跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.144) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/04/27 08:40
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:李姵萱
研究生(外文):Annie Lee
論文名稱:高職生英文寫作之策略使用及寫作困難之研究
論文名稱(外文):A Case Study of Taiwanese Vocational High School Students'' English Writing Strategies and Writing Difficulties
指導教授:宋麗珠
指導教授(外文):Li-chu Sung
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:銘傳大學
系所名稱:應用英語學系碩士在職專班
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:英文
論文頁數:102
中文關鍵詞:學習策略英文寫作英文寫作困難高職生寫作策略
外文關鍵詞:vocational high schoolEFL learnerslearning strategieswriting strategieswriting difficulties
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:1037
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:154
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
高職生的英文寫作教學一直以來較被不注重。但仍有許多高職生在面臨升學及找工作時,必須使用到英文寫作。本研究為質化研究,目前為調查臺灣高職學生對於英文學習上的學習策略。此研究針對高職生之英文寫作的策略採用、英文寫作面臨到的困難、及對於英文寫作的一些看法及建議。
英文寫作有別於母語寫作,高職生在英文寫作時,因為不同的寫作結構及有限的英文能力,常面臨許多困難。因此,為了瞭解高職生是如何從事寫作英文,本研究將分別探討受測者的英文寫作過程中,英文寫作之策略運用、英文寫作困難及對英文寫作之相關想法。
本研究針對十五位高職生進行英文寫作實驗。這十五位學生必須先完成一篇英文書信的寫作。他們在寫作完畢,必須個別與研究者進行十至十五分鐘之非正式訪談。訪談後必須填寫一份調查。整個過程都會以錄音的方式進行,提供未來更深入的分析和研究。本研究結果顯示,高職生寫作者會運用不同的策略來進行他們的寫作。此外,本研究也指出這些受測者遭遇大的寫作困難大多為字彙能力有限。受測者也指出他們對於目前高職寫作課的一些看法,研究者將這些看法分為三大部份:學校行政相關、老師教學相關、及寫作者本身相關的看法。此歸納成果其相關想法和建議可提供學校行政、教師、及學生等各方做為提升英文寫作運作、教學、及學習之參考。
研究者希望藉由本研究結果,能進一步說明在未來統測考試中,臺灣高職生要如何為英文寫作做準備,並能讓學校、老師、及學生一同努力朝向更有效的英文寫作。
Vocational high school students in Taiwan receive little attention on their English writing. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to investigate these EFL learners’ English language learning strategies and their difficulties in English writing. The participants are fifteen senior vocational high school female students majoring in accounting. Each participant was informed to perform a writing task of an assigned topic by the researcher. After completing the writing task, a semi-structured interview was conducted with each participant. Interview questions were centered on their strategies employed for the writing task, their difficulties they encountered and ways to tackle their problems during the writing process, and their thoughts and suggestions about English writing. A questionnaire was distributed to these participants after the interview to investigate their general difficulties in L2 writing. This is a case study of the qualitative research and the researcher intended to take a close look of these learners and give a detailed description of these fifteen individual cases. Data were collected and analyzed based on interview transcription and the questionnaire they filled out. Each participant signed a consent form and agreed to be tape-recorded during their interviews.
This research provides some good insights on what strategies these vocational high school students apply to their writing. By understanding the strategies they employ and difficulties they encounter, the teachers may further assist their writing difficulties and motivate them to write more. The results offer some suggestions to school administration, teachers, and learners to reflect on L2 writing of EFL education at vocational high schools and to adjust the EFL learners’ attitudes to improve their writing skill in the future.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledgements i
Chinese Abstract iii
English Abstract iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS v
LIST OF TABLES vii
LIST OF FIGURES viii
Chapter One: Introduction 1
1.1 Background of the Study 1
1.2 The Problem Statement 3
1.3 Purpose of the Study 5
1.4 Definition of Terms 6
1.5 Research Questions 8
1.6 Significance of the Study 9
1.7 Conclusion 10
Chapter Two: Literature Review 12
2.1 Language Learning Strategies 12
2.1.1 Definition of Language Learning Strategies 12
2.1.2 O’Malley et al.’s Taxonomy 13
2.2 The Studies of Language Learning Strategies and English Writing 16
2.3 Difficulties in L2 Writing 19
2.4 Phenomena of EFL Education in Vocational High Schools 22
2.5 Conclusion 25
Chapter Three: Methodology 27
3.1 Research Design 27
3.2 Participants 27
3.3 Instrumentation 28
3.4 Data Collection Procedure 32
3.4.1 Subject Selection Procedures 32
3.4.2 Performing a Writing Task 33
3.4.3 Interviews with Fifteen Participants 33
3.4.4 Filling out the Questionnaire 35
3.5 Data Analysis Method 35
3.5.1 Interview Data Relevant to Strategies Used 35
3.5.2 Questionnaire Data Relevant to Difficulties 40
3.5.3 Interview Data Relevant to Thoughts and Suggestions 41
3.6 Conclusion 43
Chapter Four: Results 46
4.1 The Writing Task 46
4.2 The Interview 49
4.2.1 Strategies Employed 49
4.2.1.1 Metacognitive Strategies 49
4.2.1.2 Social Affective Strategies 52
4.2.1.3 Cognitive Strategies 55
4.2.2 Data about Learners’ Thoughts and Suggestions 58
4.3 Questionnaire 61
4.3.1 Difficulties in English Writing 61
4.4 Conclusion 64
Chapter Five: Discussions and Conclusions 65
5.1 Findings and Discussions 65
5.1.1 Research Question One 65
5.1.2 Research Question Two 68
5.1.3 Research Question Three: 70
5.2 Pedagogical Implications 73
5.3 Limitations of the Study 74
5.4 Suggestions for Further Studies 76
5.5 Conclusion 77
References: 79
Appendix 88
Appendix One: Consent Form 88
Appendix Two: Writing Task Description 89
Appendix Three: Questionnaire 90
Appendix Four: A Sample of the Participant’s Interview Transcription 91
References:
Atkinson, R.C. (1985). Mnemotechnics in second-language learning. "American
Psychologist," 30, pp821-28.

