臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

核心能力一直是企業所關注的議題，它會直接影響企業之永續經營與市場競爭力，企業轉型最重要就是核心能力之建立與發揮，在不同的轉型時期有其不同的訴求重點，也應該具備不同的核心能力；組織學習在近年來的研究漸漸受到重視，也被視為建立競爭優勢方法之一，不同階段有其主要知識來源，透過關係知識之學習與互動，可以協助轉型企業在拓銷市場、研究發展、生產製造及產品差異化方面之全面提升。
本研究係以個案探討方式進行，以國內一家已經轉型之廠商及另一家專注本業經營之廠商作為研究對象，探討在轉型過程中核心能力與關係知識之關連性。研究結果顯示，在本業經營期，拓銷市場能力最為重要，關係知識之來源以功能知識最為重要；在轉型醞釀時期，接近市場能力是最先被建立之核心能力，環境知識為主要關係知識來源；在轉變時期，研發能力養成是重要之任務，環境知識與互動知識為主要關係知識來源。在新市場經營時期，三種核心能力都必須具備，環境知識、互動知識與功能知識對於核心能力的建立與發揮都很重要。
建議目前已積極籌劃轉型之廠商，應該通盤考量外部環境的變化及審視公司既有的核心能力，轉型過程不同階段所需具備的核心能力其重要性將有差異，而關係知識對於核心能力的建立與發揮相當重要，企業轉型時應該重視關係知識之取得、吸收與應用，加速強化企業核心能力與提升競爭優勢。

The enterprise is more concerned about core competency. It is because the core competency will affect the company’s development. There is different core competency at different edge. Organizational learning becomes more important in recent years. It is also concerned a way to establishing competitive advantage. There are different sources of knowledge at different stages. Through organizational learning, the enterprise can develop the capability of R&D, manufacturing and marketing.
The research is a case study. There are two research companies. One is at reforming stage, and the other focus on his main business. The research objective is to find the relationship between core competency and relational knowledge in the reforming stage.
The research results are as follow:
1.The most important capability is marketing when company focus on his own business. The most important resource of relational knowledge is functional knowledge.
2.Marketing capability is initially performed at the reforming stage. The main resource of relational knowledge is environmental knowledge.
3.In changing stage, the R&D capability is performed firstly. The resources of relational knowledge are environmental and interactional knowledge.
4.In new markets development stage, functional, environmental and interactional knowledge are required. All three are important to form core competency.

中文摘要.............................................................i
Abstract..........................................................iii
第一章　緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機................................................2
第二節 研究目的.....................................................7
第三節 研究流程.....................................................8
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 核心能力.....................................................9
第二節 關係知識....................................................18
第三節 企業轉型....................................................22
第四節 工具機定義與台灣工具機產業現況.................................28
第五節 台灣FPD設備產業現況..........................................40
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構....................................................48
第二節 個案研究與流程...............................................48
第三節 研究設計與對象...............................................49
第四節 研究個案信效度...............................................50
第五節 資料分析方法.................................................52
第四章 個案訪談結果
第一節 主新德科技股份有限公司........................................53
第二節 普發工業股份有限公司..........................................64
第五章 綜合分析與命題推導
第一節 本業經營期...................................................71
第二節 轉型醞釀期...................................................75
第三節 轉變期......................................................80
第四節 新市場經營期.................................................83
第五節 命題推論後之研究架構..........................................87
第六章 結論與建議
第一節 結論........................................................91
第二節 研究限制....................................................93
第三節 未來研究方向.................................................93
參考文獻
一、英文部分.........................................................94
二、中文部分.........................................................97

