臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究主要目的為探討大學生的自我效能、成就目標和考試焦慮、學習策略
之間的關係以及對於數學學習成就的影響。本研究以中央大學101學年度微積分
聯合教學的管理學院大一新生為施測對象，共329位學生參與測試，採用問卷量
表來測量大學生的自我效能、成就目標、考試焦慮及學習策略，並透過信度及效
度的分析，得知本研究施測問卷具有良好的信度、效度。
依據文獻探討建構出自我效能、成就目標及考試焦慮、學習策略與數學學習
成就之間互相影響的模型，並使用結構方程模式(SEM)進行分析。本研究結果顯
示：學生的自我效能會直接正向影響精通目標、表現趨向目標、直接負向影響表
現逃避目標以及正向間接影響數學學習成就。成就目標理論中的精通目標透過學
習策略間接正向影響數學學習成就；逃避目標透過考試焦慮間接負向影響數學學
習成就；表現趨向目標會直接正向影響數學學習成就。而學生面對考試時所產生
的考試焦慮則會直接負向影響數學學習成就，學習策略則是會直接正向影響數學
學習成就。最後，根據研究結果提出對數學教育及未來研究的建議。

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships among self-efficacy,
achievement goal, test anxiety, learning Strategies , and the influences of these factors on
the mathematic achievement for the students in university. This study is based on Joint
Teaching Calculus system which created by National Central University with sample of
329 freshmen who enrolled in Calculus course in Department of Management, and it
measures the self-efficacy, achievement goal, test anxiety and learning strategies using
designed questionnaire. The reliability and validity analysis were used in developing
questionnaire to ensure it is an adequate reliability and validity measure.
Constructing self-efficacy, achievement goal, test anxiety and learning strategies and
the influences on the mathematic academic achievement were discussed in several
literatures and were analyzed by Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). In this study, the
result indicates that (1) Self-efficacy has a direct positive effect on mastery-approach goal and
performance-approach goal; non-direct positive effect on mathematic achievement, but
direct negative influence toward performance-avoidance goal.
(2) Mastery-approach goal has a direct positive effect on mathematic achievement when
learning strategies were used；performance-avoidance goal has non-direct negative
influence toward mathematic achievement when subject facing test anxiety；
performance-approach goal has a direct positive effect on mastery-approach goal.(3) Test anxiety exerted significant direct negative effect on mathematic achievement.
(4) Learning strategies has a direct positive effect on mathematic achievement.Finally, this
study provided implications for mathematics education and suggestions for future research.

摘 要............................................................ i
目 錄........................................................... iv
圖目錄............................................................. vi
表目錄............................................................ vii
第一章 緒論......................................................... 1
1-1 研究動機 ..................................................... 1
1-2 研究目的 ..................................................... 2
1-3 研究問題 ..................................................... 3
1-4 名詞釋義 .................................................... 3
1-5 研究範圍及限制 .............................................. 5
第二章 文獻探討..................................................... 6
2-1 成就目標理論與相關研究 ...................................... 6
2-2 探討考試焦慮的理論基礎及相關研究 ............................ 9
2-3 探討自我效能理論與相關研究 ................................. 12
2-4 探討學習策略理論與相關研究 ................................. 16
第三章 研究方法.................................................... 19
3-1 研究架構 .................................................... 19
