跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.213) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/11 18:44
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳明裕
研究生(外文):CHEN,MING-YU
論文名稱:家族企業、實質選擇權與投資政策
論文名稱(外文):Family Firm, Real Option, and Investment Policy
指導教授:王功亮王功亮引用關係
指導教授(外文):WANG,DAVID-K
口試委員:陳一如張志向
口試委員(外文):CHEN,I-JUCHANG,CHIH-HSIANG
口試日期:2016-05-26
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄大學
系所名稱:金融管理學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:39
中文關鍵詞:實質選擇權家族企業長期投資研究發展支出投資效率性
外文關鍵詞:Real optionFamily firmLong-term investmentR&D spendingInvestment efficiency
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:171
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:9
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究主要為探討台灣家族持股與公司投資決策之關聯性。本研究包含兩個假說:(1)實質選擇權假說(Real option hypothesis),企業擁有實質選擇權偏好投入較多資金於長期投資。(2)風險趨避假說(Risk aversion hypothesis),家族企業為了降低企業風險相較非家族企業投入較少資金於研究發展支出。實證發現台灣企業持有實質選擇權會影響其投資決策,企業為了增加所持有的實質選擇權價值願意投入未來盈餘成果較不確定的長期投資中。此外,以各縣市每人可支配所得中位數當作工具變量(Instrumental variable)探討其中的內生性問題,透過二階段最小平方法(Two stage least squares)發現其持有實質選擇權的多寡和長期投資依然呈現顯著的正向關係,實質選擇權和長期投資兩者並不存在內生性問題。其中長期投資由資本支出以及研究發展支出兩費用所組成,個別探討實質選擇權對研究發展支出影響性時,發現其雖具有影響性卻不會促使原本風險趨避的家族企業轉而變成風險愛好,換句話說當家族企業沒有持有實質選擇權或持有的實質選擇權太少時家族企業的投資決策不會受到影響。本研究額外做了投資效率性假說的驗證,台灣的家族企業投入研究發展費用的資金少於非家族企業,但是其獲得的研發成果優於非家族企業的研發成果,家族企業相較非家族企業擁有較多的專利數目以及專利引用數。
We examine the relation between family ownership and corporate investment policy. Our analysis centers on two hypotheses: (1) family owners’ risk aversion (Anderson et al., 2012) and (2) their option to invest (Grullon et al., 2012), which potentially influence the level and type of investments that family firms undertake.
If real option hypothesis dominates the risk aversion hypothesis,(1) we find that firms in Taiwan devote more capital to long-term investments while they possess real option; (2) when dividing long-term investment into its two components of R&D and capital expenditures, we note that family firms, relative to non-family firms, prefer investing in physical assets relative to riskier R&D projects, even though they possess real option; (3) additional tests indicate that family firms receive more patents per dollar of R&D investment and more patent citations per dollar of R&D investment relative to nonfamily firms.
Overall, our empirical results indicate that family preferences for lower firm risk, across all family subtypes, affects corporate R&D spending and capital expenditures.

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究架構、流程與貢獻 3
第二章 文獻回顧 6
第一節 家族企業最終控制者持股和企業資本支出之關聯性 6
第二節 持有實質選擇權對企業投資政策之影響 7
第三章 資料來源與研究方法 9
第一節 樣本資料 9
第二節 研究模型 9
第四章 實證結果與分析 17
第一節 敘述統計、平均數差之T檢定和相關性分析 17
第二節 風險趨避假說與實質選擇權假說實證結果 21
第三節 實質選擇權假說穩健性測試 28
第四節 投資效率假說實證結果 30
第五章 結論 35
參考文獻 36

Abraham, K., Medoff, J., 1984. Length of service and layoffs in union and nonunion work groups. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38, 87–97.

Adams, R., Almeida, H., Ferreira, D., 2009. Understanding the relationship between founder-CEOs and firm performance. Journal of Empirical Finance 16, 136–150.

Almeida, H., Campello, M., Weisbach, M., 2004. The cash flow sensitivity of cash. Journal of Finance 59, 1777–1804.

Almeida, H., Campello, M., 2007. Financial constraints, asset tangibility, and corporate investments. Review of Financial Studies 20, 1429–1460.

Anderson, R., Reeb, D., 2003. Founding family ownership, corporate diversification, and firm leverage. Journal of Law and Economics 46, 653–684.

Anderson, R., Reeb, D., 2004. Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 49, 209–237.

