臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究目的有三:(1)瞭解網路的真實情況, (2)瞭解網路的社會事實,(3)找到政府處理網路犯罪的原則。本研究的研究法主要是公共政策中的問題建構法, 並輔以實證研究, 以證實問題建構中所提假設。 本研究為深入瞭解網路犯罪問題, 特地從多元學科的角度切入,其中包括法理學、法律社會學、犯罪學、空間論述、當代社會哲學 (主要是Habermas 和Foucault ) 以及經濟學 (主要是公共財)。 根據研究設計, 本研究將網路分成公共空間 (例如WWW的首頁)、特定空間 (例如需要嚴格認證的網站)和私人空間 (例如E-mail); 我們並選擇立委助理、法官、速食店群眾、學生和網路使用者, 針對網路上發生的十九種偏差或將變為偏差的行為調查其容許程度; 而此十九種行為可分為不道德行為(mala prohibita)和本質上邪惡的行為(mala in se)。結果發現法官和立委助理對大部份行為的容許程度比網路使用者低; 不道德行為的爭議比本質上邪惡行為的爭議高; 當行為出現在特定空間時,爭議也較多。 最後一章本研究檢視了十九種行為的相關法律, 發現共識程度愈低者, 其法律與行為間的爭議性就愈高。最後我們建構了網路犯罪的四種類型政策問題, 並分別提出政府處理的原則和方向。

There are three major purposes of the present study: (1) to understandthe nature of cyberspace; (2) to investigate the social reality of cybercrime;and (3) to constructs some possile strategies for government to manage cybercrime. To achieve the research goals, the study took a multi-disciplinary approach to explore the subject. Our perspectives include legal theory, sociology of law, criminology, spacial theory, contemporary social philosophy and economics. Problem structuring in public policy was utilized as a methodology to developthe theoretical framework and hyptheses for the research. An empirical analysis was then designed to further examine the researchhypotheses. In the empirical analysis, cyberspace was classified into three categories based on the nature of its accessibility: public, specified and private spaces. Among the five target groups (legislators'' assistants, judges,consumers in fast food restaurants, colleges students, and internet users), the
research found that their attitudes towards the 19 selected deviant or deviant-to-be behaviors in cyberspace varied. For instance, legislators'' assistantsand judges had lower tolerance than internet useers to most of the behaviors.However, no matter which group one belonged to, people tended to have lessagreement for "mala prohibita" behaviors than "mala in se" behaviors. The results also indicated that regardless of the nature of deviant behabior,deviant behaviors occurring in specified cyberspace were more likely to activate debates than those in public and private cyberspaces. At last, this research reviewed the laws and regulations in Taiwan relatedto cybercrime in general and the 19 selected behavior in specific. Along with the empirical findings and legal literature review, the present studyproposed a multi-dimensional model of structuring the problem of cybercrime. We argue that strategies for government to managing cybercrime would be more appropriate and feasible if the public consensus and the nature of cyberspaceare both taken into a serous consideration when constructing the problem ofcybercrime. The policy implication was further discussed in detail at the end of the study.