跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.180) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/10/15 12:21
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:駱月雲
研究生(外文):Yueh--Yun Lo
論文名稱:土肉桂不同冠層位置二氧化碳固定效益之研究
論文名稱(外文):Study on Carbon Dioxide Fixation Efficiency at Different Canopy Layers ofCinnamomum osmophlaeum
指導教授:王亞男王亞男引用關係
指導教授(外文):Prof. Ya-Nan Wang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:森林學研究所
學門:農業科學學門
學類:林業學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2003
畢業學年度:91
語文別:中文
論文頁數:60
中文關鍵詞:土肉桂、淨光合作用速率、中午抑制、葉溫、光度。
外文關鍵詞:Cinnamomum osmophlacum、net photosynthetic rate middy depression、PAR、leaf temperature。
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:324
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
選擇四年生土肉桂為試驗材料,每月分別測定上下層陽葉與蔭葉淨光合作用速率、蒸散作用速率、氣孔導度三項生理因子,以及光合作用有效光輻射、葉溫、氣溫、相對濕度、二氧化碳濃度等環境因子的日變化。藉以探討土肉桂不同冠層陽葉、蔭葉的光合作用與環境及生理因子之相關性及其主要影響因子,並進而推估全年葉部CO2固定量。
一年生盆苗在控制環境恒溫箱內蒸氣壓差維持1KPa以內,葉溫27-28℃時,測得土肉桂光飽和點約為600-700 µmol m-2s-1,最大淨光合作用速率為7.2 µmol m-2s-1。而在野外土肉桂成木,淨光合作用速率上層陽葉為5.22 µmol m-2s-1,上層蔭葉為3.10 µmol m-2s-1,下層陽葉為3.92 µmol m-2s-1,下層蔭葉為2.51 µmol m-2s-1。經成對樣本T檢定顯示,上下層陽葉與蔭葉間及上下層陽葉間,多數測定日,環境因子及淨光合作用速率及蒸散作用速率均差異顯著,但上下層蔭葉間則差異不顯著。光度與葉溫為多數測定日影響陽葉光合作用的主要因子,而光度多為蔭葉光合作用的主要影響因子。在晴朗炎熱的天候,上層陽葉淨光合作用速率日變化有明顯的中午抑制現象而呈雙峰趨勢。
累計一日9小時土肉桂陽葉平均每平方公尺面積可固定6.52 g CO2,蔭葉為4.01 g CO2。
The efficiency of carbon dioxide fixation of Cinnamomum osmophlacum Kaneh was analyzed by measuring net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance rate and other environmental factor in this study in the field monthly.
Effects of temperature , light, CO2, vapor pressure deficit(VPD) on photosynthetic rates of Cinnamamum osmophlacum Kaneh leaves were investigated on photosynthetic characteristics by portable photosynthetic system and self-organized environmental control system. When VPD was below 1.0KPa in ambient CO2 concentration light saturation point is 600-700µmolm-2s-1. Maximum Pn was about 7.2 µmolm-2s-1 under light intensity above 600 µmolm-2s-1, leaf temperature between 27-28℃.
In the field , the upper sun-leaf average net photosynthetic rate was 5.22 µmolm-2s-1. For the upper shadow-leaf, the lower sun-leaf and the lower shadow-leaf , they are 3.10, 3.92, 2.51 µmolm-2s-1 respectively
According to the result of paired t-test analysis, it has significantly difference between the sun-leaf and the shadow-leaf and between the upper and lower canopy layer of the sun-leaf in photosynthesis, transpiration and environmental factors, but is not between the upper and lower canopy layer of shadow-leaf. PAR and leaf temperature are the major influence factors of sun-leaf and PAR is the major influence factor of shadow -leaf in photosynthesis in many experiment days. Under sunny and hot day, diurnal changes showed two peaks with middy depression for the upper sun-leaf.
The CO2 fixation efficiency in 9 hours during the daytime that of sun-leaf of Cinnamomum osmophlacum Kaneh was 6.52 g m-2s-1, and that of shadow-leaf was 4.01g m-2s-1.
