跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.141) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/10/09 09:37
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:邱琪閔
研究生(外文):CHI-MIN CHIU
論文名稱:影響淨值市價比因素之研究-以帳面價值與市場價值之觀點
論文名稱(外文):A Study on the factor of Book-to-Market effect-An view of book value and market value
指導教授:詹家昌詹家昌引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chia-Chung Chan
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:財務金融學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:中文
論文頁數:30
中文關鍵詞:淨值市價比帳面價值市場價值無形資產
外文關鍵詞:Book-to-MarketBook ValueMarket Valueintangible asset
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:1373
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在Rosenberg, Reid and Lanstein(1985)提出淨值市價比效果後,雖然形成因素有許多不同的解釋,但在跨國資本市場中都證實其存在性。過去的文獻視淨值市價比為單一變數,因此無法確認該效果是由帳面價值或市場價值所導致,即探討帳面價值之影響時,未能去除市場價值面的干擾;討論市場價值之影響時,亦無法除去帳面價值的影響。因此本文將分別控制市場價值和帳面價值後,檢視形成淨值市價比的來源,以求釐清導致淨值市價比效果的因素。
過去的結果大致認為是由市場面因素造成淨值市價比效果,如風險溢酬的貼水、過度反應造成錯誤定價等等。本文在分別控制市場價值與帳面價值後,發現淨值市價比的成因大部分為市場面之因素所造成,但控制市場價值後,在市值最小組別下,帳面價值對其產生影響力而存在淨值市價比效果。再將此市值極端小的組別依據有形資產佔總資產之數值畫分為無形資產高、無形資產低兩組時,顯示造成淨值市價比效果的原因與資產類別有關。
在知識經濟的時代中,投資人對無形資產的評價不會與帳面價值相同,不論是投資人認為無形資產對公司未來的價值較有成長性,或是因為一般公認會計原則傾向保守穩健基礎,因而使無形資產相對低估,皆會造成本文之研究結果,即當有形資產佔總資產的比例較高時,其淨值市價比效果不顯著存在,反之,有形資產佔總資產的比例較低時,淨值市價比效果顯著存在。
After Rosenberg, Reid and Lanstein(1985) introduced the Book-to-Market effect, the explanations of cause of Book-to-Market effect are quite diverse. However, its existence can be proved in many capital markets and be considered as a variable in many articles. Still, the reason why Book-to-Market effect exists is unclear. Therefore, Book-to-Market will be divided into two parts which are book value and market value to explain and examine in this paper.

After controlling two factors individually, evidence shows that causes of Book-to-Market are most resulting from market factors; in other words, book value has smaller influence on Book-to-Market effect. Furthermore, it points out that asset category is related to the cause of Book-to-Market effect after market value be controlled and classified by tangible and intangible assets. In this knowledge-based economy era, investors have different evaluation about intangible assets, for examples, some investors think that intangible assets can bring more value for company in the future; however, intangible assets will be underestimated if general accounting rules are keeping conservative. Hence, it can be concluded that Book-to-Market effect is not remarkable when tangible assets have higher proportion; on the contrary, lower tangible assets proportion results in outstanding Book-to-Market effect.
壹、 緒論 1
貳、 相關文獻探討 5
一、 淨值市價比之相關文獻 5
二、 會計科目與淨值市價比之相關文獻 8
三、 有形、無形資產之相關文獻 10
參、 研究方法 12
一、 樣本選取 12
二、 變數之衡量方法 12
三、 研究設計 13
肆、 實證結果與分析 15
伍、 結論 26
參考文獻: 28
參考文獻:
Aboody, D. and B. Lev, 1998, “The value-relevance of intangibles: The case of software capitalization,” Journal of Accounting Research 36, 161-191.

Ali, A., L.-S. Hwang and M. A. Trombley, 2003, “Arbitrage risk and the book-to-market anomaly,” Journal of Financial Economics 69, 355–374.

Barber, B. M. and J. D. Lyon, 1997, “Firm size, book-to-market ratio, and security returns:A holdout sample of financial firms,” Journal of Finance 52, 875-883.

Barth, M. and G. Clinch., 1998, “Revalued financial, tangible, and intangible assets: Associations with share prices and non market-based estimates,” Journal of Accounting Research 36, 199-233.

