跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.127) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/07/29 14:20
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:蔡柔忻
研究生(外文):Rou-Shin Tsai
論文名稱:風險態度、最適投資組合及其風險值分析
論文名稱(外文):Risk Attitude、Optimal Portfolio and Value at Risk
指導教授:吳博欽
指導教授(外文):Po-Cnin Wu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中原大學
系所名稱:國際貿易研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:貿易學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:87
中文關鍵詞:EGARCH蒙地卡羅模擬法風險趨避程度最適投資組合風險值
外文關鍵詞:EGARCH model.Monte Carlo SimulationThe degrees of risk aversionValue at RiskOptimal Investment Portfolio
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:646
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:10
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
摘要

自衍生性金融商品問世以來,各種投資工具及投資標的不斷地推陳出新,但金融市場中仍以Markowitz之投資組合概念進行投資行為。投資標的及相關衍生性金融商品的突破創新,雖然為金融市場提供更多的分散資金之管道,卻也使投資者面對更高之風險,進而促使投資者必須針對該風險值加以評估,並採行相關的規避措施。換言之,對投資者與企業經營者而言,投資組合及其風險值為投資行為上不可或缺的觀念。有鑑於此,本研究將風險值的概念與投資組合理論予以合併,探討投資者如何決定最適投資組合下進行風險值分析,並針對風險值加以控管。

本研究之實證資料涵蓋匯率、股票、基金及黃金市場中10項資產之日報酬資料,透過MV模型及個別投資者之風險趨避程度,決定最適完整性投資組合之標的與其標的所對應之最適權重,並進一步針對該最適投資組合運用歷史模擬法、以GARCH為先驗模型之蒙地卡羅模擬法與EGARCH模型進行風險值分析,最後透過RMSE、MAE及回溯測試,評估各種風險值模型預測能力之績效。

實證結果顯示,當樣本期間包含全球金融風暴期間時,在市場衰退時投資者應將資金比重投資於具有保值與避險效果之黃金商品,且構成完整性投資組合後,可有效地降低投資風險。此外,各種風險值模型的樣本外預測結果顯示,以GARCH模型為樣本內先驗模型之蒙地卡羅模擬法估計之風險值預測效果為最佳;而使用歷史模擬法與EGARCH模型所估算之風險值則有高估之現象。
Abstract

As the financial derivatives been rapidly developed, various kinds of investment tools have been constantly renovateing. In fact, Markowitz’s portfolio concept is still the benchmark for most investment behavior in the financial market. Although the innovation of investment tools and related financial derivatives can offer more scattered fund for financial market, more risk derived from the fluctuation of asset price comes with that. Therefore, the concept of risk management becomes more important for investors and managers. Based on this reason, this study combines the concept of VaR with the theory of portfolio to investigate how should investors analyze and manage the VaR under the chosen optimum portfolio.

The 10 component assets in portfolio contain foreign exchange rates, stocks, mutual funds and gold. By using Mean-Variance approach and individual investor’s risk aversion altitude, we can first decide optimal investment portfolio, including component assets and their weights. Furthermore, employing historical simulation, Mote Carlo simulation combined with GARCH model, and EGARCH model we can evaluate the VaR of that optimal portfolio. Finally, through the RMSE, MAE and back test we can evaluate each model’s forecasting performance.

Empirical study shows that during the period of Subprime Mortgage storm (the stage of economic recession), investors should invest in gold market to get better hedge and preserve asset value, and the decided optimal portfolio can actually reduce investment risk. Moreover, from the results of the out-of-sample forecasting we know that the metempirical model to GARCH of Monte Carlo Simulation is the best one to forecast the VaR, and the Historical Simulation and EGARCH model have over-evaluated the VaR.
目錄

中文摘要 Ⅰ
Abstract Ⅱ
誌謝辭 Ⅲ
目錄 Ⅳ
表目錄 VI
圖目錄 VII
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 6
第三節 研究流程與架構 7
第貳章 文獻回顧 9
第一節 投資組合分析 9
第二節 風險值模型 13
第三節 預測模型績效評估 18
第參章 研究方法與實證模型 19
第一節 投資組合模型 19
第二節 VaR之定義與估計模型 26
第三節 預測能力之衡量與回溯測試 35
第肆章 實證結果與分析 37
第一節 研究範圍及資料來源 37
第二節 投資權重分析 40
第三節 完整性投資組合風險值評估 45
第四節 風險模型之比較與回溯測試 54

