臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

消費者的購買行為錯綜複雜，了解消費者對於產品的觀點與認知能作為製造商開發新產品的依據，而零售商也能為此制定行銷策略。本研究將探討消費者對產品特徵的看法及認知到的產品差異，並以現今最流行的機能性紡織品作為研究範圍，研究消費者在購買機能性紡織品時的資訊搜尋、產品知識以及商品帶來的知覺價值，對購買意願之影響，同時研究加入涉入程度時的干擾效果。
機能性紡織品的終端運用原以運動用及戶外用紡織品為主，但因應人們逐漸轉向「部份運動、部分日常生活」的生活型態，因此出現了強調時尚感的機能性紡織品，稱之為「機能性時尚紡織品」。現今，時尚品牌與運動戶外用品品牌皆朝向時尚結合機能的方向邁進，以擴大原有市場。
本研究以問卷方式進行量化分析，探討不同類型的消費者對機能性時尚紡織品之「機能」與「時尚」兩種產品屬性的看法，並使用結構方程模型驗證假設模型之配適度，以分析購買行為構面對購買意願的影響。問卷回收樣本共391份，有效樣本共378份，有效回收率達96.7%。
實證結果顯示，消費者視單一機能為垂直特徵，面對多機能時將以對單一機能的偏好排序，仍視為垂直特徵；時尚型消費者視時尚為水平特徵、視機能為先垂直後水平之複合特徵；機能型消費者視時尚為以品牌/價格等外在線索主導的垂直特徵、視機能為垂直特徵。消費者之「搜尋資訊程度」、「產品知識」及「知覺價值」皆正向影響對機能性紡織品之「購買意願」，此外，涉入程度也確實會造成干擾效果。

Consumers’purchasing behavior is complicated of many reasons. Realizing consumers’ perspectives on products can help manufacturers and retailers to develop or sell new products. This research is focusing on horizontal and vertical differentiation on function-fashionable fibers, the most famous fibers nowadays. We would also like to know how consumers’ purchasing behavior, such as information searching, product knowledge and customer perceived value, will impact on purchase intentions. Simontaneously, we analyze the degree of involvement as a moderator to see whether it will disturb between those behavior and purchase intension.
Fuctional fibers are most used in sports and outdoor textiles. With lifestyle changing, functional fibers with fashion are more and more on the market, called “function-fashionable fibers”. Fashion and outdoor brands try hard to combine fashion and function together to expand their market size.
This research is developed by quantitative analysis and structural equation model with questionnaire. We discussed about consumers’ perspective on two product attributes, function and fashion, and also analyzed purchasing behavior’s effects on purchase intensions. The results demonstrate that single function is vertical attribute, multiple functions will be considered as single function as vertical attribute. Consumers’ purchasing behavior is positive effect on purchase intentions. Furthermore, the degree of involvement actually caused the disturbance between those behavior and purchase intension.

目錄
口試委員會審定書 #
致謝 i
摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究問題分析 3
1.3 研究目的 4
1.4 研究範圍 5
1.5 研究流程 6
第二章 文獻探討 8
2.1 產品特性差異相關研究 8
2.1.1 產品特性(product attributes) 8
2.1.2 產品差異化(product differentiation) 10
2.1.3 產品特性在二維空間中表示 10
2.2 消費者行為相關研究 11
2.2.1 消費者購買行為的類型 11
2.2.2 產品資訊搜尋程度 13
2.2.3 產品知識 15
2.2.4 知覺價值的衡量 16
2.2.5 購買意願 16
2.3 涉入程度相關研究 18
2.3.1 消費者涉入程度(Consumer involvement) 18
2.3.2 涉入程度與消費者行為 18
2.3.3 涉入程度的測量 20
2.4 機能性紡織品介紹 21
2.4.1 台灣紡織產業發展概述 21
2.4.2 台灣為機能性紡織品最佳供應商 21
2.4.3 台灣機能性紡織品發展狀況 22
2.4.4 機能性時尚紡織品 22
2.5 研究使用方法 23
2.5.1 李克特量表(Likert scale) 23
2.5.2 生活型態構面量表(ICP, Integrated Consumer Profile)24
2.5.3 聯合分析法(Conjoint Analysis) 24
2.5.4 結構方程模型(Structural Equation Model, SEM) 25
第三章 研究設計 31
3.1 概念架構及研究假說 31
3.1.1 機能性紡織品之產品屬性 31
3.1.2 消費者對機能性紡織品的購前行為對購買意願之影響 33
3.2 研究變數與操作型定義 35
3.3 問卷調查與設計 37
3.3.1 研究對象及抽樣設計 37
3.3.2 問卷設計 38
3.3.3 問卷前測 38
3.3.4 資料分析與統計方法 41
第四章 實證結果 43