謝誌 I
中文摘要 II
英文摘要 III
目錄 V
圖目錄 VII
表目錄 VIII
一、前言 1
二、前人研究 4
2.1土肉桂的形態分類與育苗栽植等相關研究 4
2.1.1土肉桂形態分類與相關種的鑑別 4
2.1.2土肉桂育苗與栽植等相關研究 5
2.2影響光合作用的環境因子 6
2.2.1光度 6
2.2.2溫度 8
2.2.3二氧化碳 9
2.2.4水分 11
2.3影響光合作用的生理因子 11
2.3.1葉齡 11
2.3.2日變化與季節變化 13
2.3.3呼吸作用 14
2.3.4樹齡 15
2.3.5葉片的結構和配置 15
三、試驗材料及方法 16
3.1試驗地概況 16
3.2試驗材料 18
3.3試驗儀器 18
3.4試驗方法 21
3.4.1控制環境苗木生理活動的測定 21
3.4.2植物園現場生理活動的測定 22
3.5資料統計分析 23
3.6葉部CO2固定量之推估 24
3.6.1葉面積之測定 24
3.6.2葉部CO2固定量之推估 24
四、結果 26
4.1控制環境苗木生理活動的測定 26
4.2土肉桂不同冠層位置淨光合作用、蒸散作用與氣孔導度
日變化及其平均值 29
4.2.1上層陽葉 29
4.2.2上層蔭葉 32
4.2.3下層陽葉 35
4.2.4下層蔭葉 35
4.2.5綜合比較各層陽葉與蔭葉 36
4.3影響土肉桂冠層淨光合作用的環境和生理因子 37
4.4葉部年CO2固定量的推估 44
4.4.1葉面積的計算 44
4.4.2葉部年CO2固定量的推估 45
五、討論 46
5.1土肉桂的光飽和點與中午抑制現象 46
5.2土肉桂不同冠層位置葉片淨光合作用速率日變化 47
5.3影響土肉桂冠層葉片淨光合作用之環境及生理因子 48
5.4葉部年CO2固定量的推估 49
六、結論 51
七、參考文獻 52
八、附錄 59
圖目錄
圖3.1 試驗地位置圖 17
圖3.2 CI-301PS攜帶式光合作用測定儀 19
圖4.1土肉桂盆苗葉片淨光合作用速率(Pn)與光度(PAR)的關係 26
圖4.2 土肉桂盆苗葉片氣孔導度(C)與光度(PAR)之關係 27
圖4.3 土肉桂盆苗葉片葉肉細胞間隙二氧化碳濃度(Ci)與
光度(PAR)之關係 28
圖4.4 2003年4月12日土肉桂環境因子,淨光合作用速率,
蒸散作用速率與氣孔導度日變化圖 31
圖4.5 2003年6月13日土肉桂環境因子,淨光合作用速率、
蒸散作用速率與氣孔導度日變化圖 34
圖4.6 土肉桂冠層陽葉、蔭葉各測定日二氧化碳固定量 50
表目錄
表3.1 CI-301PS光合作用測定系統資料擷取光合作用
與相關生理參數 20
表4.1 土肉桂各測定日光合作用參數之平均測值 30
表4.2 土肉桂各測定日光合作用參數在不同位置差異顯著
性的比較 39
表4.3 土肉桂各測定日葉溫、光度、淨光合作用速率、蒸散
作用速率及氣孔導度綜合比較不同位置葉片差異顯著
日數統計表 40
表4.4 影響土肉桂冠層陽葉淨光合作用之環境及生理因子 41
表4.5 影響土肉桂冠層蔭葉淨光合作用之環境及生理因子 42
表4.6 土肉桂陽葉與蔭葉日淨光合作用率與日淨光合作用量
及CO2固定量 43
表4.7 土肉桂全株陽葉、蔭葉平均葉面積 44
表4.8 土肉桂冠層陽葉與蔭葉一日及一年CO2固定量 45
王亞男 2000 柳杉、樟樹對溫室氣體效益之研究 八十九年度國科會/環保署科技合作研究計畫期末報告41頁。
王立志 1997 氣候變遷對台灣林業的損害評估與適應策略之研擬(一) 行政院環保署研究發展計畫期中報告 EPA-86-FA41-09-80。
呂勝由、楊遠波 1986 台灣胡氏肉桂之確認。 中華林學季刊119(4):113-117。
金恒鑣 1993 森林與地球環境變遷 森林資源經營研討會論文集 第1-12頁。
林俊成、鄭美如、劉淑芬、李國忠 2002 全民造林運動二氧化碳吸存潛力之經濟效益評估 台灣林業科學 17(3):311-321。
林素貞、張子見 1996 由OECD數國溫室效益行方案與策略探討我國因應之道 能源季刊 26(4):2-12。
林讚標、吳濟琛 1992 土肉桂扦插繁殖與種子苗培育 土肉桂專論 第15-30頁。
洪儷文 2002 樟樹不同冠層位置之光合作用淨生產力 國立台灣大學森林研究所碩士論文 49頁。
胡大維、林耀堂、何政坤 1985 台灣土肉桂葉部精油化學成分之然變異 台灣省林業試驗所抽印本No.78。
翁仁憲 1996 作物之光合、呼吸及蒸散作用與其環境適應性之關係
中華農業氣象 3(1):1-7。
郭耀綸 2000 南仁山熱帶低地雨林白榕冠層及林下植物的光合作用 台灣林業科學15(3):351-363。
廖日京 1989 台灣樟科植物之學名訂正 著者自行出版。
廖述惠 2002 樟樹與台灣櫸於林下栽植二氧化碳固定效益之研究 國立台灣大學森林研究所碩士論文 61頁。
潘富俊 1992 土肉桂的分類地位 土肉桂專論 第7-14頁。
鄭廷康 1991 土肉桂的栽植造林 藥用及保健植研討會專集 第28-45頁。
Amundson, R. G. ,J. L. Hadley, J. F Fincher,S. Fellows, and R. G. Alscher. 1992. Comparisons of seasonal changes in photosynthetic capacity, pigments, and carbohydrates of declining and healthy red sprude. Can. J. For. Res. 22:1605-1616.
