臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

從過去台灣產業鏈來看，附加價值較高的研發及行銷大都掌握在國際大廠的手裡，台灣過去所能參與的部份是附加價值較低的製造部份。因此，欲提升台灣中小企業附加價值，在發展上勢必得往研發高經濟價值的方向升級，並輔以智慧財產權的取得，才能在瞬息萬變、競爭愈來愈激烈的環境中脫穎而出，新產品的設計研發就成了企業創造價值，維持競爭優勢的手段。而新產品開發的成功率與管理階層對資源的妥善規劃與運用有明顯的相關性，如何在新產品開發中運用正確的產品開發策略及資源投入取得專利技術主導權，創造新產品開發績效，卻是相關文獻中較少探討之課題。本研究以此為動機，試圖由過去學者所提出的理論整理出一個資源投入程度對新產品開發績效的影響架構，配合實證方式來驗證這些假設，其主要的研究目的：首先探討智慧財產權的策略與管理、產品設計及新產品開發策略對新產品開發績效之影響。其次再探討資源投入程度對前述自變數與依變數新產品開發績效間關係之影響程度。
本研究的母體以台灣1000大企業為問卷調查對象，採取隨機抽樣其中500家大企業，共計發放500份問卷。問卷詢問對象為公司法務部及研發部主管，並以公司為單位，一家廠商寄出一份樣本，回收之有效問卷為135份，問卷之有效回收率為27%。
研究結果發現智慧財產權的策略與管理、產品設計、新產開發策略對新產品開發績效有顯著的影響，且資源投入對前述三個自變數與新產品開發績效之關係亦有影響。有鑑於此，本研究鼓勵台灣企業，掌握自身的核心能力制定明確有效的競爭策略，同時做好技術研發人才的培訓，創新求變，對專利導向的市場資訊制定有效的管理機制，配合適當的資源投入，將可以提升經營績效和財務績效，這也是企業永續經營，維持競爭優勢的不二法門。

Seen from the industrial chain of Taiwan in the past, the R&D and marketing of higher added value were controlled by the international leading manufacturers, while Taiwan just participated in the manufacturing of lower added value. Therefore, the small and medium-sized enterprises in Taiwan, for the purpose of improving their added values, must develop toward the directions of R&D and high-end manufacturing and acquire the necessary intellectual property rights. Only by doing so, they can become eminent in the ever-changing environment of severe competition. The design and R&D of new products has become the means for an enterprise to create values and maintain competitive advantages, and the success rate of the R&D of new products is obviously related to the management's proper planning and utilization of resources. However, it has seldom been discussed in the related literatures how to acquire the leading position of patent technologies and create good performance of new product development by utilizing correct strategies of new product development and resource input. This research, intended to probe into this issue, tries to work out a model on the influence of resource input on the performance of new product development by collating the theories raised by the scholars in the past, and uses empirical analysis to testify the hypotheses. The research has two main purposes: first, to discuss the influences of the strategy and management of intellectual property rights, product design and the strategy of new product development on the performance of new product development; second, to discuss the influence of resource input on the relations between the aforesaid three independent variables and the dependent variable – the performance of new product development.
In this research, 1000 big enterprises in Taiwan are used as the population of questionnaire investigation, and 500 samples are selected by random sampling. Totally 500 copies of the questionnaire are sent to the directors of legal affairs department or R&D department of the selected companies, one copy each company; and 135 valid ones are called back, with an effective callback rate of 27%.
From the research result we find that, the strategy and management of intellectual property rights, product design and the strategy of new product development have significant influences on the performance of new product development, and the degree of resource input also has an influence on the relations between the aforesaid three independent variables and the performance of new product development. Therefore, it is the author's suggestion that Taiwanese enterprises understand their own core capabilities to work out definite and effective competition strategies, do well the training of technical R&D personnel, make innovations and seek for changes, establish effective management mechanism for patent-oriented market information, and invest resources properly, so as to improve their operation performance and financial performance. This is the one and the only way for an enterprise to realize sustainable operation and keep competitive advantages.

