跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.255) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/07/03 17:47
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:何明勇
研究生(外文):Mong-Young He
論文名稱:知識創造,知識資產,與資訊科技的整合模式
論文名稱(外文):An integrated model of knowledge management: knowledge creation, knowledge assets, and Information Technology
指導教授:周斯畏
指導教授(外文):Shih-Wei Chou
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄第一科技大學
系所名稱:資訊管理所
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2003
畢業學年度:91
語文別:中文
論文頁數:137
中文關鍵詞:資訊科技知識創造知識資產資訊科技整體性建設
外文關鍵詞:Technological Knowledge Creation InfrastructureInformation TechnologyKnowledge CreationKnowledge Assets
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:386
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:48
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
二十一世紀企業管理的策略為透過資訊科技與組織知識結合,創造知識導向的組織;然而過去對於資訊科技如何促進組織知識創造之研究都只有提出了一個理論上的架構,對於如何具體的落實知識創造,在資訊科技的設計與組織環境的配合上,皆沒有完整的描述。Nonaka et al. (2000)的知識創造動態模式理論中,提出了知識資產的觀念,並且認為資訊科技與知識資產兩項因素的整合效果,對組織知識創造的效果很有幫助。但只是觀念上的指導方針,對於如何有效利用資訊科技與知識資產來具體落實組織知識創造,欠缺實務上可行性的驗證。
本研究根據理論的推導,發展出知識創造、知識資產與資訊科技的整體性理論架構,並以問卷調查法針對本國中大型企業進行調查,來實證這個架構的關聯性。研究結果發現組織透過「資訊科技整體性建設」與「知識資產」對「組織知識創造」具有正面的影響,同時並驗證知識資產對於特定知識創造過程的相關性:分別為(一)「觀念性知識資產」對於知識創造中的內化過程,其影響較其他的知識資產為大;(二)「常規性知識資產」對於知識創造中的社會化過程,其影響較其他的知識資產為大。本研究的具體貢獻在於將影響知識管理相關的因素具體化,提供企業管理者在促進組織知識創造的過程中,運用適當的資訊科技與知識資產,達到較高效能的知識創造。對學術界而言,找出「知識資產」與「知識創造」間的關係,延伸了以往對此一領域的研究。
In the beginning of the 21-century, an important strategy of enterprise competition and management is to create a knowledge-guided organization by consolidating IT(information technology) and organization knowledge. In the past, IT research only provided a theory structure on how to improve the creation of knowledge in an organization. However for how to implement creation of knowledge, there is no complete description regarding combining both design of IT and organization environment. Nonaka et al. (2000) Provided “knowledge assets” concept in his organization creation dynamical model. He thinks that combining IT and KA (Knowledge Assets) will be very useful for KC (knowledge creation) in organizations. This is only a concept guide. There is no practical proof on how to effectively use IT and KA to implement knowledge creation in an organization.
Therefor, according to reference from theory, this research provides a concept structure, including both “IT complete infrastructure” and “knowledge assets” of knowledge creation in organizations. A questionnaire was prepared and people who work in middle to large sized enterprises were asked to complete it. From 204 returned valid questionnaires an analysis of the relationship between TKCI (Technological Knowledge Creation Infrastructure), “KA” and “KC” was made. It shows that through combining “TKCI” and “KA”, organization find a positive effect on “KC”. Furthermore was proven that in the 4 process of knowledge creation in an organization, 4 kinds KA will give organization difference influences. Compared to other knowledge assets, conceptual knowledge assets have a greater effect on internalization. Compared to other knowledge assets, routine knowledge assets have a greater effect on socialization. That provides business managers to use IT and KA and have high effective process of in their organization. The implications of the study are discussed, and further research directions are proposed.
