臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本論文乃研究科技接受模型是否可用於解釋再購意願，以「信任」及「形象」為外在變數，探討現有使用者的「知覺有用性」、「知覺易用性」對其「再購意願」的影響。本研究以結構方程式建構研究模型並探討各變數之間的關係，實證結論及管理意涵如下：1.對現有使用者而言，「知覺有用性」對其「再購意願」有顯著的影響；「知覺易用性」無法對「再購意願」形成顯著的影響。因此科技接受模型無法用於解釋現有使用者的「再購意願」。2.「知覺有用性」會影響現有使用者的「再購意願」。因此業者可對現有使用者加強產品用途的宣導，增加其「知覺有用性」認知，進而提升「再購意願」。3.「知覺易用性」雖無法直接影響現有使用者的「再購意願」，卻對「知覺有用性」有顯著的影響力。因此業者可對現有使用者加強「操作方式」教學，或改善操作流程，使產品更易於使用，藉由加強「知覺易用性」而影響其「知覺有用性」，間接提升「再購意願」。4.「企業形象」、「信任」主要乃透過直接影響力以影響現有使用者的「再購意願」。因此業者可對現有使用者加強「企業形象」的塑造，增加其「信任」感，使其成為永久的忠實客戶。

This study explores the practicality of using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to interpret the repurchase willingness of users. Using ‘trust’ and ‘corporate image’ as external variables, the study looks into how ‘perceived usefulness’ and ‘perceived ease of use’ of current users affect their willingness to repurchase. This paper adopts the structural equation modeling technique to construct the research model, as well as to evaluate the relationships among these variables. The findings are as follows: 1. While ‘perceived usefulness’ has a significant effect on current users’ willingness to repurchase, ‘perceived ease of use’ does not possess the same obvious effect. Therefore TAM cannot be used to analyze the repurchase willingness of current users; 2. As ‘perceived usefulness’ could affect the repurchase willingness of users, suppliers may heighten current users’ awareness of product usage in order to increase their repurchase willingness; 3. Although ‘perceived ease of use’ does not have a direct impact on the repurchase willingness of current users, it does have a significant effect on ‘perceived usefulness’. Suppliers shall therefore make their products more easy to use, by enhancing information on product instructions or by improving operating procedures. By doing so, ‘perceived usefulness’ can be increased and ‘repurchase willingness’ can be promoted; 4. As ‘corporate image’ and ‘trust’ have a direct effect on the repurchase willingness of current users, suppliers may therefore increase the sense of ‘trust’ and loyalty of current users by reinforcing the development of cooperate image.
Key words: Technology Acceptance Model, TAM, Repurchasing intention, Structural Equation Modeling, SEM

中文摘要…………………………………….….……………………………………i
英文摘要…………………………………….….……………………………………ii
誌謝…………………………………….……….……………………………..……iii
目錄…………………………………….….……………………………………..…iv
表目錄…………………………………….…….……………………………………v
圖目錄…………………………………….…….……………………………………v
一、緒論…………………………………….….……………………………………1
1.1研究背景………………………………….….….….……………..………….1
1.2研究動機……………………………….…….….….……………..………….2
1.3研究目的……………………………….….……..………………..………….2
1.4研究流程…………………………………………………….……..…...…….3
1.5研究範圍…………………………………………………….……..…...…….4
1.6論文架構………………………………..….…….…………………..…….…4
二、文獻探討………………………………..………………………………..……5
2.1理性行為理論……………………………..…………………………..……...5
2.2科技接受模型……………………………………………………………….....6
2.3知覺品質…………………………..……………………………………….....8
2.4形象……………………………..……………………………………….…....9
2.5信任……………………………..……………………………………..….....11
三、研究方法………………………………………………………………....……13
3.1研究架構………………………..…………………………………..………...13
3.2研究方法………………………..………………………………..…………...15
四、實證結果與分析…………………………………………………....…………18
五、結論與建議………………………………………………………..…..………25
5.1結論…………………………..………………………………..……………...25
5.2管理意涵……………………..……………………………..………………...26
5.3研究限制與建議……………..……………………………..………………...27
參考文獻…………………………………..……………………..…………………28
附錄………………………………………..……………………..…………………32