目錄
頁次
中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………..… i
英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………. ii
誌謝…………………………………………………………………………………. iv
目錄…………………………………………………………………………………...v
表目錄………………………………………………………………………………. vii
圖目錄………………………………………………………………………………..ix
第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………...1
1.1 研究背景與動機………………………………………………………......1
1.2 研究目的…………………………………………………………….….....3
1.3 研究對象與範圍………………………………………………………......4
1.4 研究流程……………………………………………………………….… 5
1.5 研究限制………………………………………………………………......6
第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………… ………………......7
2.1 智慧財產權的策略與管理……………………………………………......7
2.2 產品設計…………………………………………………………….…...23
2.3 新產品開發策略………………………………………………………....44
2.4 資源投入………………………………………………………………....61
2.5 新產品開發績效………………………………………………………....69
2.6 探討各研究變項間之關聯性研究……………………………………....76
第三章 研究方法………………………………………………………………….84
3.1 研究架構………………………………………………………………....84
3.2 研究假設………………………………………………………………....87
3.3 研究變項之操作性定義………………………………………………....90
3.4 研究設計………………………………………………………………....93
3.5 資料分析與統計方法…………………………………………………..103
第四章 研究結果與分析……………………………………………………...…105
4.1 問卷信度與效度分析…………………………………………………..106
4.2 樣本結構與各變項之描述性分析……………………………………..108
4.3 t檢定與單因子變異數分析(One-Way ANOVA)……………………...113
4.4 各構面之相關分析……………………………………………………..124
4.5 複迴歸分析……………………………………………………………..132
4.6 層級迴歸分析…………………………………………………………..136
4.7 集群分析………………………………………………………………..138
4.8 二因子變異數分析(Two-Way ANOVA)……………………………….142
第五章 產品設計實務經驗分享………………………………………………...151
5.1 產品設計實務經驗之分享………………………………………….….151
第六章 結論與建議………………………………………………….…………..161
6.1 研究結論……………………………………………………….……….167
6.2 總結……………………………………………………………………..166
6.3 研究貢獻…………………………………………….………………….172
6.4 後續研究及建議………………………………….…………………….174
參考文獻
一、中文部份……………………………………….………………………..182
二、英文部份…………………………………….…………………………..185
附錄一 本研究問卷……………………………. ….……………………………190

一、中文部份
1. 尹啟銘(民78) 產品創新自由度、企業策略與技術策略之關係－台灣資訊電子業實證研究，國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
2. 方至民(民89),「企業競爭優勢」, 前程企業管理有限公司。
3. 司徒達賢(民84) 策略管理，台北遠流出版社。
4. 司徒達賢(民84) 策略管理新論，台北智勝出版社。
5. 江炯聰（民73），「高度技術產業之經營管理發展策略」，台灣經濟研究月刊，第七卷第一期。
6. 李傳房、郭辰嘉（民92），Universal Design 概念應用於企業開發之研究-以Fujitsu、NEC 為例，設計研究，第三期，205-213 頁。
7. 巫宗融譯(民89) 新產品的完全開發手冊，遠流出版社。
8. 林大器口述、張聖怡整理（民87），「建立更有效的專利管理制度」，智慧財產權管理季刊，第十九期。
9. 林麗文，生物科技產業之智慧財產權管理，東吳大學法律學研究所碩士論文，2001年5月。
10.吳思華(民85) 策略九說，台北麥田出版社。
11.何孝元 (民60) 工業所有權之研究，著者發行。
12.祈明輝(民80) 專利於產品研發所扮演的角色，智慧財產權p41-43
13.周伶繁 工商園地期刊報導，貿易協會。
14.周虢竫(民93) 組織管理與新產品開發策略對公司績效相關性之研究，立德管理學院科技管理研究所碩士論文。
15.趙晉枚、蔡坤財、周慧芳、謝銘洋、張凱娜合著，《智慧財產權入門》，元照出版有限公司，2003年二版二刷。
16.洪順慶(民88) 行銷管理，台北新陸書局。
17.徐小波(民79) 科技智慧財產權之保護、管理與運用，產業科技研究發展管理論文集，經濟部科技顧問室。
18.黃亮樺(民92) 市場導向、新產品開發策略與新產品創新程度之關係研究，國立台北科技大學生產系統與管理研究所碩士論文。
19.陳歆(民85) 如何建立智慧財產權管理制度，智慧財產權管理季刊。
20.陳達仁、黃慕宣，《專利資訊與專利檢索》，文華圖書館管理資訊股份有限公司，2003年二版。
21.陳櫻琴,葉玟妤(民94) 智慧財產權法，五南出版有限公司2005初版
22.張凱娜(民81) 高科技智慧財產權管理。
23.傅和彥譯(民88) 生產管理，前程企業管理有限公司。
24.喻幸園(民89) 智慧財產權的策略與管理，元照出版公司。
25.經濟部中小企業服務報導期刊，96年第一期。
26.經濟部中央標準局，《企業之專利管理》，1992年
27.趙晉枚、蔡坤財、周慧芳、謝銘洋、張凱娜合著，《智慧財產權入門》，元照出版有限公司，2003年二版二刷。
28.鄒政下(民77) 壽險管理導論，保險事業發展中心壽險管理研討班講義。
