跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.81) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/10/05 01:00
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:鄭建揚
研究生(外文):Chien-Yang Cheng
論文名稱:從故事觀點看經營模式價值主張策略-以連鎖加盟為例
論文名稱(外文):The Value Proposition of Business Model from Storytelling Perspective -The Case Study on Franchise
指導教授:蔡文鈞蔡文鈞引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中原大學
系所名稱:企業管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:62
中文關鍵詞:故事連鎖加盟價值主張經營模式
外文關鍵詞:Business ModelStoryValue PropositionFranchise
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:527
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
  由過去學者提出的經營模式之組成與要素來看,大部分皆認為包含了價值主張此一要素,此外,更有學者發現,若透過提出對顧客創造價值的主張,不僅讓企業能夠繼續生存,且更能確定其價值定位,由此可知,價值主張在經營模式中扮演很重要的角色,但目前大部分的學者對價值主張的研究皆著重於描述其定義,而較少提及其組成的部份。基於此,本研究希望以故事觀點進一步探討經營模式價值主張的組成,並且探討其故事策略,以了解有效傳遞的要素。

  另外,本研究是以台灣連鎖加盟企業總部為研究對象,挑選的個案包含A公司與B公司,進行分析與歸納,以探討總部如何成功地傳遞其價值主張,說服加盟主加盟至此一體系。而本篇論文以紮根理論之方法,將收集的資料歸納整理後,得到以下三點結論:

一、 企業傳遞價值主張時,可針對機會、資本與策略佈局三大主題進行敘述
  藉由故事架構中的語言面意義將組成的要素區分為兩個層次,且經由紮根的方式歸納整理後,發現兩個案說明會內容皆以機會、資本與策略佈局主題加以說明。

二、 企業傳遞價值主張時,使用反對者角色可強化機會與策略佈局主題;使用幫助者角色可強化資本主題
  如果於描述機會與策略佈局主題時,藉由提出反對者角色將可更突顯企業主體的優勢與差異,但如果於描述資本主題時,提出幫助者角色將可強化其擁有的資源資本,尤其在描述社會資本時,更能發揮其功能。

三、 創業階段早期的企業較重視機會主題的傳遞,成熟的企業較重視資本主題的傳遞
呼應文獻中提到創業早期因為每個創業家的新事業都是獨特且創新的,所
以都會面對缺乏正當性所帶來的問題,如較不熟悉其經營模式,因此將著重於機會主題的描述,以證明其可行性,而較成熟的企業,為區隔和競爭者之間的差異,因此著重於描述所擁有的各項資本,以說服加盟主參與此一體系。
In industrial circles or academic community, business model is discussed widely. According to its fundamental element and function, although many savants have different opinions, but it's all including value proposition. Besides, some savants think if there’s a claim of creating value for customers, the enterprises can not only keep on operating, but can make sure its position of value. From that point, we know that value proposition is an important role. But now most savants focus on describing the definition of value proposition. Therefore, we hope to discuss the form of the business model value proposition in perspective of story and its tactic to realize the essential factor of effective communication.

In addition, the subject of this research is Taiwan franchise headquarters. To discuss how the headquarters express its value proposition successfully and persuade leaguers to join the system. The cases are including A company and B company. Researcher use grounded theory as methodology in this research. This paper is based on Researcher use grounded theory as methodology. From all collecting information, we got two conclusions:

1. The enterprises can aim at opportunity, capital and strategy layout to describe when
they communicate value proposition.

2. The enterprises can use the against role to strengthen the opportunity and strategy
layout when they communicate value proposition. If they use help role, it can
strengthen the capital.