中文摘要..................................i
英文摘要.................................ii
誌謝.....................................iv
目錄......................................v
表目錄..................................vii
圖目錄...................................ix
壹、緒論..................................1
一、研究背景……….......................1
二、研究動機與目的.......................5
三、研究範圍.............................9
四、論文結構與研究程序…………………..…10
貳、文獻探討.............................13
一、知識的定義與管理內涵................13
二、組織知識創造........................21
三、知識創造的資訊基礎建設功能……………25
四、知識資產…………………………..………28
參、研究方法.............................31
一、研究................................31
二、研究假設.........………………….……37
三、研究變數的操作性定義與衡量………..…45
四、研究樣本............................62
五、資料分析方法與工具…………………..…64
肆、資料分析結果.........................67
一、問卷資料............................67
二、因素分析………......................69
三、信度檢定…………....................78
四、假設檢定…………………..............80
伍、討論…………………………………..……104
一、Ba與知識創造………………………….…104
二、知識創造基礎建設與知識創造………….105
三、知識資產與知識創造……………….……106
陸、結論與建議..........................109
一、研究限制.......................……109
二、研究貢獻與建議…...................110
三、結論…………………………………….…111
參考文獻..........................……..113
附錄- 本研究問卷........................121
【中文文獻】
1.陳信邦,周斯畏,汪素如,2001,“以實證研究探討輔助組織學習系統與組織情境對組織學習程序之影響”,第七屆資訊管理研究暨實務研討會,台北。
2.周斯畏,汪素如,陳信邦,2002,“以實證研究探討組織資訊機制對組織知識創新之影響”,第十三屆國際資訊管理學術研討會,台北。
3.楊國樞等編著,1990,社會及行為科學研究方法,東華書局。
4.張紹勳,民 90,研究方法,滄海書局,台中。
5.張紹勳、張紹評、林秀娟編,2000,SPSS for Windows統計分析─初等統計與高等統計,四版,松崗電腦圖書資料股份有限公司,台北。
6.邱皓政,2000,量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析,五南圖書出版公司,台北。
7.吳明隆,2000,SPSS統計應用實務,松崗電腦圖書資料股份有限公司,台北。
8.黃俊英,2000,多變量分析,七版,中國經濟企業研究所,台北。
【英文文獻】
1. Ackerman, M. S., McDonald, D. W., 1996, “Answer Garden 2: Merging Organizational Memory with Collaborative Help”, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work(CSCW’96), November , pp.97-105.
2. Alavi, M., Leidner, D. E., 1999, “Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits”, Communication of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 7, pp1-36, February.
3. Alavi, M., Leidner, D. 2001, “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 107-136.
4. Anand, V., Manz, C. C., & Glick, W. H., 1998, “An organizational memory approach to information management”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4, No.23, pp. 796—809.
5. Ang, K. —T., et al., 1997, “IT implementation through the lens of organizational learning : a case study of Insurir”, Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Information System, Atlanta, December 15-17, pp. 331-348.
6. Argyris, C., Schon, D., 1978, Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Approach, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7. Badaracco, J. L, 1991, The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete through Strategic Alliances, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
8. Barbara, G. T., Linda, S. F., 2001, Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th ed, A Pearson Education Company.
9. Becerra-fernandez, I. and Sabherwal, R., 2001, “Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency Perspective”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 23-35, Summer.
10. Belsley, D. A., et al., 1980, Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity, New York: John Wiley&Sons.
11. Bennett, J. K. and O’Brine, M. J., 1994, “The Building Blocks of The Learning Organization”, Training, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp.41-49.
12. Bloodgood, J. M., Salisbury, W. D., 2001, “Understanding the influence of organizational change strategies on information technology and knowledge management strategies”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 31, pp 55-69.
13. Boczkowsk, P. J, 1999, “Mutual Shaping of Users and Technologies in a National Virtual Community”, Journal of Communication, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp.86-108.
14. Broadbent, M., and Weill, P., 1997, “Management by Maxim: How Business and IT Managers Can Create IT Infrastructure”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 77-93.
15. Broadbent, M., et al., 1996, “Firm context and patterns of IT infrastructure capability”, Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Information Systems, Cleveland, December, pp.174-194.
16. Chou, S. W., Wang, S. J., and Chen, H. P., 2002, “Aspects of Knowledge Creation Based on Information Management and Learning Mechanisms”, ACME International Conference on Pacific Rim Management.
17. Cohen, M. D.and Levinthal, D. A., 1990, “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 35, pp. 128-152.
18. Cohen, M. D., et al., 1996, “Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: contemporary research issues”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp.653-698.
19. Cross, R., Baird, L., 2000, “Technology Is Not Enough: Improving Performance by Building Organizational Memory”, Sloan Management Review, pp. 69-78, Spring.
20. Davenport, T. H., et al., 1998, “Successful knowledge management projects”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp.43—57.
21. Davenport, T. H., Hansen, M. T, 1999, Knowledge management at Andersen Consulting, Boston: Harvard Business School.
22. Davenport, T. H., Prusak, L., 1998, Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, President and Fellows of Harvard Collage.
23. Delaney, J. T. and Huselid, M. A., 1996, “Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Test of universalic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 949-969.
24. Draf, R. L., Lengel, R. H., 1986, “Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design”, Management Science, Vol. 32, pp. 554-571.
25. Duncan, R., 1972, “Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 313-327.
26. Foil, C. M. and Lyles, M. A., 1985, “Organizational Learning”, Academy of Management, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp.803-813, October.