3-2 研究對象 .................................................... 24
3-3 研究工具 .................................................... 25
3-4 資料分析 .................................................... 28
第四章 研究結果與討論.............................................. 34
4-1 因素分析結果 ................................................ 34
4-2 測量模型檢驗結果 ........................................... 40
4-3 結構模型檢驗結果 ............................................ 62
第五章 結論及建議.................................................. 80
5-1 研究結論 .................................................... 80
5-2 建議 ........................................................ 83
參考文獻........................................................... 85

﹝1﹞ 吳明隆，結構方程模式 : AMOS的操作與應用 = Structural equation modeling :
AMOS operation and application，五南圖書出版股份有限公司，臺北市，2007。
﹝2﹞ 陳寬裕，王正華，結構方程模型分析實務:AMOS的運用，五南圖書出版股份
有限公司，臺北市，2010。
﹝3﹞ 張偉豪、鄭時宜，與結構方程模型共舞，前程文化事業有限公司，臺北市，2012。
﹝4﹞ 張春興，現代心理學，東華書局，臺北市，1996。
﹝5﹞ 黃芳銘，結構方程模式 : 理論與應用 = Structural equation modeling，五南圖
書出版股份有限公司，臺北市，2010。
﹝6﹞ 楊世瑩，SPSS統計分析實務，旗標出版股份有限公司，臺北市，2005。
﹝7﹞ 林清山，程炳林，「國中生自我調整學習因素與學習表現之關係暨自我調整的
閱讀理解教學策略效果之研究」，教育心理學報,，第28卷，15~58頁，1995。
﹝8﹞ 王雅玲，秦爾聰，「實施探究教學對學生數學焦慮的影響」 ，台灣數學教師電
子期刊，第15期，41~57頁，2008。
﹝9﹞ 古明峰，「數理教育：孩子為什麼害怕數學-談數學焦慮」，國教世紀，第175卷，
29~33頁，1997。
﹝10﹞ 李仁豪，余民寧，「2×2成就目標理論架構之驗證」，教育與心理研究，第26卷
第3期， 433~470頁，2003。
﹝11﹞ 李仁豪，「以結構方程模式探討並驗證成就目標與學習行為的關係」 ，教育與
心理研究，第28卷第3期，551~580頁，2005。
﹝12﹞ 李仁豪，余民寧，「二層次結構方程式模型的應用：以教育心理學為例」，師大
學報：教育類 ，第53卷第3期，95~123頁，2008。
﹝13﹞ 林啟超，「高職學生之未來時間觀、成就目標與適應性學習行為間徑路模式
之檢驗」，教育實踐與研究，第22 卷第1 期，81~112 頁，2009。
﹝14﹞ 林麗芬，「提升國中數學學習成就--數學學習策略之探討」，科學教育月刊，
第328 期，19~28 頁，2001。
﹝15﹞ 林麗華，林清文，「國中生數學科學習之目標導向、社會比較、自我效能與
課業壓力關係研究」，彰化師大輔導學報，第25 期，87~132 頁，2003。
﹝16﹞ 林宴瑛，程炳林，「個人目標導向、課室目標結構與自我調整學習策略之潛
在改變量分析」 ，教育心理學報 ，第39 卷第2 期，173~194 頁，2007。
﹝17﹞ 施淑慎，「成就目標、自我效能、以及策略使用在考試焦慮上所扮演之角色」，
國立台北師範學院學報 ，第17 卷第1 期，355~378 頁，2004。
﹝18﹞ 施淑慎，曾瓊慧，蔡雅如，「國小學童之成就目標、動機與情感中介歷程以
及學業成就間路徑模式之檢驗」，測驗學刊，第54 卷第1 期，31~58 頁，2007。
﹝19﹞ 陳嘉成，「二向度或三向度?國中生之成就目標建構適用性與自主性在學習歷
程角色之研究」，教育研究與發展期刊，第6 卷第4 期，137~166 頁，2010。
﹝20﹞ 陳嘉成，「成就目標、行動控制取向與數學能力知覺的中介效果對國中生數
學學習行為組型之關係研究」，教育與心理研究(TSSCI)，第25 期，
629~656 頁，2002。
﹝21﹞ 許崇憲，「目標結構知覺對成就目標取向、學業表現、及學習策略的預測力：
期刊文獻的後設分析研究」，教育心理學報，第45 卷第1 期，63~82 頁，2013。
﹝22﹞ 張新仁，「學習策略的知識管理」，教育研究與發展期刊，第2 卷第2 期，
19~42 頁，2006。
﹝23﹞ 彭淑玲，程炳林，「四向度課室目標結構、個人目標導向與課業求助行為之
關係」，師大學報：教育類，第50 卷第2 期，69~95 頁，2005。
﹝24﹞ 程炳林，「四向度目標導向模式之研究」，師大學報：教育類，
第48 卷第1 期，15~40 頁，2003。
﹝25﹞ 劉佩雲，「目標導向與趨向或逃避行為之關係探討」，課程與教學季刊，
第12 卷第3 期，213~240 頁，2009。
﹝26﹞ 魏麗敏，「高中生的學習困擾與輔導策略」，輔導措施實務手冊，43~55 頁，
1996。
﹝27﹞ 龔心怡，林素卿，張馨文，「家長社經地位與數學學習動機對數學學業成就
之研究-以國中基本學力測驗數學領域為例」，彰化師大教育學報，第15 輯，
121~142 頁，2009。
﹝28﹞ 王湘君，「大學生學業自我效能量表之編製」，國立中山大學，碩士論文，
2012。
﹝29﹞ 古明峰，「三種輔導與教學介入策略對國小數學高焦慮兒童之數學態度、計
算能力與應用題解題能力之影響」，國立臺灣師範大學，碩士論文，1990。
﹝30﹞ 余民寧，「考試焦慮、成就動機、學習習慣與學業成績之研究」，國立政治大
學，碩士論文，1987。
﹝31﹞ 沈珮琦，「高中學生數學自我概念、數學自我效能與數學學業成就關係之研
究」，國立彰化師範大學，碩士論文，2009。
﹝32﹞ 侯玫如，「多重目標導向對國中生認知、動機、情感與學習行為之影響」，
國立成功大學，碩士論文，2002。
﹝33﹞ 柯曉玲，「國中生數學自我效能與數學學業成就關係之研究」，國立彰化師範大學，碩士論文，2009。
﹝34﹞ 陳彥廷，「學習動機、學習策略、考試焦慮對數學科學業成績的影響-以台南
市立後甲國中為例」，國立成功大學，碩士論文，2008。
﹝35﹞ 許玉芳，「國小學童的教師期望、父母期望與自我效能、學業成就之相關研
究」，國立屏東教育大學，碩士論文，2008。
﹝36﹞ 黃俊程，「合作學習對國中七年級學生的數學學習成就與數學焦慮的影響」，
國立台灣師範大學，碩士論文，2011。
﹝37﹞ 鄭淑米，「台中市高中職學生數學焦慮、數學字我效能與數學學業成就之研
究」，國立台灣師範大學，碩士論文，2006。
﹝38﹞ Bandura, A., “Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency”, The American
Psychologist ,37(2) , pp. 122 – 147, 1982.
