跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.24) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/29 01:22
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:李佳玲
研究生(外文):Lee, Cha-Lin
論文名稱:分析師預測歧異度與修正量對股權價值評估之攸關性
論文名稱(外文):The Relevance of Analysts’ Forecast Dispersions and Revisions for the Valuation of Equity Price
指導教授:金慶平金慶平引用關係
指導教授(外文):King, Chin-Ping
口試委員:莊雅雪陳育成
口試委員(外文):Chuang, Ya-HsuehChen, Yu-Cheng
口試日期:2014-06-19
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:靜宜大學
系所名稱:財務金融學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:中文
論文頁數:41
中文關鍵詞:股權評價分析師預測歧異度預測修正量
外文關鍵詞:Equity ValuationAnalystsForecast DispersionsForecast Revisions
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:661
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:67
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
在評估股票價格時,一般是使用公司的財務報表資訊來進行分析與判斷,而Ohlson(1995)股權評價模型則將公司財務報表中的會計數據與其他可能影響股價的重要非會計資訊,譬如分析師對盈餘的共識預測(consensus forecast),整合在一起來評估股票價格。

然而在影響股價的非會計資訊中,除了分析師的共識預測之外,分析師在盈餘預測上的歧異程度與分析師對盈餘預測的修正幅度也隱含著許多重要的訊息,因此也有可能對股票價格產生影響。本文依循與延伸Ohlson(1995) 模型,研究分析師盈餘預測的歧異度與分析師盈餘預測的修正量在公司股權評價中的作用。依據財務理論,分析師在盈餘預測上的歧異程度對股價應呈負向影響,因為當分析師預測歧異度增加時,表示公司與分析師之間的資訊不對稱現象比較嚴重,不同分析師彼此間對公司未來盈餘的看法呈現比較大的分歧,代表這家公司營運上的風險增加,對股價應會產生負面的影響。此外,若分析師盈餘預測是向上修正,表示公司未來的盈餘會增加,所以股價應該上漲,但若分析師對盈餘預測是向下修正,則表示公司未來的盈餘不如原先的預期,所以公司股價應會下跌。因此分析師盈餘預測的修正量向上修正時,股價也會跟著向上修正,而分析師盈餘預測的修正量向下修正時,股價也會跟著向下修正,所以這之間的關係應為正向的,代表分析師預測修正量與股價之間為同方向變動。

本文依循Ohlson(1995)模型,從股利折現模型( discounted dividend model)出發,並假定乾淨盈餘會計關係(clean surplus relation),而本文將Ohlson(1995)模型中的線性動態資訊系統(linear dynamic information system)擴展為包括了分析師預測歧異度、分析師預測修正量以及其他相關會計或非會計變數的一階向量自迴歸模型(VAR(1) model),並由此推導出包括分析師預測歧異度與分析師預測修正量的股權評價模型。本文使用2000年至2011年間,台灣141家上市公司的時間序列與橫斷面資料來對本文的股權評價模型進行實證研究。實證結果發現分析師預測歧異度與分析師預測修正量的估計係數之正負符號與預期的一致,但估計係數並不顯著,而敏感度分析也顯示了實證結果的穩健性。此外包括了分析師預測歧異度、分析師預測修正量的股權評價模型也具有較佳的樣本外預測能力。

While we evaluate the stock prices of corporations, we often take the financial statements as a basis and engage in investigating the information contained in the financial statements in order to determine the proper stock price. However Ohlson(1995) equity valuation model combine accounting numbers in the financial statements and other important non-accounting information which may affect share price, like analysts’ consensus forecast, to jointly determine the stock price of corporations.

Among the non-accounting factors which may affect stock price, analysts’ consensus forecast is not an unique factor. Analysts’ forecast dispersions and revisions contain much significant information, so they are also other possible factors which may have impacts on the stock price. Hence we follow and extend Ohlson(1995) model to study the effects of analysts’ forecast dispersions and revisions on the equity price. According to the finance theory, analysts’ forecast dispersions represent asymmetric information between corporations and analysts. More serious analysts’ forecast dispersions are, more unstable the future performance of corporations is. When the analysts’ opinions about corporation diverse severely than before, then the risk of operation of corporations increase. Therefore analysts’ forecast dispersions have negative effect on the share price. Moreover analysts adjust his forecast upward, this means the future earnings of corporation will increase. So share price should rise. If Analysts adjust his forecast downward, then this means the future earnings of corporation will decrease. So share price should fall. Therefore analysts’ forecast revisions and share price will move in the same direction.

