跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.75) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/08/21 02:02
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:廖英彥
研究生(外文):Ying-Yen Liao
論文名稱:表面吸附分子的轉動能態及量子點的電子性質之研究
論文名稱(外文):Studies on the Rotational States of Adsorbed Molecules, and the Electronic Properties of Quantum Dots
指導教授:褚德三褚德三引用關係
指導教授(外文):Der-San Chuu
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:電子物理系所
學門:自然科學學門
學類:物理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:英文
論文頁數:128
中文關鍵詞:分子偏向糾纏量子點弛豫傳輸
外文關鍵詞:moleculeorientationentanglementquantum dotrelaxationtransport
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:207
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:16
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在本論文中,我們研究吸附雙原子分子的轉動能態和量子點的物理性質。在第一部份中,我們考慮高強度雷射場照射在受到角錐位能井局限的吸附極性分子上,藉由改變位能井的禁制角度,我們觀察分子從自由轉動過渡到禁制轉動的行為。同時,我們也進一步探討耦合自由與吸附分子的轉動能態,發現其分子偏向與單一吸附分子的偏向有相當不同的差異性,原因是來自於分子間偶極作用的影響。此外,我們也計算了von Neumann熵來定義耦合分子系統的糾纏程度,結果發現糾纏會受到分子間距離、雷射脈衝強度與數目以及局限效應的影響。
在第二部份中,我們探討量子點系統的自旋弛豫與電子傳輸的現象。當量子點被製備在半導體平板內,我們發現由於聲子與自旋軌道交互作用的影響,自旋弛豫會顯現出類似共振腔的行為;另外,為了研究聲子在電子傳輸的效應,我們進一步考慮雙量子點元件處在一個單一聲子的環境中,結果顯示傳輸行為強烈地受到庫倫或是聲子場的影響。最後,我們也研究雙量子點在外加場作用下的電子傳輸現象,由於電子能態與外加場交互作用,我們發現電流大小會受到提升或是壓抑。
In this dissertation, we study the rotational states of adsorbed diatomic molecules and some physical properties of quantum dots. In part I, an adsorbed dipole molecule confined by a conical well is subject to strong laser fields. The crossover from field-free to hindered rotation motion is observed by varying the hindering angle. Moreover, the rotational states of coupled free and adsorbed molecules with dipolar interaction are further studied. It is shown that the orientation is significantly different from that of an isolated one due to the dipole-dipole interaction. In addition, the von Neumann entropy is calculated to characterize the degree of entanglement. It is also found that the entanglement can be influenced by the inter-molecule distance, the strength and number of laser pulses, and the confinement effect.
In part II, we investigate the spin relaxation and electron transport in quantum dot systems. When a quantum dot is embedded in a semiconductor slab, the spin relaxation rate shows peculiar behaviors due to the confined phonons. Second, to observe the phonon effect on the transport, we have also considered a double-dot device embedded in a single phonon environment. It is shown that the transport behavior is deeply influenced by the Coulomb or phonon field. Finally, the transport of a double-dot device irradiated by an external field is considered. The enhanced or suppressed current is found due to the interplay between the energy states and external field.
LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .xiv
1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
2 INTRODUCTION TO PART I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
3 AN ADSORBED DIPOLE MOLECULE IN LASER FIELDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
3.1 Model of an adsorbedmolecule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 9
3.2 Connection between theory and experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 12
3.3 An adsorbed molecule in a strong laser field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.4 Results and discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 16
4 COUPLED FREE MOLECULES IN LASER FIELDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25
4.1 Model of two coupled free molecules in a strong laser pulse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4.2 Entanglement of two coupled freemolecules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
4.3 Results and discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
5 COUPLED ADSORBED MOLECULES IN LASER FIELDS . . . . . . . . . . . . .46
5.1 Single adsorbedmolecule in a strong laser pulse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5.2 Two coupled adsorbedmolecules in a strong laser pulse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
6 SUMMARY AND FUTURE WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .61
7 INTRODUCTION TO PART II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .64
8 SPIN RELAXATION IN A GAAS QUANTUM DOT EMBEDDED INSIDE
A SUSPENDED PHONON CAVITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .69
8.1 Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 71
8.1.1 Single particle in a quantumdot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 71
8.1.2 Confined phonon in a semiconductor slab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 73
8.1.3 Electron-phonon coupling and scattering rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 75
8.2 Results and discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 76
9 ELECTRON TRANSPORT THROUGH A DOUBLED QUANTUM DOT
SYSTEM WITH SINGLE PHONON MODE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .86
9.1 Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
9.2 Results and discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 93
10 ELECTRON TRANSPORT THROUGH A DRIVEN THREE-LEVEL DOUBLE DOT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .101
10.1 Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ... . . 102
10.2 Results and discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
11 SUMMARY AND FUTURE WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .116
[1] The CollectedWorks of Irving Langmuir, edited by C. G. Suits (Pergamon,
New York, 1961).