一、英文部分
1.Aaker, D. A., (1984), “Developing Business Strategies,” New York : John Willey and Sons, pp. 35-36.
2.Amit, Schoemaker and Paul J. H., (1993), “Strategic Assets and Organizational Rant,” Strategic Management Journal vol.14 (January), pp. 33-46.
3.Ansoff, H. I., (1965), “Corporate Strategy,” New York：McGraw-Hill.
4.Buckley, P. J., Newbound, G. and Thurwell, J., (1988), “Foreign Direct Investment by Smaller UK Firms,” London, UK: Macmillan Press.
5.Barney (1991), “Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 99-120.
6.Leonard-Barton (1992), “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities：A Paradox in Managing New Product Development,” Strategic Management Journal Vo1.13, pp. 111-125.
7.Berry, C. H., (1975), “Corporate Growth and Diversification,” Press University Princeton.
8.Blumenthal, B. and P. Haspeslagh (1994), “Towrd a definition of corporate transformation,” Sloan Management Review, 35(3), pp. 101-206.
9.Booz, Allen and Hamilton (1985), “Diversification: A Survey of European,” Chief Executives Inc., New York.
10.Chandler, D. Jr. (1962), “Strategy and Structure,” Cambridge Mass: The MIT. Press.
11.Chiesa, V. and Mazini, R. (1998) , “Towards a framework for dynamic technology strategy,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1465-3990, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp. 111-129.
12.Collis, D. and Montgomery, C. (1995), “Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990s,” Harvard Business Review, 73 (July-August), pp.118-128.
13.Collis, D. (1991), “A Resource-Based Analysis of Global Competition: The Case of the Bearings Industry,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, Special Issue: Global Strategy (Summer), pp. 49-68.
14.Coyne, Kevin P., Hall, Stephen J. D. and Clifford, P. G. (1997), “Is your core competence a mirage?” McKinsey Quarterly 1 , pp. 40-54.
15.Gallon, M. R., Stillman, H. M., and Coates, D. (1995), “Putting core competency thinking into practice,” Research Technology Management, Vol. 38 No.3, pp.20-28.
16.Gort, M. (1962), “Diversification and integration in American Industry,” Princeton, N. J., Princeton University Press.
17.Hafeez, K., Zhang, Y.B. and Naila, M. (2002), “Determining Key Capabilities of a Firm Using Analytic Hierarchy Process,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 76, pp. 39-51.
18.Hammer and Champy (1994), “Reengineering the Corporation-A Manifesto for Business Revolution,” Harper Collins publishers, Inc.
19.Helleloid, D. and Simonin, B. (1994), ”Organizational Learning and a Firm's Core Competence,” In Competence-Based Competitive. G. Hamel & A. Heene (Eds.), New York: Wiley, 213-239.
20.Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D. and Hoskisson, R.E. (1995), “Strategic management: Competitiveness and globalization,” West Publication Inc., New York.
21.Hitt, Michael A., Keats, Baibaia W. and DeMaiie, Samuel M. (1998), “Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century,” Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 12, No. 4.
22.Hofer, C.W. and Schendel, D. (1978), ”Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts,” West Publishing Co., St. Paul.
23.Javidan, M. (1998), “Core Competence: What Dose it Mean in Practice,” Long Range Planning, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 60-71.
24.John, C. H. and Harriso, J. S. (1999), “Manufacturing-based Relatedness, Sy- nergy and Coordination,” Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), pp. 129-145.
25.Kalakota, R. and Robinson, M. (1999), ”e-Business: Roadmap for Success,” 1st ed., Addison-Wesley.
26.Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. (1975),” Market structure and innovation: A survey,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 13 pp. 1-37.
27.Lavy, A. and Merry, U. (1988), ”Organizational Transformation. Revitalizing Organization for a Competitive World,” Jessey-Bass Inc.
28.Leonard-Barton, D. (1995), ”Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation,” Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
29.Mirabile R.J. (1997),” Everything You Want To Know About Competency Modeling,” Training & Development, pp. 73-77.
30.Penrose, E. T. (1959 ), ”The theory of the growth of the firm,” UK, Oxford University Press.
31.Petts, N. (1997), “Building Growth on Core Competences-a Practical Approach,” Long Range Planning 4, pp. 551-561.
32.Pitts, R. A. and Hopkins, D. H. (1982), ”Fir diversity: Concepturalization and measurement,” Academy of Management Journal (July), pp. 620-629.
33.Hamel, G., and Prahalad, C. K. (1990), “The core competence of the corporation,” Harvard Business Review(May), pp. 79-91.
34.Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. K. (1996), “Competing in the New Economy: Managing Out of Bounds,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 3 (March), pp. 237-242
35.Ramanujam and Varadarajan (1989), “Research on Corporate Diversification: A Hypothesis,” Strategic Management Journal, 10(6), pp. 523-551.
36.Rumelt, R. P. (1987), “Theory, Strategy, and Entrepreneurrship,” in D. Teece(ed). The Competitive Challenge, Cambridge: Ballinger, pp. 137-158.
37.Shaheen, G. T. (1994), “Approach to transformation,” Chief Executive(March): pp. 2-5.
38.Mahen Tampoe. (1994),” Exploiting the core competence of your organization,” Long Rang Planning, 27(4), pp. 66-77.
39.Wernerfelt, B. (1984), ”A resource-based view of the firm,” Strategic Management Journal,5: pp. 171-181.

二、中文部分
1.司徒達賢，（2001），策略管理新論：觀念架構與分析方法，台北：智勝文化事業股份有限公司。
2.伍忠賢，（2000），企業轉型的策略方案選擇，管理雜誌第314期，頁106-110
3.竹本次郎著，（1989），從勞動密集到技術密集的轉型，日本文摘雜誌社。
4.吳思華，（1996），策略九說-策略思考的本質，麥田出版社。
5.李世隆，（2005），多角化經營策略與經營效率之分析－以臺灣地區金融控股公司為例，國立台灣科技大學管理研究所碩士論文。
6.卓長蒼，（2003），產能擴充策略、核心能耐與經營績效關係之研究－以台灣TFT-LCD產業為例，中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
7.林寄雯譯，（1992），日本中小企業事業團編譯，中小企業轉型策略（上），經濟部國貿局出版。
8.袁素萍，（2003），企業轉型成功關鍵因素之研究，國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
9.涂家培，（2006），品牌併購與企業經營模式轉型之研究， 國立中興大學企管碩士論文。
10.楊松壽，（2000），核心能耐之槓桿運用—以聲電業為例，國立台灣大學國際企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
11.鄭榮郎，（2001），傳統產業向上提升的轉型策略，能力雜誌第540期，頁77-80。
12.蕭清允，（2005），廠商核心能耐對國際化的影響：台灣車燈廠商之研究，國立中興大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
13.戴國榮，（2006），台灣國營事業之組織轉型與面臨之挑戰：以中油公司為例，元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。