We follow Ohlson(1995) model to start with discounted dividend model and to postulate clean surplus accounting relation. Besides we also extend linear dynamic information system of Ohlson(1995) model to incorporate analysts’ forecast dispersions and revisions. Hence the linear dynamic information system in our model is designed as first-order vector autoregressive model (VAR(1) model) which include analysts’ forecast dispersions, analysts’ forecast revisions and other relevant accounting variables and non-accounting variable. Based on these setting, we can derive our equity valuation model with analysts’ forecast dispersion and revisions. We use time series and cross sectional data sampled from 2000 to 2011 and 141 listed corporations in Taiwan centralized market to conduct empirical studies. Empirical results reveal that the signs of estimated coefficients about analysts’ forecast dispersions and revisions coincide with the predictions, but the estimates are not significant. However sensitivity analysis also reveals that the empirical results are robust. Besides, our equity valuation model with analysts’ forecast dispersions and revisions also has better out-of sample forecast abilities.

摘要 I
Abstract II
謝辭 IV
目錄 V
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第三章 具有分析師預測歧異度與修正量的股權評價模型
第一節 剩餘所得股權評價模型 18
第二節 線性動態資訊系統 20
第三節 分析師對盈餘預測的歧異度與修正量 22
第四節 具有分析師盈餘預測歧異度與修正量的Ohlson股權評價模型 24
第四章 實證結果
第一節 資料來源與樣本敘述統計量 27
第二節 線性動態資訊系統VAR(1)模型的估計 29
第三節 股權評價模型的估計與檢定 31
第四節 模型的樣本外預測能力 33
第五節 敏感性分析 34
第五章 結論 36
參考文獻 37

英文部分:

Athanassakos, G., Madhu Kalimipalli, “Analyst forecast dispersion and future stock return volatility.”, Quarterly Journal of Business & Economics 42(1-2):57-78.

Avramov, D., Tarun Chordia, Gergana Jostova, Alexander Philipov (2007), “Dispersion in Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts and Credit Rating.”, 1-40.

Barron, O. E., Mary Stanford, Yong Yu (2005), “Further evidence on the relation between analysts’ forecast dispersion and stock returns.” ,1-42.

Barth, M. E. , Amy P. Hutton (2003), “Analyst earnings forecast revisions and the pricing of accruals.” ,1-59.

Bar-Yosef ,S., Jeffrey L.Callen, Joshua Livnat (1996),“Modeling dividends, earnings, and book value equity:an empirical investigation of the ohlson valuation dynamics.”, Review of Accounting Studies 1:207-224.

Beaver, W. H. (1999), “Comments on ‘An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model’.”, Journal of Accounting and Economics , 26:35-42.

Bernard, V. L. (1995), “The feltham-ohlson framework:implications for empiricists.”, Contemporary Accounting Research 11(2):733-747.

Bonner, S. , Artur Hugon, Beverly R. Walther (2007), “Investor reaction to celebrity analysts:the case of earnings forecast revisions.”, Journal of Accounting Research 45(3):481-513.

Bonner, S. E. , Beverly R. Walther, Susan M. Young (2003), “Sophistication-related differences in investors' models of the relative accuracy of analysts' forecast revisions.”, The Accounting Review 78(3):679-706.

Callen, J. L., Dan Segal (2005), “Empirical tests of the feltham–ohlson (1995) model.”, Review of Accounting Studies 10:409-429.


Chaney, P. K., Chris E. Hogan, Debra C. Jeter (1999), “The effect of reporting restructuring charges on analysts' forecast revisions and errors.”, Journal of Accounting and Economics 27: 261-284.