3. The stage of early entrepreneurial enterprises attach importance to the opportunity
theme to convey and mature enterprises that attach importance to the theme of the
capital.
目錄
摘要 ...................................................................................................................................I
致謝詞............................................................................................................................ III
目錄.................................................................................................................................IV
表目錄.... ...........................................................................................................................V
圖目錄............................................................................................................................ VI
第一章 緒論.............................................................................................................. .....1
第一節 研究背景與動機........................................................................................... 1
第二節 研究目的................................................... .....................................................2
第二章 文獻探討.......................................................................................................... 4
第一節 經營模式之定義與組成............................................................................... 4
壹、經營模式的定義........................................................................................... 4
貳、經營模式的組成要素................................................................................... 5
第二節 價值主張之定義........................................................................................... 7
第三節 故事觀點 ........................................................................................................9
壹、故事的定義..................................................................................................10
貳、故事的目的與功能......................................................................................11
参、故事的結構..................................................................................................12
肆、好故事的條件 ..............................................................................................15
伍、故事運用在創業之研究 ..............................................................................16
陸、小結 ..............................................................................................................18
第三章 研究方法 .........................................................................................................20
第一節 研究架構 ......................................................................................................20
第二節 研究方法之選擇 ..........................................................................................20
第三節 研究對象 ......................................................................................................20
第四節 資料蒐集方法 ..............................................................................................21
第五節 資料分析方法 ..............................................................................................22
第四章 價值主張組成分析 .........................................................................................24
第一節 A公司 ..........................................................................................................24
壹、個案背景與簡介 ..........................................................................................24
貳、創設動機與特色 ..........................................................................................24
参、價值主張傳遞媒介 ......................................................................................25
肆、A公司說明會價值主張組成分析 ..............................................................26
第二節 B公司 ..........................................................................................................34
壹、個案背景與簡介 .........................................................................................35
貳、創設動機與特色 .........................................................................................35
参、價值主張傳遞媒介 .....................................................................................36
肆、B公司說明會價值主張組成分析 .............................................................36
第三節 A公司、B公司價值主張組成比較 .........................................................41
第五章 價值主張故事策略分析..............................................................................44
第一節 角色分析 ....................................................................................................44
第二節 情節結構分析 .............................................................................................49
第六章 結論與建議 51
第一節 研究結論 .....................................................................................................51
第二節 後續研究建議 .............................................................................................52
參考文獻......................................................................................................................53

表目錄
表2-1 經營模式組成要素整理 7
表2-2 價值主張定義 9
表2-3 經營模式價值主張定義 9
表3-1 研究對象 21
表3-2 本研究個案之對象、說明會時間與地點 21
表3-3 編碼範例..........................................................................................................23
表4-1 A公司 說明會主題範疇-機會 28
表4-2 A公司 說明會主題範疇-資本 30
表4-3 A公司 說明會主題範疇-策略佈局 31
表4-4 B公司說明會主題範疇-機會 38
表4-5 B公司說明會主題範疇-資本 39
表4-6 B公司說明會主題範疇-策略佈局 41
表4-7 A公司與B公司價值主張比較 44
表5-1 A公司說明會角色分析-反對者 46
表5-2 A公司說明會角色分析-幫助者 47
表5-3 B公司說明會角色分析-反對者 48
表5-4 B公司說明會角色分析-幫助者 49
表5-5 主題與情節結構對照分析 50

圖目錄
圖2-1 行銷顧客價值(Marketing Value) 8
圖2-2 故事類型 11
圖2-3 敘述觀點 12
圖2-4 敘述方式 13
圖2-5 敘述結構 14
圖2-6 故事結構 15
圖3-1 初步理論架構示意圖 20
圖4-1 A公司經營方向 ...............................................................................................24
中文部份

方至民(2000)。企業競爭優勢。台北:前程企業管理公司。
林妙雀,張琦雅(2008)。影響連鎖加盟者再續約意願因素之研究:以台灣地區餐飲業、零售業、生活文教業績盟者為例,未出版。
吳信如(譯) (2005) 。故事,讓遠景鮮活:最有魅力的領導方式。台北:商周,(原著出版年: 2003年)
周慶華(2002)。故事學。台北:五南。
胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
徐宗國(譯) (1997)。Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.著。質性研究概論,台北市:巨流,(原
  文於1990出版) 。
張方(譯)(1997)。Steven C. & Linda M.S.著。講故事:對敘是虛構作品的理論分析。
  駱駝。
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北市:五南文化。
楊振富(譯)(2008)。Maxwell& Dickman著。好故事無往不利。天下文化。
陳文智(譯) (2004)。說故事的力量: 激勵、影響與說服的最佳工具。台北: 臉譜出版。(原著出版年: 2001年)
劉蕙穎(2006)。運用價值主張建構智慧型運輸系統應用服務產業之發展策略 -以
  電子收費服務為例。私立元智大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園。
蔡敦浩(1984)。策略性決策過程之研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論       
  文。未出版,台北
英文部分