1.MBA智庫百科: http://wiki.mbalib.com
2.丁誌魰、黃俊瑋，2008，「線上拍賣購買意願模型之研究」，資訊管理學報，第十五卷第三期：83-112
3.于丹、董大海、劉瑞明、原永丹，2008，「理性行爲理論及其拓展研究的現狀與展望」，心理科學進展，第十六卷第五期：796-802
4.李永挺，2007，「信任理論對知識分享之探討」，網路社會學通訊，第61期
5.周宣光、蔡清嵐，2003，「網際網路中廣播閱聽眾電台收播研究」，圖書館學與資訊科學，第二十九卷第二期：90 -105
6.范淑芬，2007，「網路電話使用意向之研究」，中華大學經營管理研究所碩士論文
7.湯宗泰、范垂仁，2006，「使用者對即時通訊軟體使用意願之研究」，台灣商管與資訊研討會論文
8.張愛華、陳仁惠、何宜真，2005，「一般個人認知服務品質模式與再購意願影響因素之研究－以資訊家電零售通路業為例」，顧客滿意學刊，第一卷第二期：1-42
9.陳育亮、鄭淑慧，2006，「網路教學與社群學習在成人教育的應用－以某社區大學電腦課程為例」，臺灣商管與資訊研討會
10.陳義勝、吳欣蓓、邱文照，「企業形象對信任與購買意願影響關係之研究」，聖約翰學報，第二十四期：111-126
11.賴明政、蔡昕晏，2006，「服務品質、企業形象、顧客滿意度與再購意願間關係之研究－以3C連鎖店為例」，管理創新與新願景研討會論文
12.蔡璞、蔡青姿，2006，「網路購物在知覺風險模式之建構」，國立虎尾科技大學學報，第二十五卷第三期：31-44
13.Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R. and Todd, P. A. (1992).”Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication”, MIS Quarterly,16(2), pp. 227-247.
14.Alan Dick, Arun Jain and Paul Richardson, 1997,“How consumers evaluate store brands,” Pricing Strategy and Practice, Vol. 5, No. 1, 18–24.
15.Anderson, E. and J. A. Narus（1990）,“A Model of Distributor Firm and Manugacturer Firm Working Relationahips”, Jorunal of Marketing, 54（January）, 42-58.
16.Baker, J., Grewal, D. and Parasuraman, A. (1994) “The influence of store environment on quality inference and store image”, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 22, pp.328-339.
17.Bayton, J. A. (1959), “Researching the corporate image.”, Public Relation, 4 (10): 3-8.
18.Chin, W. and Gopal, A. (1995). Adoption Intention in GSS: Relative Importance of Beliefs. DATABASE, 26 (2 & 3),pp. 42-63.
19.Crosby, Evans & Cowles（1990） ,“Relationship quality in service selling: An interpersonal influence perspective,” Journal of Marketing,vol.54(3), .p.68-80.
20.Davis, F.D., ”Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology”, MIS Quarterly, 1989, Vol.13, No.3, pp. 319-340.
21.Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi (1989), "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models", Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
22.Davis, F.D. and Venkatesh, V. (1996), A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the TAM: Three experiments. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies. 45, 19-45.
23.David Gefen, Elena Karahanna, and Detmar W. Straub, ”Inexperience and ExperienceWith Online Stores: The Importance of TAM and Trust ”,IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOL. 50, NO. 3, AUGUST 2003 :307-321
24.Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999),”Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs”, Information & Management, 36(1), 9-21.
25.Dodds, W.B., Monroe, K.B.,Grewal, Dhruv(1991),”Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations JMR”, Journal of Marketing Research,28(3), 307
26.Dooney, P.M., Cannon, J. (1997), "An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 61 pp.35-51.
27.E.E Gunther(1959), Evaluating Corporate Image Measurements: A Review of Technigues, N.Y.: Preceedings of the Advertising Research Foundation.
28.Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. ISBN: 0201020890.
29.Gefen, D. and Straub, D. W. (1997), ”Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model”, MIS Quarterly, 21(4),December, pp. 389-400.
30.Gefen D., ”E-commenee:The role of familiarity and trust[J].Omega-Int J Manage Sci,2000,28(6):725-737
31.Golembiewski, & McConkie. (1975). The Centrality of Interpersonal Trust in Group Processes. New York, NY: Wiley.
32.Geyskens, I. ,Steenkamp, J.,and Kumar, N. (1999),”A Meta-Analysis of Satisfactionin Marketing Channel Relationship”,Journal of Marketing Research, 36(May), 223-238.
33.Hawkins Del I., Best Roger J. Coney, Kenneth A. (1998), Consumer Behavior, 396-402.
34.Holbrook, M. B. and K. P. Corfman（1983）,“Quality and Other Types of Value in the Consumption Experience: Paedrus Rides Again,”Working Paper, N. Y.: Columbia University.
35.Mathieson, K. (1991),Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior”, Information Systems Research, 2(3) 173-191.
36.Mazzarol, T. (1998), “Critical success factors for international education marketing.”, The International Journal of Educational Management, 12, No.4, pp.163-175.
37.Moorman, Christine, Rohit Deshpande & Gerald Zaltman(1993), “Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships, “ Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 81-102.
38.Morgan, Robert M.& Shelby D. Hunt, “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 1994, Vol.58, pp20~38.
39.Nevin, John R.,”Relationship marketing and distribution Channels：exploring fundamental issues”,Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1995; 23(4): 327-334.
40.Pierre Martineau(1960), “The Corporate Personality”, Developing the Corporate Image, Lee Bristol Jr. N.Y.: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
41.Rai et al.,”Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis”,INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH.2002; 13: 50-69
42.Robertson, T. S., and H. Gatignon, 1986, “Competitive Effects on Technology Diffusion”, Journal of Marketing, 50, 1-12.
43.Rousseau,D.,Sitkin, S.B.,Camerer,C.(1998).Academy of anagement,The Academy of Management Review,23(3),393-404.
44.Shirley Taylor and Peter Todd,”Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 4 (Dec., 1995), pp. 561-570
45.Smeltzer, L. R., “The Meaning and Origin of Trust in Buyer- Supplier Relationships”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 1997, pp. 40-48.
46.Spector, P. (1961),”Basic Dimension of The corporate Image”, Journal of Marketing, l(25), 47-51.
47.Szajna, B.(1996),”Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model”, Management Science, 42(1),85-92.
48.Taylor, S. and P. A. Todd (1995), "Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience", MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-570.
49.Valarie A. Zeithaml(1988), " Consumer Perceptions of Price,Quality, and Value : A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence ", Journal of Marketing,pp3-5,pp13-17
50.Viswanath Venkatesh and Fred D. Davis ,”A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies”, Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2 (Feb., 2000), pp. 186-204
51.Viswanath Venkatesh and Michael G. Morris, “Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 1 (Mar., 2000), pp. 115-139
52.Weitz and Jap,”Relationship Marketing and Distribution Channels”,Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.1995; 23: 305-320
53.Zand. (1972). “Trust and managerial problem solving”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229-239.
54.Zimmer, R. Mary & Linda L. Golden (1988), “Impressions of Retail Stores : A Content Analysis of Consumer Image”, Journal of Retailing, (Fall), vol.64, No.3, pp.281-285