[2] U. Landman, G.G. Kleiman, C.L. Cleveland, E. Kuster, R.N. Barnett, and
J.W. Gadzuk, Phys. Rev. B 29, 4313 (1984).
[3] J. W. Gadzuk, U. Landman, E. J. Kuster, C. L. Cleveland, and R. N.
Barnett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 426 (1982).
[4] Y. T. Shih, D. S. Chuu, andW. N. Mei, Phys. Rev. B 51, 14626 (1995).
[5] Y. T. Shih, D. S. Chuu, andW. N. Mei, Phys. Rev. B 54, 10938 (1996).
[6] Y. T. Shih, D. S. Chuu, and W. N. Mei, Solid State Commun. 99, 819
(1996).
[7] Y. T. Shih, Y. Y. Liao, and D. S. Chuu, Phys. Rev. B 68, 075402 (2003).
[8] J. Xu, A. Barnes, R. Albridge, C. Ewig, N. Tolk, and L. D. Hulett, Jr.„
Phys. Rev. B 48, 8222 (1993).
[9] I. Beauport, K. Al-Shamery, and H.-J. Freund, Chem. Phys. Lett. 256, 641
(1996).
[10] S. Thiel, M. Pykavy, T. Klüner, H.-J. Freund, R. Kosloff, and V. Staemmler,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 077601 (2001).
[11] S. Thiel, M. Pykavy, T. Klüner, H.-J. Freund, R. Kosloff, and V. Staemmler,
J. Chem. Phys. 116, 762 (2002).
[12] H. Stapelfeldt and T. Seideman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 543 (2003).
[13] B. Friedrich and D. Herschbach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4623 (1995).
[14] B. Friedrich and D. Herschbach, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 6157 (1999).
[15] B. Friedrich and D. Herschbach, J. Phys. Chem. A, 103, 10280 (1999).
[16] L. Cai, J. Marango, and B. Friedrich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 775 (2001).
[17] J. Ortigoso, M. Rodriguez, M. Gupta, and B. Friedrich, J. Chem. Phys.
110, 3870 (1999).
[18] M. Machholm, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 10724 (2001).
[19] N. E. Henriksen, Chem. Phys. Lett. 312, 196 (1999).
[20] M. Machholm and N. E. Henriksen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 193001 (2001).
[21] C. M. Dion, A. Keller, and O. Atabek, Eur. Phys. J. D 14, 249 (2001).
[22] A. Ben Haj-Yedder, A. Auger, C. M. Dion, E. Cancès, A. Keller, C. Le Bris,
and O. Atabek, Phys. Rev. A 66, 063401 (2002).
[23] C. M. Dion, A. Ben Haj-Yedder, E. Cancès, C. Le Bris, A. Keller, and O. Atabek, Phys. Rev. A 65, 063408 (2002).
[24] O. Rogalsky, P. Vorderwisch, A. Huller, and S. Hautecler, J. Chem. Phys.
116, 1063 (2002).
[25] A. Würger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 063002 (2002).
[26] D. DeMille, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 067901 (2002).
[27] H. Shima and T. Nakayama, Phys. Rev. B 69, 035202 (2004).
[28] H. Shima and T. Nakayama, Phys. Rev. A 70, 013401 (2004).
[29] W. Ho, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 11033 (2002).