﹝39﹞ Baumgartner, H. and C. Homburg, “Applications of structural equation modeling
in marketing and consumer research: A review” , Intern. J. of Research in
Marketing, Vol13, pp. 139-161, 1996.
﹝40﹞ Betz, N. E. ,”Prevalence, distribution, and correlates of math anxiety in college
students”, Journal of Counseling Psychology , 25(5), pp. 441-448, 1978.
﹝41﹞ Bong, Mimi et al.,”Comparison of Self-Beliefs for Predicting Student Motivation
and Achievement”, The Journal of Educational Research, Vol 105, pp. 336-352,
2012.
﹝42﹞ Bong, Mimi,”Academic Motivation in Self-Efficacy, Task Value, Achievement
Goal Orientations, and Attributional Beliefs”, The Journal of Educational
Research , Vol 97, pp. 287-297, 2004.
﹝43﹞ Bandalos, Deborah L. , Sara J. Finney, Jenenne A. Geske,”A Model of Statistics
Performance Based on Achievement Goal Theory”Journal of Educational
Psychology,Vol 95, pp. 604-616, 2003.
﹝44﹞ Chouinard, R., T. Karsenti and N. Roy , “Relations among competence beliefs,
utility value, achievement goals, and effort in mathematics”, British Journal of
Educational Psychology, Vol 77, pp. 501-517, 2007.
﹝45﹞ Church, Marcy A. ,Andrew J. Elliot and Shelly L. Gable,”Perceptions of
Classroom Environment, Achievement Goals, and Achievement Outcomes”,
Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol 93, pp. 43-54, 2001.
﹝46﹞ Church, Marcy A. , Andrew J. Elliot and Shelly L. Gable,”Perceptions of
Classroom Environment, Achievement Goals, and Achievement Outcomes”,
Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol 93, pp. 43-54, 2001.
﹝47﹞ Elliot, A. J. and K. M. Sheldon, “Avoidance Achievement Motivation: A Personal Goals Analysis”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol73,
pp. 171-185 , 1997.
﹝48﹞ Elliot, A. J. and M. A. Church, “A Hierarchical Model of Approach and
Avoidance Achievement Motivation”, Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, Vol72, pp. 218-232, 1997.
﹝49﹞ Elliot, A. J. and H. A. McGregor,”A 2× 2 Achievement Goal Framework”, journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 80, pp. 501-519, 2001.
﹝50﹞ Elliot, A. J. and K. Murayama, “On the Measurement of Achievement
Goals:Critique, Illustration, and Application”, Journal of Educational Psychology,
Vol 100, pp. 613-628, 2008.
﹝51﹞ Friedel, Jeanne M. et al.,”Achievement goals, efficacy beliefs and coping
strategies in mathematics:The roles of perceived parent and teacher goal
emphases”,Contemporary Educational Psychology,Vol 32, pp. 434-458, 2007.
﹝52﹞ Graham, S., and Weiner, B., “Theory and principles of motivation.” , Handbook
of educational psychology , pp. 63-84, 1996.
﹝53﹞ Hooper, Daire , Joseph Coughlan, Michael R. Mullen,”Structural Equation
Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit”, Electronic Journal of
Business Research Methods ,6(1) pp. 53-60, 2008.
﹝54﹞ Hooper, D., J. Coughlan and M. R. Mullen,“Structural Equation Modelling:
Guidelines for Determining Model Fit”, Electronic Journal of Business Research
Methods ,6(1), pp. 53-60, 2008.
﹝55﹞ Ho, Hsiu-Zu et al.,”The Affective and Cognitive Dimensions of Math Anxiety:
A Cross-National Study”, journal for Research in Mathematics Education,Vol 31,
pp. 362-379, 2000.