Berry, J. and O. Bjorkman 1980 Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperture in higher plant. Ann. Rev.Plant Physiol. 31:491-543.
Cornic G. and J. Ghashaie 1991 Effect of temperature on net CO2 assimilation and photosystem II quantum yield of electron transfer of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) leaves during drought stress. Planta 185:255-260
Coughenour, M. B. 1991 Dwarf shrub and graminoid responses to clipping, nitrogen and water:simplified simulations of responses to nitrogen dynamics. Ecological Modelling. 54:81-110.
Demming-Adams, B.,W. W. Adams and S. C. Grace 1997 Physiology of light tolerance in plants. Hort. Rev. 18:215-246.
Downton, W. J. S., W. J. R. Grant and B. R. Loveys. 1987 Diurnal changes in the photosynthesis of field-growth grape virus. New Phytol. 105:71-80.
Farquhar, G. D. and T. D. Sharkey. 1982. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33:31-345.
Flore, J. A., and A. N. Lasko 1989 Environmental and physiological requlation of photosynthesis in fruit crops. Hort. Rev. 11:111-157.
Geiger, D. R. and J. C. Servaites. 1994 Diurnal regulation of photosynthetic carbon metabolism in C3 plant. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.38:11-45.
Grange, R. I. And D. W. Hand. 1987. A review of the effect of atmospheric humidity on the growth of horticultural crops. J. Hort. Sci. 62:125-134.
Hollinger, D. Y. 1992 Leaf and simulated whole-canopy photosynthesis in two co-occurrung tree species. Ecology 73:1-14.
Hopkins, W. G. 1995 Carbon assimilation and productive in Hopkins W. G. (eds.) Introduction to Plant Physiology John Wiley&Sons, Inc. New York.
Hutchison, K.W., C. D. Sherman, J. Weber, S. S. Smith, P. B. Singer, and H. S. Greenwood. 1990. Maturation in larch. II. Effects of age on photosynthesis and gene expression in developing foliage. Plant Physiol. 94:1308-1315.
Kozlowski, T. T., P. J. Kramer and S. G. Pallardy 1991 The physiological ecology of wood plants Academic Press inc. Harcourt Brace Jovanovidh, Publishers.
Kramer, P. J. and T. T. Kozlowski 1960 Photosynthesis. In:Physiology of Trees pp.59-97 McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
Kramer, R. J. and J. S. Boyer. 1995 Stomatal and gas exchange. In : Water Relations of Plants and Soils. pp.257-282.
Kromer, S. 1995 Respiration during Photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 46:45-70.
Lawlor A. W. 1995 Photosynthesis, productivity and environment. Journal of Experimental Botany 46:1449-1461.