Afuah A. (2004). Business Models: A Strategic Management Approach, N. Y.: McGraw-Hill
Afuah A., and Tucci C.L. (2001). Internet Business Model and Strategies: Text and Cases. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
Aldrich H. E., and Fiol C.M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19: 645-670.
Amit, R., and Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business, Strategic Management Journal, 22:493-520.
Amit, R., and Zott, C. (2008). The Fit Between Product Market Strategy and Business Model: Implications for Firm Performana, Strategic Management Journal, 29: 1-26.
Anderson, J. C., Narus, J. A. and Rossum, W. V. (2006). Customer Value Propositions in Business Markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 90-99.
Band, W. (2000). Creating value for your customer. Sales and Marketing Management in Canada, 31(2).
Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. NY: General Learning Press.
Baum, J.A.C., and Powell, W.W. (1995). Cultivating an institutional ecology of organizations: comment on Hannan, Carroll, and Torres. American Sociological Review. 60:529-538.
Bovet, D., Martha, J., and Kramer, K. (2000). Value Nets-Breaking the Supply Chain to Unlock Hidden Profits. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Chesbrough, H., and Rosenbloom, R.S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11: 529-555.
Collins, J.C., Porras, J.I., (1994). Built to Last. HarperBusiness: New York.
David, B. (2000). Value nets: Breaking the supply chain to unlock hidden profits. New York: Wiley.
Day, G. S. (2000). Managing market relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 28(1).
De Meza, David and Lockwood, B. (2004). Too Much Investment : A Problem Of Coordination Failure, The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series, University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Dubosson-Torbay, M. A., Osterwalder and Pigneur, Y. (2002). E-Business Model Design, Classification and Measurements, Thunderbird International Business Review, 44, no. 1, 5-23.
Fernley,T. G. A. (1996). The pivotal role of an AMC in the life cycle of an association, Association Management, pp.4-5.
Fiol, C. M. (1989). A semiotic analysis of corporate language: organizational boundaries and joint venturing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 277-303.
Gifford, S. (1997). Limited attention and the role of the venture capitalist. Journal of Business, 12: 459-482.
Gorman, Michael and William A. S. (1989). What Do Venture Capitalists Do?, Journal of Business Venturing, No. 4, July, pp.231-248.
Hamel, G. (2000). Leading the Revolution, Harvard Business School Press, 15: 61-113.
Hannan MT, Freeman J. (1989). Organizational Ecology. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
Hybels RC . 1994.Legitimation, population density, and founding rates: the institutionalization of commercial biotechnology in the U.S., 1971-1989. OhD dissertation, Cornell University.
Ireland DR, Hitt MA. 1997. Strattegy-as-story’: clarifications and enhancements to Barry and Elmes’ arguments. Academy of Management Review 22: 844-847.
Kluyver, C. A. d. (2000). Strategic thinking: An executive perspective: Perntice Hall.
KMLab. (2000). Inc, http://www.kmlab.com/4Gwarfare.html, accessed 20 June .
Konczal, E. F. (1975). Models are for managers, not mathematicians, Journal of Systems Management, 26(1): 12-14.
Leibold, M., Voelpel, S., and Tekie, E. (2004). Managerial Levers in Cultivating New Mental Space for Business Innovation, South African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 35, No.4, pp.61-71.
Linder, J.C., and Cantrell, S. (2001). Changing Business Models: Surveying the L L and-scape, Working Paper, Institute for Strategic Change, Accenture.
Lounsbury, M., and Glynn MA. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 545-564.
Low M.B., and Abrahamson, E. (1997). Movements, bandwagons, and clones: Industry evolution and the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 12 pp.435 - 457.
Low MB, Abrahamson E. (1997). Movements, bandwagons, and clones: industry evolution and the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing.12:435-458.
Magretta, J. (1998). The power of virtual integration: An interview with dell computer's michael dell. Harvard Business Review, 76(2): 72-84.