Das, S., Shahrokh M. Saudagaran (1998), “Accuray, bias, and dispersion in analysts' earnings forecasts:the case of cross ─ listed foreign firms.”, Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 9(1):18-33.

Dechow, P. M., Amy P. Hutton, Richard G. Sloan (1999), “An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model.”, Journal of Accounting and Economics 26:1-34.

Dechow, P. M., Richard G. Sloan, Amy P. Sweeney (1995), “Detecting earnings management.”, The Accounting Review 70(2):193-225.

Dechow, P. M., Richard G. Sloan, Amy P. Sweeney (1995), “Detecting earnings management.”, The Accounting Review 70(2):193.

Dische, A. (2001), “Dispersion in analyst forecasts and the profitability of earnings momentum strategies.” , 1-28.

Feltham, G. A. ,James A. Ohlson (1995), “Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities.”, Contemporary Accounting Research 11(2):689-731.

Han, B. H. and David Manry (2000), “The implications of dispersion in analysts' earnings forecasts for future roe and future returns.”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 27(1-2):99-125.

Hand, J. R. M. (2001), “Discussion of ‘earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation: an empirical perspective.”, Contemporary Accounting Research 18(1):121–300.

Imhoff, E. A., Jr. Gerald J. Lobo (1983), “Information content of analysts' composite forecast revisions.”, Working Paper 341:1-29.



Ivkovic, Z. and Narasimhan Jegadeesh (2002), “The timing and value of forecast and recommendation revisions: Do analysts receive early peek at good news?. ”, 1-49.

Jones, J. J. (1991), “Earnings management during import relief investigations.”, Journal of Accounting Research 29 (2):193-228.

Kasznik, R. and Maureen F . Mcnichols (2002), “Does meeting earnings expectations matter? evidence from analyst forecast revisions and share prices.”, Journal of Accounting Research 40(3):27-759.

Kwon, S. S. (2002), “Financial analysts’ forecast accuracy and dispersion: high-tech versus low-tech stocks.”, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 19:65-91.

Lee, S.C., Li-Wen Hung (2006), “An empirical investigation of the ohlson model and the dividend discount model.”, Master in Accounting.

Liu, M., Danielle Xu, and Tong Yao (2003), “Why does analyst forecast dispersion predict stock return? a corporate guidance perspective.”, Preliminary Version November, 1-56.

Lo, K., Thomals YS (2000), “The ohlson model:contribution to valuation theory, limitations, and empirical applications.” Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance Jul 1:337-367.

Lobo, G. J., Samuel S. Tung (2000), “Financial analysts' earnings forecast dispersion and intraday stock price variability around quarterly earnings announcements.”, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 15:137-151.

Lustgarten, S., Vivek Mande (1998), “The effect of insider trading on financial analysts' forecast accuracy and dispersion.”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 17:311-327.

Ohlson, J. A . (2001), “ Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation: an empirical perspective.”, Contemporary Accounting Research 18(1):107–200.


Ohlson, J. A. (1995), “Eamings, book values,and dividends in equity valuation.”, Contemporary Accounting Research 11(2):661-687.

Ohlson, J. A. (2005), “On accounting-based valuation formulae.”, Review of Accounting Studies 10:323-347.

Ohlson, J. A., Jing Liu, “The feltham-ohlson(1995) model:empircal implications, journal of accounting.”, Auditing & Finance, 321-331.

Ota K. (2002), “A test of the Ohlson (1995) model: Empirical evidence from Japan.”, The International Journal of Accounting 37:157-182.

Park, C. W. and earl K. Stice (2000), “Analyst forecasting ability and the stock price reaction to forecast revisions.”, Review of Accounting Studies 5:259-272.

Qi, D. D. , Woody Y. Wu, Bing Xiang (2000), “Stationarity and cointegration tests of the ohlson model.”, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 141-160.

Stober, T. L. (1999), “Empirical applications of the ohlson [1995] and feltham and ohlson [1995, 1996] valuation models.”, Managerial Finance 25(12):3-16.