29.榮泰生(民84) 企業研究方法，五南圖書出版有限公司。
30.劉博文(民88) 智慧財產權資產管理
31.劉博文(民89) 智慧財產權之保護與管理，揚智文化公司。
32.劉江彬、黃俊英(民93) 智慧財產權管理總論，華泰文化公司。
33.劉江彬，知識經濟時代下企業的智慧財產權管理，會計研究月刊第204期，2002年11月，頁67-73。
34.劉江彬(民92) 智慧財產權法律與管理，華泰文化公司。
35.劉常勇(民88) 知識管理與企業發展，智慧財產權管理與專利應用研討會，高雄國立中山大學管理學院主辦, 1-10。
36.劉常勇(民86) 技術資源管理能力對新產品開發績效影響之研究，國立中山大學企業管理系，國科會專題計劃報告。
37.劉瑞圖（1988），「發展高科技產業之途徑」，工業簡訊，第十八卷第二期。
38.伍家德(民89) 新產品開發特性與新產品開發管理機制相關之研究，東海管理評論，第2卷第一期。
39.鄭燦堂(民89) 風險管理理論與實務，五南書局
40蔡璞-研發管理園地http://blog.sina.com.tw/tsaipwu/article.php?pbgid=38426&entryid=376861
41.潘正隆(民90) 新產品開發策略配置核心能力對新產品績效之研究－以電腦周邊產品業為例，銘傳大學管理科技研究所碩士論文。
42.鄧穎懋(民88) 智慧財產權管理，高雄迪生文教。
43.鄧穎懋、王承守、劉仲平、李建德，《智慧財產權管理》，元勝出版有限公司，2005年初版一刷。
44賴士葆(民89) 科技策略與新產品發展績效相關之研究，發表於中華民國科技管理研討會論文集。
45.蕭宏銘(民88) 高科技產業智慧財產權制度及策略之研究－以資訊電子業為例，長榮管理學院經營管理研究所碩士論文。
46.謝舒萍(民94) 市場特性、核心能力、組織策略及文化對新產品開發績效之影響―資源投入程度之調和作用，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。






二、英文部分
1. Aaker, D.A.(1991), managing Brand Equity? New York:The free Press.
2. Ansoff, H. Igor and J.M Stewart, “Strategies for a Technology Based Bussiness”, Harvard Business Review, vol. 45, 1967, pp.71-83.
3. Andrew, H.G. ; Arvind, M.; Albert H.S.(2001),”Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective”, Journal of Management Information System , 18(1), pp.185-214.
4. Argyris and Chris, “The Executive Mind and Double-Loop Learning, Organizational Dynamics, vol. 11, no. 2, 1982, pp. 5-22.
5. Barney, J.B. 1997 Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
6.Barney, J. B., & Hansen, H. M. (1994). Trustworthiness as a Source of CompetitiveAdvantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(SPECIAL ISSUE), 175-216.
7. Booz, A. J., Allen B. C. and Hamilton, P. J., New Products Management for the 1980s, New York: Booz, Allen and Hamilton Inc., 1982.
8. Chang, Y.-F. (2006). A Study on the Motivations of Ports Seeking to Diversify Their Operations in Taiwan. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 8(1), 106.
9. Cleland, D.I. and W.R. King, 1983. Systems Analysis and Product Management, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
10.Cool, K.O. 1985 Strategic group formation and strategic group shifts:A longitudinal analysis of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue Univesity.
11. Cooper, R.G. “New Product Strategies: What Distinguishes the Performance,” Journal of Product innovation Management, vol.1, 1984, pp.151-164.
12.Cooper, G Robert, “New products: The Factors that Drive Success,” International Marketing Review, vol.11, 1994, pp60-76.
13.Cooper, R.G. 1998 Product leadership: creating and launching superior new products. New York: Perseus Publishing.
14.Cooper, R.G.& Kleinschmidt, E.J.(1991), “New Process at Leading Industrial Firms”, Industrial Marketing Journal, Vol.20, pp.137-147.
15.Cooper and G. Robert,“The Strategy-Performance Link in Product Innovation, ”R&D Management, vol. 14, 1984, pp. 247-259
16.Cooper, G. Robert,“New products: The Factors that Drive Success, ”International Marketing Review, vol.11, 1994, pp. 60-76.