[30] C. Hettich, C. Schmitt, J. Zitzmann, S. Kuhn, I. Gerhardt, and V. Sandoghdar,
Science 298, 385 (2002).
[31] S. Yasutomi, T. Morita, Y. Imanishi, and S. Kimura, Science 304, 1944
(2004).
[32] R. P. Pan, R. D. Etters, K. Kobashi, and V. Chandrasekharan, J. Chem.
Phys. 77, 1035 (1982).
[33] J. W. Riehl and C. J. Fisher, J. Chem. Phys. 59, 4336 (1973).
[34] V. M. Allen and P. D. Pacey, Surf. Sci. 177, 36 (1986).
[35] Handbook of Mathematical Functions, edited by M. Abramowitz and I. A.
Stegun (Dover, New York, 1970).
[36] D. C. Jacobs, K. W. Kolasinski, R. J. Madix, and R. N. Zare, J. Chem.
Phys. 87, 5038 (1987).
[37] H. Hou, S. J. Gulding, C. T. Rettner, A. M. Wodtke, and D. J. Auerbach,
Science 277, 80 (1997).
[38] D. Wetzig, R. Dopheide, M. Rutkowski, R. David, and H. Zacharias, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 76, 463 (1996).
[39] M. Rutkowski, D. Wetzig, and H. Zacharias, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 246101
(2001).
[40] C. H. Greene and R. N. Zare, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 6741 (1983).
[41] A. D. Buckingham, Adv. Chem. Phys. 12, 107 (1967).
[42] C. M. Dion, A. Keller, O. Atabek, and A. D. Bandrauk, Phys. Rev. A 59,
1382 (1999).
[43] P. A. Miller and S. Sarkar, Phys. Rev. E 60, 1542 (1999).
[44] H. Fujisaki, T. Miyadera, and A. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. E 67, 066201 (2003).
[45] D. You, R. R. Jones, P. H. Bucksbaum, and D. R. Dykaar, Opt. Lett. 18,
290 (1993).
[46] C. H. Bennett, H. J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schumacher, Phys. Rev.
A 53, 2046 (1996 ).
[47] S. Parker, S. Bose, and M. B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. A 61, 032305 (2000).
[48] See, for instance, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, edited byD. R. Lide,
84st ed. (The Chemical Rubber Company, Boca Raton, (2003).
[49] H. Sakai, S.Minemoto, H. Nanjo, H. Tanji, and T. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. Lett.
90, 083001 (2003).
[50] S. Minemoto, H. Nanjo, H. Tanji, T. Suzuki, and H. Sakai, J. Chem. Phys.
118, 4052 (2003).
[51] H. Sakai, S. Minemoto, H. Nanjo, H. Tanji, and T. Suzuki, Eur. Phys. J. D
26, 33 (2003).
[52] A. Weiner, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 1929 (2000).
[53] S. M. Reimann and M. Manninen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 1283 (2002).
[54] W. G. van der Wiel, S. De Franceschi, J. M. Elzerman, T. Fujisawa, S.
Tarucha, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 1 (2003).
[55] H. Tamura, K. Shiraishi, and H. Takayanagi, in Quantum Dots and
Nanowires, edited by S. Bandyopadhyay and H. S. Nalwa (American Scientific,
2003), p. 67.
[56] G. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. 100, 580 (1955).
[57] M. I. D’yakonov and V. I. Perel’, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 60, 1954 (1971) [Sov.
Phys. JETP 38, 1053 (1971)].
[58] M. I. D’yakonov and V. Yu. Kachorovskii, Fiz. Tekh. Poluprovodn. 20, 178
(1986) [Sov. Phys. Semicond. 20, 110 (1986)].
[59] Yu. L. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, JETP Lett. 39, 78 (1984).
[60] Yu. L. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, J. Phys. C 17,6039 (1984).
[61] O. Voskoboynikov, C. P. Lee, and O. Tretyak, Phys. Rev. B 63, 165306
(2001).
[62] C. F. Destefani, S. E. Ulloa, and G. E. Marques, Phys. Rev. B 70, 205315
(2004).