4.1 樣本結構分析 43
4.2 研究結果描述 45
4.2.1 機能性紡織品之產品屬性結果分析 45
4.2.2 第一部份(機能性紡織品之產品屬性)假說統整表 51
4.3 信度效度分析與相關分析 52
4.3.1 信度分析 52
4.3.2 效度分析 54
4.3.3 相關分析 54
4.4 結構方程模式分析 55
4.4.1 驗證性因素分析(Confirmatory Factor Analysis,CFA)56
4.4.2 路徑分析 60
4.4.3 影響效果分析-機能性紡織品之消費者購買行為 63
4.4.4 干擾效果 64
第五章 研究結果與討論 72
5.1 研究結論 72
5.1.1 機能性紡織品之產品屬性 72
5.1.2 機能性紡織品之消費者購買行為 73
5.2 管理意涵與建議 74
5.3 研究限制 77
5.4 未來研究方向 77
參考文獻 79
附錄(正式問卷) 86

中文部分
[1]三分鐘熱度，2014/11/01，「家庭號」讓人生更憂鬱！14個你不該去Costco的理由，商業週刊，職場力，心靈成長。
[2]李國慶、周庭銳、陳淑青，2006，品牌知覺影響下消費者購買行為的分類研究，商場現代化-品牌戰略2006年5月（上旬刊）總第466期。
[3]周文賢，1999，行銷管理-市場分析與策略規劃，智勝文化出版社。
[4]林靈宏、張魁峰，2006，消費者行為學，第二版，五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
[5]胡凱傑，2003，應用服務品質量表與知覺價值模式探討旅客再消費意願之影響因素：以汽車客運業為例，交通大學運輸科技與管理學系博士論文。
[6]宮瑞雲，1990，女性化妝品消費者購買動機之研究-以台北市女性市民為例，國立交通大學管理科學系所碩士論文。
[7]財團法人紡織產業綜合研究所，2014年11月，機能性時尚紡織品形成策略聯盟之市場利基研析，p.7-8。
[8]陳寬裕，王正華，2011，論文統計分析實務：SPSS與AMOS的運用，第二版，五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
[9]楊雅民，2012/10/15，張嗣漢︰差異化才能打敗不景氣，自由時報
[10]經濟部國際貿易局-中華民國紡織業拓展會，2007年6月，機能性紡織品競爭力與市場發展分析 (外觀變化機能)，p.2-4。
[11]經濟部國際貿易局-中華民國紡織業拓展會，2007年6月，機能性紡織品競爭力與市場發展分析 (物理現象機能)，p.1-39。
[12]經濟部國際貿易局-中華民國紡織業拓展會，2014年4月，2013年紡織工業概況，p.1-12。
英文部分
[1]Aaker, D.A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, New York: The Free Press
[2]Anderson, J.C. & Gerbing, D.W. (1988), Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), p.411-423.
[3]Assael, H. (1981), Consumer Behavior and Executive Action, Boston: Kent.
[4]Assael, H. (1998), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action, 6th edition, US: South-Western College Publishing, p.388-399.
[5]Baumgartner, H. (2002), “Toward A Personality of the Consumer,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), p.286-292.
[6]Beales, H., Jagis, M.B., Salop, S.C. & Staelin, R. (1981), “Consumer Search and Public Policy,” Journal of Consumer Research, p.12-21.
[7]Beatty, S.E. & Smith, S.M. (1987), “External search effort: An investigation across several product categories,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14(1), p.83-96.
[8]Bettman, J.R. & Zins, M.A. (1979), “Information Format and Choice Task Effects in Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Research 6.
[9]Bigné, J.E., Sánchez, M.I. & Sánchez, J. (2001), “Tourism image, evaluation variables and after purchase behavior: inter-relationship,” Tourism Management, 22(6), p.607-616.
[10]Bollen, K.A. (1989), Structure Equations with Latent Variable, New York: John Wiely and Sons.
[11]Brannon, L.A., & McCabe, A.E. (2001), “Time-restricted sales appeals: The importance of offering real value,” Cornell Hotel & Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 42(4), p.47-52.
[12]Brucks, M. (1985), “The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12, p.1-16.
[13]Chang, T.Z. & Wildt, A.R. (1994), “Price, Product Information, and Purchase Intention: An Empirical Study,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(1), p.16-27.
[14]Comrey, A.L. (1988), “Factor-Analytic Methods of Scale Development in Personality and Clinical Psychology,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(5), p.754-761.
