跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.213) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/12 18:26
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:詹淑玲
研究生(外文):Shu-Ling Chan
論文名稱:影響消費者採用資安系統因素之研究
論文名稱(外文):The Factors Influencing Consumer Adoption of Information Security System
指導教授:董和昇董和昇引用關係
指導教授(外文):Her-Sen Doong
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立嘉義大學
系所名稱:資訊管理學系碩士班
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:64
中文關鍵詞:資訊安全系統廣告態度採用涉入恐懼訴求
外文關鍵詞:information security systemattitude toward the adadoptioninvolvementfear appeal
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:360
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
資訊安全事件隨著資訊科技的發展,發生的頻率越來越高。面對資安威脅隨時都存在的情況,採用資安系統成為重要的對策。不論是擔任購買角色的企業,或是銷售角色的廠商,都需要瞭解影響採用資安系統的因素,唯有員工或消費者採用系統才能達成他們的目標。然而,傳統IT採用的研究著重於實質效益,如有用性和易用性,這些觀點卻不適用於強調防護功用的資安系統上。因此,本研究欲探討哪些因素才能有效地促進消費者採用資安系統,影響過程為何,並且這些影響結果是否會隨著消費者特性不同而改變。我們依據恐懼訴求(fear appeal)的研究提出五個假說,採用實驗室實驗法進行檢驗。結果顯示,恐懼程度、威脅類型和資訊類型皆為影響消費者採用資安系統的因素,提升廣告態度可產生使用意圖,個人涉入程度會干擾影響的過程。
As there are many events about information security violation, adoption of information security systems becomes an important preventative measure. Although the general public has become increasingly aware of the importance, many people still encounter these system are not utilized. For example, employees do not incorporate this system into their projects, or customers do not purchase the products recommended by a system developer. What factors influence these results is the key topic we explore. In this study, we examine how processes of emotional influence shape information security systems adoption among potential consumers, what factors work more effectively, and how such influence effects vary across a user population. Drawing on the fear appeal, we manipulated three type, fear level, threat type, and information type, as motivating factors of system adoption. These factors are linked to attitude toward the ad and adoption intention, the core drivers of advertisement effectiveness. We further examined how these influence processes were moderated by consumers’ involvement of the product. Five hypotheses thus developed were empirically validated using a laboratory experiment. This study found that fear appeal and its three types are factors influencing consumers’ adoption, and involvement moderates the influence processes.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 3
第三節 研究目的 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 資訊安全系統 7
第二節 恐懼訴求 8
第三節 保護動機 10
第四節 廣告態度的中介角色 11
第五節 涉入 13
第三章 研究模型與假說 14
第一節 研究架構 14
第二節 研究假說 15
第四章 研究設計 20
第一節 變數的操弄與衡量 20
第二節 問卷設計 23
第三節 實驗流程與設計 24
第五章 資料分析 30
第一節 樣本的基本資料分析 30
第二節 各變項的敘述性統計分析 32
第三節 問卷信效度分析 33
第四節 操弄檢定 35
第五節 假說檢定 36
第六章 結論與建議 42
第一節 結論 42
第二節 討論和貢獻 45
第三節 研究限制和未來研究建議 47
參考文獻 49
附錄 一 55
中文文獻
[1] 王宏仁,台灣資安市場年成長率將超過15%,iThome電腦報,2007,第315期, p. 27.
[2] 黃彥棻,2007回顧與展望:資訊安全篇,iThome電腦報,2007,第327期, pp. 40-44.
英文文獻
[3] Abdul-Gader, A. H., and Kozar, K. A., “The Impact of Computer Alienation on Information Technology Investment Decisions: An Exploratory Cross-National Analysis.Preview,” MIS Quarterly, Dec 1995, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 535-559.
[4] Berkowitz, L., and Cottingham, D. R., “The Interest Value and Relevance of Fear Arousing Communications,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, January 1960, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 37-43.
[5] Bhattacherjee, A., “Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model,” MIS Quarterly, 2001, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 351–370.
[6] Bhattacherjee, A., and Sanford, C, “Influence Processes for Information Technology Acceptance: An Elaboration Likelihood Model,” MIS Quarterly, Dec. 2006, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 805-825.
[7] Brooker, G, “A Comparison of the Persuasive Effects of Mild Humor and Mild Fear Appeals,” Journal of Advertising, 1981, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 29-40.
[8] Burnett, J. J., and Oliver, R. L., “Fear Appeal Effects in the Field: A Segmentation Approach,” Journal of Marketing Research, May 1979, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 181-190,
[9] Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science, 1989, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 982-1003.
[10] Dickinson, S., and Holmes, M., “Understanding the Emotional and Coping Responses of Adolescent Individuals Exposed to Threat Appeals,” International Journal of Advertising, 2008, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 251-278.