Tiras, S. L. and Daniel Bryan (2007), “Influence of forecast dispersion on the incremental explanatory power of earnings, book value, and analyst forecasts on market prices.”, The Accounting Review, 1-45.

Tiras, S. L. and Daniel Bryan (2007), “The influence of forecast dispersion on the incremental explanatory power of earnings, book value, and analyst forecasts on market prices.”, The Accounting Review, 1-45.

中文部分:

王泰昌 (1999),「股票價格對於會計盈餘永久性及暫時性衝擊的反應」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。

朱偉捷 (2008),「意見不同對股票報酬、成交量及波動影響之研究」,國立台灣科技大學財務金融研究所碩士班碩士學位論文。

吳安妮 (1993),「財務分析師、管理當局及統計模式預測準確度之比較研究」,管理評論,第12卷。

吳博欽、黃淑慧 (2004),「股價的評估及其動態調整─以我國電信產業為例─」,私立中原大學國際貿易學系碩士學位論文。

林維珩、高誌謙 (2001),「台灣新上市公司承銷價格與公司價值之研究─Ohlson模式之應用」,私立中原大學會計學系碩士學位論文。

俞明德、夏侯欣榮、李益收 (2001),「股價異常報酬與分析師盈餘預測修正、可操控應計項目及會計資訊之關連性」,國立中央大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。

張文瀞 (2003),「本益比變動與盈餘管理」,當代會計,第4卷第1期:29-56。

張紹基、賴怡靜 (2004),「國際策略聯盟宣告對財務分析師盈餘預測修正之影響」,國立成功大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。

陳振遠、張智堯、王蘭芬、李文智 (2005),「應用Ohlson 會計評價模型探究公司治理之價值攸關性—以台灣上市公司電子業為例」,台大管理論叢,第15卷第2期:123-142。

陳雪如、林琦珍、柯佳玲 (2009),「自願性資訊揭露對財務報導舞弊偵測之研究」,會計與公司治理,第6卷第2期:1-30。

程心瑤、蔡宜芬 (2006),「分析師預測與管理者當局預測對於企業評價之相對有用性:發布時機與先後順序」,會計評論,第42期:81-107。

賴秀卿、黃靖雅 (2004),「修正式無保留意見之資訊內涵─運用Ohlson模型」,國立成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文。

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 吳安妮 (1993),「財務分析師、管理當局及統計模式預測準確度之比較研究」,管理評論,第12卷。
2. 吳安妮 (1993),「財務分析師、管理當局及統計模式預測準確度之比較研究」,管理評論,第12卷。
3. 吳安妮 (1993),「財務分析師、管理當局及統計模式預測準確度之比較研究」,管理評論,第12卷。
4. 張文瀞 (2003),「本益比變動與盈餘管理」,當代會計,第4卷第1期:29-56。
5. 張文瀞 (2003),「本益比變動與盈餘管理」,當代會計,第4卷第1期:29-56。
6. 張文瀞 (2003),「本益比變動與盈餘管理」,當代會計,第4卷第1期:29-56。
7. 陳雪如、林琦珍、柯佳玲 (2009),「自願性資訊揭露對財務報導舞弊偵測之研究」,會計與公司治理,第6卷第2期:1-30。
8. 陳雪如、林琦珍、柯佳玲 (2009),「自願性資訊揭露對財務報導舞弊偵測之研究」,會計與公司治理,第6卷第2期:1-30。
9. 陳雪如、林琦珍、柯佳玲 (2009),「自願性資訊揭露對財務報導舞弊偵測之研究」,會計與公司治理,第6卷第2期:1-30。
10. 程心瑤、蔡宜芬 (2006),「分析師預測與管理者當局預測對於企業評價之相對有用性:發布時機與先後順序」,會計評論,第42期:81-107。
11. 程心瑤、蔡宜芬 (2006),「分析師預測與管理者當局預測對於企業評價之相對有用性:發布時機與先後順序」,會計評論,第42期:81-107。
12. 程心瑤、蔡宜芬 (2006),「分析師預測與管理者當局預測對於企業評價之相對有用性:發布時機與先後順序」,會計評論,第42期:81-107。