Allen, V. F. (1983). Techniques in teaching vocabulary. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bejarano, Y. (1987). A cooperative small-group methodology in the language classroom.
"TESOL Quarterly," 2, pp483-504.

Bialystok, E. (1979). The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency.
Modern Language Journal, 65.

Bournot-Trites, M. & Seror, J. (2003). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions about strategies
which promote proficiency in second language writing. Revue Canadienne de Linguistique Appliqué’s/Canadian. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 129-157.

Bremner, S. (1999). Language learning strategies and language proficiency: investigating
the relationship in Hong Kong. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 55.

Casanave, C. P. (2002). Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacies in
higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Casanave, C. P., & Hubbard, P. (1992). The writing assignments and writing problems of
doctoral students: Faculty perceptions, pedagogical issues, and needed research. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 33-49.

Chamot, A.U. & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction.
"Foreign Language Annals," 22, pp13-24.

Chang, S. (1992). A study of language learning strategies that overseas Chinese students in
the United States employed and the relation of their strategy use to oral proficiency and other factors. Paper from the eighth conference on English teaching and learning in R.O.C., 443-470.

Chelala, S. (1981). Developing second-language skills theory and practice. Orlando, FL: HBJ
Publishers.

Chi, C. H. (2004). An Analysis of Text Structures Employed by EFL Beginning Writers.
Unpublished Master Thesis at National Yunlin University of Science & Technology.

Cohen, A.D. & Hosenfeld, C. (1981). Some uses of mentalistic data in second language
acquisition. "Language Learning," 31, pp285-313.

Connor, U. (2002). New Directions in Contrastive Rhetoric. TESOL QUARTERLY,
36(4), pp.493-510.

Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1993). Ways with words-Chinese students learning of English
vocabulary. The proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on English teaching
(pp. 15-29). Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.

Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second-language proficiency. Language
Learning, 39, pp.81-141

Diaz-Rico, L.T. (2004). Teaching English learners: strategies and methods. Pearson
Education Inc., Boston

Fan, Y. S. (2006). Topical structure analysis as an alternative learning strategy for coherent
writing. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Qung-Hua University.

Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of Error in Second-Language Student Writing. TESL-EJ,
6(4).

Flower, L. & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College
Composition Communication, 32, pp. 356-387.

Flower, L. & Hayes, J. R. (1980). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College
Composition Communication, 31, pp. 365-387.

Friendlander, A. (1990) Composing in English: effects of a first language on writing in
English as a second language. In Barbara Kroll (Eds.), Second Language Writing: research insight for the classroom. (pp. 109-125). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fukai, M. (2004). Bring the Standards for Foreign Language Learning to Life through an
Internet-Based Newspaper Project. Dissertation Abstracts. Indiana University.


Goldstein, L. M. (2004). Questions and Answers about Teacher Written Commentary and
Student Revision: Teachers and Students Working Together. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13 (1), 63-80.