Magretta, J. (2002). Why business Models Matter. Harvard Business Review, pp.86-92.
Mahadevan, B. (2000). Business models for internet-based e-commerce: An anatomy. California Management Review, 42(42), pp.55-69.
Mathews, R., and Wacker, W. (2008). What’s your story: Storytelling to move market, audience, people, and brands. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education/Financial Times Press.
Mckinsey, and Company, I. (1996). Value proposition and delivery strategies. Japan: Mckinsey & Company, Inc.
Mitchell, D., and Coles, C. (2003). The ultimate competitive advantage of continuing business model innovation. The Journal of Business Strategy, 24(5): pp.15-21.
Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23: 242-266.
O'Dell, C., and Grayson, J. (1998). If only we knew what we know: The Free Press.
Oliver, C. (1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal. 18(9):697-713.
Osterwalder, Alexander and Pigneur, Y. (2002). An eBusiness Model Ontology for Modeling eBusiness.
Osterwalder, Pigneur and Tucci, (2005). Clarifying Business Models: Origins
Perry, R., Johnston, A., Lycett, M., and Paul, R. (2004). Value propositions: A new conceptualisation for integration. Journal of Enterprise Information, 17(2).
Pettigrew, A. (1979). On studying organizational culture. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 570-581.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press.
Ruef, M. (1997). Prolegomenon to the relation between social theory and method. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 22: 303-332.
Salter, S. F. (1997). Development a customer-value based theory of the firm. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2).
Schneiberg, M., and Clemens, E.S. Forthcoming. The typical tools for the job: research strategies in institutional analysis. University of Chicago Press:
Chicago, IL.
Scott, W.R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Sage; Newbury Park, CA.
Selz, D. (1999). Value Webs: Emerging forms of fluid and flexible organizations: Thinking, organizing, communicating, and delivering value on the Internet. Dissertation, University of St. Gallen.
Shafer, S. M., Smith, H. J., and Linder, J. C. (2005). The power of business models. Business Horizons, 48(3): 199-208.
Snow, D.A., Rochford, B., Worden, S., and Benford, R., (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review. 51:456-481.
Solomon, M. R., Marshall, G. W., and Stuart, E. W. (2006). Marketing: Real people, real choices: Prentice Hall.
Staehler, P. (2002). Business Models as an Unit of Analysis for Strategizin. Patrick.Staehler@alumni.unisg.ch.
Stinchcombe, A.L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In Handbook of Organizations, March JG(ed). Rand McNally: Chicago, IL; 142-193.
Stone, M.M., Brush, C.G. (1996). Planning in ambiguous contexts: the dilemma of meeting needs for commitment and demands for legitimacy. Strategic management Journal, 17(8): 633-652.
Suchman, M.C. (1995). Management legitimacy; strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20: 571-610.
Taylor, S. S., Fisher, D., and Dufresne, R. L. (2002). The aesthetics of management storytelling: a key to organizational learning, Management Learning, 33(3): 313-330.
Timmers, P. (1998). Business Models for Electronic Markets. Electronic Markets International Journal of Electronic Commerce & Business Media, 8(2): 3-8.
Tuomine, M. (2004). Channel collaboration and firm value proposition. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 32(4/5).
Vincent, L. (2002). Legendary brands: Unleashing the power of storytelling to create a winning marketing strategy. Chicago: Dearborn.
Vorhies, D. M., Harker, M., and Rao, C. P. (1999). The capabilities and performance advantages of market-driven firm. European Journal of Marketing, 33(11/12).
Weick, K.E. (1979). The social Psychology of Organizing. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
Weick, K.E. (1995).Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage: Thouand Oaks, CA.
Weill, P., Vitale, M.R. (2001). Place to space: Migrating to e-Business Models. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.
Woodall, T. (2003). Conceptualising ' value for the customer': An attributional, structural and dispositional analysis. Academy of Marketing Science Review.
電子全文 電子全文(本篇電子全文限研究生所屬學校校內系統及IP範圍內開放)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