第伍章 結論與建議 57
第一節 結論 57
第二節 未來延伸與建議 59
參考文獻 60
附錄 65


表目錄

表1-1-1 VaR評估方法之比較 4
表4-1-1 投資標的日報酬之基本統計分析 39
表4-2-1 效率前緣上可行性投資組合 41
表4-2-2 不同風險偏好下最適完整性投資組合 43
表4-3-1 最適風險性資產之相關係數 48
表4-3-2 歷史模擬法最適完整性投資組合風險值估計結果 48
表4-3-3 GARCH模型之係數估計結果 49
表4-3-4 蒙地卡羅模擬法最適完整性投資組合風險值估計結果 50
表4-3-5 EGARCH模型之係數估計結果 52
表4-3-6 EGARCH模型最適完整性投資組合風險值估計結果 52
表4-4-1 A=2、5時,各模型樣本外預測能力之衡量 54
表4-4-2 A=7時,各模型樣本外預測能力之衡量 55
表4-4-3 A=10時,各模型樣本外預測能力之衡量 56


圖目錄

圖1-3-1 研究流程圖 8
圖3-1-1 效率前緣與可行性投資組合之集合 20
圖3-1-2 資本市場線與最適完整性投資組合 25
圖4-2-1 不同風險趨避係數下資金投資比重之比較 44
圖4-3-1 最適權重資產與投資組合之日報酬率 46
參考文獻

