Language Journal, 80, 287-308.
Hiemstra, R. (2001). Uses and benefits of journal writing. New directions for adult and continuing education, 90, 19-26.
Hipple, M. L. (1985). Journal writing in kindergarten. Language Arts, 62, 255-261.
Ho, B. (1992). Journal writing as a tool for reflective learning: Why students like it. . English Teaching Forum, 30(4), 40-42.
Holmes, V. L., & Moulton, M. R. (1997). Dialogue journals as an ESL learning strategy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40(8), 616-621.
Holt, S. (1994). Reflective Journal Writing and Its Effects on Teaching Adults. The Year in Review, Vol. 3. Dayton: Virginia Adult Educators Research Network.
Hosseiny, M. (2014). The Role of Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback in Improving Iranian EFL Students’ Writing Skill. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 668-674.
Huang, J.-y. (2000). Effective journal writing: A polite study. Paper presented at the The Ninth International Symposium on English Teaching, Taipei.
Huang, P. W. (2014). A Study of Grammatical Errors in EFL English Majors' Writing. (master), National Yunlin University of Science and Technology.
Hudelson, S. (1984). Kan yu ret an rayt en ingles: Children become literate in English as a second language. TESOL quarterly, 18(2), 221-238.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues: Cambridge university press.
Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach: Newbury House Rowley, MA.
Janesick, V. J. (1999). A journal about journal writing as a qualitative research technique: History, issues, and reflections. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(4), 505-524.
Kerka, S. (1996). Journal writing and adult learning: ERIC Clearinghouse.
Kim, J. (2005). A community within the classroom: Dialogue journal writing of adult ESL learners. Adult Basic Education, 15(1), 21-32.
Kreeft, J. (1984). Dialogue writing—Bridge from talk to essay writing. Language Arts, 141-150.
McIntyre, S. R., & Tlusty, R. H. (1995). Computer-mediated discourse: Electronic dialogue journaling and reflective practice. Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA.
Milton, J. (2006). Resource-rich web-based feedback: Helping learners become independent writers. Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues, 123-139.
Moon, J. (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development. Abingdon, Oxon: RoutledgeFalmer.
Musa, F., Mansor, A. Z., Mufti, N., Abdullah, N. A., & Dato’Kasim, F. (2012). Negotiation skills: Teachers’ feedback as input strategy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 221-226.
Perham, A. (1992). Collaborative journals. Paper presented at the National Council of Teachers of English Conference.
Perl, S. (1994). Composing texts, composing lives. Harvard Educational Review, 64(4), 427.
Peyton, J. K., & Reed, L. (1990). Dialogue Journal Writing with Nonnative English Speakers. A Handbook for Teachers and An Instructional Packet for Teachers and Workshop Leaders: ERIC.
Peyton, J. K., & Seyoum, M. (1989). The effect of teacher strategies on students' interactive writing: The case of dialogue journals. Research in the Teaching of English, 310-334.
Polio, C. G. (1997). Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Language learning, 47(1), 101-143.
Polio, C., & Fleck, C. (1998). “If I only had more time:” ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(1), 43-68.
Rahimi, A., & Abedini, A. (2009). The interface between EFL learners' self-efficacy concerning listening comprehension and listening proficiency. Novitas-Royal, 3(1), 14-28.
Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. Teaching Techniques in English as a second language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Razak, R., & Asmawi, A. (2004). The use of dialogue journal through e-mail technology in developing writing internet and skills. Malaysian online journal of instructional technology, 1(2), 14-24.
Reid, J. M. (1993). Teaching ESL writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Rhodes, L.K., Dudley-Marling, C. C., & Mowder, B. A. (1986). Intervention strategies for developing student reading and writing fluency. Techniques, 2(3), 256-262.
Rokni, S. J. A., & Seifi, A. (2013). The effect of dialog journal writing on EFL learners’ grammar knowledge. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 9(2), 57-67.
Rokni, S. J. A., & Seifi, A. (2014). Dialog Journal Writing and its Effect on Learners’ Speaking Accuracy and Fluency. Studies in English Language Teaching, 2(1), 28.
Sachs, R., & Polio, C. (2007). Learners' uses of two types of written feedback on a L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(11), 67-100.
Sandler, K. W. (1987). Letting them write when they can't even talk? Writing as discovery in the foreign language classroom. The journal book, 312-320.
Schneider, P. (1993). The writer as an artist: A new approach to writing alone and with others: Lowell House.
Sedlak, C. (1992). Use of clinical logs by beginning nursing students and faculty to identify learning needs. The Journal of Nursing Education, 31(1), 24-28.
Semke, H. D. (1984). Effects of the red pen. Foreign language annals, 17(3), 195-202.
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. Tesol Quarterly, 41(2), 255-283.
Sommer, R. F. (1989). Teaching Writing to Adults: Strategies and Concepts for Improving Learner Performance: ERIC.
Spaventa, S. (2000). Essay writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Staton, J. (1988). Dialogue journal communication: Classroom, linguistic, social, and cognitive views (Vol. 10): Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language learning, 46(2), 327-369.
Truscott, J. (1999). The case for “The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 111-122.
Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: a response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 337–343.
Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255-272.
Urzua, C. (1987). “You stopped too soon”: Second language children composing and revising. TESOL Quarterly, 21(2), 279-304.
Voit, M. H. (2009). Do dialogue journals with recasts improve the writing skills for adult learners with limited literacy skills? , Hamline University.
Wallace, D.L. (1987). Dialogue journals: A tool for ESL teaching. Urbana, IL: Eric (280316)
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, & complexity: University of Hawaii Press.
Zarei, A. A., & Rahnama, M. (2013). The Effect of Written Corrective Feedback Modes on EFL Learners’ Grammatical and Lexical Writing Accuracy: From Perceptions to Facts. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 1(3), 1-14.




QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top