[11] Fishbein, M.A., and Ajzen, I., Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.
[12] Goldstein, M., “Relationship between Coping and Avoiding Behavior and Response to Fear-Arousing Propaganda,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, March 1959, Vol. 58, pp. 247-252
[13] Gorn, Gerald J., “The Effects of Music in Advertising on Choice Behavior: A Classical Conditioning Approach,” Journal of Marketing, Winter 1982, Vol. 46, pp. 94-101.
[14] Heilman, C. M., Nakamoto, K., and Rao, A., “Pleasant Surprises: Consumer Response to Unexpected In-Store Promotions,” Journal of Marketing Research, May 2002, Vol. 39, pp. 242-51.
[15] Higbee, Kenneth L., “Fifteen Years of Fear Arousal: Research on Threat Appeals: 1953-1968,” Psychological Bulletin, 1969, Vol. 72, No. 6, pp. 426-444.
[16] Hong, S.J., Thong, J.Y.L., and Tam, K.Y., “Understanding Continued Information Technology Usage Behavior: A Comparison of Three Models in the Context of Mobile Internet,” Decision Support Systems, 2006, Vol. 42, pp. 1819-1834.
[17] Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., and Kelley, H. H., Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1953.
[18] Insko, C. A., Arkoff, A., and Insko, V. M., “Effects of High and Low Fear-Arousing Communications upon Opinions towards Smoking,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1965, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 256-266.
[19] Janis, I. L., “Effects of Fear Arousal on Attitude Change: Recent Developments in Theory and Experimental Research,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 3, L. Berkowitz (ed.), New York: Academic Press, 1967.
[20] Janis, I. L., and Feshbach, S., “Effects of Fear-Arousing Communications,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, January 1953, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 78-92.
[21] Janis, I. L., and Feshbach, S., “Personality Differences Associated with Responsiveness to Fear-Arousing Communications,” Journal of Personality, December 1954, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 154-166.
[22] Keller, P. A. and Block, L. G., “Increasing the Persuasiveness of Fear Appeals: The Effect of Arousal and Elaboration,” Journal of Consumer Research, Mar 1996, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 448-459.
[23] King, Karen W., and Reid, L. N., “Fear Arousing Anti-drinking and Driving PSAs: Do Physical Injury Threats Influence Young Adults?” Journal of Current Research and Issues in Advertising, 1990, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 155-175.
[24] Laroche, M., Toffoli, R., Zhang, Q., and Pons, F., “A Cross-Cultural Study of the Persuasive Effect of Fear Appeal Messages in Cigarette Advertising: China and Canada,” International Journal of Advertising, 2001, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 297-317.
[25] LaTour, M. S., and Pitts, R. E., “Using Fear Appeals in Advertising for AIDS Prevention in tbe College-Age Population,” Journal of Health Care Marketing, 1989, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 5-14.
[26] Lavack, A. M., “Fear Appeals in Social Marketing Advertising,” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, 1997, The University of British Columbia (Canada).
[27] Lee, Y. H., “Manipulating Ad Message Involvement through Information Expectancy: Effects on Attitude Evaluation and Confidence,” Journal of Advertising, Summer 2000, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 29-43.
[28] Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A., and Larsen, K. R. T., “The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and the Future,” Communications of the AIS, 2003, Vo. 12, No. 50, pp. 752-780.
[29] Leventhal, H., “Fear-For Your Health,” Psychology Today, September 1967, Vol. 1, pp. 54-58.
[30] Leventhal, H., and Niles, P., “Persistence of Influence for Varying Duration of Exposure to Threat Stimuli,” Psychological Reports, 1965, Vol. 16, pp. 223-233.
[31] Leventhal, H., and Watts, J. C., “Sources of Resistance to Fear Arousing Communications on Smoking and Lung Cancer,” Journal of Personality, June 1966, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 155-175.
[32] Leventhal, H., Findings and Theory in the Study of Fear Communications, in Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 5. New York: Academic Press, pp. 119-186, 1970.
[33] Lodish, L. M., Abraham, M., Kalmenson, S., Livelsberger, J., Lubetkin, B., Richardson, B., and Stevens, M. E., “How T.V. Advertising Works: A Meta-Analysis of 389 Real World Split Cable TV Advertising Experiments,” Journal of Marketing Research, May 1995, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 125-139.
[34] Lutz, R. J., “Affective and Cognitive Antecedents of Attitude Toward the Ad: A Conceptual Framework,” in Psychological Processes and Advertising Effects: Theory. Research and Application, L. F. Alwitt and A. A. Mitchell (eds.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 45-63, 1985.