[63] C. F. Destefani and S. E. Ulloa, Phys. Rev. B 71, 161303(R) (2005).
[64] A. V. Khaetskii and Y. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B 61, 12639 (2000).
[65] A. V. Khaetskii and Y. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B 64, 125316 (2001).
[66] L. M. Woods, T. L. Reinecke, and Y. Lyanda-Geller, Phys. Rev. B 66,
161318(R) (2002).
[67] R. de Sousa and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B 68, 155330 (2003).
[68] D. V. Bulaev and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B 71, 205324 (2005).
[69] T. Fujisawa, T. H. Oosterkamp, W. G. van der Wiel, B. W. Broer, R.
Aguado, S. Tarucha, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Science 282, 932 (1998).
[70] T. Brandes and B. Kramer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3021 (1999).
[71] J. Seyler and M. N. Wybourne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1427 (1992).
[72] A. Greiner, L. Reggiani, T. Kuhn, and L. Varani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1114
(1997).
[73] L. G. C. Rego and G. Kirczenow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 232 (1998).
[74] E. M. Höhberger, T. Krämer, W. Wegscheider, and R. H. Blick, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 82, 4160 (2003).
[75] E. M. Weig, R. H. Blick, T. Brandes, J. Kirschbaum, W. Wegscheider, M.
Bichler, and J. P. Kotthaus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 046804 (2004).
[76] M. Grifoni and P. Hanggi, Phys. Rep. 304, 229 (1998).
[77] G. Platero and R. Aguado, Phys. Rep. 395, 1 (2004).
[78] T. H. Oosterkamp, T. Fujisawa, W. G. van der Wiel, K. Ishibashi, R. V.
Hijman, S. Tarucha, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Nature (London) 395, 873
(1998).
[79] M. Switkes, C. M. Marcus, K. Campman, and A. C. Gossard, Science 283,
1905 (1999).
[80] X. Hu and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. A 61, 062301 (2000).
[81] M. Friesen, P. Rugheimer, D. E. Savage, M. G. Lagally, D. W. van der
Weide, R. Joynt, and M. A. Eriksson, Phys. Rev. B 67, 121301(R) (2003).
[82] T. Fujisawa, D. G. Austing, Y. Tokura, Y. Hirayama, and S. Tarucha, Nature
(London) 419, 278 (2002).
[83] R.Hanson, B. Witkamp, L. M. K. Vandersypen, L. H. Willems vanBeveren,
J.M. Elzerman, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 196802 (2003).
[84] J. M. Elzerman, R. Hanson, L. H. Willems van Beveren, B. Witkamp, L. M. K. Vandersypen, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Nature (London) 430, 431
(2004).
[85] N. Bannov, V. Mitin and M. A. Stroscio, Phys. Status Solidi B 183, 131
(1994).
[86] N. Bannov, V. Aristov, V. Mitin, and M. A. Stroscio, Phys. Rev. B 51, 9930
(1995).
[87] S. Debald, T. Brandes, and B. Kramer, Phys. Rev. B 66, 041301(R) (2002).
[88] The parameters for the GaAs quantum dot:m=0.067m0, g*=−0.44, Ea= 6.7 eV, ρ=5.3×103 Kg/m3, ct=3.35×103 m/s, cl=5.7×103 m/s.
[89] U.Meirav,M. A. Kastner, and S. J.Wind, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 771 (1990).
[90] For a review, see Single Charge Tunneling, edited by H. Grabert and M.
Devoret (Plenum, New York, 1992).
[91] R. Schuster, E. Buks, M. Heiblum, D. Mahalu, V. Umansky, Hadas Shtrikman,
Nature (London) 385, 417 (1997).
[92] S. M. Cronenwett, T. H. Oosterkamp, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Science 281,
540 (1998).
[93] D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Hadas Shtrikman, D. Mahalu, David Abusch-
Magder, U. Meirav, M. A. Kastner, Nature (London) 391, 156 (1998).
[94] S. Tarucha, D. G. Austing, Y. Tokura, W. G. van der Wiel, and L. P.
Kouwenhoven, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2485 (2000).
[95] A. Y. Smirnov, N. J. M. Horing, and L. G. Mourokh, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77,
2578 (2000).