中文文獻:
蒲建亨(2001),整合VaR法之衡量與驗證以台灣金融市場投資組合為例,國立政治大學國際貿易學系碩士論文。
范沛綱 (2004),最佳投資組合研究-以台灣50指數為例,國立中央大學統計研究所未出版碩士論文。
涂惠娟(2006),臺指選擇權風險值之研究,文大商管學報,第十一卷第二期,57-69頁。
林楚雄、劉維琪、吳欽杉(1999),不對稱GARCH模型的研究,管理學報,第十六卷第二期,479-515頁。
陳嘉惠、高郁惠、劉玉珍(2002),投資人偏好與資產配置,臺灣管理學刊,第1卷2期,213-231頁。
陳信宏(2004),投資組合決策最佳化與績效指標之研究,國立中山大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
陳信宏、韋伯韜、蔡憲唐、傅懷慧(2005),應用時間序列ARMA模型於資產配置之研究,中國統計學報,15-31頁。
張簡彰程、林楚雄、曾正杰(2008),風險矩陣波動修正之風險值估計,輔仁管理評論,第十五卷第二期,61-82頁。
張雅惠(2000),應用風險值評估共同基金之績效, 國立政治大學金融研究所碩士論文。
侯佳利(2001),組合編碼遺傳演算法於投資組合及資金分配之應用,國立中央大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
蔡麗茹、葉銀華(2000), 不對稱GARCH族模型預測能力之比較研究,輔仁管理評論,第七卷第一期,183-196頁。
謝劍平(2003),現代投資學分析與管理,智勝文化。
劉美纓(2006),研究銀行投資組合風險模型之測試與應用,金融風險管理季刊,第二卷第一期,1-27頁。
楊宗庭(2001), 共同基金風險值的評估與應用,台灣大學財務金融研究所碩士未出版碩士論文。
英文文獻:
Akgiray, V., (1989), “Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Time Series of Stockreturns:Evidence and Forecasts,” Journal of Business, Vol.62, pp.5-80.
Alexander, C. O. and C. T. Leigh,(1997), “On the Covariance Metrices Used in Value at Risk Models,” Journal of Derivatives,50-62.
Anderson, R.W. and J-P. Danthine, (1981), “Cross Hedging,” Journal of Political Economy, 89, 1182-1196.
Basak, S., & A. Shapiro, (2001), “Value-at-Risk based risk management: Optimal policies and asset prices,” The Review of Financial Studies, 371-405.
Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, (1996), “Amendment to the Capital Accord to Incorporate Market Risks,” Basle, Switzerland.
Beder, T. S. (1995), “VaR : Seductive but Dangerous, “ Financial Analysis Journal,12-14.
Black, F., (1976), “Studies in Stock Price Volatility Changes,” Proceedings of the 1976 Business Meeting of the Business Economic Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, 177-181.
Black, F., and R. Litterman, (1992), “Global Portfolio Optimization,” Financial Analysts Journal, 28-43
Bollerslev,T.,( 1986),“Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity”, Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327,
Bodie, Z., A. Kane & A.J. Marcus , (1999), “Investments, Fifth edition,” McGraw-Hill International Editions: ,154-254.
Boothe, P. and D. Glassman, (1987), “The Statistical Distribution of Exchange Rates,” Journal of International Economic, 22, 297-319.
Brinson, G.P., B.D. Singer and G.L. Beebower, (1991), “Determinants of portfolio performance II: An update,” Financial Analysts Journal, vol.3, No.47, 40-48.
David Lowe, (1994), “Novel Exploitation of Neural Network Methods in Financial Markets,” International Conference on Neural Networks ,6, 3623-3628.
Diamond, P. and J. Stiglitz, (1974), “Increases in Risk and in Risk Aversion,” Journal of Economic Theory, 66-84.
Duarte and Alcantara, (1999), “Mean-Value-at-Risk Optimal Portfolios with Derivatives,” Derivatives Quarterly, 56-64.
Engle, R.F., (1982),“Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of U.K. inflation”, Econometrica, 50, 987-1008.
Engle,R.F.; D.M.Lilien, and R.P Robins.,( 1987), “Estimating Time Varying Risk Premia in the Term Structure:The ARCH-M Model,” Econometrica,55, 391-408.
Figlewski, S., (1997), “Forecasting Volatility Financial Markets.” Financial Markets, Institutions, and Instruments, 6, 1-88.
Fu, Jiarong, (1993), “Increased Risk Aversion and Risky Investment,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, 60, 494-501.
Ghose, D. and K. Kroner, (1995). “The Relationship Between GARCH and Symmetric Stable Processes: Finding the Source of Fat Tails in Financial Data,” Journal of Empirical Finance, 2, 225-51.
Goorbergh, R.V.D. and P. Vlaar, (1999), “Value at Risk Analysis of Stock Returns Historical Simulation, Variance Techniques or Tail Index Estimation”, Econometric Research and Special Studies Dept. De Nederlandsche Bank.
Grubel, H. G.,(1968), “International Diversified Portfolio: Welfare Gains and Capital Flows,” American Economic Review 58,1299-1314.
Harold and Jr ,(1998), “A Utility Approach to the Portfolio Allocation Decision and the Investment Horizon.” Journal of Portfolio Management 25 no1,81-87.
Hendricks, D.,(1996), “Evaluation of Value-at-Risk Models Using Historical Data,” Economic Policy Review, 2(1):39-70.
Hopper, G. P., (1997), “What Determines the Exchange Rate: Economic Factors or Market Sentiment?” Business Review, 17-29.
Hull, J. and A. White,(1998), “Value at Risk When Daily Changes in Market Variables Are Not Normal Distributed,” Journal of Derivatives,9-19.
Huisman, R., K. Koedijk, and R. A. J. Pownall ,(1998), “VaR-x: Fat Tails in Financial Risk Management,” Journal of Risk, 1(1), 47-61.
Jorion, P.,(1996), “Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Controlling Market Risk,” Chicago, IL:Irwin.
Jorion, P., (2001), “Value at Risk: the new benchmark for managing financial risk,” Second Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
J.P. Morgan, (1996), “RiskMetrics Technical Document”, 4th edition.
Kupiec, P., (1995), “Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models,” Journal of Derivatives, 2,73-84.
Levy, H. and M. Sarnat, (1970), “ Internatal Diversidication of Investment Portfolios,” The American Economic Review, 60, 4, 668-675.
Loretan, M. and P. C. B. Phillips (1994), “Testing the Covariance Stationarity of Heavy-Tailed Time Series,” Journal of Empirical Finance, 1, 211-248.
Lobo, B. J. & D. Tufte, (1998), “Exchange Rate Volatility:Does Politics Matter?,” Journal of Macroeconomics, 20, 351-365.
Markowitz, Harry M. ,(1952), “Portfolio selection,” Journal of Finance, 77-91.
Markowitz, Harry M., (1959), “Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments,” Wiley, New York.
McNess,S.S.,( 1979), “The Forecasting Record for the 1970’s,” New England Economic Review.
Nelson, D., (1991), “Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach,” Econometrica, Vol.59, 347-370.
Pritsker, M., (1997), “Evaluating Value at Risk Methodologies: Accuracy versus Computational Time, ” Journal of Financial Services Research, 12, 3, 201-243.
Rachel, C., H. Ronald, and K. Kees,( 2001), ”Optimal portfolio selection in a Value-at-Risk framework”, Journal of Banking & Finance; Amsterdam.
Schwert, W. G., (1990), ”Stock Volatility and the Crash of ’87, “ The Review of Financial Studies, 3: 77-102.
Shapre, W. F.,(1964), “Capital Assets Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk,” Journal of Finance, 19, 425-442.
Shapre, W. F.,(1991), “Capital Assets Prices with and without Negative Holdings,” Journal of Finance, 46, 489-509.
Siegel, F.W. and J. P. Hoban, (1982), “ Relative Risk Aversion Revisited,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 481-87.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top