[35] MacKenzie, S. B., and Lutz, R.J., “An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context,” Journal of Marketing, April 1989, vol. 53, pp. 48-65.
[36] MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., and Belch, G. E., “The Role of Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations,” Journal of Marketing Research, May 1986, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 130-143.
[37] McGuire, W. J., “Personality and Susceptibility to Social Influence,” in Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, E. Borgatta and W. Lambert (eds.), Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968.
[38] Mitchell, A. A., and Olson, J. C., “Are Product Attributes Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude?” Journal of Marketing Research, August 1981, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 318-332.
[39] Muehling, D. D., and Laczniak, R. N., “An Examination of Factors Mediating and Moderating Advertising's Effect on Brand Attitude Formation,” Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 1992, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 23-34.
[40] Mukhopadhyay, A., and Johar, G.V., “Tempted or Not? The Effect of Recent Purchase History on Responses to Affective Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, Mar 2007, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 445-453.
[41] Niles, P., “The Relationship of Susceptibility and Anxiety to Acceptance of Fear-Arousing Communications,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University, 1964.
[42] O’Brien, J. A. , and Marakas, G. M., Management Information Systems. (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2008.
[43] Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T., “Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change,” Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986.
[44] Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., and Goldman, R. “Personal Involvement as a Determinant of Argument-Based Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and S ocial Psychology, 1981, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 847-855.
[45] Ray, M. L., and Wilkie, W. L., “Fear: The Potential of an Appeal Neglected by Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, January 1970, Vol. 34, pp. 54-62.
[46] Reid, L. N., and King, K. W., “The characteristics of anti-drinking and driving PSAs: a preliminary look,” Proceedings of the 1986 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Advertising, 1986, pp. 103-106.
[47] Rogers, R. W., “A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change,” Journal of Psychology, 1975, Vol. 91, No. 1, pp. 93-114.
[48] Rogers, R. W., and Prentice-Dunn, S., Protection Motivation Theory, In D. Gochman (ed.), Handbook of health behavior research: Vol. 1. Determinants of health behavior: Personal and social (pp. 113-132). New York, NY Plenum, 1997.
[49] Rogers, R.W., “Cognitive and Physiological Processes in Fear Appeals and Attitude Change: A Revised Theory of Protection Motivation,” In J. T. Cacioppo and R. E. Petty (eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook, New York: Guilford, 1983.
[50] Schoenbachler, D. D., and Whittler, T. E., “Adolescent Processing of Social and Physical Threat Communications,” Journal of Advertising, 1996, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 37-54.
[51] Smith, K. H., and Stutts, M. A., “Effects of Short-Term Cosmetic versus Long-Term Health Fear Appeals in Anti-Smoking Advertisements on the Smoking Behaviour of Adolescents,” Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 2003, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 157-177.
[52] Snipes, R. L., LaTour, M. S., and Bliss, S. J., “A Model of the Effects of Self-Efficacy on the Perceived Ethicality and Performance of Fear Appeals in Advertising,” Journal of Business Ethics, April 1999, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 273-285.
[53] Spence, H. E., and Moinpour, R., “Fear Appeals in Marketing—A Social Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, July 1972, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 39-43.
[54] Stallings, W., Cryptography and Network Security-Principles and Practices. (4th ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc. 2006.
[55] Stern, H., “The Significance of Impulse Buying Today,” Journal of Marketing, April 1962, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 59-62.
[56] Sternthal, B., and Craig, C. S., “Fear Appeals: Revisited and Revised,” Journal of Consumer Research,” December 1974, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 22-34.
[57] Sutton, S., Fear-arousing communications: A critical examination of theory and research, In J. Eiser (Ed.), Social psychology and behavioral medicine (pp. 303-337). London, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 1982.
[58] Symantec, Symantec Global Internet Security Threat Report: Trends for July-December 07, April 2008, Vol. 13.
[59] Tanner, J. F., Hunt, J. B., and Eppright, D. R., “The Protection Motivation Model: A Normative Model of Fear Appeals,” Journal of Marketing, July 1991, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 36-45.
[60] Vakratsas, D., and Ambler, T., “How Advertising Works: What Do We Really Know?” Journal of Marketing, Jan 1999, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 26-43.
[61] Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D., “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science, February 2000, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186-205.
[62] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unifying View,” MIS Quarterly, September 2003, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 425-478.
[63] Wheatley, J. J., and Oshikawa, S., “The Relationship between Anxiety and Positive and Negative Advertising Appeals,” Journal of Marketing Research, 1970, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 85-89.
[64] Workman, M., Bommer, W. H., and Straub, D., “Security Lapses and the Omission of Information Security Measures: A Threat Control Model and Empirical Test,” Computers in Human Behavior, 2008, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 2799-2816.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