[15]Dawes, J. (2008), "Do Data Characteristics Change According to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales," International Journal of Market Research, 50 (1), p.61-77.
[16]Dodds, B.W., Monroe, K.B. & Grewal, D. (1991), “Effect of Price, Band, and Store Information on Buybers Product Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), p.307-319.
[17]Engel, J.F., Blackwell, R.D. & Miniard, P.W. (1995), “Consumer Behavior,” 8th edition, Fort Worth, Dryden.
[18]Fan, X., Thompson, B. & Wang, L. (1999), “Effects of sample size, estimation method, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes,” Structural Equation Modeling, 6, p.56-83.
[19]Fishbein, M. (1963), “An Investigation of the Relationships between Beliefs About an Object and the Attitude toward That Object," Human relations, 16 (3), p.233.
[20]Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), p.39-50.
[21]Garretson, J.A. & Clow, K.E. (1999), “The Influence of Coupon Face Value on Service Quality Expectations, Risk Perceptions and Purchase Intentions in the Dental Industry.” The Journal of Services Marketing, 13, No.1, p.59-72.
[22]Hackleman, E.C. & Duker, J.M. (1980), “Deal Proneness and Heavy Usage: Merging Two Segmentation Criteria,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 8(4), p.332-344.
[23]Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R. & Tatham, R. (2006), Multivariate data analysis, 6th edition, Uppersaddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
[24]Hair, J.F.Jr., Anderson, R.E. & Tatham, R.L. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice-Hall, U.S.A.
[25]Harmon-Jones, E., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2002), “Testing the action-based model of cognitive dissonance: The effect of action-orientation on post-decisional attitudes,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, p.711-723.
[26]Hawkins, D.I., Best, R.J., & Coney, K.A. (2001), Consumer behavior: building marketing strategy, 8th edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
[27]Hirschman, E.C., & Holbrook, M.B. (1982), “Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions,” Journal of Marketing, 46, p.92-101.
[28]Howard, J.A. & Sheth, J.N. (1969), The Theory of Buyer Behavior. New York: John Willey & Sons.
[29]Jacoby, J. (1971), “A Model of Multi-Brand Loyal,” Journal of Adverting Research, 11, p.25-30.
[30]Jacoby, J., & Kyner, D.B. (1973), “Brand Loyalty Versus Repeat Purchasing Behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research, 10, p.1-9.
[31]Johnson, E.J. & Russo, J.E. (1984), “Product Familiarity and Learning New Information”, Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), p.542-550.
[32]Kline, R.B. (2005), Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd edition, New York: Guilford Press.
[33]Kotler, P. (1997), Marketing Management-Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 9th edition, NJ: Prentice-Hall International, p.313-314.
[34]Krikelas, J. (1983), Information-seeking behavior: patterns and concepts, Drexel Library Quarterly, 19(2), p.5-20.
[35]Krugman, H.E. (1965). “The impact of television advertising learning without involvement”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, p.349-356.
[36]Lancaster, K. (1979), “Variety, efficiency and equity,” chapter2.
[37]Liebermann, Y. & Flint-Goor, A. (1996), “Message Strategy by Product-class Type: A Matching Model,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, p.237-249.
[38]MacCallum, R.C. & Hong, S. (1997), “Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), p.193-210
[39]MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W., & Sugawara, H.M. (1996), “Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling,” Psychological Methods, 1, p.130-149.
[40]Maggard, J.P. (1976), “Positioning revisited,” Journal of Marketing, 40, p.63-67.
[41]Maslow, A.H. (1954), “Motivation and Personality,” New York: Harper & Row.
[42]McCarthy, E.J. (1975), “Basic Marketing: A Managerial Approach,” 5th edition, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., p.37.
[43]McQuarrie, E.F. & Munson, J.M. (1987), “The Zaichkowsky Personal Involvement Inventory: Modification and Extension,” Advances in Consumer Research, 14, p.36-40.
[44]Monroe, K.B. (1990), “Pricing: Making Profitable Decision,” 2nd edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
[45]Monroe, K.B., & Krishnan, R. (1985), “The effect of price on subjective product evaluations,” in Perceived Quality, edited by Jacoby, J. & Olson, J., MA: Lexington Books, p.209-232.
[46]Muncy, J. A. (1990), “Involvement and Perceived Brand Similarities/Differences: The Need for Process Oriented Models,” Advances in Consumer Research, 17, p.144-148.
[47]Myers, J.H. & Alpert, M.I. (1968), “Determinant Buying Attitudes: Meaning and Measurement,” Journal of Marketing, 32 (October), p.13-20.
[48]Nunnally, J. (1967), Psychometric theory, New York, NY : McGraw-Hill, p. 21-32.