Layne. D. R. and J. A. Flore. 1995 End-product inhibition of photosynthesis in Prunus cerasus L. in response to whole-plant source-sink manipulation . J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 120:583-599.
Marimuthu S., R. Raj Kumar, and L. Manivel 1994 Factors affecting partitioning of assimilates in tea. J. Nuclear Agr. Biol. 23:210-223.
Nii, N. T. Watanabe, K. Yamagudi and M. Nishimura 1995 Changes of anatomical features, Photosynthesis and ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenae content of mango leaves. Ann. Bot. 76:649-656.
Nobel, P. S. 1991. Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology. Academin Press.
Owens, M. K. 1996 The role of leaf canopy-level gas exchange in the replacement of Quercus viginiana (Fagaceae) by Juniperus ashei (Cupressaceae) in semiarid savannas. Amerrica Journal of Botany 83(5):617-623.
Pearcy R. W. 1987 Photosynthetic gas exchange responses of Australian tropical forest trees in canopy, gap and understory micro-environments. Funct. Ecol. 1:169-178.
Pierce M. and K. Raschke 1981 Synthesis and metabolism of abscisic acid in detached leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris L. after loss and recovery of turgor. Plant Physiol.35:15-44.
Powels S. B. 1984 Photoinhibition of photosynthesis induced by visible lighe. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35:15-44.
Rajkumar R., L. Manivel and S. Marimuthu 1998 Longevity and factors influencing phothsynthesis in tea leaves. Photosynthetica 35(1):41-46.
Roper, T. R., and R. A. Kennedy 1986 Photosynthetic characteristics during leaf development in “Bing” sweet cherry J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111:938-941.
Salisbury, F. B. and C. W. Ross. 1992 Plant Physiology. 4th edition, The Wadsworth publishing company, Inc.
Schaper, H. and E. K. Chacko 1993 Effect of irradiance, leaf age, chlorophyll content and branch girdling on gas exchange of cashew (Anacardium accidentale L.) leaves. J. Hort. Sci. 68:54-550.
Schulze, E. D. 1986. Carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange in response to drought in the atmosphere and in the soil. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 37:247-274.
Shimazaki, K. M. Linon, and E. Zeiger 1986 Blue light-dependent proton extrusion by guard-cell protoplasts of Vicia fuba. Nature 319:324-326.
Suzuki, S. H. Nakamoto., M. S. B. Ku., and G. E. Edwards 1987 Influence of leaf age an Photosynthesis, enzyme activity, and metabolite levels in Wheat Plant Physiol. 84:1244-1248.
Taiz and E. Zeiger 1998 Plant Phsiology. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc..
Tezara, W., M. D. Fernandez, C. Donoso and A. Herrera. 1998 Seasonal changes in photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of five plant species from a semiarid ecosystem. Photosynthetica.35:399-410.
Thomas, D. S. and D. W. Turner. 1998a. Leaf age and environmental effects on gas exchange in leaves of bananas (cv. Williams) growing in a hot, arid environment, J. Hort. Sci. and Biotech. 73:734-780.
Williams, T. G. and L. B. Flanagan. 1998 Measuring and modeling environmental influences on photosynthetic gas exchange in Sphagnum and Pleurozium. Plant Cell and Environment. 21:555-564.
Willmer, C. and M. Fricker. 1996. Stomata. Chapman& Hall. London.Yamane, Y., Y. Kashino, H Koike and K. Satoh. 1998 Effects of high temperatures on the photosynthetic system in spinach:oxygen-evolving activities fluorescence characteristics and the denaturation process. Photosyn. Res.57:51-59.
Yamada, M., H. Fukumachi and T. Hidaka 1996 Photosynthesis in longan and mango as influenced by high temperatures under high irradiance. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 64:749-756.
Zelitch, I. 1975 Improving the efficiency of Photosynthesis. Science 188:626-633.
Zotz G. and K. Winter 1993 Short-term photosynthesis measurement predict leaf carbon balance in tropical rain-forest canopy plants. Planta 191:409-412.
Zotz. G. and K. Winter 1996 Diel pattern of CO2 exchange in rainforest canopy plants. In:Mulkey SS, Chazdon RL, Smith AP, Editors. Tropical forest plant ecophysiology. New York:Chapman and Hall. p.89-113.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top