27. Foreman, S. K., 1999, “Marketing: Marketing Organization and Virtual Communities”, Manager Update, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp.11-21.
28. Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., and Segars, A., 2001, “Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective”, Journal of MIS, Vol.18, No. 1, pp. 185-214.
29. Goodhue, D. L. et al., 1998, “Managing the Data Resource: A Contingency Perspective”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp 373-391.
30. Goodhue, D. L., Thompson, R. L., 1995, “Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance”, MIS Quarterly, Vol.19, No.2, pp.213-236, June.
31. Goodman, P. S., Darr, E. D., 1998, “Computer-aided Systems and Communities: Mechanisms for Organizational Learning in Distributed Environments”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22, No.4, pp. 417-440.
32. Goodman, P. S., Darr, E. D., 1996, “Exchanging Best Practices Through Computer-Aided Systems”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp.7-18.
33. Grant, R. M. 1996, “Prospering in Dynamically Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration”, Organization Science, Vol. 4, No. 7, pp. 375-387.
34. Gray, P. H., Chan, Y. E., 2000, “Integrating Knowledge Management Practices Through a Problem-solving Framework”, Communication of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 4, No. 12, pp. 1-21, November.
35. Gruber, T., 1995, “Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing International”, Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 43, pp. 907-928.
36. Hair, J. F.Jr, Anderson, R. E, Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C., 1998, Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed., NJ: Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
37. Hamel G, and Heene , 1994, “A Competence Based Competition Chichester UK: John Wiley”.
38. Hamel ,G., and Prahalad , C. K., 1994, “Competing for the Future : Breakthrough Strategies for Seizing Control of Your Industry and Creating the Markets of Tomorrow Boston”, Harvard Business School .
39. Hansen, M. T.,et al., 1999, “What’s Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge? ”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 2, No. 77, pp. 106-116.
40. Hidding, G. and Shireen, M. C., 1998, “Anatomy of a learning organization: Turning knowledge into capital at Andersen Consulting”, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp.3-13.
41. Huber, G. P. (1991), “Organizational Learning: The Contributing Process and the Literatures”, Organizational Science, Vol. 2, pp 88-115.
42. Jain, H. et al., 1998, “Success of Data Resource Management in Distributed Environments: An Empirical Investigation”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp 1-29.
43. Johannessen, J., et al., 1999, “Aspects of Innovation Theory Based on Knowledge-management”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 19, pp.121-139.
44. Kaiser, K. F., 1974, “An index of factorial simplicity”, Psychometrika, Vol. 39, pp. 31-36.
45. King, W. R., 1999, “Integrating Knowledge Management into IS Strategy”, Information Systems Management, Vol.4, pp. 70-72.
46. King, W. R. and Ko, D., 2001, “Evaluating Knowledge Management and the Learning Organization: An Information/knowledge Value Chain Approach”, Communication of AIS,, Vol.5, Article 14.
47. Leonard, D., 1995, Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation, Harvard Business School , Boston.
48. Leonard, D., Sensiper, S., 1998, “The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation”, California Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp.112-132.
49. Levitt, B., March, J., 1988, “Organizational Learning”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 14, pp. 319-340.
50. March, J., 1991, “Exploration and Exploitation in Organization Learning”, Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp.71-87, March.
51. Majchrzak, A., et al., 2000, “Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-organizational Virtual Team”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp.569-600.
52. Malhotra, Y., 2000, “Knowledge Management for E-Business Performance : Advancing Information Strategy to Internet Time”, Information Strategy The Executive’s Journal, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp.5-16, Summer.
53. Mann, L., Samson, D., & Dow, D., 1998, “A field experiment on the effects of benchmarking and goal setting on company sales performance”, Journal of Management, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 73—96.
54. Markus, M. L., 1994, “Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice”, Organization Science, Vol.5, No.4, pp.502-527, November.
55. McDermott, R., 1999, “Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management”, California Management Review, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp.103-117.
56. Moorman, C., Miner, A. S., 1997, “The impact of organization memory on new product performance and creativity”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 1, No. 34, pp. 91-106.
57. Nambisan, S., Agarwal, R., and Tanniru, M., 1999, “Organizational Mechanisms for Enhancing User Innovation in Information Technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp 365-395.
58. Nelson, R., 1993, National Innovation Systems- A comparative analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press Inc.
59. Nolan, R. L., 1979, “Managing the crisis in data processing”, Harvard Business Review, pp. 106-116.
60. Nonaka, I., 1990, “Redundant, Overlapping Organization: A Japanese Approach to Managing the Innovation Process”, California Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 27-38.