[49]Olson, J.C. & Jacoby, J. (1972), “Cue Utilization in the Quality Perception Process,” in Proceeding of the Third Annual Conference of the Association For Consumer Research, Association for Consumer Research, p.167-179.
[50]Olson, J.C. (1978), “Inferential Belief Formation in the Cue Utilization Process,” Advances in Consumer Research, 5, p.706-713.
[51]Park, C.W. & Lessig, V.P. (1981), “Familiarity And Its Impact On Consumer Decision Biases And Heuristic”, Journal of Consumer Research, 8(2), p.223-230.
[52]Park, C.W., Feick, L. & Mothersbaugh, D.L. (1992), “Consumer Knowledge Assessment-How Product Experience And Knowledge Of Brands, Attributes, And Features Affects What Think We Know”, Advances In Consumer Research, 19(3), p.193-198.
[53]Payne, J.W. (1976),”Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, p.366-387.
[54]Peter, J.P., & Olson, J.C. (1993), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy, IRWIN, p.225
[55]Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986), Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
[56]Pitts, R.E., Wong, J.K., & Whalen, D.J. (1991), “Consumers'' Evaluative Structures in Two Ethical Situations: A Means-End Approach,” Journal of Business Research, 22, p.119-130.
[57]Quester, P.G. & Smart, J. (1998), “The Influence of Consumption Situation and Product Involvement over Consumers’ Use of Product Attribute,” The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15 (3), p.220-238.
[58]Rao, A.R. & Monroe, K.B. (1988), “The Moderating Effect Of Prior Knowledge On Cue Utilization In Product Evaluations”, Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), p.253-264.
[59]Ray, M.L. (1973). “Marketing communications and the hierarchy of effects. In P Clarke (ed.)”, New Models for Mass Communication Research, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
[60]Reichheld, F.F. (1996), “The Loyalty Effect: The Hidden Force Behind Growth, Profit, and Lasting Value,” Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
[61]Reynolds, F.D. & Wells, W.D. (1977), “Consumer Behavior,” New York, Mcgraw-Hill.
[62]Rook, D.W. (1987), “The Buying Impulse,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (September), p.189-199
[63]Roscoe, J. T. (1975), Fundamental Research Statistics for The Behavior Sciences. N.Y. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
[64]Roth, M.S. (1995), “The Effect of Culture and Socioeconomic on the Performance of Global Brand Image Strategies,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32(May), p.163-175.
[65]Rudell, F. (1979), Consumer Food Selection and Nutrition Information, New York: Praeger.
[66]Rust, R. & Oliver, R.L. (1994), “Service quality: Insights and managerial implications from the frontier,” New York: Sage Publication, p.1-19.
[67]Schmidt, J.B. & Spreng, R.A. (1996), A proposed model of external consumer information search, Journal Greenvale, 24(3), p.246-256.
[68]Schoell, W.F. & Guiltinan, J.P. (1993), Marketing Essentials, Kluwer Academic Publishers Press.
[69]Schumacker, R.E. & Lomax, R.G. (2004), A Beginner''s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd edition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ.
[70]Solomon, M.R. (1996), Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being, 3rd edition, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
[71]Stanton, W.J., & Etzel, M.J. (1991), “Fundamentals Marketing,” 9th edition, p.168.
[72]Sultan F. (1999), “Consumer Preferences for Forthcoming Innovations: the Case of High Definition Television,” The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(1), p.24-41.
[73]Takashima, K. (2010), “Product attributes, product differentiation, and market segmentation,” Unpublished dissertation, Kobe University, Japan, p.1-13.
[74]Thaler, R. (1983), “Transaction Utility Theory,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Richard P. Bagozzi and Alice M. Tybout, eds. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 10, p.296-301.
[75]Walker, B.A., Celsi, R. & Olson, J.C. (1986), “Exploring the Structural Characteristics of Consumers'' Knowledge,” Advances in Consumer Research 14, p.17-21.
[76]Zaichkowsky, J.L. (1985), “Measuring the involvement construct,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34(12), p.1-352.
[77]Zaichkowsky, J.L. (1994), “Research notes: The personal involvement inventory: reduction, revision, and application to advertising,” Journal of Advertising.
[78]Zeithaml, V. A. (1988), “Consumer Percep¬tions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, 52, No. July, p.2-22.
[79]Ziethaml, V.A. & Kirmani, A. (1993), “Advertising, Perceived Quality, and Brand Image,” in Brand Equity & Advertising: Advertising’s Role in Building Strong Brands, edited by Aaker, D.A. & Alexander L.B., Iowa City: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., p.143-161.