Barth, M. E. and R. Kasznik, 1999, “Share repurchase and intangible assets,” Journal of Accounting and Economics 28, 211-241.

Bauman, W. S. and R. E., Miller, 1997, ”Investor expectations and the performance of value stocks versus growth stock,” Journal of Portfolio Management 23, 57-68.

Beaver and S. Ryan, 1993, “Accounting fundamentals of the book-to-market ratio,” Financial Analysts Journal, 50–56.

Beaver W. H. and S. Ryan, 2000, “Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the ability of the book-to-market ratio to predict book return on equity,” Journal of Accounting Research 38, 127-148.

Ben Zion, U., 1978, “The investment aspect of nonproduction expenditures: An empirical test,” Journal of Economics and Business 30, 224-229.

Capual, C., I. Rowley and W. F. Sharpe, 1993, “International value and growth stock returns,” Financial Analysts Journal 49, 27-36.

Collins, D. W., M. Pincus, and H. Xie, 1999, “Equity valuation and negative
earnings:the role of book value of equity,” The Accounting Review 74, 29-61.

Daniel, K. and S. Titman, 1997. “Evidence on the characteristics of cross sectional variation in stock Returns,” Journal of Finance 50, 1-33.

Daniel, K. and S. Titman, 2004, “Market reactions to tangible and intangible information,” Journal of Finance 61, 1605-1643.

Daniel, K. et. al., 1998, “Characteristics or covariances?” Journal of Portfolio Management 24, 24-33.

Davis, J. L., 1994, “The cross-section of realized stock returns:The pre-COMPUSTAT evidence,” Journal of Finance 49, 1579-1593.

DeBondt, W. F. M. and R. Thaler, 1985, “Does the stock market overreact?” Journal of Finance 40, 793-805.

Fama, E. F. and K. R., French, 1992, “The cross-section of expected stock returns,” Journal of Finance 47, 427-465.

Fama, E. F. and K. R., French, 1993, “Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds,” Journal of Financial Economics 33, 3-56.

Fama, E. F. and K. R., French, 1995, “Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns,” Journal of Finance 50, 131-156.

Fama, E. F. and K. R., French, 1996, “Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies,” Journal of Finance 51, 55-184.

Fama, E. F. and K. R., French, 1997, “Industry costs of equity,” Journal of Financial Economics 43, 153-193.

Fama, E. F. and K. R., French, 1998, “Value versus growth: The international evidence,” Journal of Finance 53, 1975-1999.

Grinold, R. C. and R. N. Kahn, 1992, ”Information Analysis: A two-step approach to information ratios, information coefficients, and the value of investment information,” Journal of Portfolio Management, 14-21.

Lakonishok, J., A. Shleifer and R. Vishny, 1994, “Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk,” Journal of Finance 49, 1541-1578.
Lakonishok, J., A. Shleifer, R. Thaler and R. Vishny, 1991, “Window dressing by pesnsion fund managers,” American Economic Review, 81, 227-232.

Lev, B. and S. Thiagarajan, 1993, “Fundamental information analysis”, Journal of Accounting Research 31, 190-215.

Lev, B. and T. Sougiannis, 1996, “The capitalization, amortization and value- relevance of R&D,” Journal of Accounting and Economics 21, 107-138.

Lev, B. and T. Sougiannis, 1999, “Penetrating the book-to-market black box: The R&D effect,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 26, 419-449.

Osborne, A., 1998, “Measuring intellectual capital: The real value of companies,” Ohio CPA Journal, Columbus, Oct.-Dec.

Ou, J. and S. Penman, 1989, “ Financial statement analysis and prediction of stock returns”, Journal of Accounting and Economics 11, 295-329.

Roos, J., G. Roos, N. C. Dragonetti and L. Edvinsson, 1997, “Intellectual capital: Navigating the new business landscape,” Macmillan press Ltd.

Rosenberg, B., K. Reid and R. Lanstein, 1985, “Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency,” Journal of Portfolio Management 11, 9-16.

Ryan, S. G., 1995, “A model of accrual measurement with implications for the evolution of the book-to-market ratio,” Journal of Accounting Research 33, 95-112.

Ryan, P. and R. Hajiyev, 2004, “Do value stocks outperform growth stocks around the release of firms’ financial results? Some preliminary evidence from the irish stock exchange,” Irish Journal of Management 25, 101-109.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