61. Nonaka, I., 1994, “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation”, Organization Science, Vol.5, No.1, Februar.
62. Nonaka, I. and Konno, N., 1998, “The Concept of ba: Building a Foundation of Knowledge Creation”, California Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 40-54.
63. Nonaka, I, and Takeuchi, H., 1995, The Knowledge-Creating Company, Oxford University,New York .
64. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., and Konno, N., 2000, “SECI, Ba, and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 33, pp. 5-34.
65. Nunnaly , I. C., 1978, Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
66. O’DELL, C., Grayson, C. J., 1998, “If only we knew what we know: identification and transfer of internal best practices”, California Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 154-174.
67. Orlikowski, W. J., 1993, “Learning from Notes: Organizational Issues in Groupware Implementation”, The Information Society, Vol. 9, pp 237-250.
68. Parente, D. H., 1996, “Assessing the Impact of the Manufacturing-Marketing Relationship on the Customer: A Multiple Informant Perspective”, Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of State University of New York at Buffalo, U.M.I..
69. Pentland, B. T., 1995, “Information systems and organizational learning: the social epistemology of organizational knowledge systems”, Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, Vol. 5, No.1, pp. 1—21.
70. Porter-Liebskind, J., 1996, “Knowledge, stragegy, and the theory of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 93-107, Winter.
71. Porter, M. E., 1985, Competitive Advantage, New York.
72. Prahalad, C.K., Hamel, G., “The core competence of the corporation”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 79-91.
73. Quin, J. B, 1992, Intelligent Enterprise : A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry, New York: Free Press.
74. Quinn, J. B., et al., 1996, “Managing Professional Intellect: Making the Most of the Best”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 71-80.
75. Robey, D., Khoo, H. M., Powers, C., 2000, “Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams”, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.
76. Sanchez, R., Mahoney, J. T., “Modularity, flexibility and knowledge management in product and organization design”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 63-76, Winter.
77. Savage, C., 1996, 5th Generation Management: CoCreating Through Virtual Enterprising, Dynamic Teaming, and Knowledge Networking, 2nd ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Stoneham, MA.
78. Sawy, O. A. and Bowles, G., 1997, “Redesigning the Customer Support Process for the Electronic Economy: Insights From Storage Dimensions”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp.457-483, December.
79. Scott, J., 2000, “Facilitating Interorganizational Learning with Information Technology”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 81-113, Fall.
80. Seufer, S. and Seufert, A., 2000, “Towards the Continuously Learning Organization through Knowledge Networking — Case Swiss Re Group”, Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Science — 2000, January.
81. Chou, S. W., 2003, “Computer systems to facilitating organizational learning: IT and organizational context”, Expert Systems with applications, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 273-280, April.
82. Chou, S. W., Wang, S. J., 2003, “Quantifying ba: An investigation of the variables that are pertinent to knowledge creation”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 167—180.
83. Spiegler, I., 2000, “Knowledge Management: A New Idea or a Recycled Concept? ”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 14.
84. Stein, E. W., Zwass, V., 1995, “Actualizing Organizational Memory with Information Systems”, Information Systems Research, Vol.6, No. 2, pp. 85-117.
85. Stewart, T. A., 1997, “Intellectual Capital:The new wealth of organizations”, Bantam Doubled at Dell Publishing Group Inc.
86. Sveiby, K. E., 1997, The New Organizational Wealth : Managing and Measuring Knowledge Based Assets, San Francisco : Berrett-Koehler.
87. Teece, D., 1998, “Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how and intangible assets”, California Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 55-79.
88. Tuomi, I., 2000 “Data is More Than Knowledge: Implications of the Reversed Knowledge Hierarchy for Knowledge Management and Organizational Memory”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 3, pp. 103-117.
89. Tyre, M. J. and Orlikowski, W. J., 1994, “Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations”, Organization Science, Vol.5, No.1, pp.98-118.
90. Vygotsky, L., 1986, Thought and Language, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA.
91. Walsh, J. P., Ungson, G. R., 1991, “Organizational Memory”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 57-91.
92. Walton, R., 1989, Up and Running, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
93. Weick, K. E., 1979, The Social Psychology of Organizing, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
94. Wijnhoven, F., 1999, “Development Scenarios for Organizational Memory Information Systems”, Journal of MIS, Vol. 16, No.1, pp. 121-146.
95. Zmud, R. W., 1988, “Building Relationships throughout the Corporate Entity”, in Transforming the IS Organization, J. J. Elam et al. (Eds.), ICIT Press, Washington DC, pp 55-82.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top