Grabe, W. & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). THEORY & PRACTICE OF WRITING New York:
Longman.

Graham, S. & Hebert, M. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve
reading. A Report of Carnegie Corporation of New York. New York: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved June 17. 2010, http://carnegie.org/fileadmin/Media/Publications/WritingToRead_01.pdf

Green, J. M. & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and
gender. TESOL QUARTERLY, 29 (2), 261-297.

Gunette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of
feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1). 40-53.

Hinds, I. (1990). Inductive, Deductive, Quasi-inductive: Expository Writing in Japanese,
Korean, Chinese, and Thai. In U. Connor & A. M. Johns (Eds.), Coherence in Writing: Research and Pedagogical Perspective. (pp. 87-110)/ Alexandrai, Va: TESOL.

Horwitz, E. K. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign
language students. The Modern Language Journal, 72:283-294

Huang, D. F. (2003). Taiwanese university English major’s beliefs about English dictionaries
and their dictionary strategy use. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
Huang, S.H., & Tzeng, C. T. (2000). Learning strategies used by high English proficiency
learners in Taiwan. Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on English Teaching and learning in the Republic of China (pp. 111-128). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.

Huang, T.C. (2009). How Can Writing Be Better Instructed Through Students’ Eyes? – A
Questionnaire Survey. Unpublished Master Thesis at Ming Chuan University

Huang, T. L. (1997). 談加強詞彙教學研究之必要性. The Proceedings of the 6th
International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 322-331). Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.

Huang, W. T. (1999). Integrated vocabulary teaching in a senior high school: an empirical
study. The Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 385-393). Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.

Huang, Y. L. (2004). Strategy Use and Regulation in the Writing Tasks of Chinese EFL
Students. Master thesis of National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology.

Hyland, K. (2006). Teachers’ perceptions of error: The effects of first language and
experience. System, 34(4) 509-19.

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language
Teaching, 39(2), 83-101.

Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Cultural through patterns in intercultural education. Language
Learning, 16, pp. 1-20

Kobayashi, H. (1984). Rhetorical Patterns in English and Japanese. TESOL QUARTERLY
18(4), pp. 737-758

Krapels, A. (1990a). The interaction of first and second language composing: Processes and
rhetorics. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(12), 4045A.

Krapels, A. (1990b). An overview of second language writing process research. In: Kroll, B.
(Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom (pp.37-56). Cambridge Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Krashen, S. D. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading. Additional evidence
of the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 440-464.

Lee, H. (2005). Collaboration in Language Testing: Investigating the Validity of a New
Rating Procedure for EFL Writing Assessment in Korea. Dissertation Abstracts International. University of Illinois, Urbana.

Lee, Y.H. (2005). Exploring EFL Writers’ Self-regulation during Composing Process.
Unpublished master’s thesis. National Yunlin University of Science and Technology

Leki, I. (1992). The Contrastive Rhetoric. Understanding ESL Writers: A guide for teachers.
(pp. 88-104). Portsmouth: Byonton/Cook.

Liao, C. H. (2005). First language use in EFL (English as a foreign language) writing
processes. Dissertation Abstracts International, 66(4), 1251. Boston University.

Liao, M. T. (2004). University students’ reactions to teacher commentary and the
relationship between the reactions and writing proficiency in an EFL setting. Unpublished Master Dissertation. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.

Liao, Y. F. (2000). Taiwanese secondary school students’ learning motivation and language
learning strategies in EFL learning. 千禧年全國語言學論文研討會 (pp. 155-183).

Liu, C. K. (1999). Identifying the writing processes a college student has to undergo: The
generating model. The Proceedings of the 16th Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China. Taipei, 16, pp. 303-312

Liu, M. L. (2003). A study of beliefs about language and learning strategies of senior high
school students. Master thesis of National Kaohsiung Normal University.

Liu, Y. (劉語) (2002).全民拼英語-一則以喜,一則以憂。 師友月刊, 第425期, pp.20-23.

Lo, M. C. (羅美貞), (2000). 高職英文教學面臨的困境與因應。商業職業教育,第14期,
pp.18-28

Manson, K. (2006). Cooperative learning and second language acquisition in first-year
composition: Opportunities for authentic communication among English language learners. Teaching English in the Two-Year-College, 34(1), 52-58.

Matalene, C. (1985). Contrastive rhetoric: An American writing teacher in China.
College English, 47(8), pp. 789-807.

McCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McDonough, S. H. (1999). Learner strategies. Language Teaching, 32, 1-18.