[96] L. G. Mourokh, N. J. M. Horing, and A. Y. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. B 66,
085332 (2002).
[97] G. D. Mahan, Many Particle Physics, 3rd ed. (Plenum, New York, 2000).
[98] T. Brandes and N. Lambert, Phys. Rev. B 67, 125323 (2003).
[99] Y. Meir and N. S. Wingreen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2512 (1992).
[100] A.-P. Jauho, N. S. Wingreen, and Y. Meir, Phys. Rev. B 50, 5528 (1994).
[101] I. H. Chan, R. M. Westervelt, K. D. Maranowski and A. C. Gossard, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 80, 1818 (2002).
[102] T. Fujisawa, T. Hayashi, Y. Hirayama, H. D. Cheong, and Y. H. Jeong,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2343 (2004).
[103] C. A. Stafford and N. S. Wingreen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1916 (1996).
[104] T. H. Stoof and Yu. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B 53, 1050 (1996).
[105] Ph. Brune, C. Bruder, and H. Schoeller, Phys. Rev. B 56, 4730 (1997).
[106] T. Brandes, R. Aguado, and G. Platero, Phys. Rev. B 69, 205326 (2004).
[107] M. Ciorga, A. S. Sachrajda, P. Hawrylak, C. Gould, P. Zawadzki, S. Jullian,
Y. Feng, and Z. Wasilewski, Phys. Rev. B 61, R16315 (2000).
[108] T. Hayashi, T. Fujisawa, H. D. Cheong, Y. H. Jeong, and Y. Hirayama,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 226804 (2003).
[109] T. Brandes, F. Renzoni, and R. H. Blick, Phys. Rev. B 64, 035319 (2001).
[110] E. Paspalakis, Z. Kis, E. Voutsinas, and A. F. Terzis, Phys. Rev. B 69,
155316 (2004).
[111] J. M. Villas-Bôas, A. O. Govorov, and S. E. Ulloa, Phys. Rev. B 69, 125342
(2004).
[112] M. T. Björk, B. J. Ohlsson, T. Sass, A. I. Persson, C. Thelander, M. H.
Magnusson, K. Deppert, L. R. Wallenberg, and L. Samuelson, Nano Lett.
2, 87 (2002).
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 29. 蔡茂寅,〈工作權保障與勞動基本權的關係及其特質〉,律師雜誌,第219期(1997)。
2. 32. 謝哲勝,〈期待權〉,輔仁法學,第14期(1995)。
3. 31. 劉志鵬,〈民法債篇修正對勞動契約關係之影響〉,法令月刊,第51卷第10期(2000)。
4. 30. 蔡茂寅,〈社會權—生存權與勞動基本權〉,月旦法學雜誌,第49期(1999)。
5. 28. 曾妙慧,〈台灣勞資爭議百年史〉,月旦法學雜誌,第107期(2004)。
6. 27. 黃越欽,〈憲法中工作權之意義暨其演進〉,法令月刊,第51卷第10期(2000)。
7. 25. 黃虹霞,〈職業災害補償相關法律問題〉,萬國法律,126期(2002)。
8. 21. 陳新民,〈論憲法人民基本權利的限制(下)〉,律師通訊,第156期(1992)。
9. 20. 陳新民,〈論憲法人民基本權利的限制(上)〉,律師通訊,第154期(1992)。
10. 19. 陳新民,〈論社會基本權利〉,人文及社會科學集刊,第1卷第1期(1988)。
11. 17. 楊通軒,〈勞基中退休與資遣法制之研究〉,勞資關係論叢,第9期(1999)。
12. 16. 姚志明,〈民法債務不履行之新發展〉,月旦法學雜誌,第99期(2003)。
13. 14. 姚志明,〈誠信原則〉,月旦法學雜誌,第76期(2001)。
14. 13. 吳從周,〈勞保給付、侵權行為損害賠償請求權與保險代位權〉,軍法專刊,第42卷第5期(1996)。
15. 12. 李弘仁,〈日本公共部門勞動基本權及其判例演變〉,經社法制論叢,第13期(1994)。