﹝56﹞ Jackson, Dennis L., J. Arthur Gillaspy, Jr.,“Reporting Practices in Confirmatory
Factor Analysis: An Overview and Some Recommendations”, Psychological
Methods 14 , Vol 14, pp. 6-23, 2009.
﹝57﹞ Jeanne M. Friedel et al.,”Achievement goals, efficacy beliefs and coping
strategies in mathematics: The roles of perceived parent and teacher goal
emphases”,Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol 32, pp. 434-458, 2007.
﹝58﹞ Joo, Y. J. , Lim, K.Y. , Kim, E.K. ,”Online university students'
satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness
and ease of use as predictors in a structural model”, Computers & Education,
Vol 57, pp. 1654-1664, 2011.
﹝59﹞ Kim, A., Park,I.,”Hierarchical structure of self-efficacy in terms of generality
levels and its relations to academic performance: General, academic,
domain-specific, and subject-specific self-sfficacy”, Paper prepared for the
Annual Meetings of the American Educational Research Association,2000.
﹝60﹞ Liem, A. D., S. Lau and Y. Nie,” The role of self-efficacy, task value, and
achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer
relationship, and achievement outcome.”, Contemporary Educational Psychology,
Vol 33, pp. 486-512, 2008.
﹝61﹞ LIU, E. Z. F. and C. H. LIN ,”The Survey Study of Mathematics
Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MMSLQ) for Grade 10–12
Taiwanese Students”, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,
9(2), pp. 221-233, 2010.
﹝62﹞ Lee, Youngju , Choi, Jaeho,“A structural equation model of predictors of online
learning retention”, Internet and Higher Education ,Vol 16, pp. 36-42, 2013.
﹝63﹞ Nasiriyan, A., H. K. Azar, A. Noruzy and M. R. Dalvand , “A Model of
Self-Efficacy, Task Value, Achievement Goals, Effort and
Mathematics Achievement”, International Journal of
Academic Research, Vol 3, pp. 612-618, 2011.
﹝64﹞ Pintrich, P. R., “An Achievement Goal Theory Perspective on Issues in
Motivation Terminology, Theory, and Research”, Contemporary Educational
Psychology, Vol 25, pp. 92-104, 2000.
﹝65﹞ Pintrich, P.and Schunk, D., ” The Role of Expectancy and Self-Efficacy Beliefs”,
Motivation in Education: Theory, Research & Applications, Ch. 3, 1996.
﹝66﹞ Pietsch, James, Richard Walker, and Elaine Chapman,”The Relationship Among
Self-Concept, Self-Efficacy, and Performance in Mathematics During Secondary
School”,Journal of educational Psychology , Vol 95, pp. 589-603, 2003.
﹝67﹞ Richardson, Suinn, “The mathematics anxiety rating scalepsychometric data”,
Journal of Counseling Psychology , Vol 19, pp. 551-555, 1972.
﹝68﹞ Silver, L. S., S. Dwyer and B. Alford,”Learning and Performance
Goal Orientation of Salespeople Revisited : The Role of
Performance-Approach and Performance-Avoidance Orientations”, Journal of
Personal Selling & Sales Management , XXVI, pp. 27-38, 2006.
﹝69﹞ Skaalvik, E. M., “Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relation
with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perception, and anixiety.”,
Journal of Education Research , Vol 97, pp. 208-220, 2004.
﹝70﹞ Stevens, Tara et al.,”Role of Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Motivation in
Mathematics Performance Across Ethnicity”,The Journal of Educational
Psychology, 89(1), pp. 71-81, 1997.
﹝71﹞ Stevens, T., A. Olivarcz, W. Y. Lan, M. K. Tallent-Runnels and T. T.
University,”Role of Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Motivation in Mathematics
Performance Across Ethnicity”, The Journal of Educational Research, Vol 97,
pp. 208-222, 2004.
﹝72﹞ Teoh, S. H.et al., “Extracting factors for students’motivation in studying mathematics.”, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Vol 41, pp. 711-724, 2010.
﹝73﹞ Tossman, I. et al., “Academic goal orientations, multiple goal profiles, and friendship intimacy among early adolescents”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol 32, pp. 231-252, 2007.
﹝74﹞ Williams, Trevor and Kitty Williams,”Self-Efficacy and Performance in
Mathematics:Reciprocal Determinism in 33 Nations”,Journal of Educational
Psychology ,Vol 102, pp. 453-466, 2010.
﹝75﹞ Weinstein, C. E., and Mayer, R. E.,”The teaching of learning strategies” Handbook of research on teaching. , pp.315-327, 1986.
﹝76﹞ Zhu, Xihe et al., “Measurement Invariance of Expectancy-Value Questionnaire in Physical Education”, Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science,Vol 16, pp. 41-54, 2012.