17.Cusumano and Nobeoka, “ Strategy, Structure and Performance in Product
18.Damanpour, F. (1991), “Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators,” Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), pp.555-567.
19.Davenport, T.H.; Klahr, P. (1998), “Managing customer support knowledge.”Califonia Management Review, 40(3), pp. 195-208.
20.Deshpande, J.U. Farly Rohit, and F. E. Webster, orporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firm: A Quardard Analysis,? Journal of Marketing, vol.57, 1993, pp.23-37.
21.Dwyer, L.D.& Mellor, R. (1991), “New Product Process Activities and Project Outcomes” R&D Management, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp.31-52.
22.Earle, M.D. 1997 Innovation in the food industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 8(5): 166-175.
23.Grant, R.M. 1991 The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3): 114-135.
24.Gatignon, Xubert and Jean-Marc Xuereb, “Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New product Performance,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol.34, 1997, pp.77-90.
25.Hopkins, D.S. (1981), “New Product Winners and Losers”Research Management, Vol. 12, PP.12-17.
26.Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 1996. The balanced scorecard:translatingstrategy into action, Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.p9.
27. Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 1996. Linking the Balanced Scorecard toStrategy. California Management Review,p59.
28.Kohli, K. Ajay and B. J. Jaworski, “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 54, 1990, pp.1-8.
29.Kotabe, M. (1990), “Corporate Product Policy and Innovation Behavior of European and Japanese Multinationals: An Empiric Investigation”, Journal of Marketing, 54 (April), PP.19-33.
30.Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing Management, 10th, New Jersey, 71-73.
31.Maidique, A.M. & Patch, P. 1988. Corporate strategy and technology policy reading in the management of innovation. 2nd eds. 236-248.
32. Mar, B. W., W. T. Newell, and B. O. Saxberg (1985), Managing High Technology: An Interdisciplinary Perspect. Elsevier Science Publishing.
33.Mary Jo Hatch and Majken Schultz,(2001), the Strategic Stars Aligned for you Corporate Brand, Harvard Business Review Feb 2001 p.130-133.
34.Mayer, H. Marc, Roberts and B. Edward, “New Product Strategy in Small Technology-Based Firms: A Pilot Study,” Management Science, vol. 32, 1986, pp.806-821.
35.Michael, E. Porter (1980), Competitive Strategy-Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors , PP16-49周旭華譯
36.Narver, C. John and S. F. Slater, “The Effect of a Marketing Orientation on Business Profitability,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 54, 1990, pp. 20-35.
37.Porter, W. L., Bigley, A. G., & Steers, M. R. (2003). Motivation and work behavior. Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
38.Process”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(4), PP.304-321.
39.Projects in Matrix Structures,” R&D Management, Apr, Vol.14, No.2 1984, pp.113-127.
40.Reeser, C.,1973 Management: Function and Modern Concepts, Foresman and company, Scott.
41. Riggs, E. Henry (1985), Managing High-Tech Companies.Van NostranoReinhold, N.Y.
42. Riggs, H.E.(1983), Managing High-Technology Companies. Lifetime Learning Publications.
43.Robert, J. Thomas(1993), New Product Development –managing and forecasting for strategic success , PP113-115
44.R.E. Miles, and C.C. Snow, Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. 1978, pp.546-562.
45.Regatz, G..L., Handfield, R.B. Peterson, K.J. 2002 Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty. Journal of Business Research, 55:389-400.
46.Rosenbloom Jerry S. 1972, A case study in Risk Management.
47.Sbragia, R., “clarity of Manager Roles and Performance of R&D Multidisciplinary
48.Schwepker, C.H. (1999). “Understanding salespeople’s intention to behaviorunethically : the effects of perceived competitive intensity, cognitive moraldevelopment and moral judgement,” Journal of Business Ethics, 21, 303-316.
49.Subramaniam, M.,& Venkatraman, N. 2003. Determinants of transnational new product development capability: testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overseas knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4):359-378.
50.Swan, K.S.,& Allred, B.B. 2003. A product and process model of the technology-sourcing decision. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(6):485-496.
51.Veryzer, R.W. (1998), “Discontinuous Innovation and New Product Development
52Williams C. Arthur Jr., & Richard M. Henis 1964, “Risk Management and Insurance.”
53.Yuen, E. C.(1990), “Human Resource Management in High and Medium Technology Companies, :”Personnel Review, pp.36-46.
54.Zahra, S.A., Nielsen, A.P. 2002. Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strategic management journal, 23:377-398.