Anderson, R., Duru, A., Reeb, D., 2009. Founds, heirs and corporate opacity. Journal of Financial Economics 92, 205–222.

Anderson, R., Duru, A.,Reeb, D.,2012. Investment policy in family controlled firms. Journal of Banking and Finance 36, 1744–1758.

Berkman, H., Cole, R., Fu, R., 2009. Expropriation through loan guarantees to related parties: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking and Finance 33, 141–156.

Bernardo, A., Chowdhry, B., 2002. Resources, real options, and corporate strategy. Journal of Financial Economics 63, 211–234.

Brennan, M.,Schwartz, E.,1985. Evaluating natural resource investments. Journal of Business 58, 135–157.

Brown, G., Kapadia, N.,2007.Firm-specific risk and equity market development. Journal of Financial Economics 84, 358–388.

Bulan, L., 2005.Real options, irreversible investment and firm uncertainty: New evidence from U.S. firms. Review of Financial Economics 14, 255–279.

Caballero, R., Pindyck, R., 1992. Uncertainty, investment, and industry evolution. Working paper, MIT.

Carpenter, R., Fazzari, S., Petersen, B., 1998. Financing constraints and inventory investment: A comparative study with high-frequency panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics 80, 513–519.

Chen, G., Firth, M., Xu, L., 2009. Does the type of ownership control matter? Evidence from China’s listed companies. Journal of Banking and Finance 33, 171–181.

Chen, J., Kasperczyk, M., Ortiz-Molina, H., 2011. Labor unions, operating flexibility, and the cost of equity. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 46, 25–58.

Duffee, G., 1995. Stock return and volatility:A firm-level analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 37, 399–420.

Edmans, A., 2009. Blockholder trading, market efficiency, and managerial myopia. Journal of Finance 64, 2481–2513.

Fama, E., Jensen, M., 1985. Organizational forms and investment decisions. Journal of Financial Economics 14, 101–119.

Galai, D., Masulis, R., 1976. The option pricing model and the risk factor of stock. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 53–81.

Gompers, P., Lerner, J., 2000. The determinants of corporate venture capital success: Organizational structure, incentives, and complementarities. In: Morck, R. (Ed.), Concentrated Corporate Ownership. University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Chicago.

Gramm, C., Schnell, J., 2001. The use of flexible staffing arrangements in core production jobs. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 54, 245–268.

Grullon, G., Lyandres, E., Zhdanov, A.,2012. Real options, volatility, and stock returns. Journal of Finance 67, 1499–1537.
Hall, B., Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., 2005. Market value and patent citations. Rand Journal of Economics 36, 16–38.

Heckman, J., 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47, 153–161.

Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers, as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 577–598.

Kothari, S., Laguerre, T., Leone, A., 2002. Capitalization versus expensing: Evidence on the uncertainty of future earnings from capital expenditures versus R&D outlays. Review of Accounting Studies 7, 355–382.

Leahy, J., Whited, T., 1996. The effect of uncertainty on investment: Some stylized facts. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 28, 64–83.

Lemmon, M., Zender, J., 2010. Debt capacity and tests of capital structure theories. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 45, 1161–1187.

Lev, B., Sougiannis, T., 1996. The capitalization, amortization and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21, 107–138.

Majd, S., Pindyck, R., 1987. Time to build, option value, and investment decisions. Journal of Financial Economics 18, 7–27.

Marschak, T., Nelson, R., 1962. Flexibility, uncertainty, and economic theory. International Review of Economics 14, 42–58.

McDonald, R., Siegel, D., 1986. The value of waiting to invest. Quarterly Journal of Economics 101, 707–727.

Mills, D., 1984. Demand fluctuations and endogenous firm flexibility. Journal of Industrial Economics 33, 55–71.

Oi, W., 1961. The desirability of price instability under perfect competition. Econometrica 29, 58–64.

Panousi, V., Papanikolaou, D., 2012. Investment, idiosyncratic risk, and ownership. Journal of Finance 67, 1113–1148.

Pindyck, R., 1988. Irreversible investment, capacity choice, and the value of the firm. American Economic Review 78, 969–985.

Pindyck, R., 1993. A note on competitive investment under uncertainty. American Economic Review 83, 273–277.

Prinsky, C., Wang, Q., 2006. Does corporate headquarters location matter for stock returns. Journal of Finance 61, 1991–2015.

Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy 94, 461–489.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top