Moragne e Silva, M. (1989). A study of composing in a first and second language. Texas
Papers in Foreign Language Education, 1(2), 132-151.

O’Malley, J.M. & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition.
New York: Cambridge University Press.

O''Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1993). Learner characteristics in second – language
acquisition. In A. O. Hadley (Ed.), Research in language learning : principles,
processes, and prospects (pp. 96-123). Lincolnwood, Ill.: National Textbook Company

O’Malley, J.M., Chamot, A.U., Stewner-Manzanares, G. Jupper, L., & Russo, R.P. (1985a).
Learning Strategies Used by Beginning and Intermediate ESL Students. Language Learning, 35, 21-46.

O’Malley, J.M., Chamot, A.U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Jupper, L., & Russo, R.P. (1985b).
Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language, TESOL Quarterly, 19, 557-584.

Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of Language Learning Strategies: A Synthesis of Studies with
Implications for Strategy Training. System, 17(2), 235-247.

Oxford, R. (1990). "Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know." New
York: Newbury House/ Harper & Row.

Oxford, R. L. (1993). Gender differences in styles and strategies for language learning: What
do they mean? Should we pay attention? In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Strategic interaction and language acquisition: theory, practice, and research (pp. 541-557). Washington: Georgetown University Press

Oxford, R., Nyikos, M. & Ehrman, M. (1988). Vive la difference? Reflections on sex
differences in use of language learning strategies. "Foreign Language Annals," 21(4).

Oxford, R., Crookall, D., Lavine, R., Cohen, A., Nyikos, M., & Sutter, W. (forthcoming).
Strategy training for language learners: Six situational case studies and a training
model."

Paltridge, B. (1997). Thesis and dissertation writing: Preparing ESL students for research.
English for Specific Purposes, 16, 61-70.

Petric, B., & Czarl, b. (2003). Validating a writing strategy questionnaire. System, 31,
187-215.

Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L.
Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & r. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp.545-561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative Inquiry in TESOL. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

Rigney, J. W. (1978). Learning strategies: A theoretical perspective. In H.F. O''Neil, Jr.
(Ed.), "Learning strategies," pp164-205. New York: Academic Press.

Rubin, J. (1975). What the "Good Language Learner" Can Teach Us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1),
41-45

Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schiller, J. (1989). Writing in L1 – Writing in L2: Case studies of the composing processes of
five adult Arabic-speaking ESL writers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50(9). 2883A.

Schoonen, R., Gelden, A., Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M.
(2003). First language and second language writing: the role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing and meta-cognitive knowledge. Language Learning, 53. 165-202

Schultz, J. M. (1991). Writing mode in the articulation of language and literature classes:
Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 75(4). 411-17.

Silva, T. (1993). Toward and understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writings: The
ESL research and its implications. TESOL QUARTERLY, 27(4), pp. 657-677.

Stern, H.H. (1992). Issues and Options in Language Teaching. Oxford: OUP.

Tierney, R. J., & Shanahan, T. (1991). Research on the reading-writing relationship:
Interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp.246-280). New York: Longman.

Vann, R. & Abraham, R. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful language learners. TESOL
Quarterly 24(2).

Wenden, A. L. (1987). Conceptual background and utility. In A.L. Wenden & J. Rubin
(Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning, 3-13. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Whalen, K. (1988). Pilot study on the nature of difficulties in written expression in a second
language: Process of product? Bullentin of the CAAL, 1(1), 51-57.

Wolfersberger, M. (2003). L1 to L2 Writing Process and Strategy Transfer: A Look at Lower
Proficiency Writers. TESL-EJ, 7.
http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/eje16/a6.html

Wu, C. P. (2003). A study on the use of feedback in senior high school English composition:
students’ preferences and teachers’ practices. Department of English National Kaohsiung Normal Master’s Thesis.

Yang, N. D. (1993). Beliefs about language learning and learning strategy use: A study of
college students of English in Taiwan. Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on English Teaching and learning in the Republic of China (pp. 193—219). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.

Yang, N. D. (1994). A study of factors affecting college EFL students’ use of learning
strategies. Papers from the eleventh conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China.

You, X. (2004). The choice made from no choice: English writing instruction in a Chinese
University. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 97-110.

Zacharias, N. T. (2007). Teacher and student attitudes toward teacher feedback. RELC
Journal, 38(1). 38-52.

Zamel, V. (1983). The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies.
TESOL QUARTERLY, 17, 2, pp. 165-187.

Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: the process of discovering meaning. TESOL QUARTERLY, 16, 2,
pp. 195-209.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top